PROOF; RUMSFELD PENTAGON WAS INVOLVED IN ATTACK UPON PENTAGON!!

Duck! The black helicopters and spaceships are coming! Where is Art Bell
when we need him??

--
SikOfLibs


"Dick Eastman" wrote in message
...
THE PROOF THAT THE RUMSFELD PENTAGON WAS INVOLVED IN THE FRAME-
UP ATTACK UPON THE PENTAGON, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

by Dick Eastman

Let me simply list each independent of proof, each establishing
on its own the conclusion that the official story of the attack
is a lie, that the attack on the Pentagon made (unsuccessfully)
to appear to be the crash of highjacked Flight 77 filled with
passengers, crew and terrorists.

1. the damaged wall of the Pentagon (photographed before the
collapse of the wall) shows still standing interior wall to the
left of the point where hit the nose of the killer jet,
indicating that the killer jet had no starboard engine.

2. there is but one straight line from the lamp posts to the
trailer containing a generator through the hole in the outer
wall made by the attacker fuselage at "pillar 14" (as identified
by civil engineers) to the last hole made in the "C-ring from
which emerged on solitary in-the-fuselage engine -- indicating a
single engine jet and not a two wing-engine airliner

3. the only released security video pictures (the recordings of
other security cameras, one from a hotel and one from a gas
station and perhaps others) shows the tail fin of the killer
jet, but without the long fuselage of the Boeing 757 that should
be seen projecting out to the left of the obstruction in the
foreground from which the tail fin is seen sticking up in the
rear. The Boeing 757 is long enough to accommodate seven of its
tail fins along its back, Stegosaurus-style, yet this
obstruction (a parking pass dispenser) only blocks view of the
plane that is five-lengths of the tail fin that is showing
behind it -- thus the photo of the plane proves that the plane
was not proportioned like a Boeing 757, that its fuselage is at
least 2/7ths too short with respect to the size of the tail fin
showing.

4. that this same picture from the security camera shows a thick
white smoke trail trailing behind the tail fin -- a trail that
is thick and creamy and white -- exactly like photos of air-to-
ground missiles that I show in my evidence archive, and exactly
not like the wispy condensation "contrail" that occasionally
comes off the wingtip of Boeing 757 (photos of which I also
show in my evidence archives) clearly a missile is being fired
by the attacking killer jet ahead of its own crash -- and it is
this missile that brings down a length of the outer wall on the
first floor (we see that pillar 15 is blasted away so that the
only steal rods and a few chunks of the original concrete are
remaining, but that the steel rods were not pushed away by the
wings of the plane -- the wings hitting above most of this
blasted away pillar on the first floor -- clearly a missile for
this reason and for the reason that follows.

5. We see a white-hot explosion rising 200 feet in the air.
This blast of released energy is the chemical explosion of a
missile warhead. Only high-explosives can make this kind of
blinding flash. (And yes, some Pentagon witnesses heard a
missile, others smelled cordite, rather than burning flesh,
after the explosion.) This blast is consistent with an ATG
missile, not with aluminum, plastic and flesh etc. hitting
concrete, wood, glass and walling. The blast seems to have
occurred before the wall was reached, so that the shockwave
brought down a length of outside first-floor-level wall, rather
than piercing the wall and exploding everything outward. At any
rate, the explosion could only have come from a missle and is
perfectly consistent with the missile smoke trail seen in the
first picture. Some witnesses reported the flash.

6. The witnesses saw the Boeing 757 come over the Sheraton
Hotel, over the Naval Annex, over the gas station (and actually
to the north of Sgt. William Lagasse who was pumping gas
there!!!, who saw its starboard (right) side as it passed him
going from west to east into the west wall. Steve Riskus, who
was also north of the crash saw the Boeing pass in front of him
(he says only 100 feet away, but that can't be taken literally
or else the plane would have come from over the cemetery and not
over the Annex (although a cemetery worker, who was cutting
grass there, did say that the AA airliner came over his head --
which would put it even further north!) and, Riskus wrote to me,
appeared to go "straight in." Even the Army newspaper the next
day, and the major media, had artist representations and
computer graphics based on witness accounts showing the Boeing
going "straight in" (i.e. at near 90 degrees, perpendicular to
the wall) -- BUT THIS PATH OVER HOTEL, ANNEX, LAGASSE ETC. IS
NORTH OF THE FROM-THE-SOUTHWEST PATH OF THE KILLER JET AS
INDICATED BY THE PHYSICAL DAMAGE EVIDENCE -- THE DOWNED LAMP
POSTS (THEIR BOLTS SNAPPED BY THE HURRICANE FORCE OF THE OFF-
WING CYCLONE OF A JET IN LOW THICK ATMOSPHERE TRAVELING AT MORE
THAN 500 MPH. The killer jet hit the wall, as determined by the
entry and exit holes, at approximately a 55-degree angle
(definitely between 50 and 60 degrees of angle). This means
that the killer jet came to the wall from behind Lagasse as he
was watching the Boeing, hitting the poles to his right (west)
and behind him (south) as he watched Flight 77 fly past
overhead and slightly north of him. (Lagasse dived into his car -
- blown into his car by the off-wing from the Boeing he told one
of the networks in an interview) -- Lagasse did not see the
Boeing hit the poles and neither did ANY of the other
witnesses!!!!!

7. The famous (cover of Time) picture of a piece of 757
aluminum skin with a fragment of the "American" lettering of an
AA airliner sitting on the lawn to the north of the crash has
been proven to be a fake. Mark Faram has written to me that he
took the first picture of this piece 15 minutes after the crash
(he had to come down from the Annex area to get to the crash
site.) But almost immediately there FBI was combing the grass
for pieces of aircraft debris pieces -- such presence of mind
given that the entire defense system wasn't otherwise
functioning very well that day -- but where all of the agents
picking up, or did some put down the obvious false evidence
piece? Why false ev idence? Because the piece of genuine 757
skin with the genuine AA letter fragment could only have come
from the starboard side (right side) of the plane. But the
killer jet came from the southwest and the starboard side of the
killer jet faced south not north!!!! (The piece is from the
letter "n" on the starboard side, as we know because of the
length of blank aluminum to the right of the letter fragment
(i.e., no letter follows it), because of the shape of the letter
fragment, because of the two vertical lines of rivets that are
seen to the right of the letter. The piece could only come from
the starboard side, because on the port side there is a door
that follows immediately after the letter "n" of American and no
stretch of blank aluminum and no rivets -- it could not come
from the port side. Thus the operative who planted the false
evidence on the lawn in the early confusion when agents were all
over the lawn, put the grass way out of the way ON THE WRONG
SIDE of the path of the actual (non-Boeing 757) killer jet.

8. The outside debris is mostly shards or "confetti" --
consistent with the casing of a missile blown to smithereens and
not the various sizes that would obtain from an airliner
crashing into a sturdy building. There are a few pieces of
crumpled aluminum -- one photographed near an ambulance -- but
it could have come from any type of plane or it could have be
carried there or dropped there by the C-130 that flew over the
sight just 30 seconds after the crash, right through the smoke
of the crash (it had been following the Boeing -- and in fact
followed it right over the Pentagon).

9. No aircraft was seen inside the hole before the collapse of
the building over the hole 20 minutes after the crash. And no
one reports seats or luggage -- except one pilots seat -- that
no one bothered to photograph! Two days after the crash FEMA
photographed an aircraft wheel strut, but the strut has but one
axle (like a jet fighter or a global hawk missile) -- not like
the Boeing 757 which as a strut with two axles in the front and
two rear landing gear assembly of four wheels each. Also there
was an engine fan that did not come from a Rolls Royce engine
(which is used exclusively on the 757-200 series that included
AA Flight 77 -- according to a spokesman from Rolls Royce when
interviewed by journalist Christopher Bollyn. Photos have been
shown of wreckage pulled out of the Pentagon and there was
nothing in any of the photos that indicated an airliner --
except a wheel in the parking lot (dropped by the C-130?) and,
most improbable of all, the radome (flimsy plastic nose) of a
Boeing 757 (reported but never photographed) -- the thing one
would most expect to have been smashed and burned up as it would
receive the full energy of the fuselage hitting all walls and
pillars (and it is said to have been seen inside the building,
not bounced off onto the grass!) And note how the wheel and the
radome are portable. Note how the radome was seen, but that no
one photographed it. The wheel may have been planted or it may
have been packed as cargo in the killer jet -- but more likely
the killer was packed with incendiary to ensure its total
destruction beyond all recognition.

10. The first reports on Washington D.C. radio spoke of a crash
of an airliner on the 14th street bridge. And the first call
for fire trucks was to a crash on the northern end of Reagan
National Airport. This indicates that an airliner was seen east
of the Pentagon, over the 14th street bridge and over Reagan
National. But all the Boeing would have to do after it overflew
the Pentagon hidden from most witnesses who saw its approach by
first the flash and then the rising mass rising smoke and flame
was to put down its wheels, bank to the right (while over the
14th street bridge, and then land at Reagan National which has a
runway that ends only one mile southeast of the crash point --
in three seconds the Boeing would be closer to the airport than
to the Pentagon, it could blend into Reagan traffic (and of
course Reagan Airport, one mile from the Pentagon would be full
of DoD and CIA operatives under Rumsfeld and Tenet etc. anyway)
where the plane could land and taxi to a hanger and be broken
down for parts, or given new numbers and a paint job while the
airport was shut down and evidence cleaned up -- Reagan
National was the last airport to open, yet it already had the
most security of any non-military airport in the US. But most
interesting is that, according to multiple mainstream media, 97
foreigners were holding ILLEGAL top secret clearances at both
Dulles (where Flight 77 took off) and Reagan National (where it
most likely landed) -- and these persons were all deported to
their home countries (UK?, Israel? -- never disclosed --
certainly not to Guantanamo, Cuba) with no charges brought
against them, by order of John Ashcroft.


All of this -- every part of the above argument, is
substantiated by the relevant photos, witness testimony, new
releases etc. in my archive.

I have proven the case that the DoD and the White House must
have been in on the 9-11 mass-murder frame-up because the
complex operation (the precision missile and killer jet, rather
than an airliner, was used for two reasons -- there was a
specific target on the first floor in that wing that was
targeted for death -- the office of Naval Intelligence (not part
of the Rumsfeld neo-cons) and because Donald Rumsfeld was
planned to be in the building at the time (on the other side) so
that he could escape all suspicion by being in the building that
was crashbombed etc. Interestingly he was in a meeting
uninformed of the highjackings and the plane headed toward
Washington DC -- and when the crash took place, he did not rush
to the information room to see what had happened and to find out
what other targets might be in danger, but rather he went
outside (ostensibly to help take care of the wounded, but more
likely to see if the crash deception had been pulled off
smoothly -- and obviously it hadn't -- because people were
photographing the too-small hole (the evidence mentioned above)
-- so shortly after the crash everyone was ordered away from
the crash "because of word that another airliner was on the
way!!!!!!) -- and during this evacuation the wall -- which
withstood the initial explosion (which should have pushed the
building "in") suddenly collapses over the hole, ending the
photo op of the too-small hole. Then Rumsfeld joined the
situation room to see if the Sears Tower or the Columbia Center
were under attack or not.

I've told people about the Pentagon attack. You are telling
people about what George W. Bush really is.

There are many people who will go public and fight for the
truth and for humanity. I correspond with a few of them,
including

John Kaminski
Christopher Bollyn
Tom Flocco
Gerard Holmgren
Nico Haupt

The details given are most unlikely. If the authors have all that
"evidence", why is there no URL to the site where everybody can see it and
draw their own conclusions? Anyway, what has all this to do with stamps?

Tony

"SikOfLibs" wrote in message
...
Duck! The black helicopters and spaceships are coming! Where is Art Bell
when we need him??

--
SikOfLibs


"Dick Eastman" wrote in message
...
THE PROOF THAT THE RUMSFELD PENTAGON WAS INVOLVED IN THE FRAME-
UP ATTACK UPON THE PENTAGON, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

by Dick Eastman

Let me simply list each independent of proof, each establishing
on its own the conclusion that the official story of the attack
is a lie, that the attack on the Pentagon made (unsuccessfully)
to appear to be the crash of highjacked Flight 77 filled with
passengers, crew and terrorists.

1. the damaged wall of the Pentagon (photographed before the
collapse of the wall) shows still standing interior wall to the
left of the point where hit the nose of the killer jet,
indicating that the killer jet had no starboard engine.

2. there is but one straight line from the lamp posts to the
trailer containing a generator through the hole in the outer
wall made by the attacker fuselage at "pillar 14" (as identified
by civil engineers) to the last hole made in the "C-ring from
which emerged on solitary in-the-fuselage engine -- indicating a
single engine jet and not a two wing-engine airliner

3. the only released security video pictures (the recordings of
other security cameras, one from a hotel and one from a gas
station and perhaps others) shows the tail fin of the killer
jet, but without the long fuselage of the Boeing 757 that should
be seen projecting out to the left of the obstruction in the
foreground from which the tail fin is seen sticking up in the
rear. The Boeing 757 is long enough to accommodate seven of its
tail fins along its back, Stegosaurus-style, yet this
obstruction (a parking pass dispenser) only blocks view of the
plane that is five-lengths of the tail fin that is showing
behind it -- thus the photo of the plane proves that the plane
was not proportioned like a Boeing 757, that its fuselage is at
least 2/7ths too short with respect to the size of the tail fin
showing.

4. that this same picture from the security camera shows a thick
white smoke trail trailing behind the tail fin -- a trail that
is thick and creamy and white -- exactly like photos of air-to-
ground missiles that I show in my evidence archive, and exactly
not like the wispy condensation "contrail" that occasionally
comes off the wingtip of Boeing 757 (photos of which I also
show in my evidence archives) clearly a missile is being fired
by the attacking killer jet ahead of its own crash -- and it is
this missile that brings down a length of the outer wall on the
first floor (we see that pillar 15 is blasted away so that the
only steal rods and a few chunks of the original concrete are
remaining, but that the steel rods were not pushed away by the
wings of the plane -- the wings hitting above most of this
blasted away pillar on the first floor -- clearly a missile for
this reason and for the reason that follows.

5. We see a white-hot explosion rising 200 feet in the air.
This blast of released energy is the chemical explosion of a
missile warhead. Only high-explosives can make this kind of
blinding flash. (And yes, some Pentagon witnesses heard a
missile, others smelled cordite, rather than burning flesh,
after the explosion.) This blast is consistent with an ATG
missile, not with aluminum, plastic and flesh etc. hitting
concrete, wood, glass and walling. The blast seems to have
occurred before the wall was reached, so that the shockwave
brought down a length of outside first-floor-level wall, rather
than piercing the wall and exploding everything outward. At any
rate, the explosion could only have come from a missle and is
perfectly consistent with the missile smoke trail seen in the
first picture. Some witnesses reported the flash.

6. The witnesses saw the Boeing 757 come over the Sheraton
Hotel, over the Naval Annex, over the gas station (and actually
to the north of Sgt. William Lagasse who was pumping gas
there!!!, who saw its starboard (right) side as it passed him
going from west to east into the west wall. Steve Riskus, who
was also north of the crash saw the Boeing pass in front of him
(he says only 100 feet away, but that can't be taken literally
or else the plane would have come from over the cemetery and not
over the Annex (although a cemetery worker, who was cutting
grass there, did say that the AA airliner came over his head --
which would put it even further north!) and, Riskus wrote to me,
appeared to go "straight in." Even the Army newspaper the next
day, and the major media, had artist representations and
computer graphics based on witness accounts showing the Boeing
going "straight in" (i.e. at near 90 degrees, perpendicular to
the wall) -- BUT THIS PATH OVER HOTEL, ANNEX, LAGASSE ETC. IS
NORTH OF THE FROM-THE-SOUTHWEST PATH OF THE KILLER JET AS
INDICATED BY THE PHYSICAL DAMAGE EVIDENCE -- THE DOWNED LAMP
POSTS (THEIR BOLTS SNAPPED BY THE HURRICANE FORCE OF THE OFF-
WING CYCLONE OF A JET IN LOW THICK ATMOSPHERE TRAVELING AT MORE
THAN 500 MPH. The killer jet hit the wall, as determined by the
entry and exit holes, at approximately a 55-degree angle
(definitely between 50 and 60 degrees of angle). This means
that the killer jet came to the wall from behind Lagasse as he
was watching the Boeing, hitting the poles to his right (west)
and behind him (south) as he watched Flight 77 fly past
overhead and slightly north of him. (Lagasse dived into his car -
- blown into his car by the off-wing from the Boeing he told one
of the networks in an interview) -- Lagasse did not see the
Boeing hit the poles and neither did ANY of the other
witnesses!!!!!

7. The famous (cover of Time) picture of a piece of 757
aluminum skin with a fragment of the "American" lettering of an
AA airliner sitting on the lawn to the north of the crash has
been proven to be a fake. Mark Faram has written to me that he
took the first picture of this piece 15 minutes after the crash
(he had to come down from the Annex area to get to the crash
site.) But almost immediately there FBI was combing the grass
for pieces of aircraft debris pieces -- such presence of mind
given that the entire defense system wasn't otherwise
functioning very well that day -- but where all of the agents
picking up, or did some put down the obvious false evidence
piece? Why false ev idence? Because the piece of genuine 757
skin with the genuine AA letter fragment could only have come
from the starboard side (right side) of the plane. But the
killer jet came from the southwest and the starboard side of the
killer jet faced south not north!!!! (The piece is from the
letter "n" on the starboard side, as we know because of the
length of blank aluminum to the right of the letter fragment
(i.e., no letter follows it), because of the shape of the letter
fragment, because of the two vertical lines of rivets that are
seen to the right of the letter. The piece could only come from
the starboard side, because on the port side there is a door
that follows immediately after the letter "n" of American and no
stretch of blank aluminum and no rivets -- it could not come
from the port side. Thus the operative who planted the false
evidence on the lawn in the early confusion when agents were all
over the lawn, put the grass way out of the way ON THE WRONG
SIDE of the path of the actual (non-Boeing 757) killer jet.

8. The outside debris is mostly shards or "confetti" --
consistent with the casing of a missile blown to smithereens and
not the various sizes that would obtain from an airliner
crashing into a sturdy building. There are a few pieces of
crumpled aluminum -- one photographed near an ambulance -- but
it could have come from any type of plane or it could have be
carried there or dropped there by the C-130 that flew over the
sight just 30 seconds after the crash, right through the smoke
of the crash (it had been following the Boeing -- and in fact
followed it right over the Pentagon).

9. No aircraft was seen inside the hole before the collapse of
the building over the hole 20 minutes after the crash. And no
one reports seats or luggage -- except one pilots seat -- that
no one bothered to photograph! Two days after the crash FEMA
photographed an aircraft wheel strut, but the strut has but one
axle (like a jet fighter or a global hawk missile) -- not like
the Boeing 757 which as a strut with two axles in the front and
two rear landing gear assembly of four wheels each. Also there
was an engine fan that did not come from a Rolls Royce engine
(which is used exclusively on the 757-200 series that included
AA Flight 77 -- according to a spokesman from Rolls Royce when
interviewed by journalist Christopher Bollyn. Photos have been
shown of wreckage pulled out of the Pentagon and there was
nothing in any of the photos that indicated an airliner --
except a wheel in the parking lot (dropped by the C-130?) and,
most improbable of all, the radome (flimsy plastic nose) of a
Boeing 757 (reported but never photographed) -- the thing one
would most expect to have been smashed and burned up as it would
receive the full energy of the fuselage hitting all walls and
pillars (and it is said to have been seen inside the building,
not bounced off onto the grass!) And note how the wheel and the
radome are portable. Note how the radome was seen, but that no
one photographed it. The wheel may have been planted or it may
have been packed as cargo in the killer jet -- but more likely
the killer was packed with incendiary to ensure its total
destruction beyond all recognition.

10. The first reports on Washington D.C. radio spoke of a crash
of an airliner on the 14th street bridge. And the first call
for fire trucks was to a crash on the northern end of Reagan
National Airport. This indicates that an airliner was seen east
of the Pentagon, over the 14th street bridge and over Reagan
National. But all the Boeing would have to do after it overflew
the Pentagon hidden from most witnesses who saw its approach by
first the flash and then the rising mass rising smoke and flame
was to put down its wheels, bank to the right (while over the
14th street bridge, and then land at Reagan National which has a
runway that ends only one mile southeast of the crash point --
in three seconds the Boeing would be closer to the airport than
to the Pentagon, it could blend into Reagan traffic (and of
course Reagan Airport, one mile from the Pentagon would be full
of DoD and CIA operatives under Rumsfeld and Tenet etc. anyway)
where the plane could land and taxi to a hanger and be broken
down for parts, or given new numbers and a paint job while the
airport was shut down and evidence cleaned up -- Reagan
National was the last airport to open, yet it already had the
most security of any non-military airport in the US. But most
interesting is that, according to multiple mainstream media, 97
foreigners were holding ILLEGAL top secret clearances at both
Dulles (where Flight 77 took off) and Reagan National (where it
most likely landed) -- and these persons were all deported to
their home countries (UK?, Israel? -- never disclosed --
certainly not to Guantanamo, Cuba) with no charges brought
against them, by order of John Ashcroft.


All of this -- every part of the above argument, is
substantiated by the relevant photos, witness testimony, new
releases etc. in my archive.

I have proven the case that the DoD and the White House must
have been in on the 9-11 mass-murder frame-up because the
complex operation (the precision missile and killer jet, rather
than an airliner, was used for two reasons -- there was a
specific target on the first floor in that wing that was
targeted for death -- the office of Naval Intelligence (not part
of the Rumsfeld neo-cons) and because Donald Rumsfeld was
planned to be in the building at the time (on the other side) so
that he could escape all suspicion by being in the building that
was crashbombed etc. Interestingly he was in a meeting
uninformed of the highjackings and the plane headed toward
Washington DC -- and when the crash took place, he did not rush
to the information room to see what had happened and to find out
what other targets might be in danger, but rather he went
outside (ostensibly to help take care of the wounded, but more
likely to see if the crash deception had been pulled off
smoothly -- and obviously it hadn't -- because people were
photographing the too-small hole (the evidence mentioned above)
-- so shortly after the crash everyone was ordered away from
the crash "because of word that another airliner was on the
way!!!!!!) -- and during this evacuation the wall -- which
withstood the initial explosion (which should have pushed the
building "in") suddenly collapses over the hole, ending the
photo op of the too-small hole. Then Rumsfeld joined the
situation room to see if the Sears Tower or the Columbia Center
were under attack or not.

I've told people about the Pentagon attack. You are telling
people about what George W. Bush really is.

There are many people who will go public and fight for the
truth and for humanity. I correspond with a few of them,
including

John Kaminski
Christopher Bollyn
Tom Flocco
Gerard Holmgren
Nico Haupt

A.E. Gelat wrote:

The details given are most unlikely. If the authors have all that
"evidence", why is there no URL to the site where everybody can see it and
draw their own conclusions? Anyway, what has all this to do with stamps?

Tony

giant snip

You're feeding the trolls again.

--

Kaleb S. KEITHLEY

It is just too bad that genius like this wastes itself on Pentagon's leaping
into the air to snag passing aircraft instead of devoting itself to
answering where Vince Foster got whacked.

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:31:49 GMT, "Docky Wocky"
wrote:

It is just too bad that genius like this wastes itself on Pentagon's leaping
into the air to snag passing aircraft instead of devoting itself to
answering where Vince Foster got whacked.

Look at the photos of the Pentagon just after the incident. Show me
the 757 wreckage. Where are the engines? Where are the wings? They're
not there! You can clearly see the first floor of the Pentagon
building where it was damaged by something. But no plane wreckage
there. Explain that, please.