Frank the Spammer has been NARUed!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"RipCurl" wrote in
:


Bill Yates is a nationally known dealer in Early
American Copper. You show your ignorance by even asking
this question.

And you are what? His bend over buddy? Lover? Brother in law/ Oh wait,
you must be his incest borne brother.
What makes you think any one cares of what Bill Yates does....




Your filthy comments prove that you are not in the same league
as legitimate sellers. Your refusal to show us your feedback
adds to the evidence. You are nothing.

"RipCurl" wrote in
:



Why dont you **** a goat? If you dont like the language, get off of
usenet.


On the day of Jesus' birth you use that kind of vulgarity. You prove that
whatever opionions you have are not worth paying attention to.

Please report this jerk to

(DONDI3) wrote in
:

In article , "RipCurl"
writes:


Spam is not bulk email. That's the DMA's definition. Spam is
unsolicited EMAIL. And that's all it needs to be. If i didn't ask for
it, its spam.


Hmmm, let me get this straight.

If I email YOU first about any subject whatsoever, it's spam. If YOU
email me first about any subject whatsoever, it's spam.

That pretty effectively makes everyone who sends an email either a
spammer or the victim of a spammer, doesn't it? Somebody's gotta go
first.

When I first got an email address, did I email my daughter first, or
did she email me first?. One of us is gonna hafta hang for this...!

Matter of fact we're both serial spammers, since we've exchanged
hundreds of emails and neither of us has ever specifically asked the
other one for permission to email...and if we did, it would be spam if
the other didn't ask first...

dondi3
(it just gets sillier and sillier)



DONDI enterprises. BUY, SELL, TRADE. RARE COINS & PRECIOUS METALS
Member COINNET, CSNS, ANA, INA, MOON, ILNA.


Silly, pathetic, pathological...many terms come to mind.

(DONDI3) wrote in
:

In article , Allen
McBroom writes:


I want the chance to disparage
him in open court.


Well, shoot. Lawsuits are easy to file, but hard to prove.
If
you've got something, go for it.
Personally, I don't know the man, have never bought from him,
and
have never corresponded with him. However, the relentless barrage of
adolescent prattle from a small group of posters is starting to make
those of us not involved think the problem is not with Frank, but
rather with the prattlers.
Basically, if you have some valid complaint, do something (of
substance) about it. If not, your complaining carries no weight.

--
Allen McBroom

Ahhh...Allen. You've hit it right on the head, of course. The longer
this relentless lynching goes on, the more I notice that Frank's
annoying posts are being superceded by the annoying posts of the
prattling vigilantes. (combined two of the most apt terms for the
whiners there, didja notice?) I'm not sure what they hope to gain,
but threatening court action is among the silliest threats I've seen
in a long time on here.

Sandbox threats are entertaining when you're bored, though. They make
for funny reading. It's ironic that to maintain his "martyr" image,
Frank may have to step up
his postings and his annoyance level. He's starting to win people
over, or rather his
detractors are starting to annoy people more than he does. He'll have
to step up to the plate and become really obnoxious if he wants to
keep this thread going.

Must be over 1,000 posts now and still going...?

dondi3
(Maybe we cud start of pool, 'er sumpin'?)
DONDI enterprises. BUY, SELL, TRADE. RARE COINS & PRECIOUS METALS
Member COINNET, CSNS, ANA, INA, MOON, ILNA.


The hatred is relentless!

"RipCurl" wrote in message
...

"Gary Dorman" wrote in message
. 158...
"RipCurl" wrote in
:



Why dont you **** a goat? If you dont like the language, get off of
usenet.


On the day of Jesus' birth you use that kind of vulgarity. You prove
that
whatever opionions you have are not worth paying attention to.

Please report this jerk to


Jesus was not born on Dec. 25 th moron. Or you dont understand the tale of
Jesus's birth all that well.

Yes, neither is your horse ass born on Jan. 1, but its the day that the
faithful celebrate.


And Im not even Christian.


That's obvious.


So dont assume that everyone cares what happens on Dec. 25th you ignorant
moron. Some us dont even observe Christmas


But decent people respect those who do.


And as if RR will do anything. Again, if you can't stand the language, get
the **** off of usenet.

We will see. I will drop them a note and call it to their attention.

With Christian Love,
Frank

From: mj
Date: 12/25/2003 8:39 PM EST

Why not move to a COMMUNIST country where capitalism is a CRIME


Nah - I like it in the US where Spam is against the law in most states -
unfortunately, it's not yet enforced.

Like just pressing delete is such a big deal?

But they would rather waste millions of bytes complaining about it when not one
of them ever received email from Frank...


Bill Yates Rare Coins
Check my ebay listings
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...ems&userid=*by

"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
...


Jesus was not born on Dec. 25 th moron. Or you dont understand the tale
of
Jesus's birth all that well.

Yes, neither is your horse ass born on Jan. 1, but its the day that the
faithful celebrate.


Only a racist or bigot would claim that only the faithful celebrate on a
certain date. There are other Christian religions that observe other dates.


--
McWebber
"Richter points to the lack of legal action against his company as proof
that he's operating appropriately."
Information Week, November 10, 2003

"McWebber" wrote in message
...
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
...


Jesus was not born on Dec. 25 th moron. Or you dont understand the
tale
of
Jesus's birth all that well.

Yes, neither is your horse ass born on Jan. 1, but its the day that the
faithful celebrate.


Only a racist or bigot would claim that only the faithful celebrate on a
certain date. There are other Christian religions that observe other
dates.



so now, Frank is a racisit bigot as well as a spammer.

"RipCurl" wrote in message
...

"Richard L. Hall" wrote in message
ink.net...

"McWebber" wrote in message
...
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
.com...
Top posting is preferred,

by the clueless.

"Any fool can make a rule. And other fools will heed it." H. D.
Thoreau

But its been around since usenet was formed, so you have no say if it was
made by fools. Since those "fools" were the ones who probably created
usenet, they are, in my book, fools to follow.

Typical ignorant comment from an ignorant individual. Next you'll want us
to believe that the people who invented the automobile are also the ones who
laid down the rules of the road. There are inventors and there are people
who make rules. I think the latter would fit very nicely into that class of
people characterized by Spiro Agnew as "an impudent core of effete snobs."
And, anal-retentive people obsessed with rules but usually not knowing why
the rule exists or whether it is currently relevant would also fit.
Recognize yourself?


http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usen.../faq_topp.html

And this says, "But if you place all your comments at the top, the
reader
has to scroll down the page and hunt to see what it is you are replying
to.
" So you prefer to have to scroll to the bottom everytime rather than
the
few times that you lose the train of the thread or the train is missing.

If you read it carefully, you will also learn to trim and reply to
sections
of posts as you are doing and I am doing.

That's because I'm commenting on specifics of your message. If I were making
comments about the message as a whole, I would top post.

Top posting is for the lazy who
dont give a damn about not replying directly to comments posted to them,
and
leave all the text of original message that they aren't replying or
directing comments to, in hence WASTING bandwidth.


Of
course, if you read the whole thread everytime, bottom posting is
preferred.
But I would think that almost no one reads the whole thread everytime.
They
scroll to the bottom of each message in the thread. Seems a waste of
time
to me.


Seems that you dont understand the nature of usenet. The reason "bottom
posting' is preferred is because not all news servers in the world will
propogate a thread. That means the context of a thread can be lost and top
posting comments can be read without understanding why it the post was
posted.

And if that's the case, scroll down and you'll pick up the original message.
Better to do that only once or twice than to have to do that every time.

The start of a thread could be lost due to server issues, or because
some news servers check for spammers and dump those articles that are
considered spam to them.


There are times when top posting is the best way to respond to a
question
or
a thread especially when you're replying to the thread as a whole.

Never, unless its email. Usenet is not email.


But nothing wastes bandwidth more than complaining about a top-posted
message. Any intelligent person usually can follow the train.

Nothing wastes bandwidths more are top posting morons who leave the
entire
text of what they are replying to without referencing what they are
replying
to. If you plan on top=posting, dont bother to include any of hte original
text your are replying to. There is no sense.

Another stupid comment. But then again, you're good at that aren't you?
Now, read my lips, ready ...You include the original text in the reply in
the event the person reading it has lost the train of thought. The same
reason you include it in a bottom posted message.

Let me modify my original statement. Nothing wastes bandwidth more than
complaining about a top-posted message except for individuals who continue
to post when they have nothing relevant to add to the group. You seem good
at quoting rules. Have you ever read the RCC faq? Especially the part that
goes "Only write about subjects that are "on topic" for the group, as
defined in the group's charter ... Any area of numismatics is ok in
rec.collecting.coins. Articles without numismatic relevance are not. " I
see 13 of your posts in this topic and none of them are relevant to
numismatics. Interested in the FAQ. Go to the bottom of my sig. It is
obvious that you have a double standard.

Now if you'd like to talk about coins, let me know. This conversataion is
over.



By the way richard, Standard sig line are only 4 lines lines in length.
You
are in violation of Usenet RFC's for having it longer than that.

Any fool can make a rule.

But this one had some relevance when it was promulgated because both
bandwidth and memory were extremely expensive and therefore limited at the
time. So saving both was important. But now both are in great abundance
and cheap. Unlmited? Maybe not. But many, many, many times more abundant
than when the Usenet came to be.

And every fool will heed it.


--
Richard
ANA# R-176949
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh

Dating Coins from the reverse:
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins...erse_Dated.htm

Minor Errors: http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins/Errors//Errors.htm
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins...s//Errors2.htm

Large and Small Date Lincolns:
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins...mall_Dates.htm

Viewing the 3's on Lincolns
http://home.netcom.com/~richlh/Coins/Comparison3's.htm
RCC FAQ:
http://www.telesphere.com/ts/coins/faq2.html

"Richard L. Hall" wrote in message
link.net...

"RipCurl" wrote in message
...

"Richard L. Hall" wrote in message
ink.net...

"McWebber" wrote in message
...
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
.com...
Top posting is preferred,

by the clueless.

"Any fool can make a rule. And other fools will heed it." H. D.
Thoreau

But its been around since usenet was formed, so you have no say if it
was
made by fools. Since those "fools" were the ones who probably created
usenet, they are, in my book, fools to follow.

Typical ignorant comment from an ignorant individual.

Typical ignorante comment from someone who refuses to follow guidelines
established so that usenet could remain a free area of the net to post
comments and threads to keep the ideas and thoughts flowing. Rules are
established for a reason. If they are made by fools, go about redefining the
rules and hope that everyone agrees. If they dotn agree, then the new rules
must have been made by a bigger fool.

Next you'll want us
to believe that the people who invented the automobile are also the ones
who
laid down the rules of the road.

Stupid comment as well. Rules were made and laws made for automobile useage
because people became aware of the abuse as well as stupidity of persons who
get behind the wheel of car. AGain, rules are made because other fools made
them possible. If you find a rule stupid, go about finding a way to redefine
rules or make up new ones that everyone will follow. If no one agrees, then
the new rules must have been made by a bigger fool.


There are inventors and there are people
who make rules.

No, rules are made by those who know their area of expertise and what is
good for the common folk to adhere to.

I think the latter would fit very nicely into that class of
people characterized by Spiro Agnew as "an impudent core of effete snobs."
And, anal-retentive people obsessed with rules but usually not knowing why
the rule exists or whether it is currently relevant would also fit.
Recognize yourself?


recognize that nothing you can do now, will change usenet and the
guildelines for posting to usenet have been around a lot longer than most
people who've been alive.