If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
-- "note.boy" wrote in message ... Bruce Remick wrote: "note.boy" wrote in message ... I live in the UK and I have one slabbed coin in my collection, a UK error coin that I happened to like, so I've not dealt with slabbed coins very much. I still know however that slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies, I would still be of this opinion if I had never bought a single slabbed coin. Are you saying that tens of thousands of knowledgeable collectors and dealers have been hoodwinked now for years? Yes, although I would say "less knowledgeable collectors" and not "knowledgeable collectors". Dealers have not been hoodwinked as they profit massively from the myth that MSwhatever slabbed coins are often worth a fortune compared to slightly lower grade examples, the Emperor has no clothes but no one has said so, yet. The less knowledgeable collector can purchase the same "slab" as the knowledgeable collector with the confidence that it will much more attractive than a raw coin when it comes time to sell. If a dealer can profit, so can a careful collector. As long as there are customers for high-MS slabbed coins there will be sellers offering them. On the other hand, the opportunities are there for those who favor raw coins to obtain bargains, as the better specimens are being slabbed. There's something for everyone. You say you don't deal with slabs, yet you claim to "know" the inside information about who benefits from slabbing in the US? I suspect many here in the US would differ with you-- from first hand experience. List the benefits for collectors buying slabbed coins versus unslabbed ones, it shouldn't take long. The benefits I see are confidence in authentification, stable value and demand in the marketplace, and generally a better quality coin than most raw ones offered. More and more of the better raw examples are disappearing from the marketplace and are being placed in slabs. I don't trust my ability to always tell if a raw coin may have been cleaned and perhaps refused by a grading company. I won't buy an attractive slabbed coin at a price I feel has been inflated to include the slabbing cost. With the exception of a one-time special offer, I don't send coins off to be graded and slabbed. I prefer slabbed coins for my type set and raw coins for my series collections. Just my preference. There is endless debate over the ranking of the grading companies and a lot of cracking out goes on trying to get a higher grade, there is also discussion as to how the grading "standards" have changed over the years. So as I said above, slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies. Among those who collect and deal with third-party-slabbed coins, there is little debate over ranking of the companies. The fact that there IS a ranking for the grading companies only proves that the slabbing of coins IS a joke. I think you'll find consumer rankings for many products and services where different brands or companies are are involved. Why should slabbing services be any different? Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. A UK dealer is currently attempting to sell slabbed coins here in the UK, I hope it is a miserable failure and that they loose a lot of money as this will deter others from trying to do the same. Why should you care, as long as you will still have a choice between raw and slabbed coins? I don't want the less knowledgeable here in the UK to be suckered in to paying silly money for slabbed coins as has happened in the USA. The "investment" word appears on their home page, this should be a big red flag. Your presumption here is that they are being "suckered". Over the long run, I would say the slabbed high grade coin would generally be a better investment than a comparable raw one. The less informed person often would be better served buying a professionally graded coin if he is determined to buy coins at all. Silly money can just as often be paid for overgraded or problem raw coins. http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/ They want £750 for this coin, crown 1898 LXII (on edge) MS64 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms64.htm They want £500 for this one in MS63 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms63.htm Can anyone explain the difference in the appearance that makes one worth £750 and the other £500? And once that has been explained explain why anyone should buy either when a coin with an identical catalogue value, crown 1899 LXII, is on offer from Spink in "a few minor surface marks, very attractively toned with underlying brilliance, as struck" condition for £375? If someone buys the £750 coin, why not ask him? I'm asking you, why should they? £375 is a lot to pay for a bit of plastic, it doubles the cost of the coin for zero benefit. Pretend that you have £750 to spend on coins and that you fancy a Victorian crown like the ones I listed, would you blow it on the slabbed coin at £750 or buy the Spink one at £375 and still have £375 left to spend on other coins? If I thought the price was way out of line, just because of the holder, I might pass, assuming both coins were otherwise identical. If I saw that all similar Victorian crowns in a particular company's slab were routinely traded at this higher price, I might ponder it. If I had been collecting raw crowns, I would likely continue to purchase only raw crowns. Purchasing expensive slabbed coins should not be an impulse thing. I would have to justify to myself that such a purchase would be right for me as a collector. I trust Spink's grading more than some slabbing company's as Spink have been doing it for 339 years and I have not noticed any reduction in their grading standards over the past 27 or so years. How do I know this, by comparing the coin pics in old and new editions of their Numismatic Circular. Billy You have your standards and you can be satisfied by sticking to them. Others may feel more comfortable considering a professionally graded coin. Whether you personally like slabs or not should not affect how you choose to collect. Bruce |
Ads |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Remick wrote: -- "note.boy" wrote in message ... Bruce Remick wrote: "note.boy" wrote in message ... I live in the UK and I have one slabbed coin in my collection, a UK error coin that I happened to like, so I've not dealt with slabbed coins very much. I still know however that slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies, I would still be of this opinion if I had never bought a single slabbed coin. Are you saying that tens of thousands of knowledgeable collectors and dealers have been hoodwinked now for years? Yes, although I would say "less knowledgeable collectors" and not "knowledgeable collectors". Dealers have not been hoodwinked as they profit massively from the myth that MSwhatever slabbed coins are often worth a fortune compared to slightly lower grade examples, the Emperor has no clothes but no one has said so, yet. The less knowledgeable collector can purchase the same "slab" as the knowledgeable collector with the confidence that it will much more attractive than a raw coin when it comes time to sell. If a dealer can profit, so can a careful collector. As long as there are customers for high-MS slabbed coins there will be sellers offering them. On the other hand, the opportunities are there for those who favor raw coins to obtain bargains, as the better specimens are being slabbed. There's something for everyone. The problem is that not all slabbed coin types with the same grade on the label can be 100% guaranteed to be the same grade, this can be down to the grading company's standing in the league table or the grader may have had an off day, the less knowledgeable collector may not be aware of this and will accept the grade on the label as gospel. Slabbing has introduced an extra unnecessary layer of knowledge that the new collector has to master or risk a financial penalty later when selling. Overgrading can be true of unslabbed coins but the price differential if a slabbed coin has been overgraded is more than for an unslabbed coins. It's foolish to pay mega bucks for a high MS coin when at the end of the day it's just an opinion and the difference in the coin's appearance is minimal. I avoid using the word "raw" as I think that term is derogatory towards unslabbed coins. You say you don't deal with slabs, yet you claim to "know" the inside information about who benefits from slabbing in the US? I suspect many here in the US would differ with you-- from first hand experience. List the benefits for collectors buying slabbed coins versus unslabbed ones, it shouldn't take long. The benefits I see are confidence in authentification, stable value and demand in the marketplace, and generally a better quality coin than most raw ones offered. More and more of the better raw examples are disappearing from the marketplace and are being placed in slabs. I don't trust my ability to always tell if a raw coin may have been cleaned and perhaps refused by a grading company. I won't buy an attractive slabbed coin at a price I feel has been inflated to include the slabbing cost. With the exception of a one-time special offer, I don't send coins off to be graded and slabbed. I prefer slabbed coins for my type set and raw coins for my series collections. Just my preference. Authentication can be assured if unslabbed coins are bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation, slabbing is not necessary. Only USA based collectors think that slabbing is often essential, elsewhere it's not necessary and the various MS grades mean nothing outside the USA. Why trust a grading company, who do not buy and sell coins (usually), over a long established dealer who does so every day? You are wise not to restrict yourself to slabbed coins only. There is endless debate over the ranking of the grading companies and a lot of cracking out goes on trying to get a higher grade, there is also discussion as to how the grading "standards" have changed over the years. So as I said above, slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies. Among those who collect and deal with third-party-slabbed coins, there is little debate over ranking of the companies. The fact that there IS a ranking for the grading companies only proves that the slabbing of coins IS a joke. I think you'll find consumer rankings for many products and services where different brands or companies are are involved. Why should slabbing services be any different? Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. If there are rankings for the grading companies due to differences in grading standards then what is the point of slabbing coins? As there is no universally recognised grading standard for slabbing coins the whole process is worthless. A UK dealer is currently attempting to sell slabbed coins here in the UK, I hope it is a miserable failure and that they loose a lot of money as this will deter others from trying to do the same. Why should you care, as long as you will still have a choice between raw and slabbed coins? I don't want the less knowledgeable here in the UK to be suckered in to paying silly money for slabbed coins as has happened in the USA. The "investment" word appears on their home page, this should be a big red flag. Your presumption here is that they are being "suckered". Over the long run, I would say the slabbed high grade coin would generally be a better investment than a comparable raw one. The less informed person often would be better served buying a professionally graded coin if he is determined to buy coins at all. Silly money can just as often be paid for overgraded or problem raw coins. They are been suckered, the attempt may fail, as the market for slabbed UK coins in the UK is virtually non existent. A coin bought from a long time UK dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/ They want £750 for this coin, crown 1898 LXII (on edge) MS64 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms64.htm They want £500 for this one in MS63 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms63.htm Can anyone explain the difference in the appearance that makes one worth £750 and the other £500? And once that has been explained explain why anyone should buy either when a coin with an identical catalogue value, crown 1899 LXII, is on offer from Spink in "a few minor surface marks, very attractively toned with underlying brilliance, as struck" condition for £375? If someone buys the £750 coin, why not ask him? I'm asking you, why should they? £375 is a lot to pay for a bit of plastic, it doubles the cost of the coin for zero benefit. Pretend that you have £750 to spend on coins and that you fancy a Victorian crown like the ones I listed, would you blow it on the slabbed coin at £750 or buy the Spink one at £375 and still have £375 left to spend on other coins? If I thought the price was way out of line, just because of the holder, I might pass, assuming both coins were otherwise identical. If I saw that all similar Victorian crowns in a particular company's slab were routinely traded at this higher price, I might ponder it. If I had been collecting raw crowns, I would likely continue to purchase only raw crowns. Purchasing expensive slabbed coins should not be an impulse thing. I would have to justify to myself that such a purchase would be right for me as a collector. The prices ARE way out of line just because of the holder. The slabbed coins will not be routinely traded at a higher price as I'm fairly sure that UK collectors will not be taken in, but time will tell. I trust Spink's grading more than some slabbing company's as Spink have been doing it for 339 years and I have not noticed any reduction in their grading standards over the past 27 or so years. How do I know this, by comparing the coin pics in old and new editions of their Numismatic Circular. Billy You have your standards and you can be satisfied by sticking to them. Others may feel more comfortable considering a professionally graded coin. Whether you personally like slabs or not should not affect how you choose to collect. Again an unslabbed coin bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. Why are you of the opinion that only a slabbed coin has been "professionally graded"? I think that you have been brainwashed by the grading companies hype. When I snap my fingers you will come out of it, "snap", did it work? Billy Bruce |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
"note.boy" wrote in message ... Again an unslabbed coin bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. Why are you of the opinion that only a slabbed coin has been "professionally graded"? I think that you have been brainwashed by the grading companies hype. When I snap my fingers you will come out of it, "snap", did it work? Billy I bought a Gold quarter eagle from one of the most respected dealers in the USA at a show a couple years ago. I sent it in to PCGS. It came back in a body bag: "Cleaned or Whizzed." He guaranteed authenticity, he didn't guarantee his coins had never been cleaned or whizzed. This left a sour taste in my mouth. At the next show, I showed him the body bag flip and he gave me a dirty look and offered to buy it back for a percentage less than I had paid him for it. I took the money, added some money to it, walked over to another dealer, and bought one already in an NGC slab.. I don't know diddley **** about British Crowns, I don't collect them, but I understand and respect your opinions about Spinks' reputation. This dealer also had a sterling reputation, but it would have always bothered me to keep this coin, knowing that it could never be slabbed, at least not by PCGS or NGC. ANACS would slab it with a net grade. I decided not to go that route.. Harv |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Remick wrote:
Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. Here in Scotland the quaint old expression "sh*t floats" about sums that up. ;-) |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
"note.boy" wrote in message
... Bruce Remick wrote: -- "note.boy" wrote in message ... Bruce Remick wrote: "note.boy" wrote in message ... I live in the UK and I have one slabbed coin in my collection, a UK error coin that I happened to like, so I've not dealt with slabbed coins very much. I still know however that slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies, I would still be of this opinion if I had never bought a single slabbed coin. Are you saying that tens of thousands of knowledgeable collectors and dealers have been hoodwinked now for years? Yes, although I would say "less knowledgeable collectors" and not "knowledgeable collectors". Dealers have not been hoodwinked as they profit massively from the myth that MSwhatever slabbed coins are often worth a fortune compared to slightly lower grade examples, the Emperor has no clothes but no one has said so, yet. The less knowledgeable collector can purchase the same "slab" as the knowledgeable collector with the confidence that it will much more attractive than a raw coin when it comes time to sell. If a dealer can profit, so can a careful collector. As long as there are customers for high-MS slabbed coins there will be sellers offering them. On the other hand, the opportunities are there for those who favor raw coins to obtain bargains, as the better specimens are being slabbed. There's something for everyone. The problem is that not all slabbed coin types with the same grade on the label can be 100% guaranteed to be the same grade, this can be down to the grading company's standing in the league table or the grader may have had an off day, the less knowledgeable collector may not be aware of this and will accept the grade on the label as gospel. Slabbing has introduced an extra unnecessary layer of knowledge that the new collector has to master or risk a financial penalty later when selling. Hey, there are few guarantees in life, except for the one we all don't like to think about. Since there is an active market for high MS grade coins here in the US, the opinion of a reputable third party service has become recognized as a safety net for those who want to play this game. There's no such thing as an unnecessary layer of knowledge when it comes to the fine points of interprreting the grades of high priced, high grade coins. Some confide in the reputable slabbers. Others don't. Neither is wrong. Overgrading can be true of unslabbed coins but the price differential if a slabbed coin has been overgraded is more than for an unslabbed coins. It's foolish to pay mega bucks for a high MS coin when at the end of the day it's just an opinion and the difference in the coin's appearance is minimal. I avoid using the word "raw" as I think that term is derogatory towards unslabbed coins. In your mind, maybe. To most others it's simply a commonly used term. Are you really concerned about the feelings of your coins? You say you don't deal with slabs, yet you claim to "know" the inside information about who benefits from slabbing in the US? I suspect many here in the US would differ with you-- from first hand experience. List the benefits for collectors buying slabbed coins versus unslabbed ones, it shouldn't take long. The benefits I see are confidence in authentification, stable value and demand in the marketplace, and generally a better quality coin than most raw ones offered. More and more of the better raw examples are disappearing from the marketplace and are being placed in slabs. I don't trust my ability to always tell if a raw coin may have been cleaned and perhaps refused by a grading company. I won't buy an attractive slabbed coin at a price I feel has been inflated to include the slabbing cost. With the exception of a one-time special offer, I don't send coins off to be graded and slabbed. I prefer slabbed coins for my type set and raw coins for my series collections. Just my preference. Authentication can be assured if unslabbed coins are bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation, slabbing is not necessary. Only USA based collectors think that slabbing is often essential, elsewhere it's not necessary and the various MS grades mean nothing outside the USA. When you want to sell your unslabbed coin to me, your claim of having bought it from a long time dealer means nothing to me, regardless of who the dealer might be. Prove it. Since you feel the various MS grades mean nothing outside the US, what's your problem then? Sure, some US collectors think that slabbing is often essential. Our slabbed MS coins shouldn't bother you in the UK. Unless you have seen a growing demand for "our" slabbed coins over there. Why trust a grading company, who do not buy and sell coins (usually), over a long established dealer who does so every day? Would you rather trust a grading service that *does* buy and sell coins? There are some large, long-established dealers here in the US, and probably in the UK as well, who do not enjoy a good reputation among knowledgeable collectors. They often rely on novice collectors who will buy their "raw" coins and not question them. You are wise not to restrict yourself to slabbed coins only. There is endless debate over the ranking of the grading companies and a lot of cracking out goes on trying to get a higher grade, there is also discussion as to how the grading "standards" have changed over the years. So as I said above, slabbing benefits only the slabbing companies. Among those who collect and deal with third-party-slabbed coins, there is little debate over ranking of the companies. The fact that there IS a ranking for the grading companies only proves that the slabbing of coins IS a joke. I don't get your reasoning. In the US there are rankings for doctors, lawyers, mid-size autos, you name it. Does this make the medical profession a joke? I think you'll find consumer rankings for many products and services where different brands or companies are are involved. Why should slabbing services be any different? Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. If there are rankings for the grading companies due to differences in grading standards then what is the point of slabbing coins? As there is no universally recognised grading standard for slabbing coins the whole process is worthless. There are rankings for grading companies based on their perceived adherance to the most widely accepted standards of grading here in the US. The fact is that some are considered much more consistent in their interpretations than others. These companies have the highest regard among collectors. Coins slabbed by lesser-rated companies will typically sell for less than the others. If this bothers you, there are many other collecting options and you should maybe avoid US coins altogether. The rest of us seem able to live with things as they are. A UK dealer is currently attempting to sell slabbed coins here in the UK, I hope it is a miserable failure and that they loose a lot of money as this will deter others from trying to do the same. Why should you care, as long as you will still have a choice between raw and slabbed coins? I don't want the less knowledgeable here in the UK to be suckered in to paying silly money for slabbed coins as has happened in the USA. The "investment" word appears on their home page, this should be a big red flag. Your presumption here is that they are being "suckered". Over the long run, I would say the slabbed high grade coin would generally be a better investment than a comparable raw one. The less informed person often would be better served buying a professionally graded coin if he is determined to buy coins at all. Silly money can just as often be paid for overgraded or problem raw coins. They are been suckered, the attempt may fail, as the market for slabbed UK coins in the UK is virtually non existent. A coin bought from a long time UK dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. Again, your concern is curious since you say slabbed coins in the UK are virtually nonexistant. Your coin bought from a long time UK dealer with a high reputation versus my coin slabbed by a top-rated grading service. At least I can prove what I have. You are asking me to believe that your claim should guarantee something to me. Does every UK dealer grade identically? Is every UK dealer who sells coins for a living a professional grader? http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/ They want £750 for this coin, crown 1898 LXII (on edge) MS64 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms64.htm They want £500 for this one in MS63 http://www.certifiedgbcoins.com/Crow...XII%20ms63.htm Can anyone explain the difference in the appearance that makes one worth £750 and the other £500? And once that has been explained explain why anyone should buy either when a coin with an identical catalogue value, crown 1899 LXII, is on offer from Spink in "a few minor surface marks, very attractively toned with underlying brilliance, as struck" condition for £375? If someone buys the £750 coin, why not ask him? I'm asking you, why should they? £375 is a lot to pay for a bit of plastic, it doubles the cost of the coin for zero benefit. Who's to say why people do things? Perhaps there's something about that expensive coin that you missed. If a knowledgeable UK collector buys it, you probably did miss something. Pretend that you have £750 to spend on coins and that you fancy a Victorian crown like the ones I listed, would you blow it on the slabbed coin at £750 or buy the Spink one at £375 and still have £375 left to spend on other coins? If I thought the price was way out of line, just because of the holder, I might pass, assuming both coins were otherwise identical. If I saw that all similar Victorian crowns in a particular company's slab were routinely traded at this higher price, I might ponder it. If I had been collecting raw crowns, I would likely continue to purchase only raw crowns. Purchasing expensive slabbed coins should not be an impulse thing. I would have to justify to myself that such a purchase would be right for me as a collector. The prices ARE way out of line just because of the holder. The slabbed coins will not be routinely traded at a higher price as I'm fairly sure that UK collectors will not be taken in, but time will tell. UK collectors make decisions the same as collectors everywhere else. If they all feel the way you do, the UK will be safe from the US slabber virus for awhile at least. I trust Spink's grading more than some slabbing company's as Spink have been doing it for 339 years and I have not noticed any reduction in their grading standards over the past 27 or so years. How do I know this, by comparing the coin pics in old and new editions of their Numismatic Circular. Billy You have your standards and you can be satisfied by sticking to them. Others may feel more comfortable considering a professionally graded coin. Whether you personally like slabs or not should not affect how you choose to collect. Again an unslabbed coin bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. Why are you of the opinion that only a slabbed coin has been "professionally graded"? I think that you have been brainwashed by the grading companies hype. When I snap my fingers you will come out of it, "snap", did it work? Billy Again, what constitutes a professional? Anyone who sells coins for a living? If you faithfully believe every UK coin shoppe owner's grading, it's you who may be vulnerable to get "suckered in". The reputable professional graders in the US have no financial stake in the coin they're grading and slabbing. Your UK dealer grades his coin and then sells it. Unbiased? This situation isn't unique to the UK. We have the same situation here. That's why some collectors here prefer independently-graded and slabbed coins. And others don't. No big deal. No need for you to feel threatened by our slabbers, unless you are having second thoughts about how a potential buyer might grade that crown you bought twenty years ago from a UK "professional grader". If not, you're safe. Go on collecting. Bruce |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Source? Attribution? Slabs have been a standard part of the hobby for almost
20 years now. Third-party authentication goes back even further to the days when ANACS was owned by the ANA. -- mark I think the evolution of the hobby has been reflected in the transformation of some of the leading figures. For example, Q. David Bowers used to write derogatorily about the need for 3rd party grading. Then he got sucked into a CU stock deal that made him a millionaire (again) many times over. All of a sudden, slabs became a -good- thing, and his writing started to reflect that completely different view. Regards, Tom |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
"Ian" wrote in message ... Bruce Remick wrote: Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. Here in Scotland the quaint old expression "sh*t floats" about sums that up. ;-) Dead bodies float, too. So do most ocean liners, sh*t, and cream. Gold and silver sinks. So do drowning living bodies, and sh*t (eventually). I don't know what any of this means but it doesn't sum up anything for me. Bruce |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Harv wrote: "note.boy" wrote in message ... Again an unslabbed coin bought from a long time dealer with a high reputation HAS been professionally graded. Why are you of the opinion that only a slabbed coin has been "professionally graded"? I think that you have been brainwashed by the grading companies hype. When I snap my fingers you will come out of it, "snap", did it work? Billy I bought a Gold quarter eagle from one of the most respected dealers in the USA at a show a couple years ago. I sent it in to PCGS. It came back in a body bag: "Cleaned or Whizzed." He guaranteed authenticity, he didn't guarantee his coins had never been cleaned or whizzed. How can "one of the most most respected dealers" sell coins but NOT guarantee that they have not been cleaned or whizzed? As we all know the presence of either greatly reduces the value of a coin. Billy This left a sour taste in my mouth. At the next show, I showed him the body bag flip and he gave me a dirty look and offered to buy it back for a percentage less than I had paid him for it. I took the money, added some money to it, walked over to another dealer, and bought one already in an NGC slab.. I don't know diddley **** about British Crowns, I don't collect them, but I understand and respect your opinions about Spinks' reputation. This dealer also had a sterling reputation, but it would have always bothered me to keep this coin, knowing that it could never be slabbed, at least not by PCGS or NGC. ANACS would slab it with a net grade. I decided not to go that route.. Harv |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce Remick wrote:
"Ian" wrote in message ... Bruce Remick wrote: Where there is competition, the cream will rise to the top, as it usually does. Here in Scotland the quaint old expression "sh*t floats" about sums that up. ;-) Dead bodies float, too. So do most ocean liners, sh*t, and cream. Gold and silver sinks. So do drowning living bodies, and sh*t (eventually). I don't know what any of this means but it doesn't sum up anything for me. Bruce Yep. Branding works. All slabbing companies would like you to make their particular brand of slabbing an integral part of your collecting habit. Fortunately (so far) those of us in the UK with a collecting habit are not having our addictions manipulated quite to the same extend as you guys are / have been. There simply hasn't been the same amount of marketing done over here. Then again, there isn't the same kind of money to be made from it to warrant heavy marketing over here either. The more faith you put in the slabbers the more power you give them to determine what `the market' will accept as being a moveable standard for grading and other conditions, thus sanctioning grade drift etcetera.... So while to you these slabbing companies are `the cream' to me they are as i've already described. I guess at the end of the day some collectors treat slabs like money. An idea backed by confidence. If the confidence is there, the slab has a perceived value. If the confidence goes, so does the perception of `value'. All down to `trust'. From what i've seen, `trust' is the last thing I would put on the`plus' side of slabbing, but that's just me. |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
"note.boy" wrote in message ... How can "one of the most most respected dealers" sell coins but NOT guarantee that they have not been cleaned or whizzed? As we all know the presence of either greatly reduces the value of a coin. Billy Billy, over here on this side of the water it happens all the time. And while the value changes with cleaning or whizzing, often the price asked does not. James 'I know, complaining again' |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Older Accugrade Labels? | eXistenZ32 | Coins | 0 | September 4th 04 04:13 PM |
Ira has been served! | Ira Stein | Coins | 53 | May 8th 04 08:48 PM |
Coin World finally reports on the suit | K6AZ | Coins | 47 | May 2nd 04 11:02 AM |
Interesting case | Ned Flanders | Coins | 1 | April 16th 04 10:34 PM |
Talking G. W. Bush and Clinton, Non-Talking Top Gun G. W. Bush in Flight Suit Dolls For Sale | Donna | Dolls | 0 | December 31st 03 05:42 PM |