Obviously overgraded, but is it even real?

The date spacing doesn't look quite right to me...

What do you think?

....Tom

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...4584 573&rd=1

I believe it's real, but the grade is several points high. Looks more like
a strong Fine or weak VF. Let's see what Ira says.

Wes
wrote in message
oups.com...
The date spacing doesn't look quite right to me...

What do you think?

...Tom

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...4584 573&rd=1



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.802 / Virus Database: 545 - Release Date: 11/26/2004

"I realize there is some aversion to ACG Certified coins"
You noticed? ;}

I still wonder...there is more of a gap to the left side of the second
"1" than on the right side. Not nearly as much as on the altered
1944s, but...genuine 14-Ds that I've seen are very evenly spaced
between the "9 1 4" . It's close...a tough call, in my opinion...
...Tom

I still wonder...on this coin there is more of a gap to the left side
of the second "1" than on the right side. Not nearly as much as on the
altered 1944-Ds, but...genuine 14-Ds that I've seen are very evenly
spaced between the "9 1 4" . It's close...a tough call, in my
opinion...

...Tom

I agree the spacing looks a little odd, but there doesn't seem to be enough for
it to be from an altered 1944-D. One thing that did catch my eye was the
vertical line at the upper right of the "1" in the "14". Something definitely
not right.

Jerry

"Tom," of Little Round Coins fame, offers:

I still wonder...on this coin there is more of a gap to the left side
of the second "1" than on the right side. Not nearly as much as on the
altered 1944-Ds, but...genuine 14-Ds that I've seen are very evenly
spaced between the "9 1 4" . It's close...a tough call, in my
opinion...

..Tom