Clarence Thomas book: Paranoid of everyone?

LA Times this morning had a byline about Clarence Thomas' new
so-called "autobiography," the gist of which is that the man is
paranoid beyond doubt. Paranoid of Democrats, paranoid of lighter
skinned negroes, paranoid of...well, just about everything!

How did this sorry excuse for a jurist make it onto the Supreme Court
bench, if not for "identity politics" played by the GOP? Thomas'
career is marked mostly by "me too" decisions, simply trailering his
other long-time right wing fanatic on the bench, Antonin Scalia.
Thomas almost never even attempts to engage litigants in arguments
during oral presentation at the court, and when he does, the question
always involves "racism," or is off-point and irrelevant entirely.

Clarence Thomas...another GOOD reason for a Democratic president in
'08!

"DeserTBoB" wrote in message
...
LA Times this morning had a byline about Clarence Thomas' new
so-called "autobiography," the gist of which is that the man is
paranoid beyond doubt. Paranoid of Democrats, paranoid of lighter
skinned negroes, paranoid of...well, just about everything!

How did this sorry excuse for a jurist make it onto the Supreme Court
bench, if not for "identity politics" played by the GOP? Thomas'
career is marked mostly by "me too" decisions, simply trailering his
other long-time right wing fanatic on the bench, Antonin Scalia.
Thomas almost never even attempts to engage litigants in arguments
during oral presentation at the court, and when he does, the question
always involves "racism," or is off-point and irrelevant entirely.

Clarence Thomas...another GOOD reason for a Democratic president in
'08!

Speaking as a former Dem, can you tell me what the Dems have done to warrant
anyone's vote, except roll over on their back for a tummy rub from the NWO?
Here is a hint: they've done nothing. Did nothing about getting a real 911
investigation. All else is secondary.

I'm going to have to teach you some history sometime, since you obviously
are clueless as well as useless. Who gave us NAFTA, the removal of
restrictions on media ownership? The Clintons, fercristsake.

"sandman" wrote in message
...

"DeserTBoB" wrote in message
...

Speaking as a former Dem, can you tell me what the Dems have done to
warrant anyone's vote, except roll over on their back for a tummy rub from
the NWO? Here is a hint: they've done nothing. Did nothing about getting
a real 911 investigation. All else is secondary.

I'm going to have to teach you some history sometime, since you obviously
are clueless as well as useless. Who gave us NAFTA, the removal of
restrictions on media ownership? The Clintons, fercristsake.

If you think the liberal boomers befuddled your sluggish brain in the
60's, hang onto your country club, the 2010's are gonna mess your mind.
Liberalism has been the prevailing ideology throughout history. (Democracy
is a liberal idea. Lending libraries are a liberal idea. Charity is a
liberal idea.) Conservatives can obstruct it only so long.

"sandman" wrote in message
...

"DeserTBoB" wrote in message
...
LA Times this morning had a byline about Clarence Thomas' new
so-called "autobiography," the gist of which is that the man is
paranoid beyond doubt. Paranoid of Democrats, paranoid of lighter
skinned negroes, paranoid of...well, just about everything!

How did this sorry excuse for a jurist make it onto the Supreme Court
bench, if not for "identity politics" played by the GOP? Thomas'
career is marked mostly by "me too" decisions, simply trailering his
other long-time right wing fanatic on the bench, Antonin Scalia.
Thomas almost never even attempts to engage litigants in arguments
during oral presentation at the court, and when he does, the question
always involves "racism," or is off-point and irrelevant entirely.

Clarence Thomas...another GOOD reason for a Democratic president in
'08!

Speaking as a former Dem, can you tell me what the Dems have done to
warrant anyone's vote, except roll over on their back for a tummy rub from
the NWO? Here is a hint: they've done nothing. Did nothing about getting
a real 911 investigation. All else is secondary.

I'm going to have to teach you some history sometime, since you obviously
are clueless as well as useless. Who gave us NAFTA, the removal of
restrictions on media ownership? The Clintons, fercristsake.

Looks like you know little about history.
NAFTA was Oldbush's horse****, passed by the republican Congress and signed
(by law) by Clinton.

NAFTA: BUSH'S CROWNING ACHIEVEMENT

History will be kind to George Bush, but not for the reasons many may now
think. The most vivid moments of the Bush presidency - the Gulf War, the
Panama invasion and the Somali aid mission, though successfully handled,
were to varying degrees ephemeral; wars, tyrants and hunger are recurrent
evils in human events. But the recently signed North American Free Trade
Agreement represents something more lasting - a step away from America's
shortsighted economic past and a step toward a


Complete Article, 1087 words ( )

http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:00:25 -0700, "sandman"
wrote:

Speaking as a former Dem snip

Obviously, you went to the lunatic fringe, as you can't even stay on
topic.

plonk

I'm going to have to teach you some history sometime snip

Here's some history for ya, dumbbell...who gave us Bush Bird?

THE GREENS!

Go check the numbers and get back to me by Sunday. There will be a
quiz Monday morning.

On topic content: Why do righttards like Clarence Thomas? It's
obvious that his character's in question, as is his intelligence.

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:30:46 GMT, "****ingOnTheRight" kidGWBoo
wrote:

Looks like you know little about history.
NAFTA was Oldbush's horse****, passed by the republican Congress and signed
(by law) by Clinton. snip

All true, but Clinton pushed people like Lee Iacocca to support
passage of NAFTA far more than he should have done. NAFTA will go
down in his presidency's history as one of his biggest blunders.
"Monicagate" and the assorted other worthless crap that gets the right
wingers foaming at the mouth won't even be worth a footnote given the
fullness of time. Come to think of it, the "christian nation" morons
we are currently defeating won't be much of a speed bump in American
history either, at the rate they're collapsing.

MY "EARLY, EARLY PREDICTION©" FOR '08:

It's going to be Hillary versus Rudy. It's possible a right wing
"splinter" candidate will rise up out of the Religious Right, further
fracturing the GOP. Hillary will barbeque Rudy to a crisp on the
stump and will win 289 electors (or more) without Rootie-Tootie even
carrying his own home state of New York, where Clinton won her
reelection to the Senate by a 67% majority. Bernie Kerik will be a
major embarrassment to Rootie late in the game, moreso than he has
been already. The Dems will pick up 20 seats in the House, 5 or 6 in
the Senate. After losing, Rudy will hit the right wing talk show
circuit, where he will earn a reputation as a bitter
has-been/never-was. Due to persistent vetting in '08 by the Clinton
war room, Rootie-Tootie's personal history will drive him into
political Siberia.

Anyone who knows me knows I tend to be uncannily accurate about these
things.

good post- you did a number on the resident Usenet liberal idiot, we prefer
to call him "DoucheBob"

FYI, he is the same guy that started a self-proclaimed Ebay cop campaign a
few years ago, and managed to get BOTH his own, and his wife's EBay
usernames, permanently banned for auction harassment.



Speaking as a former Dem, can you tell me what the Dems have done to
warrant anyone's vote, except roll over on their back for a tummy rub
from
the NWO? Here is a hint: they've done nothing. Did nothing about
getting
a real 911 investigation. All else is secondary.

I'm going to have to teach you some history sometime, since you
obviously
are clueless as well as useless. Who gave us NAFTA, the removal of
restrictions on media ownership? The Clintons, fercristsake.

Ross Perot, one of the wealthiest businessmen in the world, warned during
his 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns, that NAFTA and other such "free
trade" agreements would create a "giant sucking sound" of USA jobs going
overseas and out of the country-

which is exactly what happened.

worst damn thing anyone ever could have signed...


" History will be kind to George Bush, but not for the reasons many may now
think. The most vivid moments of the Bush presidency - the Gulf War, the
Panama invasion and the Somali aid mission, though successfully handled,
were to varying degrees ephemeral; wars, tyrants and hunger are recurrent
evils in human events. But the recently signed North American Free Trade
Agreement represents something more lasting - a step away from America's
shortsighted economic past and a step toward a

On Sep 30, 3:57 am, "trippin-2-8-trak" wrote:
Ross Perot, one of the wealthiest businessmen in the world, warned during
his 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns, that NAFTA and other such "free
trade" agreements would create a "giant sucking sound" of USA jobs going
overseas and out of the country-

which is exactly what happened.
worst damn thing anyone ever could have signed...

Agree. I could not believe what I was seeing.. Clinton - hand in hand
with NWO Bush sr - pushing for a nation destroying WTO and NAFTA. And
then seeing Clinton sweet talking some labor unions into supporting
that economic poison.

No better proof is needed to demonstrate that - on big ticket items -
the two parties are joined and corrupted at the top.

History will be kind to George Bush, but not for the reasons many may now
think. The most vivid moments of the Bush presidency - the Gulf War, the
Panama invasion and the Somali aid mission, though successfully handled,
were to varying degrees ephemeral; wars, tyrants and hunger are recurrent
evils in human events. But the recently signed North American Free Trade
Agreement represents something more lasting - a step away from America's
shortsighted economic past and a step toward a..

...Toward economic impoverishment of Americans, and a disempowerment of
political influence.
And honest history is *never* kind to democracy destroying tyrants.

PS on Clarence:
Clarence is obviously unqualified to sit on the Supreme Court... just
as he was unqualified when the democraps had a chance to shoot down
his nomination on the basis of moral deficiencies surround his sexual
harrassment allegations - and failed to do so.

What a clown show that was.. 'Liberal' democratic leadership
(including Teddy Kennedy) all lined up to praise a confirmed and
obvious retrograde neocon.. only because the man was black. Now the US
is saddled with a entrenched neocon who doesn't even bother to write
his judicial opinions.

Superficial intellect given a pass by superficial (if not outright
traitorous) legislators.

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 06:55:29 -0400, "trippin-2-8-trak"
wrote:

good post- you did a number on the resident Usenet liberal idiot, we prefer
to call him "DoucheBob" snip

Who's "we?" You have a mouse in your pocket yet again?

FYI, he is the same guy that started a self-proclaimed Ebay cop campaign a
few years ago, and managed to get BOTH his own, and his wife's EBay
usernames, permanently banned for auction harassment. snip

What he doesn't mention is that Nudo himself had three of his own eBay
fraud accounts terminated for various rule infractions, including
copyright violations, fraud and spamming. Add to this that he's had
28 Google Groups "Usenet For 'Tards" accounts terminated for spamming,
threats of violence and other TOS violations, along with two AIOE
freebie NNTP server accounts similarly terminated, and you get the
picture rather quickly.

Hey Noodles! Not having much luck learning how to work a REAL
newsreader, are you?