If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Toke Nørby wrote :
........ I have already been practicing a bit: http:/www.norbyhus.dk/runic5.html :-) Hi Toke, I imagine your url should be : http://www.norbyhus.dk/runic5.html (not yet visited it) -- All the best, Pierre Courtiade |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I wrote a few minutes ago :
I imagine your url should be : http://www.norbyhus.dk/runic5.html (not yet visited it) Now I can thank you for sharing with us the picture of this beautiful runic stone. (and also to see you ;-) -- All the best, Pierre Courtiade |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Mette,
You cannot win, you know, as you have told me in the past. I am reminded of the (possibly paraphrased) Borg Collective quote from a Startrek -- The Next Generation episode: "We are the Borg lower your shields and surrender your ships we will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own your culture will adapt to serve us resistance is futile we are the Borg...." :^) Bob From: "A.M.Heindorff" Newsgroups: rec.collecting.stamps.discuss Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 22:17:46 +0200 Subject: On Humor and Insinuations. Was: Don't change the subject line, please! Victor Manta wrote in message ... "Toke Nørby" wrote in message news - very big snip - One can wonder what has Toke to do with this thing, and why does he bring it in an unrelated thread. My only explanation is that as a (former?) FIP juror he tries to protect his comrades against the "bad" (in his eyes) SNA irony. Why haven't we heard something about those "logos" when we have discussed here the debacle of the FIP 2002 contest, and when the page was published, and why has he chosen for this, much later, an unrelated thread? No idea, just some suppositions. As concerning FIP's logos (actually these were images of their awards) on the SNA sheet, they were replaced by something more funny a long time ago, so why speaking about the snows of yesterday (or continue beating the same dead horse, if this sounds more familiar)? The images of their awards is so similar to their copyrighted logo, that it is self-protected. The history of FIP contest related e-mails that SNA has allegedly published without approval is a *pure* invention. Period. Victor, this is *not* true, and you know it. You have quoted my posts from this NG, without my prior consent. BTW, it is up to the authors of those (which?) me for one! e-mails to write me if they feel concerned, and not up to Toke to try playing a kind of role of the Sir Knight of the Sorrowful Figure, and this especially when nobody asked him for that. I have not discussed this issue with Toke at all, but I have written to you in private and asked you to remove "my part" of the SNA fenny-award page. You refused flatly. You told me that because I had published my opinion on a public NG, you were free to use that opinion on your page without asking first. I couldn't convince you that *I* have the copyright to what I say, and that I do not wish to be quoted before knowing first. You asked me whether I was afraid of somebody or something. I am not; it is simply a matter of principle that I want to know where I am to be quoted and in which context. I want to maintain my right to say "no", and expected of course that you would respect that. By refusing to remove anything quoted from me, you have not respected my rights. In case you do not remember this private discussion between us, I will be happy to forward the related emails to you. At that point I gave up discussing with you, knowing that your main attitude is "don't argue with me, because you won't win". The only thing I could say was DON'T DO IT IN THE FUTURE! Ann Mette Heindorff |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Victor Manta" wrote:
....snip Again I can't see the need to comment Victor's questions with his own answers. It's a never ending and accelerating "discussion" with more new questions and answers. I must admit that I was warned but naive enough to give my comments to his strange SNA-pages even I knew what would happen - ha! Thanks for your posting, Bob :-) ... and thanks a lot to you too, Mette! BTW. Mette, you can see that Victor has published Francis' private e-mails to him too and I can't find a permission to publish it in Francis' answers to Victor. Never mind. I won't waste my time on Victor any more. -- Mvh Toke http://www.norbyhus.dk/ |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Pierre Courtiade" wrote:
I wrote a few minutes ago : I imagine your url should be : http://www.norbyhus.dk/runic5.html You are quite right, thank you very much! Now I can thank you for sharing with us the picture of this beautiful runic stone. (and also to see you ;-) We have a few runic stones from Aarhus where I live. This one is my favorite. One of our web servers are named "Asser" after our friend on the stone :-) -- Mvh Toke http://www.norbyhus.dk/ |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Hello there,
Everything is in the title. Everytime I connect to rcsd, I have to download more or less 200 posts titles. Thanks to *all* people participating here, RCSD is a very interesting and full-of-life NG. But I *do not* want to waste my time -and I *do not have* time- to open and read 200 posts per evening, trying to find if the actual discussion has slipped from the subject line title to another exchange of informations that could interest me more. I expect from all the people writing in RCSD to keep on being so interesting and passionate collectors, and that they do not hesitate to broaden an initial discussion to another subject of interest to share their knowledge. But at the same time, I expect that the subject line is updated acordingly, to have the opportunity when I browse 200 titles to identify *where* is an information that could interest me, and open the post. Best and respectful regards to all, -- Didier Maistre Chinese stamps collector |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Ingraham wrote in message
... Mette, You cannot win, you know, as you have told me in the past. I am reminded of the (possibly paraphrased) Borg Collective quote from a Startrek -- The Next Generation episode: "We are the Borg lower your shields and surrender your ships we will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own your culture will adapt to serve us resistance is futile we are the Borg...." :^) Paraphrased or not, this is the essential of this part of the thread :-)) Mette From: "A.M.Heindorff" Newsgroups: rec.collecting.stamps.discuss Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 22:17:46 +0200 Subject: On Humor and Insinuations. Was: Don't change the subject line, please! Victor Manta wrote in message ... "Toke Nørby" wrote in message news - very big snip - One can wonder what has Toke to do with this thing, and why does he bring it in an unrelated thread. My only explanation is that as a (former?) FIP juror he tries to protect his comrades against the "bad" (in his eyes) SNA irony. Why haven't we heard something about those "logos" when we have discussed here the debacle of the FIP 2002 contest, and when the page was published, and why has he chosen for this, much later, an unrelated thread? No idea, just some suppositions. As concerning FIP's logos (actually these were images of their awards) on the SNA sheet, they were replaced by something more funny a long time ago, so why speaking about the snows of yesterday (or continue beating the same dead horse, if this sounds more familiar)? The images of their awards is so similar to their copyrighted logo, that it is self-protected. The history of FIP contest related e-mails that SNA has allegedly published without approval is a *pure* invention. Period. Victor, this is *not* true, and you know it. You have quoted my posts from this NG, without my prior consent. BTW, it is up to the authors of those (which?) me for one! e-mails to write me if they feel concerned, and not up to Toke to try playing a kind of role of the Sir Knight of the Sorrowful Figure, and this especially when nobody asked him for that. I have not discussed this issue with Toke at all, but I have written to you in private and asked you to remove "my part" of the SNA fenny-award page. You refused flatly. You told me that because I had published my opinion on a public NG, you were free to use that opinion on your page without asking first. I couldn't convince you that *I* have the copyright to what I say, and that I do not wish to be quoted before knowing first. You asked me whether I was afraid of somebody or something. I am not; it is simply a matter of principle that I want to know where I am to be quoted and in which context. I want to maintain my right to say "no", and expected of course that you would respect that. By refusing to remove anything quoted from me, you have not respected my rights. In case you do not remember this private discussion between us, I will be happy to forward the related emails to you. At that point I gave up discussing with you, knowing that your main attitude is "don't argue with me, because you won't win". The only thing I could say was DON'T DO IT IN THE FUTURE! Ann Mette Heindorff |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Toke Nørby wrote in message
... "Victor Manta" wrote: ...snip Again I can't see the need to comment Victor's questions with his own answers. It's a never ending and accelerating "discussion" with more new questions and answers. I must admit that I was warned but naive enough to give my comments to his strange SNA-pages even I knew what would happen - ha! Thanks for your posting, Bob :-) .. and thanks a lot to you too, Mette! BTW. Mette, you can see that Victor has published Francis' private e-mails to him too and I can't find a permission to publish it in Francis' answers to Victor. I know, Toke. And for what it's worth, I have downloaded all the different "versions" of this page, from the very first one to the amended ones. Just for proof, if anything happens ... Mette |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I have not discussed this issue with Toke at all, but I have
written to you in private and asked you to remove "my part" of the SNA fenny-award page. You refused flatly. You told me that because I had published my opinion on a public NG, you were free to use that opinion on your page without asking first. I couldn't convince you that *I* have the copyright to what I say, and that I do not wish to be quoted before knowing first. You asked me whether I was afraid of somebody or something. I am not; it is simply a matter of principle that I want to know where I am to be quoted and in which context. I want to maintain my right to say "no", and expected of course that you would respect that. By refusing to remove anything quoted from me, you have not respected my rights. In case you do not remember this private discussion between us, I will be happy to forward the related emails to you. At that point I gave up discussing with you, knowing that your main attitude is "don't argue with me, because you won't win". The only thing I could say was DON'T DO IT IN THE FUTURE! Ann Mette Heindorff I have no wish to inflame any sensitive discussion points here, but surely there is no question of having any 'copyright' control over comments and opinions made on a Public NewsGroup? Everything posted here is placed in the "Public Domain", and there is no restriction on who can subscribe to the NG and read all of the messages placed here, using the information as they wish. If you do not wish to be quoted as having a particular view or opinion, then why state it in the first place? Is it the truth or not? I do not see the problem! Say what you mean and mean what you say. David. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
check this out wtt | William R. Altman | Football (US) | 0 | September 12th 04 04:17 PM |
Hockey Card Collection For Sale Part 2 of 4 | Douglas Berry | Hockey | 0 | April 29th 04 06:45 PM |
Hockey Card Collection For Sale Part 2 of 4 | Douglas Berry | Hockey | 0 | April 28th 04 06:25 AM |
Hockey Card Collection For Sale Part 2 of 4 | Douglas Berry | Hockey | 0 | April 27th 04 04:06 AM |
auction 200 03/09 | VernsCards | Baseball | 0 | March 10th 04 02:32 AM |