If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
Three anonymous first-time posters to RCC just post pro-PCGS messages.
This follows a fair amount of posts by real posters that shed negative light on PCGS. These posts discussed a judge tossing out PCGS's lawsuit against alleged coin doctors, with the take-home message that it's PCGS's job to spot coin doctoring in the first place, and a coin dealer who committed suicide apparently being the recipient of negative posts on PCGS's boards and PCGS then allegedly removing these posts from its site. Anybody think there's any possibility that these three pro-PCGS anonymous first-time posters aren't the work of PCGS's PR firm or otherwise connected to PCGS? Anybody think that these posts don't make PCGS look even worse? PCGS is the top coin grading firm in the U.S., judging by popularity and prices realized for coins it grades. It can do better than this nonsense. Where's Ira, a real person, to defend PCGS when you need him? -- Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
On 1/1/2011 4:25 PM, Reid Goldsborough wrote:
Three anonymous first-time posters to RCC just post pro-PCGS messages. This follows a fair amount of posts by real posters that shed negative light on PCGS. These posts discussed a judge tossing out PCGS's lawsuit against alleged coin doctors, with the take-home message that it's PCGS's job to spot coin doctoring in the first place, and a coin dealer who committed suicide apparently being the recipient of negative posts on PCGS's boards and PCGS then allegedly removing these posts from its site. Anybody think there's any possibility that these three pro-PCGS anonymous first-time posters aren't the work of PCGS's PR firm or otherwise connected to PCGS? Anybody think that these posts don't make PCGS look even worse? PCGS is the top coin grading firm in the U.S., judging by popularity and prices realized for coins it grades. It can do better than this nonsense. Where's Ira, a real person, to defend PCGS when you need him? For what it's worth, I dumped my CLCT stock - hard - yesterday. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
According to this ad in coin publications, there seems to be a lawsuit
brewing AGAINST PCGS on behalf of coin buyers who feel they were harmed by failure of PCGS to buy back supposedly problem coins. http://www.earlyus.com/coinforum/junk1101.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message
... According to this ad in coin publications, there seems to be a lawsuit brewing AGAINST PCGS on behalf of coin buyers who feel they were harmed by failure of PCGS to buy back supposedly problem coins. http://www.earlyus.com/coinforum/junk1101.jpg Just ambulance chasers. Don't forget that even a new fresh out of law school attorney has to win his first case sometime, not to mention that even the attorney that graduated lowest in his class and just barely passed the bar exam is still called an attorney. I don't think PCGS has anything to worry about. These people are scum. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
Every possible category of mistake, misstep, mechanical error, typo, slight,
customer service gaffe, and blunder that has ever occurred at PCGS has been reported, often ad nauseum and on multiple occasions, on this forum. Over the last nearly 8 years, I cannot remember a single collector complaining that PCGS did not treat him/her fairly on the grade guarantee. If anything, the few that have had issues have been ebullient in their praise for how they were treated. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
By the way, here is a comment from David "Home Run" Hall about this class
action lawsuit. ----- Many of you have seen the ad in Coin World from two lawyers seeking clients for a class action lawsuit regarding the PCGS grading guarantee. Just so you know. The firm, Jackson & Stephenson, is also representing Greg Krill and Tangible Assets in a lawsuit regarding some coins we are holding that we think are part of the doctoring lawsuit. Tangible Investments is a company owned or somehow associated with Silvano DiGenova, I'm not usre of the exact relationship. Jackson & Stephenson are also listed as an associate firm (or something like that) in the major coin doctoring lawsuit. And Greg Krill and Silvano DiGenova are defendants in the coin doctoring lawsuit. Mark Stephenson did undergraduate work at UCLA and got his law degree from South Western law school. Dorian Jackson did his undergraduate at UCLA and got his law degree from Loyola. They both were admitted to the California Bar in June, 2010. homerunhall |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
I agree. We all know that PCGS has nothing to hide.
"RYK" wrote in message ... Every possible category of mistake, misstep, mechanical error, typo, slight, customer service gaffe, and blunder that has ever occurred at PCGS has been reported, often ad nauseum and on multiple occasions, on this forum. Over the last nearly 8 years, I cannot remember a single collector complaining that PCGS did not treat him/her fairly on the grade guarantee. If anything, the few that have had issues have been ebullient in their praise for how they were treated. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
On 1/1/2011 8:44 PM, Frank Provasek wrote:
According to this ad in coin publications, there seems to be a lawsuit brewing AGAINST PCGS on behalf of coin buyers who feel they were harmed by failure of PCGS to buy back supposedly problem coins. http://www.earlyus.com/coinforum/junk1101.jpg What do you think? Are these three just-arrived anonymous posters who are posting pro-PCGS spin, or maybe one poster with three email addresses, a part of a PR firm retained by PCGS? Or are they PCGS employees? If a PR firm, PCGS should fire the firm. PCGS isn't being represented professionally. If they're part of PCGS and they're doing this on their own, they should be reprimanded. If this is an official in-house PCGS effort, shame. I don't see it as the work of three coin collectors who just happen to like PCGS, which is the pretense. In any case, it's not working, and it can't possibly work the way it's being carried out. -- Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
On 1/1/2011 8:17 PM, Reid Goldsborough wrote:
On 1/1/2011 8:44 PM, Frank Provasek wrote: According to this ad in coin publications, there seems to be a lawsuit brewing AGAINST PCGS on behalf of coin buyers who feel they were harmed by failure of PCGS to buy back supposedly problem coins. http://www.earlyus.com/coinforum/junk1101.jpg What do you think? Are these three just-arrived anonymous posters who are posting pro-PCGS spin, or maybe one poster with three email addresses, a part of a PR firm retained by PCGS? Or are they PCGS employees? If a PR firm, PCGS should fire the firm. PCGS isn't being represented professionally. If they're part of PCGS and they're doing this on their own, they should be reprimanded. If this is an official in-house PCGS effort, shame. I don't see it as the work of three coin collectors who just happen to like PCGS, which is the pretense. In any case, it's not working, and it can't possibly work the way it's being carried out. It's my feeling that they just happen to be three non-PCGS posters. I might be wrong, but I doubt PCGS would do something that bite-yourself-in-the-assish. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pro-PCGS posts
In , on 01/01/2011
at 11:17 PM, Reid Goldsborough said: What do you think? Are these three just-arrived anonymous posters who are posting pro-PCGS spin, or maybe one poster with three email addresses, a part of a PR firm retained by PCGS? Or are they PCGS employees? All three new posters are posting from the same news server, with the same NNTP posting host headers using identical versions of Outlook. And all with the same unnatural super-positive attitude. Personally, I don't care much about the topic, but this seems like a one-person mission to me. Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: Zoc24BAheab7StuiH2wMVw.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 Nick |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bob Casey Jr.- Pa. Roman Catholic- conservative- pro gun- pro life- AWESOME ! | wannabee motorhead from Lancaster-BWAHAHAHAHAHA !! | 8 Track Tapes | 4 | November 9th 06 03:41 PM |
FS: Two toned Morgans _ PCGS MS65 1882, PCGS MS64 1885-CC | K6AZ | Coins | 0 | March 7th 05 03:19 AM |
FS: FS: Phree NGC Morgan - 1880/79-CC PCGS Morgan - 1895 PCGS Morgan - 1885-CC PCGS Morgan - 05 Gold | BestCoin.Com | Coins | 0 | January 17th 05 07:27 PM |
ED JACKSON 7 POSTS CARDSHOP 6 POSTS --NEW RULES????? | Don B | Baseball | 0 | April 30th 04 11:25 PM |
" PCGS posts a population of only one in ALL grades combined."...OOPS... | tomkatf | Coins | 1 | September 5th 03 05:19 PM |