If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
BTW, why do people on this list collect these things in the first place? I
love music, but I can't stand record companies that want to charge me 20 bucks for some long dead band (and I mean dead, as in deceased) that won't (nor couldn't) see a dime of the money anyhow -- and I don't much care for downloading stuff that IMHO should be in public domain by now anyhow. Regardless, there is a lot of good music out there that can be found on "dead" formats. darnoc |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:06:08 -0500, "darnoc"
wrote: BTW, why do people on this list collect these things in the first place? I love music, but I can't stand record companies that want to charge me 20 bucks for some long dead band (and I mean dead, as in deceased) that won't (nor couldn't) see a dime of the money anyhow -- and I don't much care for downloading stuff that IMHO should be in public domain by now anyhow. Regardless, there is a lot of good music out there that can be found on "dead" formats. snip "IMHO" doesn't cut the legal argument used in copyright laws...sorry. You are correct about using "dead" formats as usable music sources. 8 track is, at best, a "mid-fi" format, but is quite usable enough to prevent you from spending $25 for a badly mastered CD of the same album. Hence, if you are technically proficient, and spend time to learn a bit about how analog tape really works, you can get some good results. However, be advised: About 35% of the 8 track tapes I've gotten from a variety of sources are magnetized and/or partially erased due to poor deck maintenance, and thus, aren't really listenable to the critical ear...most of the top end will be gone, and in extreme cases, distortion on peaks will be unlistenable. Other problems, such as "crinkled" tape, spalling graphite backcoating, bad pressure pads (a certainty) and "melted" pinch rollers, are just a fact of life with this obsolete format. In short, when compared to later cassettes, they are a pain in the ass, which is why the format went away finally in 1988. Although initially better than early cassettes aurally, later high speed ferrichrome dupe processes gave full range frequency response with well done Dolby encoding and lower noise floors. Thus, the oft-heard claim that 8 track is always superior to cassette due to its higher speed just doesn't ring true on any prerecorded cassette sold after about 1981. This isn't to say that used cassettes aren't trashed either...many are. But my experience has been that used cassettes, which can be had for sometimes 50¢ a shot, are a better bet on quality than most 8 tracks you get on eBay. There, with the market being boosted by opportunistic eBay hustlers desperate to make a dime, the return on investment is getting thinner all the time for the buyer. 8 tracks that used to routinely go for the traditional 99¢ on eBay are now being hustled for $3 and more. It just doesn't make sense to buy at that price, unless it's something you REALLY want in your collection that's unobtainable in other formats...which is sometimes the case. Thus, if you're only in it for the music, skip the 8 tracks and collect later cassette. If you're in it for the "fun" of tinkering and fixing, 8 track's lots of "fun." I find myself increasly just dubbing the material off of usable 8 tracks into PCM files, from which I can burn CD-Rs to use in the car and at home. Use of ProTools allows me to "dehiss" these to a degree, as well as compensate for poor high frequency response and add judicious expansion. I've already just about given up using 8 tracks in the one remaining vehicle so equipped...the maintenance just isn't worth my time anymore. dB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
darnoc wrote:
BTW, why do people on this list collect these things in the first place? I love music, but I can't stand record companies that want to charge me 20 bucks for some long dead band (and I mean dead, as in deceased) that won't (nor couldn't) see a dime of the money anyhow -- and I don't much care for downloading stuff that IMHO should be in public domain by now anyhow. Regardless, there is a lot of good music out there that can be found on "dead" formats. darnoc I collect them because I can find unique stuff that you can't find anywhere else for a really cheap price or free. All of my players were free except for one that cost me $5.00. I know they weren't the best format ever and don't have the best sound quality, but there is a lot of unique stuff that I enjoy listening to, but I wouldn't go and pay the price to have it on a Cd, so this gives me a chance to sample bands that I never got into back in the day like Deep Purple, Cream, J. Geils Band and many others. Hope this helps you to understand. Scott Irvine |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
I totally agree. I got a collection of 120 8-tracks from eBay for like 20
bucks a couple of weeks ago (most were complete. .. ahem ****e). However, out of it was about 17 really good carts. The Willie Nelson and Leon Russell cart really made me feel good about the purchase -- besides the bizarre stuff you wouldn't bother with otherwise. Like I said. I love music. My darkest day was when Big Lots stopped carrying cassettes -- BB King and Bobby Bland Live, where you gonna find that for 3 bucks new? Anyway, great stuff can be neither new, expensive, nor well known. "Scott Irvine" wrote in message news:G96Uf.43499$oL.21191@attbi_s71... darnoc wrote: BTW, why do people on this list collect these things in the first place? I love music, but I can't stand record companies that want to charge me 20 bucks for some long dead band (and I mean dead, as in deceased) that won't (nor couldn't) see a dime of the money anyhow -- and I don't much care for downloading stuff that IMHO should be in public domain by now anyhow. Regardless, there is a lot of good music out there that can be found on "dead" formats. darnoc I collect them because I can find unique stuff that you can't find anywhere else for a really cheap price or free. All of my players were free except for one that cost me $5.00. I know they weren't the best format ever and don't have the best sound quality, but there is a lot of unique stuff that I enjoy listening to, but I wouldn't go and pay the price to have it on a Cd, so this gives me a chance to sample bands that I never got into back in the day like Deep Purple, Cream, J. Geils Band and many others. Hope this helps you to understand. Scott Irvine |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
Like I said, just MHO. no more, no less I don't sell ****, and I don't
skirt the law. But I've found such good things over the years. -- and I will continue to do so. I really want to get into Reel to Reel. Not the right forum, but I've heard good things about the pioneer decks -- but the price seems prohibitive lately. The Akai gx-4000D looks like a good bet for under 200? Is it possible to get a "decent" reel to reel under 200 bucks these days? I have lots of personal contacts with these tapes just setting on their shelves. "DeserTBoB" wrote in message ... On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:06:08 -0500, "darnoc" wrote: BTW, why do people on this list collect these things in the first place? I love music, but I can't stand record companies that want to charge me 20 bucks for some long dead band (and I mean dead, as in deceased) that won't (nor couldn't) see a dime of the money anyhow -- and I don't much care for downloading stuff that IMHO should be in public domain by now anyhow. Regardless, there is a lot of good music out there that can be found on "dead" formats. snip "IMHO" doesn't cut the legal argument used in copyright laws...sorry. You are correct about using "dead" formats as usable music sources. 8 track is, at best, a "mid-fi" format, but is quite usable enough to prevent you from spending $25 for a badly mastered CD of the same album. Hence, if you are technically proficient, and spend time to learn a bit about how analog tape really works, you can get some good results. However, be advised: About 35% of the 8 track tapes I've gotten from a variety of sources are magnetized and/or partially erased due to poor deck maintenance, and thus, aren't really listenable to the critical ear...most of the top end will be gone, and in extreme cases, distortion on peaks will be unlistenable. Other problems, such as "crinkled" tape, spalling graphite backcoating, bad pressure pads (a certainty) and "melted" pinch rollers, are just a fact of life with this obsolete format. In short, when compared to later cassettes, they are a pain in the ass, which is why the format went away finally in 1988. Although initially better than early cassettes aurally, later high speed ferrichrome dupe processes gave full range frequency response with well done Dolby encoding and lower noise floors. Thus, the oft-heard claim that 8 track is always superior to cassette due to its higher speed just doesn't ring true on any prerecorded cassette sold after about 1981. This isn't to say that used cassettes aren't trashed either...many are. But my experience has been that used cassettes, which can be had for sometimes 50¢ a shot, are a better bet on quality than most 8 tracks you get on eBay. There, with the market being boosted by opportunistic eBay hustlers desperate to make a dime, the return on investment is getting thinner all the time for the buyer. 8 tracks that used to routinely go for the traditional 99¢ on eBay are now being hustled for $3 and more. It just doesn't make sense to buy at that price, unless it's something you REALLY want in your collection that's unobtainable in other formats...which is sometimes the case. Thus, if you're only in it for the music, skip the 8 tracks and collect later cassette. If you're in it for the "fun" of tinkering and fixing, 8 track's lots of "fun." I find myself increasly just dubbing the material off of usable 8 tracks into PCM files, from which I can burn CD-Rs to use in the car and at home. Use of ProTools allows me to "dehiss" these to a degree, as well as compensate for poor high frequency response and add judicious expansion. I've already just about given up using 8 tracks in the one remaining vehicle so equipped...the maintenance just isn't worth my time anymore. dB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
you hit the nail- for years I've been getting lots of 300-400 tapes
from the local thrifties for 20 cents each. The flea markets are better yet, where you can buy an entire stand out for a dime a tape. Why pay $15-25 per CD at Walmart or Best Buy ? The 8-tracks actually sound BETTER, through a high end tube amp and player. That's the problem- people have stuck in their head that 8-tracks "should" sound bad. The reason being, back in the day the splices always broke. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
you hit the nail- for years I've been getting lots of 300-400 tapes
from the local thrifties for 20 cents each. The flea markets are better yet, where you can buy an entire stand out for a dime a tape. Why pay $15-25 per CD at Walmart or Best Buy ? The 8-tracks actually sound BETTER, through a high end tube amp and player. That's the problem- people have stuck in their head that 8-tracks "should" sound bad. The reason being, back in the day the splices always broke. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:00:19 -0500, "darnoc"
wrote: Like I said, just MHO. no more, no less I don't sell ****, and I don't skirt the law. But I've found such good things over the years. -- and I will continue to do so. I really want to get into Reel to Reel. Not the right forum, but I've heard good things about the pioneer decks -- but the price seems prohibitive lately. The Akai gx-4000D looks like a good bet for under 200? Is it possible to get a "decent" reel to reel under 200 bucks these days? I have lots of personal contacts with these tapes just setting on their shelves. snip Getting a "decent RTR for under $200" is sort of like buying a "reliable car for under $200"...they don't really exist. If you're serious about RTR, get a three motor, 4 track format machine. Auto reverse is optional on your part. For reliability, the Teacs were pretty good, although their electronics were fairly noisy, and not all that good for recording. I think the Pioneers are way overpriced, as they weren't that good a machine when new. The big three motor Akais were pretty good machines, better than the single motored 1700 and 1800 series with the built in 8 track...those sort of suck. For consumer RTR, it was pretty hard to beat the Teacs for reliability, if not sonic quality. Teacs didn't make very good recorders; their record amps were somewhat wimpy and couldn't do 250 nWb/m, but for home use, they were OK. Stay WAY away from Dokorders and Sonys...two of the worst RTRs every sold. dB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
On 22 Mar 2006 02:38:42 -0800, "duty-honor-country"
wrote: Why pay $15-25 per CD at Walmart or Best Buy ? The 8-tracks actually sound BETTER, through a high end tube amp and player. snip BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That's the problem- people have stuck in their head that 8-tracks "should" sound bad. The reason being, back in the day the splices always broke. snip There's a LOTmore to it than what this simpleton is saying, but you can't expect anything more from Charlie Nudo, our resident 'tard. Hey Noodles! How's your Power Smeller status lately? BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
question for 8 track folks:
On 22 Mar 2006 02:38:53 -0800, "duty-honor-country"
wrote: you hit the nail- for years I've been getting lots of 300-400 tapes from the local thrifties for 20 cents each. The flea markets are better yet, where you can buy an entire stand out for a dime a tape. Why pay $15-25 per CD at Walmart or Best Buy ? The 8-tracks actually sound BETTER, through a high end tube amp and player. That's the problem- people have stuck in their head that 8-tracks "should" sound bad. The reason being, back in the day the splices always broke. snip Hey Noodles....you're making more work for yourself! After all, you'll get scared later today and delete your posts again! RUNNNNNNNNNNNNN, Noodles....RUNNNNNNNNNNNNN! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pinch roller comparison | DeserTBoB | 8 Track Tapes | 6 | October 30th 04 08:26 PM |
"Cheapness," as per Frank Zappa. | DeserTBoB | 8 Track Tapes | 8 | October 13th 04 01:02 AM |
looking for 8 track player with recorder and old blank 8 track tapes | Chris | 8 Track Tapes | 2 | February 20th 04 01:48 AM |
FA: Original NIB Kraco In Dash 8 Track | Rare Old Things | 8 Track Tapes | 2 | December 5th 03 04:33 AM |
Spam Question: Or A Former (one-time only) Spammer Explains Himself | Mark | Books | 1 | July 17th 03 08:40 AM |