If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, this is a long shot, but... (Coin ID)
I thought I might as well try this out. This a fairly awful description
to ID from, I know, but it's the best I can do given the condition of the coin. Ok, it's copper, roughly the size of a British pre-1860 half penny, and I'd feel generous grading it "poor". I'm fairly sure that a scan would not give you any useful information. Because of the size, I've looked at Spink's. I'm fairly sure it isn't British, because the legends on the obverse are much smaller, and the date is in the wrong place. The Obverse has a man, facing right, with legends around him. The date, which appears to be 1780 (though the second digit may be a 5 or an 8), is at 11:00-12:00. The legends are significantly smaller than those on the coins of that era in Spinks - more the size you'd put them if you wanted all the blurb they they put on the silver coins (Duke of Hannover, Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire, and so on). The legends themselves are nearly illegible - I can roughly make out ROX at about 1:30 (though that might be wrong). There are no legends between 5:00 and 5:30 (because the head is in the way), and there may well not be any until as far around as 8:00, or from as far as 4:00. The man looks vaguely like William III on the 1696 ha'penny, or George III on the 1770 ha'penny (as illustrated on Spinks 39th Ed. pages 345 and 386 respectively) - or how Jefferson and Washington look on today's US coins. (And yes, I know they all look completely different). Assuming a coin turn (so, as with US coins, the top of the obverse is on the same bit of metal as the bottom of the reverse), on the reverse there appears to be some kind of thick line running from about 8:30 to just above the centre, and another running from 10:00 to just above that. There could be stars, or lines running from the lower of the two lines above - there is too much wear to tell. I'm going to stop there because I keep seeing different things in it that look famililar but are probably coincidental. Now, obviously in such bad condition, it isn't worth anything above melt (and that might be a bit much). I'm more looking for ideas as to what it might be - preferably with pictures that I can compare against. Thanks in advance... -- Pete Remove removes to reply by e-mail |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Toning: real, artificial, in between? -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 0 | December 3rd 03 03:26 AM |
Coin Club Meeting Report | Bill Krummel | Coins | 1 | November 14th 03 03:31 PM |
How to select a coin holder -- periodic post | A.Gent | Coins | 0 | November 8th 03 11:05 PM |
Coin Talk Needs You | Peter T Davis | Coins | 51 | September 16th 03 01:19 AM |
How to avoid getting cheated on eBay - periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 1 | August 16th 03 01:30 AM |