If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stamp Paper ~ was photo-Litho.
This piece does not explain how to differentiate between issues of common heritage, but explains the paper makeup pertinent to each printing method, which may, or may not assist in ID of that particular printing method. It has been edited for Australian use, but includes English particulars as well, however how much use for Indian printings I could not hazard a guess. For those who like a little depth to their hobby (Rein comes to mind Any blatant typos please complain to my OCR programmer. Acknowledgement : "The Bookmark Journal" edited, and as explained by Mr. Bernie Doherty "Australian Stamp News" April 1989 Stamp Paper I have received a copy of an article on British stamp papers from Richard Walls of Victoria. Whilst some of the detailed information on papers used for particular classes of mail is not relevant to the Australian scene, other details are relevant and I feel of interest. The following is a summary of the pertinent details from the article in "The Bookmark" Journal March 1988 edition. "Paper prepared for printing by photogravure must, have different qualities from paper intended for lithographic printing. Paper for photogravure printing needs to be relatively absorbent because of the high ; speeds employed in the printing, and tne spirit based inks used in the process. Papers used in both processes are coated, chalk being used for photogravure printing. The coating provides a smoother surface than uncoated papers for printing fine screen halftones with greater fidelity. Lithographic printing has to take into account the antipathy of oil and water, the basis for this method. Inks, including phosphor inks, used in lithographic printing are oil based. The coating used on the paper for lithographic printing is clay. To date, four different paper manufacturers have made paper for British stamps. The first three of these are known to have supplied paper for Australian stamps. They a Harrison and Sons Ltd (HS); Henry and Leigh Slater Ltd (HLS); Coated Papers Ltd (CPL); Inveresk Paper Co Ltd (INV). : With the British stamp paper, a phosphorised coating is incorporated. This . differs to the material used for Australian , paper. With the British stamp paper produced by Harrisons, the terms B4 and ACP indicate the different methods of incorporating phosphor into the coating, rather than a difference between photogravure and lithographic papers. The term B4 applies to phosphorised paper, where the phosphor resin was cured on the web. The term ACP is used to indicate a different method of curing the phosphor resin. The ACP papers are more sensitive to long wave ultra violet light than the B4 coatings. As a result, they would have interfered with the blue (B2) phosphor used by the British Post Office for address coding on envelopes. To counteract this, an additional amount of fluorescent brightener is added during manufacture. This "soaks up" the unwanted long wave response. Under normal conditions, and long wave irradiation (UV lamp), ACP fluoresces better than the B4 paper. Some Optical Brightening Agent was added to the paper from 1971, to make what collectors call Fluorescent Coated Paper. (Perhaps some of these papers have been used over the last two years on Australian stamps.) In regard to gum, Harrisons has used three types: Gum Arabic a natural exudate, Polyvi-nyl Alcohol and Polyvinyl Alcohol with Dextrine added, both synthetic. Polyvinyl Alcohol was first seen on British stamps at the beginning of 1968, its introduction being caused by a worldwide shortage of Gum Arabic (although Harrisons only needed 30 tons per year). Australian paper manufacturers had similar problems at that time with Gum Arabic. In its pure state, Polyvinyl Alcohol is practically colourless, leading to early complaints that the stamps were not gummed at all. In consequence, a small amount of yellowish-brown dye was soon added to Harrison's Polyvinyl Alcohol. The Polyvinyl Alcohol used by other manufacturers is pure white, ie no dye is added. When Polyvinyl Alcohol with Dextrine was introduced, a small amount of blue-green dye was added. (If you roll a sheet of stamps into a tube, gummed side inwards, and look through it at a piece of white paper, the colour is easily seen.) One sometimes reads about gums fluorescing to varying degrees. This is extremely doubtful, since none of the gums have fluorescent substances. It is more likely that it is the base paper under the gum which varies. Also the dyes used to tint the synthetic gums absorb UV to some degree, coupled with the amount of dye used from batch to batch, may cause apparent variations in the fluorescence of the paper. To conclude this note on papers, just a word or two about thickness. Several factors can contribute to the perceived thickness of a finished stamp, and many of them are variable. Among them a the type of coating and how it is applied. Coatings consist of pigment in suitable adhesive binders. They are applied by rolls, brushes, air knives, or by trailing blades. Blade coatings have become very popular as they are smoother, and it is possible to apply lower weight coats which are necessary in some applications. The ink and depth of etching in photogravure. And even the amount of moisture in the paper. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Stamp Paper ~ was photo-Litho.
"Rod" wrote in message ... This piece does not explain how to differentiate between issues of common heritage, but explains the paper makeup pertinent to each printing method, which may, or may not assist in ID of that particular printing method. It has been edited for Australian use, but includes English particulars as well, however how much use for Indian printings I could not hazard a guess. For those who like a little depth to their hobby (Rein comes to mind Any blatant typos please complain to my OCR programmer. Acknowledgement : "The Bookmark Journal" edited, and as explained by Mr. Bernie Doherty "Australian Stamp News" April 1989 Stamp Paper I have received a copy of an article on British stamp papers from Richard Walls of Victoria. Whilst some of the detailed information on papers used for particular classes of mail is not relevant to the Australian scene, other details are relevant and I feel of interest. The following is a summary of the pertinent details from the article in "The Bookmark" Journal March 1988 edition. "Paper prepared for printing by photogravure must, have different qualities from paper intended for lithographic printing. Paper for photogravure printing needs to be relatively absorbent because of the high ; speeds employed in the printing, and tne spirit based inks used in the process. Papers used in both processes are coated, chalk being used for photogravure printing. The coating provides a smoother surface than uncoated papers for printing fine screen halftones with greater fidelity. Lithographic printing has to take into account the antipathy of oil and water, the basis for this method. Inks, including phosphor inks, used in lithographic printing are oil based. The coating used on the paper for lithographic printing is clay. To date, four different paper manufacturers have made paper for British stamps. The first three of these are known to have supplied paper for Australian stamps. They a Harrison and Sons Ltd (HS); Henry and Leigh Slater Ltd (HLS); Coated Papers Ltd (CPL); Inveresk Paper Co Ltd (INV). : With the British stamp paper, a phosphorised coating is incorporated. This . differs to the material used for Australian , paper. With the British stamp paper produced by Harrisons, the terms B4 and ACP indicate the different methods of incorporating phosphor into the coating, rather than a difference between photogravure and lithographic papers. The term B4 applies to phosphorised paper, where the phosphor resin was cured on the web. The term ACP is used to indicate a different method of curing the phosphor resin. The ACP papers are more sensitive to long wave ultra violet light than the B4 coatings. As a result, they would have interfered with the blue (B2) phosphor used by the British Post Office for address coding on envelopes. To counteract this, an additional amount of fluorescent brightener is added during manufacture. This "soaks up" the unwanted long wave response. Under normal conditions, and long wave irradiation (UV lamp), ACP fluoresces better than the B4 paper. Some Optical Brightening Agent was added to the paper from 1971, to make what collectors call Fluorescent Coated Paper. (Perhaps some of these papers have been used over the last two years on Australian stamps.) In regard to gum, Harrisons has used three types: Gum Arabic a natural exudate, Polyvi-nyl Alcohol and Polyvinyl Alcohol with Dextrine added, both synthetic. Polyvinyl Alcohol was first seen on British stamps at the beginning of 1968, its introduction being caused by a worldwide shortage of Gum Arabic (although Harrisons only needed 30 tons per year). Australian paper manufacturers had similar problems at that time with Gum Arabic. In its pure state, Polyvinyl Alcohol is practically colourless, leading to early complaints that the stamps were not gummed at all. In consequence, a small amount of yellowish-brown dye was soon added to Harrison's Polyvinyl Alcohol. The Polyvinyl Alcohol used by other manufacturers is pure white, ie no dye is added. When Polyvinyl Alcohol with Dextrine was introduced, a small amount of blue-green dye was added. (If you roll a sheet of stamps into a tube, gummed side inwards, and look through it at a piece of white paper, the colour is easily seen.) One sometimes reads about gums fluorescing to varying degrees. This is extremely doubtful, since none of the gums have fluorescent substances. It is more likely that it is the base paper under the gum which varies. Also the dyes used to tint the synthetic gums absorb UV to some degree, coupled with the amount of dye used from batch to batch, may cause apparent variations in the fluorescence of the paper. To conclude this note on papers, just a word or two about thickness. Several factors can contribute to the perceived thickness of a finished stamp, and many of them are variable. Among them a the type of coating and how it is applied. Coatings consist of pigment in suitable adhesive binders. They are applied by rolls, brushes, air knives, or by trailing blades. Blade coatings have become very popular as they are smoother, and it is possible to apply lower weight coats which are necessary in some applications. The ink and depth of etching in photogravure. And even the amount of moisture in the paper. This is one of many articles I wrote when I was editor of the Bookmark Journal; there are several more in just that one issue of the Journal. The original article, before unauthorised changes were made to it, is: Machin Papers. The content of this article, and many others in which I hold the copyright has been incorporated into my Complete Deegam Machin Handbook, now available on CD. For more information you can contact me at but add bt before open. The Pipex address will not work.The MBPC is in the process of converting every issue of The Bookmark Journal, which was first published in 1971 and is still going strong, onto a searchable CD which will be made available to members. Douglas Myall |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photo paper issues | Sue H | Autographs | 10 | July 20th 06 03:21 PM |
About photo paper. | Keeponrockin | Autographs | 3 | December 21st 05 03:33 AM |
100+ WW STAMP COLLECTION (off paper & cancelled) LAST LOT! | HUGE WW STAMP COLLECTION | Worldwide Stamps | 0 | December 15th 05 03:56 PM |
non glossy photo paper | Keeponrockin | Autographs | 12 | December 15th 05 01:00 AM |
100+ WW STAMP COLLECTION (off paper & cancelled) | HUGE WW STAMP COLLECTION | Marketplace | 0 | December 3rd 05 12:48 PM |