A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Stamps » General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turkish Constantinople City post - help please



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th 10, 02:15 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Nick Bridgwater[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

I'm having difficulty deciphering my Michel catalogue to understand what
the differences are between the four authentication marks they list.

The catalogue only illustrates 3 of them (type I, Ia, II) while it has a
table that also refers to a type III. It also says that there are more
specialised varieties.

Here's a scan of the images the catalogue shows:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...Citymichel.jpg

This one's quite easy as type Ia according to the image above:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityc.jpg

I think this is type I with a continuous circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityb.jpg

and this is type II with dots around the circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCitya.jpg

Can someone please confirm this is correct, or set me right !

I've got no idea what type III looks like ? Anyone help please !


Regards,
Nick
Ads
  #2  
Old June 29th 10, 02:20 AM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Ryan Davenport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 150
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

I have a 2006/07 Michel SE Europe, and it doesn't have much more
information beyond what you have already mentioned. It says the 4
different types of overprint are "significantly" / "substantially"
different. It's known from the table that Type III exists only in blue
and only on Michel 11, 12 & 13 - the only other overprint type used on
those three issues is Type II (in all 4 different overprint colours), so
at least that narrows down your possibilities for Type III. Must be
blue, must not be Type II, must be on Michel 11, 12 or 13.
I agree with your determination of which types you have on the
three stamps in your collection, for what that's worth.

Ryan

-----

Nick Bridgwater wrote:
I'm having difficulty deciphering my Michel catalogue to understand what
the differences are between the four authentication marks they list.

The catalogue only illustrates 3 of them (type I, Ia, II) while it has a
table that also refers to a type III. It also says that there are more
specialised varieties.

Here's a scan of the images the catalogue shows:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...Citymichel.jpg

This one's quite easy as type Ia according to the image above:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityc.jpg

I think this is type I with a continuous circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityb.jpg

and this is type II with dots around the circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCitya.jpg

Can someone please confirm this is correct, or set me right !

I've got no idea what type III looks like ? Anyone help please !


Regards,
Nick

  #3  
Old June 30th 10, 09:37 AM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Nick Bridgwater[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

I'd also posted on Stampboards (but hadn't got a reply) - now have, see:
http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic...84799&e=784799

Regards,
Nick


Ryan Davenport wrote in
:

I have a 2006/07 Michel SE Europe, and it doesn't have much more
information beyond what you have already mentioned. It says the 4
different types of overprint are "significantly" / "substantially"
different. It's known from the table that Type III exists only in
blue and only on Michel 11, 12 & 13 - the only other overprint type
used on those three issues is Type II (in all 4 different overprint
colours), so at least that narrows down your possibilities for Type
III. Must be blue, must not be Type II, must be on Michel 11, 12 or
13.
I agree with your determination of which types you have on the
three stamps in your collection, for what that's worth.

Ryan

-----

Nick Bridgwater wrote:
I'm having difficulty deciphering my Michel catalogue to understand
what the differences are between the four authentication marks they
list.

The catalogue only illustrates 3 of them (type I, Ia, II) while it
has a table that also refers to a type III. It also says that there
are more specialised varieties.

Here's a scan of the images the catalogue shows:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...Citymichel.jpg

This one's quite easy as type Ia according to the image above:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityc.jpg

I think this is type I with a continuous circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityb.jpg

and this is type II with dots around the circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCitya.jpg

Can someone please confirm this is correct, or set me right !

I've got no idea what type III looks like ? Anyone help please !


Regards,
Nick



  #4  
Old June 30th 10, 07:12 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Blair (TC)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,199
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

On Jun 30, 4:37*am, Nick Bridgwater No@Spam wrote:
I'd also posted on Stampboards (but hadn't got a reply) - now have, see:http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic...84799&e=784799

Regards,
Nick

Ryan Davenport wrote :

* * *I have a 2006/07 Michel SE Europe, and it doesn't have much more
information beyond what you have already mentioned. *It says the 4
different types of overprint are "significantly" / "substantially"
different. *It's known from the table that Type III exists only in
blue and only on Michel 11, 12 & 13 - the only other overprint type
used on those three issues is Type II (in all 4 different overprint
colours), so at least that narrows down your possibilities for Type
III. *Must be blue, must not be Type II, must be on Michel 11, 12 or
13.
* * *I agree with your determination of which types you have on the
three stamps in your collection, for what that's worth.


* * *Ryan


-----


Nick Bridgwater wrote:
I'm having difficulty deciphering my Michel catalogue to understand
what the differences are between the four authentication marks they
list.


The catalogue only illustrates 3 of them (type I, Ia, II) while it
has a table that also refers to a type III. It also says that there
are more specialised varieties.


Here's a scan of the images the catalogue shows:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...Citymichel.jpg


This one's quite easy as type Ia according to the image above:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityc.jpg


I think this is type I with a continuous circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityb.jpg


and this is type II with dots around the circle:
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCitya.jpg


Can someone please confirm this is correct, or set me right !


I've got no idea what type III looks like ? Anyone help please !


Regards,
Nick


Of course, by posting a stamp boards link, you oblige any here to
register there and then login before seeing the answer. wouldn't
it be simpler to copy and paste the reply here, as well?

Blair
  #5  
Old July 1st 10, 09:20 AM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Asia-translation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 726
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

Of course, by posting a stamp boards link, you oblige any here to
register there and then login before seeing the answer. *wouldn't
it be simpler to copy and paste the reply here, as well?

Blair


As far as I know, and I'm open to correction, there isn't any need to
register and login with Stampboards in order to read posts there.

Tony
  #6  
Old July 1st 10, 02:37 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Nick Bridgwater[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

If you're having difficulty with the Stampboards link, try here for the
scans that Jay posted up the

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...antinople1.jpg
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...antinople2.jpg

It appears that Michel confused their illustration from about 2001 to at
least 2006.

Regards,
Nick

"Blair (TC)" wrote in
:

On Jun 30, 4:37*am, Nick Bridgwater No@Spam wrote:
I'd also posted on Stampboards (but hadn't got a reply) - now have,
see:

http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic...84799&e=784799


Of course, by posting a stamp boards link, you oblige any here to
register there and then login before seeing the answer. wouldn't
it be simpler to copy and paste the reply here, as well?

Blair


  #7  
Old July 2nd 10, 09:10 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Jeffry L. Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

On Jul 1, 9:37*am, Nick Bridgwater No@Spam wrote:
If you're having difficulty with the Stampboards link, try here for the
scans that Jay posted up the

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...antinople1.jpg

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...antinople2.jpg

It appears that Michel confused their illustration from about 2001 to at
least 2006.


Michel 1998/99 matches the original as shown in
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...antinople1.jpg .

Michel 2001/2002 has three photos and captions describing the four
types. The photos do not match the captions. Photo above Type I
description is really photo of Type Ia. Photo above Type Ia
description is really photo of Type III. Photo above Type II
description is really photo of Type I. No photo of Type II, which is
the circle made of dots.

Type II
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCitya.jpg

Type Ia
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityb.jpg

Type III
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s...urkeyCityc.jpg
  #8  
Old July 3rd 10, 09:41 AM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Asia-translation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 726
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

On Jul 2, 3:58*am, "Victor Manta" wrote:

When I opened Nick's link, I could read in the center of the page:http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic...84799&e=784799

"Login. You have been notified about this topic, please login to view it."

The language barrier, perhaps? For me eventually but why for Blair too? :-)


Being a Stampboards member, I don't receive the message when I click
on the link.

Perhaps going to stampboards.com and using the Search function to find
the relevant page might help. I do know that there are many lurkers
on Stampboards, who have never registered, yet seem to be able to
access it without difficulty.

Tony

  #9  
Old July 6th 10, 03:25 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Blair (TC)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,199
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

On Jul 3, 4:41*am, Asia-translation
wrote:
On Jul 2, 3:58*am, "Victor Manta" wrote:

When I opened Nick's link, I could read in the center of the page:http://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic...84799&e=784799


"Login. You have been notified about this topic, please login to view it."


The language barrier, perhaps? For me eventually but why for Blair too? :-)


Being a Stampboards member, I don't receive the message when I click
on the link.

Perhaps going to stampboards.com and using the Search function to find
the relevant page might help. *I do know that there are many lurkers
on Stampboards, who have never registered, yet seem to be able to
access it without difficulty.

Tony


I am quite capable of joining Stampboards and other sites.
However, in the last few years I was on too m,any sites and reduced
the number.

The point I was trying to make was one of common courtesy.
If you you ask a question in several fora and get a reply in two or
more,
then I was taught that it was courteous to post the final reply take
the
final (or best) response to the question and repost it to groups where
I
had had at least one reply.

Am I just too old fashioned?

Blair

post
  #10  
Old July 7th 10, 08:59 AM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Asia-translation
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 726
Default Turkish Constantinople City post - help please

On Jul 7, 12:25*am, "Blair (TC)" wrote:

Am I just too old fashioned?

Blair


Not in my opinion!

Tony

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Turkish-Armenian journalist shot dead in Turkey by Turkish Armenian Turk"!!!! KostASS gogu golanule PapafloraTOSS the usenet NAZI from Kalamaria Coins 1 January 20th 07 02:08 AM
"Turkish surprise move confuses EU diplomacy"...""unclear" language of the Turkish proposal"... ® Lame GAYson COPIES Da Hui ™ his MASTER !!! Coins 0 December 8th 06 12:48 AM
Looking Back #86 - (US) City Despatch Post Die on Market Blair (TC) General Discussion 0 September 18th 05 09:45 PM
Oklahoma City Warriors, Buffalo Majors, Chicago Shamrocks, Kansas City Pla-mors and other AHA t-shirts1 Retro Sports Hockey 0 April 26th 05 12:43 AM
Carson City Morgan dollars from the Post Office Harlan Messinger Coins 0 August 30th 03 12:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.