If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental
red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
On Jul 15, 11:23*pm, "don't look" don't wrote:
Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. They were correctly graded according to the standards of the mid 1970s. These would likely have graded MS63 in the late 1980s and perhaps MS64 today. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
Frank Provasek wrote:
On Jul 15, 11:23 pm, "don't look" don't wrote: Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. They were correctly graded according to the standards of the mid 1970s. These would likely have graded MS63 in the late 1980s and perhaps MS64 today. I thought grading standards become more lax over time, not the other way around? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
PC wrote:
Frank Provasek wrote: On Jul 15, 11:23 pm, "don't look" don't wrote: Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. They were correctly graded according to the standards of the mid 1970s. These would likely have graded MS63 in the late 1980s and perhaps MS64 today. I thought grading standards become more lax over time, not the other way around? They have, that's why the coin only merited a 63 then, but merits a 64 now. I use the word "merit" loosely. James |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
Mr. Jaggers wrote:
PC wrote: Frank Provasek wrote: On Jul 15, 11:23 pm, "don't look" don't wrote: Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. They were correctly graded according to the standards of the mid 1970s. These would likely have graded MS63 in the late 1980s and perhaps MS64 today. I thought grading standards become more lax over time, not the other way around? They have, that's why the coin only merited a 63 then, but merits a 64 now. I use the word "merit" loosely. I got confused by 65 being stated first. It reads like Frank is saying a Morgan in the 70s would be MS65, then MS63 in the 80s and then MS64 today. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
On Jul 16, 4:49*pm, "PC" wrote:
I got confused by 65 being stated first. *It reads like Frank is saying a Morgan in the 70s would be MS65, then MS63 in the 80s and then MS64 today..- Hide quoted text - That is correct. Grading standards tightened in the early 1980s and again in the late 1980s and became excessively strict. The grading services rarely gave out any grades above MS65. They have relaxed a point or so in the late 1990s. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
On Jul 15, 9:23*pm, "don't look" don't wrote:
Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. http://www.speakeasy.org/~bruceg/redfield/images.html Like this one you mean? BTW, I closed my speakeasy account about 4 years ago, but my personal website is still there... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message ... On Jul 16, 4:49 pm, "PC" wrote: I got confused by 65 being stated first. It reads like Frank is saying a Morgan in the 70s would be MS65, then MS63 in the 80s and then MS64 today.- Hide quoted text - That is correct. Grading standards tightened in the early 1980s and again in the late 1980s and became excessively strict. The grading services rarely gave out any grades above MS65. They have relaxed a point or so in the late 1990s. Okay,just to clarify , I was referring to the Redfield/Paramount or just Paramount Morgans(alot of people confuse the two) in the red slabs that are all marked Mint State 65. Most if not all of them I've seen don't look to be that high. I haven't seen many in the blue/black MS60 slabs or the Green MS 65 plus holders so I can't say what I think of those. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
"bgg" wrote in message ... On Jul 15, 9:23 pm, "don't look" don't wrote: Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. http://www.speakeasy.org/~bruceg/redfield/images.html Like this one you mean? BTW, I closed my speakeasy account about 4 years ago, but my personal website is still there... Yup. Can't tell the grade from the pics though. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Redfield hoard
On Jul 16, 10:43*pm, "don't look" don't wrote:
"bgg" wrote in message ... On Jul 15, 9:23 pm, "don't look" don't wrote: Has anyone actully seen a MS 65 Morgan in one of the Redfield/Continental red packs? It looks to me they vary pretty wildly. http://www.speakeasy.org/~bruceg/redfield/images.html Like this one you mean? BTW, I closed my speakeasy account about 4 years ago, but my personal website is still there... Yup. Can't tell the grade from the pics though. Of course you can. It say Mint State 65 right on the holder. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
customer looking for Redfield Dollar outer plastic case | Jake's Marketplace, Inc. | Coins | 0 | January 20th 06 07:57 PM |
FA: I relisted my 1882-S Redfield | Bruce Greenblatt | Coins | 5 | January 30th 05 02:22 AM |
FA: 1882-S Redfield & Collection of 8 different trimes | Bruce Greenblatt | Coins | 0 | January 19th 05 03:31 PM |
Scratched Redfield Dollar holder | UsterDay72 | Coins | 0 | October 3rd 04 05:18 AM |
Redfield Hoard Info needed | UsterDay72 | Coins | 5 | July 21st 04 05:58 PM |