If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Coin returns and a question about toning
Today, I am having the fourth coin returned to me from an eBay auction sale.
This Maine commemorative half; http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3031730183 I honestly don't begrudge the buyer at all. I failed to mention in my verbal description the surface marks on each side of the wreath on the reverse. I thought I had mentioned them, and checked the auction site to find that I hadn't. I think I mentioned them here, in a reply to Bob Rudd's comments about the coin. I am going to bite the bullet on this one, but may need some help to be fair to myself. First, when I relist, I am mentioning the surface marks and that I would not grade the coin as a 64, as ICG did. Secondly, I may talk a little about the toning on this coin. It is very hard to describe or image, very subtle toning, and I have had thoughts that the toning is actually retoning from a dip or some type of cleaning. I may mention this possibility in my auction description. So, two questions. Looking at the coin, does anyone have thoughts about this toning - it is very light, pastel shades of pinkish/peach, yellow, and blue. You do not even see the colors if looking at the coin from straight on, you have to tilt the coin to see the colors. What is the likelihood this is a retoning? Should I mention my retoning theory in my auction description? Other three coins returned; Years ago, I used to sell at Coin Universe. I had a Walking Liberty half in a PCGS MS65 slab. I thought it looked pretty nice. At that time, I did not sell with low starts, but used reserves and this particular coin did not sell during the auction. I had an offer after the auction was over with, and the buyer received the coin and emailed me that he did not like the milky spots on the coin, could he return it. I okayed the return, reviewed the coin upon receipt and agreed with the buyer. Learned something. Sold an unc Washington quarter that had die polish lines, which I had mentioned in the auction description. Buyer emails me that the coin is not uncirculated, has wear and scratches. I email back and explain that he is seeing die polish lines, as I described in the auction. Buyer emails back, insisting the coin is circulated and his local dealer backs him up. I email back and tell him to return the coin for a refund. Buyer emails back and says he was thinking more along the lines of renegotiating the price. I email back and tell him to return the coin for a refund, which he did. I sold the coin on eBay to an rcc'er, whose advice I sought. He verified what I knew - late die state and die polish lines, but uncirculated and very lustrous. Earlier this year sold a high circulated grade, harder date IHC. Buyer wanted to return it, no reason given. I okayed the return, relisted and sold for 20% more than the original auction, with high feedback praise from the newest buyer. Bill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1992 DC Comics "Batman Returns" 16-PRISM Sticker Set | J.R. Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 0 | November 2nd 04 05:54 AM |
FS: 1992 O-Pee-Chee "Batman Returns" 10-Card SubSet | J.R. Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 0 | July 21st 04 07:36 AM |
FS: 1992 Topps "Batman Returns" Official Poster Magazine Series | J.R. Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 0 | June 28th 04 05:34 AM |
FS: 1992 Topps "Batman Returns" Official Poster Magazine Series | Jim Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 0 | August 10th 03 07:35 AM |
FS: 1992 DC Comics "Batman Returns" 16-PRISM Sticker Set | Jim Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 0 | August 9th 03 03:40 AM |