If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
oly wrote:
On Dec 8, 8:49 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Jass" wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 10:21 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Jass" wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 9:44 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Michael G. Koerner" wrote in ... In case anyone didn't yet notice, the USMint has unveiled the design for the 2010 Sac. It is at: http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/...n=2010NADesign I actually kind of like this one. Still looks like more cut 'n' paste clipart on a flat background to me. I'd like to see some traditional medalists tackle the Sac and maybe come up with some dimensional features on a textured background. The Sac doesn't circulate anymore anyway, so why not use it as a design platform for some serious artists. The sac does indeed circulate. Ive gotten new ones as change from machines many times (Boston MBTA fare machines) Most recently, I got 10 coins as change. 1 new sac, 2 old sacs, 1 susan, and the rest presidents. (The machines give out up to $19 in change) _________________ I guess you're luckier(?) than I am. I've never received one in change ever since they came out. That indicates to me that they don't circulate, and are being used mainly as "tokens" in vending machines, like you experienced. When was the last time you actually got one in change at a store? Some of our local banks do keep a few mixed dollar coins in a change tray on the counter for those who might ask for one. A few banks have been getting rolls of the new president dollars, but no Sac dollars. Wow, this thread got hijacked by children. Anyway, Ive never received a coin from a human transaction, but the fact that the mass transit vending machines give them out means all merchants are used to receiving them. Before the machines were deployed in 2006, many merchants would do a double take when receiving a dollar coin as payment. Today they don't react, which makes me think they see them every day. Of course, that has done nothing to change the behavior of returning them as change to the next customer. Still, some circulation is better than none. And based on the brown 2001 saks I see, they have done a decent amount of circulating. Im sure this is the same in other cities that have popular mass transit systems with automated machines that give change. _____________________ So like I said, they're essentially used mostly as "tokens" in machines, seldom seen in merchants' register drawers. By now, most cashiers should have seen these dollar coins and won't do the double take any more. But for a little golden coin that has been available for 30 years now, that doesn't speak much for its popular acceptance along with the penny, nickel, dime, and quarter. Yet it still is being cranked out each year by the millions. That said, a dollar coin might evoke less surprise from many cashiers than a half dollar. I was thinking how rare it would be to find a modern dollar coin graded VG-F from actual wear. But then I can't remember the last time I saw ANY of our circulating coins in less than Fine condition, including 50 years of Memorial reverse cents. Those pesky coin jars and credit cards at work, I guess.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Could it be that copper nickel is more durable than silver for coinage use and that is why older coins looked more used? Of course, coins are almost totally irrelevant today for any purchase (spent almost $9 last night on a quality loaf of bread, 10 ounces of deli turkey and two cold 20 oz diet cokes - and I did not use coins). Coins are recieved in the backside of purchases, not often used for the front side. I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. James the Money Launderer |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
"oly" wrote in message ... On Dec 8, 8:49 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Jass" wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 10:21 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Jass" wrote in message ... On Dec 6, 9:44 pm, "Bruce Remick" wrote: "Michael G. Koerner" wrote in ... In case anyone didn't yet notice, the USMint has unveiled the design for the 2010 Sac. It is at: http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/...n=2010NADesign I actually kind of like this one. Still looks like more cut 'n' paste clipart on a flat background to me. I'd like to see some traditional medalists tackle the Sac and maybe come up with some dimensional features on a textured background. The Sac doesn't circulate anymore anyway, so why not use it as a design platform for some serious artists. The sac does indeed circulate. Ive gotten new ones as change from machines many times (Boston MBTA fare machines) Most recently, I got 10 coins as change. 1 new sac, 2 old sacs, 1 susan, and the rest presidents. (The machines give out up to $19 in change) _________________ I guess you're luckier(?) than I am. I've never received one in change ever since they came out. That indicates to me that they don't circulate, and are being used mainly as "tokens" in vending machines, like you experienced. When was the last time you actually got one in change at a store? Some of our local banks do keep a few mixed dollar coins in a change tray on the counter for those who might ask for one. A few banks have been getting rolls of the new president dollars, but no Sac dollars. Wow, this thread got hijacked by children. Anyway, Ive never received a coin from a human transaction, but the fact that the mass transit vending machines give them out means all merchants are used to receiving them. Before the machines were deployed in 2006, many merchants would do a double take when receiving a dollar coin as payment. Today they don't react, which makes me think they see them every day. Of course, that has done nothing to change the behavior of returning them as change to the next customer. Still, some circulation is better than none. And based on the brown 2001 saks I see, they have done a decent amount of circulating. Im sure this is the same in other cities that have popular mass transit systems with automated machines that give change. _____________________ So like I said, they're essentially used mostly as "tokens" in machines, seldom seen in merchants' register drawers. By now, most cashiers should have seen these dollar coins and won't do the double take any more. But for a little golden coin that has been available for 30 years now, that doesn't speak much for its popular acceptance along with the penny, nickel, dime, and quarter. Yet it still is being cranked out each year by the millions. That said, a dollar coin might evoke less surprise from many cashiers than a half dollar. I was thinking how rare it would be to find a modern dollar coin graded VG-F from actual wear. But then I can't remember the last time I saw ANY of our circulating coins in less than Fine condition, including 50 years of Memorial reverse cents. Those pesky coin jars and credit cards at work, I guess.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Could it be that copper nickel is more durable than silver for coinage use and that is why older coins looked more used? _________________________ Worn pennies and nickels were common when found in change 50-60 years ago. Today, you'd have to do a lot of searching before finding a VG-F Lincoln or Jefferson-- for the exact reasons you mention. They're not usually used for purchases, except maybe by the older lady in front of me in the checkout line. Although I usually don't worry about receiving coins in the backside, I never turn my back on the cashier at the register. _________________________ Of course, coins are almost totally irrelevant today for any purchase (spent almost $9 last night on a quality loaf of bread, 10 ounces of deli turkey and two cold 20 oz diet cokes - and I did not use coins). Coins are recieved in the backside of purchases, not often used for the front side. oly |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message
... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
Petronius wrote:
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie Then let's bring back the half cent - perfect for paying the EXACT sales tax! |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
Petronius wrote:
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie Then let's bring back the half cent - perfect for paying the EXACT sales tax! You'd need the mill for that. James the Decimalator |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie Then let's bring back the half cent - perfect for paying the EXACT sales tax! You'd need the mill for that. James the Decimalator The mil, eh - that has never been part of out pantheon of coins. You should be called James the Apostate! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
Mr. Jaggers lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote:
Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie You aren't half the Fundie you should be. Make dollars, halves and quarters from bronze, 3, 6, 12, 24, 30 and 60 dollar coins from silver, and 120, 240, 480 and 1200 dollar coins from gold. The smallest note should be 1200 dollars - then you would have a proper monetary system. You could call the $12 coin something beginning with S and the $240 gold coin something beginning with L. The silver coins should have 66 $12 coins weighing twelve troy ounces of .925 silver, and the gold coins should be based on a $240 coin weighing 123.274 grains of .9166 gold. Peter. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
On Dec 9, 4:24*pm, "Petronius" wrote:
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! *Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? *If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie Then let's bring back the half cent - perfect for paying the EXACT sales tax! You'd need the mill for that. James the Decimalator The mil, eh - that has never been part of out pantheon of coins. You should be called James the Apostate!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Even made of a non-metal composite composition, struck or assembled by technology routinely involving no "expensive" human labor - could a "mil" be produced for today's currency system??? A "mil" would probably cost several mils to make! Costs of handling would be obscene compared to the mil's value. oly "I once knew a guy named 'James the Apostate', or was it "Julian'??? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Reverse design of 2010 Sac
Petronius wrote:
"Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... Petronius wrote: "Mr. Jaggers" lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com wrote in message ... I always make it a point to use coins on the front side - if I have them, I like to get rid of them so they don't end up in the wash, like about $2 in oddments did this morning. At the end of the day my coins go into my piggy bank from whence they eventually wind up in a Coinstar machine. If I have change, I'll try to use it in a purchase but I rarely have enough. As pointed out before, the denominations of today's coins have not kept up with inflation. Back in the 50s, a candy bar cost a nickel, now one (albeit smaller) costs 50 cents. The cent, nickel and possibly dime could easily be eliminated from the ranks of current coinage without an adverse effect on the economy. Ease the public into the process slowly, by first eliminating the now-useless cent (keep making them for collectors though), after a few years do the same for the nickel and then the dime. By that time no one will miss them, esp. if we experience the runaway inflation the current administration's fiscal policies will engender. Start making more half dollars (which were in wide use 50 years ago, odd considering they were actually worth something then). Eliminate the dollar bill (like Canada did) to force the use of the dollar coins. Start making $2 coins and maybe even $5 ones Sacrilege! Don't you know that our currency system originated in the Garden of Eden? If the cent was good enough for Adam, it's good enough for me. James the Fundie Then let's bring back the half cent - perfect for paying the EXACT sales tax! You'd need the mill for that. James the Decimalator The mil, eh - that has never been part of out pantheon of coins. You should be called James the Apostate! I've seen plastic tokens from various states denominated in the mill for use in dealing with taxes. James the Apostle [heh] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Cent Reverse in 2010 | Arizona Coin Collector | Coins | 10 | April 20th 09 10:15 PM |
2010: The End of the Cent? | [email protected] | Coins | 31 | December 8th 08 09:53 PM |
Best design for Hawaii quarter is no design. | stonej | Coins | 0 | February 19th 06 01:01 PM |
Vancouver 2010 Olympics | Richard Thouin | General Discussion | 0 | July 16th 03 12:30 AM |