If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
Hi everybody,
I am not a collector but it has always puzzled me why ancient Roman coins that I have seen in photos (and indeed, coins from throughout the ancient world) are always oddly shaped and never perfectly round or symmetrical. Though I imagine they must exist, I have never personally seen one that is perfectly round and with the stamp perfectly centered. It seems that given the technology of the time, reasonably well-shaped coins should have been doable with maybe the occasional off stamp on a coin here or there. Is this due to corrosion, wear and tear or simply indifference on the part of the coin makers? Thanks, --Sean C |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
Sean C wrote:
Hi everybody, I am not a collector but it has always puzzled me why ancient Roman coins that I have seen in photos (and indeed, coins from throughout the ancient world) are always oddly shaped and never perfectly round or symmetrical. Though I imagine they must exist, I have never personally seen one that is perfectly round and with the stamp perfectly centered. It seems that given the technology of the time, reasonably well-shaped coins should have been doable with maybe the occasional off stamp on a coin here or there. Is this due to corrosion, wear and tear or simply indifference on the part of the coin makers? Thanks, --Sean C The Production of Ancient Coins http://oldmoney.vassar.edu/papers/production.html How Roman Coins Were Made http://detecting-finds.50megs.com/roman.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
On Oct 8, 4:42 pm, Sean C wrote:
... why ancient Roman ... are always oddly shaped ... It seems that given the technology of the time, ... Perfectly round, modern-looking coins only go back to about 1700. Though earlier examples are known, for instance from Spain and from France in the late 1500s to mid-1600s, the process only was standardized about the time that Sir Isaac Newton was master and warden of the British Royal Mint, at the very end of the 1600s, the "Great Recoinage" of 1696. A number of factors are at work. 1. In ancient times, there was simply no demand that coins be "better looking" than they were. 2. The amount of labor (time, machinery; invention) put into a coin must be paid for somehow. Coins would have become smaller or less pure.... or the government (or minter: in the middle ages it was often bishops) would have to absorb the loss. The US Mint did that for many years, probably the better part of its first 100 (maybe 150!) years, running at a deadweight loss made up for by taxes. 3. Coining tends to be very conservative. 3.a. The kind of device that puts the reeded edge on a coin -- the Castaing Device -- kept its basic functionality for about 100 years, and its basic modality for another 50 or so after that. 3.b. The greatest innovations in coining came first from the private sector. James Watt (inventor of the steam engine) and Matthew Boulton established the Birmingham Mint about 1780 and their engines and machineries were a quantum leap in production skills. Governments followed, buying new machineries when they had been proofed out. In fact, the first steam press was not installed at the Philadelphia Mint until _1836_! 3.c. Changing the method of production would change the appearance. That might make a coin less acceptable. In fact, those first very modern coins of the Birmingham Mint were not government coins at all, but private merchant tokens for taverns, etc. So, there was a new demand from a new market met by new kinds of coins. 4. Modern coins get their sharp images from the tremendous machine pressures that actually make metal flow, turn it liquid. In ancient times, coin planchets were heated red and then struck with a sledgehammer striking a die. The earliest coins with two images (about 550 BC or so -- some argument there) had one side carved into an anvil. So, the hot metal flowed beyond the edges of the engraved dies. 4.a. The die collar was invented only about 1600 (again, some early examples), used in larger Mints (Spain, France, Britain) and not put into full practice until the 1830s in the USA and then not consistently for a couple more years. Look at US colonial and early Republic coins and you will an incomplete procedure in which some coins are collared, but not all. Edge-lettering and other edging was applied via different machineries until the production was finally standardized as you and I might understand it only after the American Civl War. 4. You are used to counting coins to know their total value. In most times and places, coins were weighed. It did not matter what size or shape they were. (Some discussion here. Clearly, in a town, the town's own coins were better known and more likley to just be counted. Even when silver coins of Britain were legally counted for taxes, gold coins were still legally weighed for taxes.) That goes back to 1. Why bother to put a nice edge on coins, if no one cared? Here are a couple of online articles from COIN WORLD about "the third side of the coin." http://www.coinworld.com/news/050707/bw_0507.asp http://www.coinworld.com/news/062104/BW_0621.asp Mike M. Michael E. Marotta |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
On Oct 8, 5:42 pm, Jim Higgins wrote:
The Production of Ancient Coinshttp://oldmoney.vassar.edu/papers/production.html Speaking of Old Money at the Vassar Museum... December 5, 2005 James Mundy The Anne Hendricks Bass Director The Frances Lehman Loeb Art Center 124 Raymond Avenue Box 703 Poughkeepsie, New York 12604-0703 Dear Mr. Mundy, You received an email from me today about a problem with plagiarism on your museum’s website, http://oldmoney.vassar.edu/. [... etc...] .... lifts entire paragraphs of my work, verbatim and without citation. You certainly must agree that this is a problem. [... etc. ...] You will find printouts accompanying this letter to substantiate my claims. My email to you gave URLs and other pointers to these works. Sincerely Yours, Michael E. Marotta --------------------------------- (The entire site was taken down briefly and the offending work was removed within minutes. MEM) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
Mike Marotta wrote:
4. Modern coins get their sharp images from the tremendous machine pressures that actually make metal flow, turn it liquid. Please Michael. Plastic flow *ain't* liquid. You know that. Great email, otherwise. Thanks for that. Restores one's faith in NGs. -- Jeff R. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
On Oct 8, 4:42*pm, Sean C wrote:
I am not a collector but it has always puzzled me why ancient Roman coins that I have seen in photos (and indeed, coins from throughout the ancient world) are always oddly shaped and never perfectly round or symmetrical. Though I imagine they must exist, I have never personally seen one that is perfectly round and with the stamp perfectly centered... There are perfectly round and centered, or nearly perfectly round and centered, ancient Roman and Greek coins. You're right that they're the exception. The reason is that for the most part the ancients struck coins by hand using a heavy hammer, leading to designs being more or less off-centered, and they didn't use a collar, so planchets expanded under the hammer's blow unequally in different directions. -- Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Question about ancient Roman coins
On Oct 8, 5:43*pm, Mike Marotta wrote:
[snip] Excellent response, Mike, as usual. But I do have one tiny nit-pick: Perfectly round, modern-looking coins only go back to about 1700. True if you're talking about struck coinage, but Chinese cast cash were being made, perfectly round, over two thousand years ago. Of course, it's a lot easier to make perfectly round cast coins- use a geometer's compass or equivalent to make the mold for the seed coin, then all molds made from the seed coin will also yield perfectly round coins. But would the great masterpieces of Western classical coinage- Syracusan dekadrachms, to cite one example- have been any more beautiful if the Greeks had been able to strike them on perfectly round planchets? -Robert A. DeRose, Jr. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BARGAIN ANCIENT GREEK/ROMAN COINS ON EBAY INCL. JULIUS CAESAR, ROMAN PROVINCIALS, AMYNTAS III, ALEXANDER THE GREAT | [email protected] | Coins | 0 | March 22nd 06 12:39 PM |
FA: Ancient / Roman Coins - Buy or Bid | Jim | Coins | 0 | October 26th 05 12:19 PM |
Ancient Roman Bronze question | Willy P | Coins | 5 | May 26th 05 07:25 PM |
FA - $$ - Lot of 50 ancient Roman coins | Glenn Simonelli | Coins | 0 | January 28th 05 11:49 AM |
ancient roman coins | tomfromfindlay | Coins | 40 | November 27th 03 12:06 AM |