If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anecdotal Lincoln Comments
A few things I've noticed in my three-year search of Lincoln Cent rolls
in Western Maryland are detailed below. Some have been discussed here before, as they popped up, others are being mentioned for the first time. I have no statistical evidence for these comments, they are impressions I've formed from the microscopic examination of cents in circulated rolls over 36 months. The total number of coins inspected is approximately 78,000. Wheatback cents are present in the circulating coinage, at a rate in the neighborhood of one per thousand. Wheaties are most likely to come from rolls stored in the vault for a long time, or from customer redeemed rolls in 'less-affluent' neighborhoods. Wheaties are least frequent from credit unions and banks with little commercial business, those least involved in supplying coin to retailers. Vault service rolls do not selectively remove steel, canadian or wheatbacked cents. Vault service rolls are not adept at removing heavily damaged coins. 1973 Lincoln Cents are most often found with a prominent fin on the rim. Unfinned 1973 cents are uncommon. 1992 Lincoln Cents are often machined doubled on the date. 1986 and 1987 Lincoln Cents are often poorly struck, with doubling, pressure ridges and uneven fields, especially the obverses near the rims. 1972 Lincoln Cents in BU condition are found more frequently than any other date within 5 years of 1972 in either direction. I can think of no explanation for this phenomenon. 1969-D's are often poorly struck and weakly mintmarked with a pencil-thin 'D' that is poorly centered and sometimes skewed. I now save all 1969-D cents with strong mm's that are well-centered. In this relatively small number of coins, I have been handed three uncirculated rolls of early (1959-1963) Memorial cents, 7 steel cents, one Indian Head (holed), several dimes, about 4 dozen canadian cents, a blank planchet, five Type 2 reverses (one 1998, three 1999 and one 2000), three counterstamped coins (two with JFK's bust, one with a horseman), and about a half pound of tar, bubble gum, glue, tape residue, motor oil and paint. ;-) Alan 'has no intention of stopping' |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Williams wrote:
1972 Lincoln Cents in BU condition are found more frequently than any other date within 5 years of 1972 in either direction. I can think of no explanation for this phenomenon. I'll hazard a guess. In '72, IIRC, the big news was the discovery of the new doubled die. So, people started hoarding 72s thinking that they might have one of those "million dollar rarities". Years later they've completely forgotten why they saved so many pennies, and dumped 'em all back at the bank... Only to be reclaimed... By YOU . -- Bob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bob Flaminio wrote:
Alan Williams wrote: 1972 Lincoln Cents in BU condition are found more frequently than any other date within 5 years of 1972 in either direction. I can think of no explanation for this phenomenon. I'll hazard a guess. In '72, IIRC, the big news was the discovery of the new doubled die. So, people started hoarding 72s thinking that they might have one of those "million dollar rarities". Years later they've completely forgotten why they saved so many pennies, and dumped 'em all back at the bank... Only to be reclaimed... By YOU . -- Bob That's a premise that holds water, assuming that the 1972 DDO was 'common knowledge' to the public. Or enough collectors grabbed boxes and bank rolls! A side note about 'S' Lincolns, which are not all that common here 120 miles from the Chesapeake Bay. 1974's are the most frequent (as explained here in the past by ?Tom Delorey?, the Fed mixed the 1974 'S' cents with D and P mintages to discourage hoarding) while the 1968 and 1969-S are least frequent. Oddly, about thirty minutes ago, I found my first 1969-S in rolls from Kelco Federal Credit Union, the first rolls I've searched from that source. It's AU, bright Red, and heavily thumbprinted. ;-) Alan 'marked for life' |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:24 GMT, Alan Williams is
alleged to have written: A few things I've noticed in my three-year search of Lincoln Cent rolls in Western Maryland are detailed below. Some have been discussed here before, as they popped up, others are being mentioned for the first time. *snip* Very interesting. I'd have thought the proportion of wheaties was higher, but maybe that's just Ohio. Who knows? The Full mint mark coins may be worth money in a few decades. Who'd have ever thought that FBL Franklins would take off the way they have? Bruce |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Hickmott wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:24 GMT, Alan Williams is alleged to have written: A few things I've noticed in my three-year search of Lincoln Cent rolls in Western Maryland are detailed below. Some have been discussed here before, as they popped up, others are being mentioned for the first time. *snip* Very interesting. I'd have thought the proportion of wheaties was higher, but maybe that's just Ohio. Who knows? The Full mint mark coins may be worth money in a few decades. Who'd have ever thought that FBL Franklins would take off the way they have? Bruce Given enough decades, they will all have value. What does your Local Coin Shoppe charge for IHC's in Good? ;-) The wheat percentage is a guessestimate that I cannot refute nor confirm. (Maybe I have a future inside the Beltway with language like that!) I could count the wheat cents in my jar, but I'd be missing those good enough for a 2x2 and I'd be adding those I received from Dan Floyd which are intermingled. ;-/ It varies out here. I've gone through a stretch of $20 without a single wheat (2,000 chances) and I've found up to 7 in a single roll (14%). 1/1000 is conservative, I think. 1/500 might be closer. 1/200 would be too much. Eliminate the 1956-D, 1944 and 1958-D and the percentage drops incredibly fast. ;-) Alan 'they have nice tails, though' |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:58:24 GMT, Alan Williams is
alleged to have written: Bob Flaminio wrote: Alan Williams wrote: 1972 Lincoln Cents in BU condition are found more frequently than any other date within 5 years of 1972 in either direction. I can think of no explanation for this phenomenon. I'll hazard a guess. In '72, IIRC, the big news was the discovery of the new doubled die. So, people started hoarding 72s thinking that they might have one of those "million dollar rarities". Years later they've completely forgotten why they saved so many pennies, and dumped 'em all back at the bank... Only to be reclaimed... By YOU . -- Bob That's a premise that holds water, assuming that the 1972 DDO was 'common knowledge' to the public. Or enough collectors grabbed boxes and bank rolls! IIR, the local fishwrapper did a front page story on the darn thing. The local banks were most upset, lots of folks came in looking for 1972 rolls. I got a couple of rolls just at the right time and managed to product a roll of 1972 DD's. I wish I still had that roll. Bruce (bet I could get a lot more now) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:11:07 GMT, Alan Williams is
alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:24 GMT, Alan Williams is alleged to have written: A few things I've noticed in my three-year search of Lincoln Cent rolls in Western Maryland are detailed below. Some have been discussed here before, as they popped up, others are being mentioned for the first time. *snip* Very interesting. I'd have thought the proportion of wheaties was higher, but maybe that's just Ohio. Who knows? The Full mint mark coins may be worth money in a few decades. Who'd have ever thought that FBL Franklins would take off the way they have? Bruce Given enough decades, they will all have value. What does your Local Coin Shoppe charge for IHC's in Good? ;-) Whatever he thinks he can get and he's willing to deal, just like your local coin shop. :-) It varies out here. I've gone through a stretch of $20 without a single wheat (2,000 chances) and I've found up to 7 in a single roll (14%). 1/1000 is conservative, I think. 1/500 might be closer. 1/200 would be too much. Eliminate the 1956-D, 1944 and 1958-D and the percentage drops incredibly fast. ;-) I think (disclaimer: I've never really kept track of the chaff) that removing those would make wheaties almost non-existant. Alan 'they have nice tails, though' I was going to call you a creep for that comment, but I think I'll call you a "stalker" instead. :-) Bruce (Apologies for the bad pun, but surely Alan deserves it!) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Hickmott wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:11:07 GMT, Alan Williams is alleged to have written: Bruce Hickmott wrote: On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:12:24 GMT, Alan Williams is alleged to have written: A few things I've noticed in my three-year search of Lincoln Cent rolls in Western Maryland are detailed below. Some have been discussed here before, as they popped up, others are being mentioned for the first time. *snip* Very interesting. I'd have thought the proportion of wheaties was higher, but maybe that's just Ohio. Who knows? The Full mint mark coins may be worth money in a few decades. Who'd have ever thought that FBL Franklins would take off the way they have? Bruce Given enough decades, they will all have value. What does your Local Coin Shoppe charge for IHC's in Good? ;-) Whatever he thinks he can get and he's willing to deal, just like your local coin shop. :-) It varies out here. I've gone through a stretch of $20 without a single wheat (2,000 chances) and I've found up to 7 in a single roll (14%). 1/1000 is conservative, I think. 1/500 might be closer. 1/200 would be too much. Eliminate the 1956-D, 1944 and 1958-D and the percentage drops incredibly fast. ;-) I think (disclaimer: I've never really kept track of the chaff) that removing those would make wheaties almost non-existant. Alan 'they have nice tails, though' I was going to call you a creep for that comment, but I think I'll call you a "stalker" instead. :-) Bruce (Apologies for the bad pun, but surely Alan deserves it!) LOL! A stalker! Only too true. A double-stalker with deer hound hat pursuing the Common Wheatie with diligence and no stealth. Alan 'Here! wheatie,wheatie, wheatie! Nice coin!' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Hickmott wrote:
I got a couple of rolls just at the right time and managed to product a roll of 1972 DD's. I wish I still had that roll. I once dated a girl that had a couple of DD's. I wish I still had her, too ;-) ... -- Bob |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Bob Flaminio" wrote in message ... Bruce Hickmott wrote: I got a couple of rolls just at the right time and managed to product a roll of 1972 DD's. I wish I still had that roll. I once dated a girl that had a couple of DD's. I wish I still had her, too ;-) ... -- Bob Those are DDO's...fifty of them? My goodness, Bruce, I'd be unable to sell more than 40 or 45 of them... ;-) Alan 'king of the VF 1967 Cent' |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Lincoln Counterstamp | Alan & Erin Williams | Coins | 3 | February 25th 04 05:39 PM |
Stolen coin alert ....... please read and pass along. | J. Craton | Coins | 4 | January 26th 04 01:24 AM |
Uneven Distribution of Lincoln 'S' | Alan & Erin Williams | Coins | 12 | December 13th 03 08:40 PM |
How To Tell If You Have An Altered Lincoln Cent? | The Numismasochist | Coins | 5 | August 21st 03 03:57 AM |
1914-D Lincoln Cent Comparo | Alan & Erin Williams | Coins | 10 | July 22nd 03 10:51 AM |