Abuse of email address

"Bob Ingraham" wrote in message
...
1/11/2004 8:31 AM

I think the problem is that Damark is a cold and loneley place this time
of year and some people need to get attention any way they can. (Alan)

ENOUGH ALREADY! Mette Heindorff has a long and respectable history as a
supportive and generous member of this newsgroup. She's trying to deal
with
something that she perceives as a problem, and hardly needs the petty
criticisms that some people in the newsgroup seem all too willing to pass
out. Check the mote in your own eye, Doug.

Her country's name is "Denmark," by the way, not "Damark."

Bob Ingraham

Please take it easy, Bob, don't shout, you aren't the moderator of this
group.

Even a person with a "long a respectable history" can make a mistake (who
doesn't?), and anyone has the right to express its opinion. One can demand
more restraint (what I have done), but you can shut up nobody here.

As for the obvious typo, eventually read what says the Netiquette on this
particular subject.

Victor Manta

Tracy Barber wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:24:15 -0700, Grandpa jsdebooATcomcast.net
wrote:


Didier Cuidet wrote:

snip

I think that someone knowing your address has his computer infected by a
worm or a virus that copied his address book, and use random names in it
to send copies of it all around the world.

Thats why I use Netscape. Its not foolproof but the hackers LOVE
Micro$oft products and rarely fiddle with NS, or Mozilla if you prefer.


Hopefully, you're using one of the 4.xx versions, unless you have a
speed demon / RAM hog of a PC that can load / paly NutScrape 6.x or
7.x - they just hog your PC.

I used 4.78 until I was unable to load a number of different web sites
so I went to 7.1. Works like a champ and pics load fine, Java stuff
etc, all the new crud that 4.x can't. I've a 2.53GHz w/512mb RAM and a
high speed cable modem connection thru Comcast so pages load really fast.

1/11/2004 12:30 PM

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:06:30 GMT, Bob Ingraham found
these unused words floating about:

1/11/2004 8:31 AM

Douglas Myall wrote:
"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...

"Mette" wrote in message
...

Grandpa and Dakota,

None of you are the culprits, and neither are those who
have contacted me at my yahoo-address.

snip

To find the offender it is not enough to yell out on Usenet
"stop spamming me!". I had to go other ways, and one
of them was to provoke people to contact me on my
Yahoo-address to narrow down the offender. I did well.
So many people, both from this group and others that I
read, have contacted me, so by simple exclusion methods
I can now concentrate my search among very few people.
In a few more days I will know for sure who that "friend"
was, and he/she can be sure to be killfiled for eternity,
both on my Usenet-account and my private accounts.

snip

Thank you, Dakota and Grandpa, and everybody else for
your patience :-)
--
Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette)

"Tom,
I have just answered your email in private but it bounced
back. Anyhow, I know it's not you Buddy :-)
Mette"

Three of RCSD participants (Tom, Dakota, Grandpa) aren't on the

black list

anymore. The work progresses, slowly but efficiently.

BTW, the abuse game isn't still over, because other 30 or more

permanents

here still have to somehow prove that they aren't the "culprits".

Maybe a better place for us would be a Danish Guaxxxxxmo. Some

suggestions

for a proper place, because I'm not familiar with Denmark's

geography? :-)

Nevertheless we stay patient, isn't it?

Victor Manta


I don't think Victor needs to keep stirring this pot and his
references to a prison camp are over the top. I am content for Mette
to do whatever is necessary to identify the person who is plaguing
her. Even although she felt it necessary (desirable?) to inform this
NG of her problem I do not see how that means that 30 or more NG
members are under any obligation to `prove' (Victor's word) their
innocence.

Douglas


I think the problem is that Damark is a cold and loneley place this time
of year and some people need to get attention any way they can.

ENOUGH ALREADY! Mette Heindorff has a long and respectable history as a
supportive and generous member of this newsgroup. She's trying to deal with
something that she perceives as a problem, and hardly needs the petty
criticisms that some people in the newsgroup seem all too willing to pass
out. Check the mote in your own eye, Doug.

Her country's name is "Denmark," by the way, not "Damark."

Bob Ingraham

That was ALAN's comment, not Doug's - note the indents ...


My apologies to Douglas, but otherwise I won't retract a word.

Bob

Please take it easy, Bob, don't shout, you aren't the moderator of this
group.

Even a person with a "long a respectable history" can make a mistake (who
doesn't?), and anyone has the right to express its opinion. One can demand
more restraint (what I have done), but you can shut up nobody here.

As for the obvious typo, eventually read what says the Netiquette on this
particular subject.

Victor Manta

In Japanese culture, some hold the traditional belief that a deep, robust
bark is a sign of good health and karma.

Bob

Bob Ingraham wrote:
1/11/2004 8:31 AM


Douglas Myall wrote:

"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...


"Mette" wrote in message
...


Grandpa and Dakota,

None of you are the culprits, and neither are those who
have contacted me at my yahoo-address.

snip

To find the offender it is not enough to yell out on Usenet
"stop spamming me!". I had to go other ways, and one
of them was to provoke people to contact me on my
Yahoo-address to narrow down the offender. I did well.
So many people, both from this group and others that I
read, have contacted me, so by simple exclusion methods
I can now concentrate my search among very few people.
In a few more days I will know for sure who that "friend"
was, and he/she can be sure to be killfiled for eternity,
both on my Usenet-account and my private accounts.

snip

Thank you, Dakota and Grandpa, and everybody else for
your patience :-)
--
Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette)

"Tom,
I have just answered your email in private but it bounced
back. Anyhow, I know it's not you Buddy :-)
Mette"

Three of RCSD participants (Tom, Dakota, Grandpa) aren't on the

black list


anymore. The work progresses, slowly but efficiently.

BTW, the abuse game isn't still over, because other 30 or more

permanents


here still have to somehow prove that they aren't the "culprits".

Maybe a better place for us would be a Danish Guaxxxxxmo. Some

suggestions


for a proper place, because I'm not familiar with Denmark's

geography? :-)


Nevertheless we stay patient, isn't it?

Victor Manta


I don't think Victor needs to keep stirring this pot and his
references to a prison camp are over the top. I am content for Mette
to do whatever is necessary to identify the person who is plaguing
her. Even although she felt it necessary (desirable?) to inform this
NG of her problem I do not see how that means that 30 or more NG
members are under any obligation to `prove' (Victor's word) their
innocence.

Douglas


I think the problem is that Damark is a cold and loneley place this time
of year and some people need to get attention any way they can.


ENOUGH ALREADY! Mette Heindorff has a long and respectable history as a
supportive and generous member of this newsgroup. She's trying to deal with
something that she perceives as a problem, and hardly needs the petty
criticisms that some people in the newsgroup seem all too willing to pass
out. Check the mote in your own eye, Doug.

Her country's name is "Denmark," by the way, not "Damark."

Bob Ingraham

Actually its Danmark, left out the "N
" in error.

J. A. Mc. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:54:25 GMT, Alan found these unused
words floating about:


Bob Ingraham wrote:

1/11/2004 8:31 AM



Douglas Myall wrote:


"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...



"Mette" wrote in message
...



Grandpa and Dakota,

None of you are the culprits, and neither are those who
have contacted me at my yahoo-address.

snip

To find the offender it is not enough to yell out on Usenet
"stop spamming me!". I had to go other ways, and one
of them was to provoke people to contact me on my
Yahoo-address to narrow down the offender. I did well.
So many people, both from this group and others that I
read, have contacted me, so by simple exclusion methods
I can now concentrate my search among very few people.
In a few more days I will know for sure who that "friend"
was, and he/she can be sure to be killfiled for eternity,
both on my Usenet-account and my private accounts.

snip

Thank you, Dakota and Grandpa, and everybody else for
your patience :-)
--
Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette)

"Tom,
I have just answered your email in private but it bounced
back. Anyhow, I know it's not you Buddy :-)
Mette"

Three of RCSD participants (Tom, Dakota, Grandpa) aren't on the

black list



anymore. The work progresses, slowly but efficiently.

BTW, the abuse game isn't still over, because other 30 or more

permanents



here still have to somehow prove that they aren't the "culprits".

Maybe a better place for us would be a Danish Guaxxxxxmo. Some

suggestions



for a proper place, because I'm not familiar with Denmark's

geography? :-)



Nevertheless we stay patient, isn't it?

Victor Manta


I don't think Victor needs to keep stirring this pot and his
references to a prison camp are over the top. I am content for Mette
to do whatever is necessary to identify the person who is plaguing
her. Even although she felt it necessary (desirable?) to inform this
NG of her problem I do not see how that means that 30 or more NG
members are under any obligation to `prove' (Victor's word) their
innocence.

Douglas


I think the problem is that Damark is a cold and loneley place this time
of year and some people need to get attention any way they can.


ENOUGH ALREADY! Mette Heindorff has a long and respectable history as a
supportive and generous member of this newsgroup. She's trying to deal with
something that she perceives as a problem, and hardly needs the petty
criticisms that some people in the newsgroup seem all too willing to pass
out. Check the mote in your own eye, Doug.

Her country's name is "Denmark," by the way, not "Damark."

Bob Ingraham


Actually its Danmark, left out the "N
" in error.


Not to mention the apostrophe in the correction ...


What does apostrophe "mean" ?

- snip -

Why are you even posting this information here in the first place ?.

To try and locate the offender(s) to see if my suspicion
can bear.


Forgive me for adding to this thread - I in no way intend to
aggravate the situation, but....

As you stated you did NOT specifically say that a member
of RCSD was the sender of these messages, why are you
now posting further information on this Newsgroup? This
has confirmed that the suspect IS an RCSD member!

David.

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:59:09 +0100, "Victor Manta"
wrote:

BTW, the abuse game isn't still over, because other 30 or more permanents
here still have to somehow prove that they aren't the "culprits".

I refuse to prove it because I don't do it. Since I don't do it, I
don't need to prove it.

That said, 'Tis'nt me!

Don't even need to post here that I didn't do it, aw, but what the
heck - might as well. :^)

Tracy Barber

Alan wrote:

snip

Not to mention the apostrophe in the correction ...


What does apostrophe "mean" ?

Don't know about an apostrophy but I know what a Catastrophy is - an
award for the cat with the nicest buns! Moving right along.........

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:31:26 GMT, Alan wrote:

Douglas Myall wrote:
"Victor Manta" wrote in message
...

"Mette" wrote in message
...

Grandpa and Dakota,

None of you are the culprits, and neither are those who
have contacted me at my yahoo-address.

snip

To find the offender it is not enough to yell out on Usenet
"stop spamming me!". I had to go other ways, and one
of them was to provoke people to contact me on my
Yahoo-address to narrow down the offender. I did well.
So many people, both from this group and others that I
read, have contacted me, so by simple exclusion methods
I can now concentrate my search among very few people.
In a few more days I will know for sure who that "friend"
was, and he/she can be sure to be killfiled for eternity,
both on my Usenet-account and my private accounts.

snip

Thank you, Dakota and Grandpa, and everybody else for
your patience :-)
--
Ann Mette Heindorff (Mette)

"Tom,
I have just answered your email in private but it bounced
back. Anyhow, I know it's not you Buddy :-)
Mette"

Three of RCSD participants (Tom, Dakota, Grandpa) aren't on the

black list

anymore. The work progresses, slowly but efficiently.

BTW, the abuse game isn't still over, because other 30 or more

permanents

here still have to somehow prove that they aren't the "culprits".

Maybe a better place for us would be a Danish Guaxxxxxmo. Some

suggestions

for a proper place, because I'm not familiar with Denmark's

geography? :-)

Nevertheless we stay patient, isn't it?

Victor Manta


I don't think Victor needs to keep stirring this pot and his
references to a prison camp are over the top. I am content for Mette
to do whatever is necessary to identify the person who is plaguing
her. Even although she felt it necessary (desirable?) to inform this
NG of her problem I do not see how that means that 30 or more NG
members are under any obligation to `prove' (Victor's word) their
innocence.

Douglas


I think the problem is that Damark is a cold and loneley place this time
of year and some people need to get attention any way they can.

Fairly askew of proper reasoning, but I guess it "could" be a reason.

Tracy Barber