If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
TWIMC:
It is understandable that someone who has spent a lot of time, money and effort in obtaining / retaining certain types of items will defend them, and their right of ownership; even though they may have been identified as items which are not allowed legally to be owned. For example; I myself have been a long time in hunting a counterfeit 1943 lead cent, as many RCC regulars know. If I ever did get one, I might also try to misquote the bill of rights to favor my position, to justify ownership. Actually, I'm more likely to shut up about having gotten one (if I ever did), to the point of making sure I still ask on the board if anyone happens to come across one, just so the SecServ don't think I did get one yet due my lack of asking. BTW, if anyone *does* happen to have one laying around that they don't want ... 8-] Coin Saver |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Coin Saver wrote:
TWIMC: It is understandable that someone who has spent a lot of time, money and effort in obtaining / retaining certain types of items will defend them, and their right of ownership; even though they may have been identified as items which are not allowed legally to be owned. For example; I myself have been a long time in hunting a counterfeit 1943 lead cent, as many RCC regulars know. If I ever did get one, I might also try to misquote the bill of rights to favor my position, to justify ownership. Actually, I'm more likely to shut up about having gotten one (if I ever did), to the point of making sure I still ask on the board if anyone happens to come across one, just so the SecServ don't think I did get one yet due my lack of asking. BTW, if anyone *does* happen to have one laying around that they don't want ... 8-] Coin Saver Can be made to order in Bulgaria. I know a guy who claims to know a guy who's from the hometown of THE guy. Alan 'shhhh' |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 03:52:40 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams
wrote: Coin Saver wrote: TWIMC: It is understandable that someone who has spent a lot of time, money and effort in obtaining / retaining certain types of items will defend them, and their right of ownership; even though they may have been identified as items which are not allowed legally to be owned. For example; I myself have been a long time in hunting a counterfeit 1943 lead cent, as many RCC regulars know. If I ever did get one, I might also try to misquote the bill of rights to favor my position, to justify ownership. Actually, I'm more likely to shut up about having gotten one (if I ever did), to the point of making sure I still ask on the board if anyone happens to come across one, just so the SecServ don't think I did get one yet due my lack of asking. BTW, if anyone *does* happen to have one laying around that they don't want ... 8-] Coin Saver Can be made to order in Bulgaria. I know a guy who claims to know a guy who's from the hometown of THE guy. Alan 'shhhh' Heck, you can make one yourself. Just be sure to stamp copy into one side :-) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
GIVE IT A REST.
You need to get out more. BILLY Reid Goldsborough wrote: There's been some pretty heated, and confused, discussion here lately over the difference between coin replicas and counterfeits. The simplistic answer is that a replica is marked as such with "COPY" or a similar countermark. But this would be incorrect. The U.S. Hobby Protection Act mandates that all coin replicas made today be countermarked in large enough letters on the obverse or reverse, but people in other countries are under no obligation to obey U.S. laws. And replica makers in this country, most notably Peter Rosa, have flouted this law as well (it has never been enforced with regard to ancient coins, according to Wayne Sayles and others), feeling that countermarking defaces the piece and detracts from its aesthetic value. On the other hand, by not countermarking a replica, you make it easier for the bad guys to try to pass it off as an authentic coin, though "real" counterfeits passed off as genuine coins are a far greater problem that replicas passed off as genuine coins. The real difference between replicas and counterfeits is the intent of the maker to deceive or not. The replicas of the Bulgarian Slavey Petrov, for instance, are clearly recognized as replicas, even those of his that aren't countermarked, by virtually everybody who has collected coins for any period of time. Among other things, the fields are too flat, and the styling is too flamboyant. His pieces are created with a hydraulic press, not struck with a hammer. They're works of art, made to pay homage to coins struck by the ancients, not attempts to pass themselves off as ancient coins. I have a page that illustrates the differences between several different kinds of "pseudonumia," using the face of Medusa: http://rg.ancients.info/medusa/replicas.html The two replicas are clearly replicas, most notably having unrealistically flat fields. Both replicas are marked, though the Slavey is marked on the edge and is thus in violation of U.S. law (again, never enforced with regard to ancient coin replicas). The forgery is clearly different from the replicas, was clearly created to deceive, and is quite deceptive and dangerous. The token is a fun, interesting piece of exonumia. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan & Erin Williams" wrote in message ... Can be made to order in Bulgaria. I know a guy who claims to know a guy who's from the hometown of THE guy. His second cousin's (twice removed on the father's side) former roommate's sister's boyfriend's uncle lives on my block :-) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 03:08:37 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams
wrote: You aren't going to show a photo of the plastic gas station token you mistook for an ancient coin, are you? Your 96th lie. Something like that. Incredibly pathetic, what you are, what you're doing here, pure disruption, pure evil. This gas station token I bought, inexpensively -- a great find -- as a token and have it displayed -- proudly -- at this Web page: http://rg.ancients.info/medusa/replicas.html It's a very cool piece of exonumia. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 05:49:04 GMT, Leo M. Cavanaugh III
wrote: "It's a common misunderstanding that whizzing primarily involves abrading metal. Some metal gets abraded, but the primary mechanism is moving metal from one spot to another on a coin's surface." -- Solipsic Reid redefines the word "whizzing" as itself. This is how PCGS defines it! Another idiot resurfaces. Mark lied that I made up this definition. He had nothing to base this on. He hadn't done any research, hadn't even Googled the term, obviously hadn't looked at the single most referenced book in numismatics about this and related subjects, PCGS's Coin Grading and Counterfeit Detection. And now, after all the discussion here about this, you jump in and say that I've redefined whizzing. You people deserve each other. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 10:41:07 -0800, Scot Kamins
wrote: Well, that's all fine, Alan, but what purpose does it all serve? How does the continued animosity and bickering help anyone? What the insane asylum inmates have done once again is destroy this thread. There's no longer any intelligent, subject-related conversation going on. A handful of them -- Alan Williams, Phil DeMayo, A.Gent, Mark are the current worst offenders -- do it virtually every time. It's sheer destruction, done for no other purpose than to destroy. This thread is destroyed, a sewer of idiotic bickering and animosity. Take a look at other threads in the past. Same junk. Watch them do it again in the future. Same junk. Losers who live for this junk. Still, despite their idiocy, some intelligent and constructive conversation manages to go on. And that, no doubt, really ****ses them off. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Coin Collecting: Consumer Protection Guide: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Glomming: Coin Connoisseurship: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Bogos: Counterfeit Coins: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Reid Goldsborough wrote:
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 03:08:37 GMT, Alan & Erin Williams wrote: You aren't going to show a photo of the plastic gas station token you mistook for an ancient coin, are you? Your 96th lie. Something like that. Incredibly pathetic, what you are, what you're doing here, pure disruption, pure evil. This gas station token I bought, inexpensively -- a great find -- as a token and have it displayed -- proudly -- at this Web page: http://rg.ancients.info/medusa/replicas.html It's a very cool piece of exonumia. Please, then, pretty please with sugar on it, explain how you can image and host your plastic gas station token and not the recent 'In the Style of Slavey' replica/counterfeit/bogo/fake/glomworthy exonumia ? Alan 'only wants an answer' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Counterfeit detection primer -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 51 | February 15th 04 12:36 AM |
Counterfeit detection primer -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 2 | January 31st 04 09:29 PM |