If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
my-wings wrote:
I tend to drop out of endless discussions earlier rather than later. I should. I joined here primarily in the hope of exchanging some information on my interest. Before 2000, i got caught up in a lot of these dicussions - compulsive fun - the only computer game i ever played. Feels like old times. Just a temporary binge, though... [xerlome]: i paid too much, and it had worm holes in it. Shortly after that i discovered a copy in a thrift store. That was one of my last really great thrift store finds. We call them "brags" here....great books found for a fraction of the "going rate." Really, i'm not here to brag. I wanted to illustrate how good items used to turn up more often for me in thrift stores. But the first thing that occurred to me was: If you've got two copies now, why not sell the least desirable one on eBay? Thanks. Selling a few items on eBay is a possibility. I have a lot of sorting to do eventually. On this item, first thing that comes to mind is having to explain (as the seller didn't) that there are worm holes in some of the volumes. I tend to like to keep duplicates, sometimes so that i can use one as much as i want without degrading the other. For the time being, i am divided between two houses far apart, so i have dupicates of a bunch of things so i am not separated from them. Then there's my goal to create a non-circulating special collection for a library. This would be a trust which would eventually include my entire collection. I'm working out in my head how to go about this. A topic for another thread. I'm considering another approach, too: Trading locally, with other book users/collectors. That way, i'm not dealing with pricing or shipping - or computers ( which tend to eat too much time, and i really prefer not to spend much of my life at them). I've been thinking some kind of book cooperative might be possible. Yet another thread... ER Lyon |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
Todd T wrote:
xerlome wrote: Robert Hunter's 4 volume, 1894 "Encyclopedic Dictionary" Wow, I've never seen anything like that in any of the thrift stores near me, not in 20 years. Really ? It's not so surprising, though: 4 volumes with the word "Encyclopedic" on them, sort of like some old Britannica volumes, not especially spiffy looking. And when you open it up: just a damned dictionary. "1894" in small numerals in an inconspicuous spot... Oh, there i go giving away secrets to the resalers. I can't seem to help it, i just tend to spill. I suspect that it's not just dealers picking them up ahead of you. I suspect that those who might have donated them before are now going straight to eBay themselves as well. Could be some are doing that. I'm not sure most donators are that sort, though. In any event, the only solution would be to ask people to stop trying to make a buck where they have discovered an opportunity to do so. That''s right, the imperative to charge the most the market will bear. It's in the fabric of our econonmic system. There are laws against making a buck certain ways, but i don't see any reasonable way to legislate against simply "taking advantage." I don't think i'd want to, either, being an anarchist at heart. Maybe you could somehow spread the word that you are interested in old dictionaries that are collecting dust in people's attics in your town. I'd like to do that, when i have time. I really do appreciate your offering helpful ideas. Rather than letting the markup knock you out, take advantage of the folks like me who will pay *you* the markup. You mean become a resaler ? I could get the markup ? Well... what would you like ? It's a good offer. Could you give me some time to think it over ? Thank you. I'll get back to you in a day or so. - - No, no, now wait a minute here ! I don't need to think it over, i know right now, and the answer is no ! No ! Doggone it ! You people think the whole world revolves around you and your money ! Well, it doesn't ! Selling things where they bring the most return is a pretty fundamental process to be fighting. Yes, i believe you are right. We make our own choices. ER Lyon |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
Allison Turner wrote:
on 31 Dec 2005 00:49:43 -0800, xerlome stated: I used to regularly buy books for 3 for a dollar at a local Salvation Army Store, great items, old and new, every time i went. Now i rarely see any of that level of material. I don't believe this is due to extreme increase of personal buying. There are clearly vastly more resalers than a few years ago. there are probably a lot of people like you - not big dealers - who are buying up the very inexpensive books from thrift stores and also putting them online. I think you are right. Resalers, eBayers. I think it's perfectly reasonable of thrift stores to "smart price" their books instead of selling them four for a buck. One of our local stores has volunteers working there, and donates all of their income to care for the elderly. Why shouldn't they get $10 for a book instead of $0.25, if people are willing to pay it? That works for me. A happy medium, under the circumstances. The lowest end of the income scale get's the shaft, of course, but a lot of unfortunates get some help, too. And the resalers are likely to leave more books behind. I'm sorry, but my heart just doesn't bleed for collectors like you (*and* me) who can no longer get an astonishing deal every time we turn around. At least we're not 95 with no one to care for us. I know. Right now i am full time caregiver for my elderly mother who is seriously crippled and in pain with arthritis. She's feels sorry for her old school friend who has to be in a nursing home. She often quotes Garrison Keillor: "It could be worse." When she or i start to complain about our lot, she finally says: "We should be glad we don't live in Iraq." I'm not as evolved as that yet. I still say, "That doen't mean i have no complaint !" A range like $20 to $200 is not common for identical books in equal condition. The high range is usually some preposterously unreasonable price for the item. It _is_ incredibly common. The only times I *don't* see it are for some of the books for which there just aren't a lot of copies available. I can't argue with your examples. It must be different for different types of books. I shouldn't try to make any general statements, because nowadays i'm 90% looking for dictionaries and language books. When i'm seeing a book offered commonly for $20 to $50, and then there's someone who wants $225, i just dismiss it as preposterous. When all i see for a long time is $175, $260, etc., then i see something like $75, i might grab it thinking this may be the best i'll see, maybe ever. I've given in to this 3 or 4 times. But with books like these, i'm not seeing any $20. Ironweed, by William Kennedy, paperback. the price range is $0.49 to $45.63. For a common paperback. Weird I've often seen in book searches where someone is selling a used copy of an in-print book for twice or more the current retail price of a new copy of the same edition. So why don't you just ignore them? They're just fools; not worth jacking up your blood pressure over. I can see why it may seem as if i suffer from high blood pressure. The truth is, i'm not as rabid as i sound. ER Lyon |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
At 3:36 pm Dec 31, 2005, Wildwood wrote:
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Jan 7, 3:36 pm). On 31 Dec 2005 00:49:43 -0800, in rec.collecting.books "xerlome" wrote: Thrift stores do not throw out books before a lot of people have looked at them. Sometimes i see the same stuff aound for years. I guess that every thrift store in my area is an exception then. All of them mark the books in some way (stickers or writing in the books) and toss them into the trash after 1-4 weeks (the length of time depends on the individual store). I guess stores and regions differ. I don't get around to all the thrift stores in the world. In this area (around a big city) a lot of them are as i have described. I have lately seldom visited stores in the area where i used to live, so things may have changed there. I do not believe that the sale of books at thrift stores (the ones bookdealers would buy at least) depends upon bookdealers buying them. Then your beliefs clash with the regional directors for the Salvation Army and Goodwill thrifts stores local to me. They tried to raise prices, the booksellers complain and stop buying en masse, the sales drop, the managers drop the changes. Now, before making any changes, they ask the people that they recognize as dealers if they will still shop at their stores if changes are made before making those changes. That's interesting. So, the sales drop following price hikes is due to sellers leaving, and not to others or buyers in general leaving ? Just hypothetically, i wonder what would happen if resalers (of all levels) stopped buying books in thrift stores. Would the books just sit there forever (or be thrown out) because readers and collectors prefer to buy them from resalers for 10, 20, 100 times the price ? Or would people catch on that there are lots of great books to be had at these stores (which used to be bought up by the sellers) and shop there more ? What would be the effect of the fact that these particular books would then not be available from the resalers ? I am not one of just some few people who buy books for themselves. And we would not prefer to pay 10 or 100 times the thrift prices to the resalers. If people will buy the books from the resalers, thrift markets surely can sell them, too. The thrift stores actually PREFER to sell to resellers, since the odds are much better that they will clear a large section of shelf space in one transaction. So, resalers *do* buy large numbers of thrift store books ? I'm seeing views in posts both that they *do* and that they *don't*. They aren't really buying of most of the good low-cost books, so i shouldn't blame them for the dearth. They clear whole sections of shelf space, so the thrift stores keep their prices low for them. I don't know which it is. Is it both ? Bill -- Meg: Thank you Jesus Jesus: That wasn't me it was. . Some Hindu God: It is okay. I am used to it. On the general subject of knowing what or who it is we are talking about: Terms used in this thread for those who sell books (primarily used) include bookdealers (book dealers), dealers, booksellers (book sellers), sellers, resellers, and (my preference as an overall term for those who buy to sell) resalers. I prefer "booksellers" when we talk about both new and used, unless context is clear, but i associate the term more with "new." Any other considerations ? ER Lyon |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
Bud Webster wrote:
I've tried very hard to keep from replying to this thread, even when you began to compare used booksellers to safecrackers. Thieves, in other words. I was afraid someone might read it that way. It's not uncommon for people to take rhetorical analogies literally. But this is not the purpose of an analogy, which is to eccentuate a principle which is then reapplied to the original subject without transferring its literal content. In this case, there was discussion about the basis for the relatively high resale prices. One or more writers suggested that the expenses of resaling justify the exponential markups. But since what was being discussed was whether there was a need in the market for the resale at all, as in moving an item from one market to another, the expenses of resaling had nothing to do with that issue. So an example that demonstrates that principle clearly, which may have been more subtle and thus missed in the present context, serves to spark recognition of the point being made in the issue at hand. "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink" is, of course, not about horses or water. Nor is this about safecrackers or thieves. Much earlier, i did use the term "market theft" to characterize high markup resaling, and later softened it to "taking advantage." I can appreciate that my views may be felt as attacks. That's not what they are in my mind. I am raising issues and discussing views. I will say this, then no mo you have *no idea* what it takes in the way of physical and financial resources to be able to operate a used book service and make any kind of living at it. You don't. Actually, i know enough to realise that i probably wouldn't make it. I hope i am not generally misunderstood to believe that it isn't a lot of work or that there aren't costs and risks. This is not what this thread is about as far as i'm concerned. It's about issues related to removing low-cost items from one market to sell them high in another. I can appreciate that you don't agree with my views. . And, from what I've seen of your posts, you're unlikely to ever understand it. Whether this is because you're unable to, or are simply unwilling to do so because paying a higher price is inconvenient to you, I neither know nor care. Change "inconvenient" to "impossible." At least virtually so in my circumstances. .. I know of not one single wealthy bookseller who got that way solely from selling used books, no matter what their mark-up is. Not ONE. I am wondering if you believe i suggested that booksellers generally get wealthy. I recall that i suggested (in a rhetorical way) that buying cheap items from an existing market to sell them high in another is tantamount to depriving the poor to sell to the rich. So the resaler may not be rich, but is tageting a relatively well-heeled clientele. I know many who, after decades of hard work and study, can support themselves and their families, but they'd all be better off financially if they'd gone into IT twenty-five years ago. I understand. I would have been better off collecting books 25 years ago. Quite the contrary, I know of hundreds and hundreds of booksellers who could NOT make a living at it, either in brick-and-mortar shops or on-line, because competition is so tough that they were unable to get prices that would cover their expenses, and subsequently closed down and sold off their stock. At thrift-store prices, I might add. I don't doubt any of that. Independent business is tough. I like bookstores. They are fun to look at, even if i can't buy much. I also like book dealers and enjoy talking to them. I may even have chatted with you at some point, i don't know. ER Lyon |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
"xerlome" wrote in message oups.com... Do we really want to try to beat the poor to the bargains only to sell them to the rich ? Are you poor? Or do you only think that beating the poor to the bargains is "moral" when it results in another trophy for your shelf? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
on 1 Jan 2006 21:47:40 -0800, xerlome stated:
Todd T wrote: I think a sizeable markup is fair, and I also think that dealers add value, which I also should pay for. I'm still perplexed by this mysterious "value" they add to books. I can't tell the difference between a book from a thrift store and the same one from a dealer. Unless you mean the feeling of greater sacrifice you feel if you spend more for the latter. That i can relate to. Allow me to give you a very clear example of added value. I have, currently on my shelves, 28 older texts on Pharmacognosy (the scientific study of medicinal plants and the drugs derived from them). I also have a few works written in the last ten years or so, but I'm not counting those as the classic works I'm collecting. I have been collecting these titles for perhaps eight years or so, and have purchased exactly *one* of these at a used book store. I have never seen any others, not at thrift stores, library sales, other used book stores, the local yearly rummage sale, flea markets, garage sales, etc. All of the rest I bought online, mostly from dealers I found through used.addall.com or from ebay. I do not expect, ever, to find one at a thrift store. I suppose there's the remote chance that I might, similar to the single one I found in that bookstore about an hour and a half east of me. But I am absolutely not going to depend on combing the thrift stores to find me the few that I don't have. The dealers (and ebay sellers, whether they're grand- mothers selling stuff from their attics, or big dealers) have added significant value to the book. Sure, it'd be nice to get one for a buck. But I'm perfectly willing to pay $20 instead (or even, perhaps, $80 or so, depending; I spent $112 on a classic three volume german set in June that I have only seen at a library otherwise) because the reality is that I will never see these titles if dealers don't find them for me, or if they don't appear, out of someone's garage, on ebay. (Tangent: one of the things I like about ebay is that anyone can sell me a book there; I have access to people's attics that never would be the case otherwise, and they get the money directly from me for their book.) As others have mentioned, you've undoubtedly worked your way past all of the abundant, cheap dictionaries. Now what you want are the ones that generally wouldn't show up at your local thrift store (although they sound like they're still more common than my p'cog books). If you want them, they're rarer, and you have to either trust to luck (that you'll eventually run across them), or pay the added value to a dealer who has found them for you. What I don't get is why you're whining because you can no longer get the astonishing deals you've gotten in the past. You really lucked out, man. You purchased a thousand titles before the market shifted with the advent of internet access - before everyone had a computer and access to the titles you snatched up for 50 cents. Now things are different, and the grandmother in Hoboken who wants a copy of the dictionary she had as a kid can find it online, because a dealer picked it up from the thrift store before you saw it. Now you need to sit back, slow down, appreciate your vaste library acquired at a fraction of the current price, and carefully assess what, of the higher-priced end of the market, you want to get to round out your collection. -Allison |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
in message ... on 1 Jan 2006 21:47:40 -0800, xerlome stated: I'm still perplexed by this mysterious "value" they add to books. I can't tell the difference between a book from a thrift store and the same one from a dealer. Just as you can't tell the difference between a bottle of water you happen to find buried in the sand in the desert, just as you're on the point of dying of thirst, and all the identical bottles of water on the shelf in your local supermarket, right? In the case of the book, the difference is in the cost of the time you'll need to spend, to find that particular book in a thrift store in the first place. a) Spend 20 hours at $4 per hour, or 10 hours at $8 per hour etc. scouring thrift stores to eventually locate a copy of Blogg's Dictionary priced at $1. Total cost £81. As compared with - b) Spend half an hour at $8 per hour (including phone charges), phoning around specialist dealers (or using the Internet for free) to locate a copy of Bloggs Dictionary priced at $40. Total cost $48. michael adams .... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
"xerlome" wrote in message oups.com... Kris Baker wrote: "xerlome" wrote in message When a resaler picks up a used book for, say, a dollar, and then sells it for the price of a new book or even higher, we are paying the dealer a four (or even five) digit percent profit for buying and holding an already available book after the original buyer has paid the legitimate costs and later decided to donate it to a charity thrift store or public library. Even $20.00 is a 2000% markup. I see this as a kind of market theft. You're assuming that the new book dealer and used book dealer invest the same amount of time and effort into selling a book. You cut out the part where i mentioned the retailer as only one of many on the chain of people paid for their part in creating the book and making it available. I might better have left the distributor and retailer out of the list and my point would have been clearer. Up to that point, the cost of the book goes to those who actually create and make the book. After that, it is primaily a matter of moving it around. That can be pretty costly, but i'd like to see those costs kept to a minimum. If I sell new books, I have to: 1 - order them from the publisher 2 - open the box and put them on the shelf 3 - return them for credit if they don't sell That's true. And it's probably done by an employee on a salary who gets paid either way. Right ? If I sell used books, I have to: 1 - know possible locations they can be found I know how difficult that is. I generally look in the yellow pages to find the locations of thrift stores (as well as used book stores). I look in the paper for yard sales and other sales. Libraries post their sales, etc. Most of those yellow page thrift store listings are out of date. If you're depending upon your local area to fulfill your needs, you are fortunate to do so. Last year, I travelled to nine states seeking and buying (not all books), and five of those trips have not broken even yet. 2 - go search those places (time, fuel, effort) All part of the added value. I understand. But if you have a store, and i bring books to you and tell you i want extra money because i added value when i invested my time, fuel, and effort finding the books originally, and again bringing them to you, what would you say ? a) That's fair. I'm always willing to pay for added value. Saves me adding it myself. b) Ha ! That's a good one ! - Hey Pat ! - Tell Pat what you just told me. c) I'll have to see your resaler's ID or i can't validate the added value. d) Would you be willing to sell me just the book and hold on to the added value ? e) Other (suggestions welcome). e) I'd negotiate a fair price for both of us, and kiss your feet. Even though I sell only online, I'd much rather have people show up at my door with items "ready to sell", than to have to take time away from selling to bookscout. or pay a scout A scout ! That's an idea, i'll have to try that ! A boy scout or a girl scout on vacation, maybe they'd work for peanuts ! Oh, pl0nk. This is useless. You claim to know all about bookselling, but have no idea what a scout is. Kris |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
The bookselling racket (was: Collecting Dictionaries)
Mr Lyon, I will say it again: you have NO IDEA what it takes to be a
bookseller. Nothing in your reply to me indicates anything else. Booksellers are NOT in business to assure you a cheap and steady source of whatever you're collecting. They - we - are in business to be in business, to make a living, however precarious. If that means I buy cheap and sell high, so be it. If it means that those people who are unable to pay my prices can't do so, that's a damn shame, but if I sell to them at prices they can afford, how long will I realistically be able to do so? What good would I do them to be in business for six months? Or three? In the meantime, what do I tell my landlord? My wife, my children? They should be proud of me because I'm selling rare books at bottom-of-the-barrel prices so poor collectors can have a more valuable estate to leave their children than I can? I've been doing without certain specific items in my own collection(s) for more years than I care to think about. Does this mean that the sellers who have those books for sale at prices I can't meet are thieves? And, yes, you chose the comparison, Mr Lyon, not me or anyone else. Whether or not you will admit to it, you placed booksellers like me and many others here in the same category as those who break open safes for their living. In other words, THIEVES. There have been times when I've bought books for a few dollars that were worth, on the open market, several hundreds. Did I sell them for $5, and be satisfied with $3 profit? I did NOT, and neither would any other knowledgeable bookseller. I might not charge top whack for it, but if selling a book that cost me $2, and is worth $300, for $200 enables me to keep other worthy, if not as "hot", books in inventory so that more collectors can find what they want on my shelves, then that's what I do to remain in business. I will say it again, one last time: YOU KNOW NOTHING about what it takes to be a bookseller, and you have little room to criticize. I'm done with this now, and you should be. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collecting Dictionaries | xerlome | Books | 22 | December 31st 05 10:06 PM |
Collecting Whims Revisited | Jerry Morris | Books | 21 | January 1st 05 12:42 AM |
Collecting; audiobooks, e-books, CBT, dictionaries, encyclopedia's THAN meet your new friend NOW | The Audiobook Lover | Books | 1 | September 20th 03 05:56 PM |
FA: 2-Days, Vintage Spalding Wood Tennis Racket w/ Cloth Case, c. 20-30s | buckeyeweb | General | 0 | September 10th 03 05:15 AM |
FA: Vintage Spalding Wood Tennis Racket w/ Cloth Case, c. 20-30s | buckeyeweb | General | 0 | September 5th 03 04:19 AM |