If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
On Dec 21, 8:49�am, "Bruce Remick" wrote:
Sincerely sorry that you and your 16-year-old son were inconvenienced and enticed to open each post in this Usenet thread expecting to read some profound numismatic information. Not necessarily profound, but I do expect to read about collecting coins. �We now realize your time is quite valuable so we'll try to reduce your bother by putting OT in the header like you suggested in your post, and which you should have done yourself so we wouldn't have had to bother reading it. The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. I subscribed to this newsgroup for him (Google only lets me use one email address for all my groups, so I forward these to him, and use his email address as the visible name) He's been interested in US coins ever since he bought a Peace Dollar as part of his project on WWI in ninth grade. I told him he would learn a lot from people with years of experience. I did not mean how to be rude, vulgar or childish. To those who felt they HAD to respond to people who were being unreasonable or incorrect, I can understand how hard it can be NOT to say something. But it's better to go off-list than off-topic. Arguing with them is almost always a waste of time anyway, and you're just giving them another chance to spout hatred and/or inaccuracies. To those who discuss coin collecting and relevant subjects, and do it in a reasonable, intelligent manner, thank you!! We are grateful for the opportunity to learn from you. Regards, Judith |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
" wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 8:49?am, "Bruce Remick" wrote: Sincerely sorry that you and your 16-year-old son were inconvenienced and enticed to open each post in this Usenet thread expecting to read some profound numismatic information. Not necessarily profound, but I do expect to read about collecting coins. ?We now realize your time is quite valuable so we'll try to reduce your bother by putting OT in the header like you suggested in your post, and which you should have done yourself so we wouldn't have had to bother reading it. The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. I subscribed to this newsgroup for him (Google only lets me use one email address for all my groups, so I forward these to him, and use his email address as the visible name) He's been interested in US coins ever since he bought a Peace Dollar as part of his project on WWI in ninth grade. I told him he would learn a lot from people with years of experience. I did not mean how to be rude, vulgar or childish. To those who felt they HAD to respond to people who were being unreasonable or incorrect, I can understand how hard it can be NOT to say something. But it's better to go off-list than off-topic. Arguing with them is almost always a waste of time anyway, and you're just giving them another chance to spout hatred and/or inaccuracies. To those who discuss coin collecting and relevant subjects, and do it in a reasonable, intelligent manner, thank you!! We are grateful for the opportunity to learn from you. ***From your description of your son it sounds as if he is a carbon copy of myself when I was 16. No internet then, of course, but picture a kid sitting at his desk sifting through a couple $50 bags of pennies every weekend and you'll see me. As for your goals for him, growing up is all about learning to make choices. If you try to shield your son from all that you consider evil in the world, he will never know how to deal with it on his own, in fact, he may not ever learn to recognize it, and as a result fall prey to it time after time. Nothing beats a healthy skepticism gained at an early age, coupled with the scars and scrapes of a few bad decisions of a less serious nature made along the way. For you to expect everyone here to remain on topic at all times and to maintain decorum at all times is unrealistic. This newsgroup is a microcosm of the world outside, and your son needs to learn how to deal with it - "take the grain, and let the chaff go" as the poet intoned. If your son is 16, and unless he has been sequestered in his room since birth, he has already been exposed to most of the evil such as exists in RCC. If he has been reading here for any length of time at all, he no doubt already has a mental list of people to take with a grain of salt. That's good. Perhaps I am on his list. That's OK, my fortune doesn't rise or fall with the level of my readership. If he has made it this far, he'll turn out just fine. As a career high school teacher I met countless parents who fretted over their kids the same way you are doing. My advice was always to let them have some space to grow. By the way, we need some new ideas about collecting from a young person's perspective around here. I think it would be neat if he'd start posting himself. James |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
On Dec 23, 6:29*am, "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote:
" wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 8:49?am, "Bruce Remick" wrote: Sincerely sorry that you and your 16-year-old son were inconvenienced and enticed to open each post in this Usenet thread expecting to read some profound numismatic information. Not necessarily profound, but I do expect to read about collecting coins. ?We now realize your time is quite valuable so we'll try to reduce your bother by putting OT in the header like you suggested in your post, and which you should have done yourself so we wouldn't have had to bother reading it. The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. I subscribed to this newsgroup for him (Google only lets me use one email address for all my groups, so I forward these to him, and use his email address as the visible name) He's been interested in US coins ever since he bought a Peace Dollar as part of his project on WWI in ninth grade. I told him he would learn a lot from people with years of experience. *I did not mean how to be rude, vulgar or childish. * To those who felt they HAD to respond to people who were being unreasonable or incorrect, *I can understand how hard it can be NOT to say something. But it's better to go off-list than off-topic. Arguing with them is almost always a waste of time anyway, and you're just giving them another chance to spout hatred and/or inaccuracies. * *To those who discuss coin collecting and relevant subjects, and do it in a reasonable, intelligent manner, thank you!! We are grateful for the opportunity to learn from you. ***From your description of your son it sounds as if he is a carbon copy of myself when I was 16. *No internet then, of course, but picture a kid sitting at his desk sifting through a couple $50 bags of pennies every weekend and you'll see me. As for your goals for him, growing up is all about learning to make choices. If you try to shield your son from all that you consider evil in the world, he will never know how to deal with it on his own, in fact, he may not ever learn to recognize it, and as a result fall prey to it time after time. Nothing beats a healthy skepticism gained at an early age, coupled with the scars and scrapes of a few bad decisions of a less serious nature made along the way. For you to expect everyone here to remain on topic at all times and to maintain decorum at all times is unrealistic. *This newsgroup is a microcosm of the world outside, and your son needs to learn how to deal with it - "take the grain, and let the chaff go" as the poet intoned. *If your son is 16, and unless he has been sequestered in his room since birth, he has already been exposed to most of the evil such as exists in RCC. *If he has been reading here for any length of time at all, he no doubt already has a mental list of people to take with a grain of salt. *That's good. *Perhaps I am on his list. *That's OK, my fortune doesn't rise or fall with the level of my readership. If he has made it this far, he'll turn out just fine. *As a career high school teacher I met countless parents who fretted over their kids the same way you are doing. *My advice was always to let them have some space to grow. By the way, we need some new ideas about collecting from a young person's perspective around here. *I think it would be neat if he'd start posting himself. James A nice reasoned reply, mon prof. IMHO, you're very nice to assume that this OP isn't a sockpuppet in drag. A lot of people might have gone off on a tangent, like "Jeez-Peez, just what numismatics needs - another 16 year-old male sublimating his sexual ambiguities into silly old coin collecting - while a ball- busting parent screws with the kid's little mind"!!! Tangent-wise (Tangentially?, or dare I use the word "Tangenitally"?), I'd guess the poor kid needs a car and a girlfriend. oly |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
"oly" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 6:29 am, "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote: " wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 8:49?am, "Bruce Remick" wrote: Sincerely sorry that you and your 16-year-old son were inconvenienced and enticed to open each post in this Usenet thread expecting to read some profound numismatic information. Not necessarily profound, but I do expect to read about collecting coins. ?We now realize your time is quite valuable so we'll try to reduce your bother by putting OT in the header like you suggested in your post, and which you should have done yourself so we wouldn't have had to bother reading it. The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. I subscribed to this newsgroup for him (Google only lets me use one email address for all my groups, so I forward these to him, and use his email address as the visible name) He's been interested in US coins ever since he bought a Peace Dollar as part of his project on WWI in ninth grade. I told him he would learn a lot from people with years of experience. I did not mean how to be rude, vulgar or childish. To those who felt they HAD to respond to people who were being unreasonable or incorrect, I can understand how hard it can be NOT to say something. But it's better to go off-list than off-topic. Arguing with them is almost always a waste of time anyway, and you're just giving them another chance to spout hatred and/or inaccuracies. To those who discuss coin collecting and relevant subjects, and do it in a reasonable, intelligent manner, thank you!! We are grateful for the opportunity to learn from you. ***From your description of your son it sounds as if he is a carbon copy of myself when I was 16. No internet then, of course, but picture a kid sitting at his desk sifting through a couple $50 bags of pennies every weekend and you'll see me. As for your goals for him, growing up is all about learning to make choices. If you try to shield your son from all that you consider evil in the world, he will never know how to deal with it on his own, in fact, he may not ever learn to recognize it, and as a result fall prey to it time after time. Nothing beats a healthy skepticism gained at an early age, coupled with the scars and scrapes of a few bad decisions of a less serious nature made along the way. For you to expect everyone here to remain on topic at all times and to maintain decorum at all times is unrealistic. This newsgroup is a microcosm of the world outside, and your son needs to learn how to deal with it - "take the grain, and let the chaff go" as the poet intoned. If your son is 16, and unless he has been sequestered in his room since birth, he has already been exposed to most of the evil such as exists in RCC. If he has been reading here for any length of time at all, he no doubt already has a mental list of people to take with a grain of salt. That's good. Perhaps I am on his list. That's OK, my fortune doesn't rise or fall with the level of my readership. If he has made it this far, he'll turn out just fine. As a career high school teacher I met countless parents who fretted over their kids the same way you are doing. My advice was always to let them have some space to grow. By the way, we need some new ideas about collecting from a young person's perspective around here. I think it would be neat if he'd start posting himself. James A nice reasoned reply, mon prof. IMHO, you're very nice to assume that this OP isn't a sockpuppet in drag. *** Even if she turns out to be Dr. Ewan Jackson in drag, I stand by everything I have said, as there may be others who will find some use for it. James |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
On Dec 23, 7:29*am, "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote:
By the way, we need some new ideas about collecting from a young person's perspective around here. *I think it would be neat if he'd start posting himself. Frankly that's the last thing we need. I don't really give a hoot in hell what some pimply-faced little punk's opinion on numismatics is. IMO the kid should be out trying to get laid, not sticking pennies in a Whitman folder! |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... "oly" wrote in message ... On Dec 23, 6:29 am, "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote: " wrote in message ... On Dec 21, 8:49?am, "Bruce Remick" wrote: Sincerely sorry that you and your 16-year-old son were inconvenienced and enticed to open each post in this Usenet thread expecting to read some profound numismatic information. Not necessarily profound, but I do expect to read about collecting coins. ?We now realize your time is quite valuable so we'll try to reduce your bother by putting OT in the header like you suggested in your post, and which you should have done yourself so we wouldn't have had to bother reading it. The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. I subscribed to this newsgroup for him (Google only lets me use one email address for all my groups, so I forward these to him, and use his email address as the visible name) He's been interested in US coins ever since he bought a Peace Dollar as part of his project on WWI in ninth grade. I told him he would learn a lot from people with years of experience. I did not mean how to be rude, vulgar or childish. To those who felt they HAD to respond to people who were being unreasonable or incorrect, I can understand how hard it can be NOT to say something. But it's better to go off-list than off-topic. Arguing with them is almost always a waste of time anyway, and you're just giving them another chance to spout hatred and/or inaccuracies. To those who discuss coin collecting and relevant subjects, and do it in a reasonable, intelligent manner, thank you!! We are grateful for the opportunity to learn from you. ***From your description of your son it sounds as if he is a carbon copy of myself when I was 16. No internet then, of course, but picture a kid sitting at his desk sifting through a couple $50 bags of pennies every weekend and you'll see me. As for your goals for him, growing up is all about learning to make choices. If you try to shield your son from all that you consider evil in the world, he will never know how to deal with it on his own, in fact, he may not ever learn to recognize it, and as a result fall prey to it time after time. Nothing beats a healthy skepticism gained at an early age, coupled with the scars and scrapes of a few bad decisions of a less serious nature made along the way. For you to expect everyone here to remain on topic at all times and to maintain decorum at all times is unrealistic. This newsgroup is a microcosm of the world outside, and your son needs to learn how to deal with it - "take the grain, and let the chaff go" as the poet intoned. If your son is 16, and unless he has been sequestered in his room since birth, he has already been exposed to most of the evil such as exists in RCC. If he has been reading here for any length of time at all, he no doubt already has a mental list of people to take with a grain of salt. That's good. Perhaps I am on his list. That's OK, my fortune doesn't rise or fall with the level of my readership. If he has made it this far, he'll turn out just fine. As a career high school teacher I met countless parents who fretted over their kids the same way you are doing. My advice was always to let them have some space to grow. By the way, we need some new ideas about collecting from a young person's perspective around here. I think it would be neat if he'd start posting himself. James A nice reasoned reply, mon prof. IMHO, you're very nice to assume that this OP isn't a sockpuppet in drag. *** Even if she turns out to be Dr. Ewan Jackson in drag, I stand by everything I have said, as there may be others who will find some use for it. Prolonged and vigorous scratching of the old cabeza just caused me to remember a posting made here in August 2007, in which the poster mentioned that he was a 16-year-old collector and that his name was Joshua. He was asking for coin buying advice. James |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
No Request Too Easy
" proclaimed in
: The point was to HAVE you read it (plural you.) It's not so much the waste of our time (and everybody's time), it's more that I am trying to teach my son to treat people decently and act maturely, and sometimes it seems that the majority of these posts are insults, flames, irrational and/or pointless off-topic arguments, etc. That's not what a list is for. Though you say you are on other newsgroups, you seem to have no idea what Usenet is and how it works. I assume that's because you're coming in through Google. No offense meant. Most people who haven't been here since the dinosaurs don't dnow what Usenet is and how it works. Most usenet groups are unmoderated; the last wild frontier of the Interwebs. Lots of spam, lots of fools. If you use a Newsgroup client instead of Google you can filter them out over time. Complaining and demanding mannerly behavior does no good at all. You and your son will probably be much happier he http://groups.yahoo.com/group/usa_coin_group/ Lots of smart people to answer questions and moderators to keep things on topic, |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Ebay policy puts PCI out of business
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message
... I don't particularly favor one group over another. I simply hold Bush and his closest advisors accountable for our dilema. Others have a different opinion. Right. He shares blame, if any is to be shared. As do the others. Except only Bush is POTUS. GET IT? I doubt it. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Ebay policy puts PCI out of business
Dave Hinz wrote:
How about clinton, clinton, pelosi, kerry, kennedy, schumer, and all the others quotes in the snopes link above, which predate Bush's election? Exactly! That is from wwaaaaaaayyy before Bush invaded Iraq. Bush should have relied on more recent, reliable intel. Like, oh I don't know... the UN inspectors maybe? They tried to tell Bush there was nothing there. They were right. Bush was wrong. Get over it. -- "At a time when voters yearn for competence and have soured on Washington because too often the Bush administration has not demonstrated it..." - The National Review, a leading conservative publication in their endorsement of Mitt Romney. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Ebay is enforcing the new policy | Frank Provasek | Coins | 32 | October 18th 07 03:25 PM |
Ebay display of S&H puts honest sellers at disadvantage | Frank Provasek | Coins | 23 | October 13th 05 02:23 PM |
New eBay policy on coins | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 7 | July 7th 04 05:21 PM |
Ebay autograph policy | Gummby3 | Autographs | 0 | April 16th 04 01:29 AM |