An equally beautiful coin!

http://www.coinfacts.com/quarter_dol...r_dollars.html

In article , "James Higby"
heezerbumfrool[at]hotmail[dot]com says...
http://www.coinfacts.com/quarter_dol...r_dollars.html



Have you put it up yer ass and pulled the one armed bandit yet?
--
f = n_1 n_2 \langle \sigma v \rangle

http://www.geocities.com/woogawooga99/

Too weird to live, and too
rare to die. -Hunter S. Thomson

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:14:44 -0600, "James Higby"
heezerbumfrool[at]hotmail[dot]com wrote:

http://www.coinfacts.com/quarter_dol...r_dollars.html

Clever. What you did, not him. g

Here's another beautiful 1796 quarter in what appears to be a totally
legitimate but very pricey auction, linked to from the first auction:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=8360700563

--

Email: (delete "remove this")

Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide
Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom
Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos

"Reid Goldsborough" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:14:44 -0600, "James Higby"
heezerbumfrool[at]hotmail[dot]com wrote:

http://www.coinfacts.com/quarter_dol...r_dollars.html

Clever. What you did, not him. g

Here's another beautiful 1796 quarter in what appears to be a totally
legitimate but very pricey auction, linked to from the first auction:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=8360700563


I just love portraits of Anne Bingham made in 1796! Thanks, Reid.

James

If you are going to spend $67,000 for a coin don't you think the seller
could
pay the $25 for shipping as a "thank you"?

"stonej" wrote in message
oups.com...
If you are going to spend $67,000 for a coin don't you think the seller
could
pay the $25 for shipping as a "thank you"?


Maybe he has $67,499.98 in it and is just trying to recoup his capital plus
a small profit.

James

Scott Evil wrote:
In article ,
says...

"Scott Evil" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"Scott Evil" wrote in message
...
In article t,
says...

"Larex" wrote in message
...
On 8 Dec 2005 17:04:04 -0800, "RevAlex"
wrote:

misogynistic

Hey, I looked that word up and I don't hate women. I love every
inch
of them especially the ones with lots of inches up front that
jiggles.

Would you like to fall hopelessly in love? There's one of them with
lots
of
inches (and I do mean -lots- of inches vbefg) of nice, firm,
20-something
jiggle who works in one of the local gun shops. She's also an
excellent
shooter.

Everybody run like hell!

Hehehe. I see them on the range every month or two. They're both good
people.

Yeah, but they're women! And with guns...

Yeah. It's even better if they know how to handle steel leans back in
chair with eyes half closed, a smile, and a dreamy expression

HEHEHEHEHEHE!

Keep dreamin.

--
f = n_1 n_2 \langle \sigma v \rangle

http://www.geocities.com/woogawooga99/

Too weird to live, and too
rare to die. -Hunter S. Thomson

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Wow, these are a lot more common than I thought!

;-)


Reclining Buddha

The Original Couch Potato!

Reclining Buddha wrote in message
...
Wow, these are a lot more common than I thought!

Yep, even the ones with identical features such as toning. I've seen 1877
Indians with identical toning offered online as well. Isn't that amazing?

James

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:43:14 -0600, James Higby heezerbumfrool wrote:

Reclining Buddha wrote in message
...
Wow, these are a lot more common than I thought!

Yep, even the ones with identical features such as toning. I've seen 1877
Indians with identical toning offered online as well. Isn't that amazing?

One might even say...incredible?