If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Improving" your coins
This is an example of the kind of topic that gets me in trouble here
g, a controversial topic, but yet one that I find interesting and compelling, one worthy of thinking about and writing about: cleaning coins. Attitudes among collectors are much different from attitudes among dealers, and attitutes among collectors of U.S. coins are much different from attitudes among collectors of ancient coins. Some people are puritanical. "Never clean a coin," they shout, over and over. You understand the reason for their overreaction: many coins in the past have been damaged by harsh cleaning. Yet dealers, some of them, perhaps many of them, routinely clean (conserve, curate) coins, and there's a service out there, NCS, that does this, and dipping is a form of cleaning, as is soaking on soappy water, as is using acetone. Etc. Virtually all ancient coins are cleaned, and typically harshly, using brass brushes, dental tools, and chemicals, for the obvious reason that many come into collectors' hands from having been buried in the ground for 2,000 years, give or take, and are deeply encrustated with dirt, organic matter, and so on. I'm in the process now of "improving" some of my ancient coins. I've done this a bit in the past, not much, making some mistakes along the way, trying to read as much as I can about what others have done to avoid making more. Until yesterday I hadn't done any of this for a while -- scared. g I haven't ruined any expensive coins, yet, but I came close in the past with one, so I've avoided until now experimenting with this further. But as we speak I'm soaking one very cool coin in white wine vinegar to improve it. Here's a picture of it, pre-cleaning: http://rg.cointalk.org/misc/emergency_owl.html It's an "Emergency Issue" Athenian Owl tetradrachm, a coin issued by Athens c. 405-404 BC during the final stages of the Peloponnesian War, which Athens lost to Sparta. It's a silver-plated bronze coin, a fouree. Fourees are tyipcally ancient counterfeits, but this coin is an official issue, issued because Sparta had cut off Athens' silver supplies, and the Athenians were desperate. It matches the official Emergency Issues in Sear (2535) and Svoronos (pl. 15, no. 13), with an Athena on the obverse sporting a frontal eye whose opened inner corner is beginning to transition to a fourth-century profile eye. Another very cool thing about this particular speimen is that it looks as if it just came from the ground. It's black. Nobody, yet, has tried to clean it, from all appearances. So what I'm doing is soaking it for two hours at a time in vinegar, a mild acid, then using as soft tooth brush and dishwashing detergent to brush off the black toning/patina to improve the coin's eye appeal. Soak-brush, soak-brush, ... There's risk involved. Vinegar, like any acid, can pit the coin. If I soak too long or brush too hard, I can scrape off part of the silver plating, though this isn't necessarily negative with fourees unless it's too extensive. I'm using vinegar and not lemon juice because it's slightly more acidic, but it's riskier too because of this. We'll see. So far the coin is looking better -- slightly more silver poking through, particularly on the obverse. I'll post a pic when I'm done. Fun stuff... -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote:
This is an example of the kind of topic that gets me in trouble here g, a controversial topic, but yet one that I find interesting and compelling, one worthy of thinking about and writing about: cleaning coins. Attitudes among collectors are much different from attitudes among dealers, and attitutes among collectors of U.S. coins are much different from attitudes among collectors of ancient coins. Some people are puritanical. "Never clean a coin," they shout, over and over. You understand the reason for their overreaction: many coins in the past have been damaged by harsh cleaning. Yet dealers, some of them, perhaps many of them, routinely clean (conserve, curate) coins, and there's a service out there, NCS, that does this, and dipping is a form of cleaning, as is soaking on soappy water, as is using acetone. Etc. Virtually all ancient coins are cleaned, and typically harshly, using brass brushes, dental tools, and chemicals, for the obvious reason that many come into collectors' hands from having been buried in the ground for 2,000 years, give or take, and are deeply encrustated with dirt, organic matter, and so on. I'm in the process now of "improving" some of my ancient coins. I've done this a bit in the past, not much, making some mistakes along the way, trying to read as much as I can about what others have done to avoid making more. Until yesterday I hadn't done any of this for a while -- scared. g I haven't ruined any expensive coins, yet, but I came close in the past with one, so I've avoided until now experimenting with this further. But as we speak I'm soaking one very cool coin in white wine vinegar to improve it. Here's a picture of it, pre-cleaning: http://rg.cointalk.org/misc/emergency_owl.html It's an "Emergency Issue" Athenian Owl tetradrachm, a coin issued by Athens c. 405-404 BC during the final stages of the Peloponnesian War, which Athens lost to Sparta. It's a silver-plated bronze coin, a fouree. Fourees are tyipcally ancient counterfeits, but this coin is an official issue, issued because Sparta had cut off Athens' silver supplies, and the Athenians were desperate. It matches the official Emergency Issues in Sear (2535) and Svoronos (pl. 15, no. 13), with an Athena on the obverse sporting a frontal eye whose opened inner corner is beginning to transition to a fourth-century profile eye. Another very cool thing about this particular speimen is that it looks as if it just came from the ground. It's black. Nobody, yet, has tried to clean it, from all appearances. So what I'm doing is soaking it for two hours at a time in vinegar, a mild acid, then using as soft tooth brush and dishwashing detergent to brush off the black toning/patina to improve the coin's eye appeal. Soak-brush, soak-brush, ... There's risk involved. Vinegar, like any acid, can pit the coin. If I soak too long or brush too hard, I can scrape off part of the silver plating, though this isn't necessarily negative with fourees unless it's too extensive. I'm using vinegar and not lemon juice because it's slightly more acidic, but it's riskier too because of this. We'll see. So far the coin is looking better -- slightly more silver poking through, particularly on the obverse. I'll post a pic when I'm done. Fun stuff... All the information anyone could ever need or want to know concerning coins (including non US) and the cleaning of / why one should / why one shoudn't is all but a google search away withing this very news group. I can't see why anyone could possibly feel compelled to write another word on the subject when all the fundamental data already exists (and has been beaten to death on numerous occasions) over the past six years or so that i've been reading and posting here. You must be a newbie to this NG to be thinking things like : 'one (topic) worthy of thinking about and writing about: cleaning coins.' Well...is it? It isn't in my books. It's a topic that is regularly and consistently hammered flat right here on this NG. It's bloody downright boring if you follow those threads. same stuff in an endless loop.....just like your post is designed to generate (grin or no grin). Now then, a coin subject that really is worthy of thinking and writing about is one that hasn't already been so flattened by the thousands of posters on the subject who have already gone before you n'est ce pas? I'm sure you can come up with one if you really thought about it (?) Ian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ian wrote in message ...
Now then, a coin subject that really is worthy of thinking and writing about is one that hasn't already been so flattened by the thousands of posters on the subject who have already gone before you n'est ce pas? I'm sure you can come up with one if you really thought about it (?) Why somebody feels compelled to spend six paragraphs saying they find a core coin area boring and not worth talking about rather than ignoring the thread? Hey, you'll like the way the coin looks now. You can see the silver. And I now know that the silver covers only a part of the coin's surfaces, most of the obverse, very little of the reverse. You can't fool me. Despite your protests, you can't wait for me to tell more. g -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Counterfeit detection primer -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 51 | February 15th 04 12:36 AM |
Counterfeit detection primer -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 2 | January 31st 04 09:29 PM |
Counterfeit detection primer -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 10 | December 14th 03 09:54 PM |
Coin Talk Needs You | Peter T Davis | Coins | 51 | September 16th 03 01:19 AM |
Help on telling repro | Linda | Coins | 11 | July 30th 03 02:03 AM |