A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » Coins
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Oh, well...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 5th 03, 07:29 PM
James McCown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Oh, well...

I was at a gun show this morning. There were a few dealers who had
coins to sell.

One that immediately caught my eye was a 1799 large cent. It was
heavily worn, probably a weak AG, but the date was strong. Knowing
that there are many altered dates, I looked at the date with a glass.
It didn't look altered to me, but since I am not an expert on large
cents, I wasn't sure.

I asked the dealer how much he wanted for the coin. It was very noisy
in the building and it sounded to me like he said $625. If it were a
genuine 1799, that would have been a great price even for such a
heavily worn coin. Then he added "It's too bad it's not an XF, it
would be a $500 coin."

I was baffled. I asked him again how much he wanted, and he said $25.
And I immediately thought what the hell? That's not much to lose. I
bought it and hurried home to compare it with the photos in Penny
Whimsy, with the hope that I had stumbled upon the Holy Grail.

It took me a long time to attribute the coin, because it is so heavily
worn and because my copy of Penny Whimsy is the Durst reprint with the
lousy photos. I finally figured out that it is a VERY skillfully
altered 1798 S-163. The date looks almost exactly like an S-189 should
look, but the reverse gave it away.

What I'm still baffled about is the dealer. This guy was obviously not
a copper specialist. He had numerous different types of US and foreign
coins, paper money, guns, knives, and other collectibles. But any coin
dealer should know that a 1799 large cent is a monster coin.

So, did he know that it was an altered 1798? Or was he unaware that it
was altered and also unaware that a 1799 is very valuable?

Say, I wonder if Accugrade will slab it as a 1799? (Just kidding).
Ads
  #2  
Old July 5th 03, 08:47 PM
Craton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Say, I wonder if Accugrade will slab it as a 1799? (Just kidding).



Of course they would. (Not Kidding)

--
Jason Craton ---- CONECA N-3407 --- WINS #5
---------------------------
Interested in error coins?
http://www.error-coins.com - A work in progress (lack of progress
really).
  #3  
Old July 6th 03, 07:16 AM
James McCown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

eXistenZ32 wrote in message .. .
In article , Craton wrote:


Say, I wonder if Accugrade will slab it as a 1799? (Just kidding).



Of course they would. (Not Kidding)


Too bad the topic came up. if you sent it in now, it would probably
"disapear in the mail"


I should have thought of that. I could have sent it to Hager for
grading, and then donated it to Eric's collection of Accugrade gems.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.