PR65? No Way

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ME:B:RECO:US:2

This doesn't look Proof 65 to me. Look at the scar on the reverse, and the
spotted obverse. I'll bet it's not even in that slab. Whada ya thunk?

Ed

In my opinion its a textbook proof 65, if it did not have
the carbon spot and the streak on the reverse would be
66 or 67, I think its the same coin in the slab.......

wrote:

In my opinion its a textbook proof 65, if it did not have
the carbon spot and the streak on the reverse would be
66 or 67, I think its the same coin in the slab.......

I don't know about that - the slab says
deep cameo but that coin doesn't look
DCAM to me. Why doesn't the seller
show the coin in the slab? Why do the
black background photos not show the
edges of the slab?

Doug

wrote:

In my opinion its a textbook proof 65, if it did not have
the carbon spot and the streak on the reverse would be
66 or 67, I think its the same coin in the slab.......

I thought if it had a carbon spot on it, that took it down to 63. No? This
is one of those "I heard it somewhere and it stuck in my mind" kinda things.