A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » Coins
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old November 9th 05, 03:25 PM
Frank Provasek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school ofmar...

"Bob Peterson" wrote in message
news:NElcf.314937$084.164323@attbi_s22...

Interestingly, no mention is made that individual states
could not institute

a state religion.


The 14th Amendment (ratified in 1868) requires states to
guarantee fundamental rights such as the First Amendment's
prohibition against the establishment of religion. This
means that states, like the federal government, can "make no
law respecting an establishment of religion."


Ads
  #172  
Old November 9th 05, 04:39 PM
Bonnie Bitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:34:18 GMT, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Dr. Kevin
Kennedy"

"Bob Peterson" wrote in
news:NElcf.314937$084.164323@attbi_s22:

I almost hate to do this, but Frank maybe you should read the
constitution.

No where in the constitution are religious ideas, people, or concepts
prohibited from being part of governing this country. NO WHERE.

A clear and unambiguous reading of the 1st amendment provides only
that congress may not institute a state religion, as was done in
England. The clear meaning being that congress was not to meddle in
religion, not the other way around.

Interestingly, no mention is made that individual states could not
institute a state religion.

"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
k.net...
"Jose Vega" wrote in message
...
hi,why don't you read Genesis 2:24 in the bible?. Marriage between a
man a woman is a sacred institution. And besides,the word of God
condenms homosexuality.. THA'ts why God destroyed sodom and
Gomorath,because the people were having inmoral issues,such as
homosexuality. That's a fact...
Jose


Why don't YOU read the Constitution. The United States is not a
theocracy.



Separation of church and state is a myth.


Thanks to you christstains who imagine that you own the US. (Or so you
imagine).
  #173  
Old November 9th 05, 04:53 PM
Spehro Pefhany
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.

On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:34:18 GMT, the renowned "Dr. Kevin Kennedy"
wrote:

"Bob Peterson" wrote in
news:NElcf.314937$084.164323@attbi_s22:

I almost hate to do this, but Frank maybe you should read the
constitution.

No where in the constitution are religious ideas, people, or concepts
prohibited from being part of governing this country. NO WHERE.

A clear and unambiguous reading of the 1st amendment provides only
that congress may not institute a state religion, as was done in
England. The clear meaning being that congress was not to meddle in
religion, not the other way around.

Interestingly, no mention is made that individual states could not
institute a state religion.

"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
k.net...
"Jose Vega" wrote in message
...
hi,why don't you read Genesis 2:24 in the bible?. Marriage between a
man a woman is a sacred institution. And besides,the word of God
condenms homosexuality.. THA'ts why God destroyed sodom and
Gomorath,because the people were having inmoral issues,such as
homosexuality. That's a fact...
Jose


Why don't YOU read the Constitution. The United States is not a
theocracy.



Separation of church and state is a myth.


Hey, just a minute. It's not a theocracy like Iran where you see
theologians having a *veto* over the appointment of judges... oh,
wait, never mind.

  #174  
Old November 19th 05, 08:28 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.bible,alt.politics.homosexuality
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.

[flame groups trimmed]

"David Hicks" wrote in message
k.net...
The terror that PRESIDENT BUSH is doing his part to defeat is rooted in
a long time family feud that has its origins in supernatural, i.e.
SPIRITUAL realms-of-being several degrees above the President's and
Osama's paygrade. Osama and his followers are "sons of Ishmael." All of
us who resist them in their efforts to establish their global caliphate
are "sons of Issac." Issac is the daddy of Jacob whose name was changed,
by God Himself, to "Israel."

Liberals are dead-wrong when they categorize this strife as only a
POLITICAL struggle; saying it is about nothing but "oil" or "money" or
"halliburton." This strife is about God and and the rebellion of a
prince in God's Court. That noble and fallen prince is named Satan. And
the evil of Satan is most evidenced with the practices of ABORTION and
HOMOSEXUALITY. Both of these geivous sins are related because they BOTH
destroy God's plan to populate the earth with His planet Earth with more
of HIS people to fight the final battle. It boils down to good versus
evil and those who don't know it or refuse to believe it are spiritually
speaking, as deluded as Mohammed.

God in Christ sits at the top of the heap. When the Big Moment comes for
resolution of this conflict, people better hope they are raputured and
will leave this planet because it is about to become a very unhappy
place.


Door... hit... ass...

BTW, your meds need adjusted.


  #175  
Old November 25th 05, 08:59 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.marketing.online.ebay,alt.flame.faggots,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.


"Edna Jo" wrote in message
ink.net...
People says gays is denied equal protection under the law, and that
gays pays taxes so they should have equal rights to be gay and get married
to his partner...If a thief has a 9-5 day job and pays his taxes just like
everyone else does this give him the right to go home, change his clothes
and be a thief by night? It is basically the same line of thinking. Lots
of
laws are being changed these days to suit the people who are doing wrong
and yes the Bible is brought up a lot because that is where our morals
originated from. In it, it states that to lay with a person of the same
sex
is an "abomination against GOD"! It seems that we turn our heads a lot
when
it comes to our own children. I live in a small town and we don't even
have
a curfew because the parents think that it violates our children's rights.
So we have more children robbing houses and getting by with it because it
might violate the childs rights. So where does it actually start & stop
with the "LEGAL" rights. Seems like everyone wants to change each law to
suit their own needs.



Why should non believers in Christianity or members of other faiths be bound
by your ideas of morals?


  #176  
Old December 3rd 05, 12:24 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.bible,alt.politics.homosexuality
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.

flame group trimmed

JohnL wrote:
On 1 Dec 2005 16:56:44 -0800, "Frank Provasek"
wrote:

Frank Provasek wrote:

Southern Baptist Convention finally issued an apology to
African-Americans for supporting slavery and segregation
in 1995, 130 YEARS after the end of the Civil War!


What an organization and people's forefathers did 130 years ago isn't
to be blamed on the current generation. The apology, while nice and
honorable, was not required.

By the way, the Southern Baptist Convention, which you so readily beat
up at the drop of a hat, has a goal this year of spending $150 million
on world aid (food, medicine, clothing, etc)


How much will they be spending on political activities like "voter
guides", contributions to right-win lawyers to oppose and/or roll-back
civil rights, satellite time for closed circuit "services" featuring
political figures, etc.??


such as they did with
hurricane Katrina


Are we talking about the same Southern Baptists who turned away
truckload of desperately needed bottled spring water from post-Katrina
New Orleans because that were donated by Anheuser-Busch?

snip

--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================= ===============+
  #177  
Old December 3rd 05, 05:01 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.bible,alt.politics.homosexuality
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school of marketing.


JohnL wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:24:54 -0500, "L. Michael Roberts"
wrote:

flame group trimmed

JohnL wrote:

On 1 Dec 2005 16:56:44 -0800, "Frank Provasek"
wrote:


snip

By the way, the Southern Baptist Convention, which you so readily beat
up at the drop of a hat, has a goal this year of spending $150 million
on world aid (food, medicine, clothing, etc)


How much will they be spending on political activities like "voter
guides", contributions to right-win lawyers to oppose and/or roll-back
civil rights, satellite time for closed circuit "services" featuring
political figures, etc.??

such as they did with
hurricane Katrina


Are we talking about the same Southern Baptists who turned away
truckload of desperately needed bottled spring water from post-Katrina
New Orleans because that were donated by Anheuser-Busch?

snip


They'll probably spend a lot less, if anything, on voter guides and
other things you mentioned than you want to mislead everyone to
believe they'll spend.


They have certainly spent lots of money on political activities in the
past. Perhaps hurricane Katrina has led them to re-focus on helping the
needy rather then attempting to curtail people's civil rights. We shall
see when the next US election cycle comes around.


And I hadn't heard anything about the water
issue, so I did a little research on the subject. There's always two
sides to every argument such as this, your side and the right side:

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22001


Wonderfully evasive article. They dance around the issue with multiple
repetitions that they had other water to distribute and they never
really state categorically if they did, or did not, hand out the A-B
water... There is indirect evidence in the following quote that they did
not:
"The Anheuser-Busch logo on the cans of water “was huge” and bothersome
to some of the Clewiston church volunteers, Bridges said. “I didn't want
to send out a mixed message. "All that was said was that First Baptist
Church [Clewiston] people would not be the ones handing it out,” he
explained. “We didn't refuse the water. Others were giving it out.
The article is evasive, hypocritical and designed to save SBC face. IT
also appears on a Baptist web site so we know they have an agenda and
are not a reliable mainstream news source.


No religious organization is perfect, and every one is made up of a
lot of individuals. There's always some that don't do what is right,
but as a whole, groups like the SBC do a lot more good than the bad
that evil people would like to make them out to have done.

So, you mentioned a couple little irks that you don't like about the
SBC, trying to make them look bad. What have YOU done for mankind
lately? Tell us all the great deeds you've done since


Matt. 6:3-4

snip

--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================= ===============+
  #178  
Old December 3rd 05, 07:20 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.bible,alt.politics.homosexuality
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default From the Provasek (prosovek prozacset - whatever) school ofmarketing.

"L. Michael Roberts" wrote:

JohnL wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:24:54 -0500, "L. Michael Roberts"
wrote:

flame group trimmed

JohnL wrote:

On 1 Dec 2005 16:56:44 -0800, "Frank Provasek"
wrote:


snip

By the way, the Southern Baptist Convention, which you so readily beat
up at the drop of a hat, has a goal this year of spending $150 million
on world aid (food, medicine, clothing, etc)

How much will they be spending on political activities like "voter
guides", contributions to right-win lawyers to oppose and/or roll-back
civil rights, satellite time for closed circuit "services" featuring
political figures, etc.??

such as they did with
hurricane Katrina

Are we talking about the same Southern Baptists who turned away
truckload of desperately needed bottled spring water from post-Katrina
New Orleans because that were donated by Anheuser-Busch?

snip


They'll probably spend a lot less, if anything, on voter guides and
other things you mentioned than you want to mislead everyone to
believe they'll spend.


They have certainly spent lots of money on political activities in the
past. Perhaps hurricane Katrina has led them to re-focus on helping the
needy rather then attempting to curtail people's civil rights. We shall
see when the next US election cycle comes around.

And I hadn't heard anything about the water
issue, so I did a little research on the subject. There's always two
sides to every argument such as this, your side and the right side:

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=22001


Wonderfully evasive article. They dance around the issue with multiple
repetitions that they had other water to distribute and they never
really state categorically if they did, or did not, hand out the A-B
water... There is indirect evidence in the following quote that they did
not:
"The Anheuser-Busch logo on the cans of water “was huge” and bothersome
to some of the Clewiston church volunteers, Bridges said. “I didn't want
to send out a mixed message. "All that was said was that First Baptist
Church [Clewiston] people would not be the ones handing it out,” he
explained. “We didn't refuse the water. Others were giving it out.
The article is evasive, hypocritical and designed to save SBC face. IT
also appears on a Baptist web site so we know they have an agenda and
are not a reliable mainstream news source.

No religious organization is perfect, and every one is made up of a
lot of individuals. There's always some that don't do what is right,
but as a whole, groups like the SBC do a lot more good than the bad
that evil people would like to make them out to have done.

So, you mentioned a couple little irks that you don't like about the
SBC, trying to make them look bad. What have YOU done for mankind
lately? Tell us all the great deeds you've done since


Matt. 6:3-4


I wonder if the COORS family did anything?
And was it accepted?

-- Fritz ...

A study of theology is a study of nothing.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Frank Provasek Collection- fagfrankprovasekpicturewithtext1.JPG (1/1) Frank Provasek Coins 1 August 24th 04 10:02 AM
Frank Provasek selling Accugrade!! Wyates9339 Coins 14 December 23rd 03 12:27 AM
Provasek NARU?! Fred A. Murphy Coins 22 November 15th 03 12:52 AM
HAHAHA Frank Provasek Bhncbad2 Coins 1 October 25th 03 05:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.