If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Edward McGrath" wrote in message ... Jeff, I can't believe you're so obsessed with Reid you'd create a site just to start a ****y flame war. Jeff, why did you put Reid in a red dress? Why, Ted? You excited? Since you're a little slow on the uptake, Ted, let me point out a few home truths: 1) Not obsessed. I created these little fun graphics about two years ago. It doesn't actually take much effort to repost their URL. (Do you need me to spell out U.R.L., Ted?) 2) I didn't create a site for Reid. Don't be silly. Reid's parody pages occupy a tiny, insignificant proportion of my personal webspace. 3) A "****y flame war"? Have you *seen* this page? http://mendosus.com/****i.html ...and you still use that term? Do you understand *ridicule* when it jumps up and slaps you across the face? Ted, I was *ridiculing* Reid for the use of grade-school childish epithets such as "****y flamejunking" by rhetorically and graphically comparing it with the classic cartoon figure, "Pippi Longstocking". Most other folk got the joke. Would you like a clearer explanation? Your continued, unabashed and unembarrassed use of the term suggests you "just don't get it". (HINT: Its not language that grownups use, Ted.) 4) Reid in a red dress? Because that's what Alicia Silverstone wore when she was utterly clueless. Hence the connection to Reid. = = = = = Ted, it was fun creating these little graphical diversions. The crew at Monty Python made a fortune airing similar ****takes - though I don't dare to suggest that I aspire to their lofty heights. Many on this NG enjoyed them. I certainly did, and that's enough for me. If they irritate Reid and Nick, then that's a bonus! -- Jeff R. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Nick Knight" wrote in message t... In , on 05/29/2005 at 12:36 PM, (Edward McGrath) said: Jeff, I can't believe you're so obsessed with Reid you'd create a site just to start a ****y flame war. Jeff, why did you put Reid in a red dress? Believe it. Jeff is one of a small group of super morons here. He's not the only one that plays with pictures and thinks he's funny. There are a couple of .composters who have agreed with Jeff and his thought that reliving grade school was "fun", too. How entertaining. I'm a "graphics" kind of guy, Nick. Hence the pictures. I used to make a perfectly satisfactory living creating and re-arranging words, but pictures are much more fun. Yup, Nick, its pretty sad and pathetic that someone would bother to post items to a website, critical of individuals on a NG - no - *wait* ! Isn't that what YOU do ? Hey - its pretty rich that you would seek to criticise me posting website ridicule, considering the existence of your supercilious and smug ".composters" page. Ho ho ho. .composters! What a funny joke. ;-| No-one else laughing? Oh dear. Don't be surprised if Sheep #1 comes up with a "bawahahahahaha" post, next. Nick (Mr Pot) -- Jeff R. (Mr Kettle) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Reid Goldsborough" whined in message ... On Sun, 29 May 2005 12:36:28 -0400, (Edward McGrath) wrote: Jeff, I can't believe you're so obsessed with Reid you'd create a site just to start a ****y flame war. Jeff, why did you put Reid in a red dress? Obsessed is the right word. You have to wonder what kind of life this person Jeff lives, to spend all this time trying to ridicule me with his various Web pages. Try do not. Do! /Yoda mode Get a grip, Reid. "Obsessed"? I spent a few hours a few years ago, having fun creating some graphics to satirise and parody your self-obsessive and juvenile behaviours. They achieved (ahem) a mild measure of critical acclaim. Wassamatta? Does the truth hurt? Do my parodies make you squirm? ...Boggles the mind, really. There's an old proverb: Ridicule is the first and last argument of fools. It's a good proverb. If you can't debate substantively, you try to ridicule. This is really rich, coming from you, Reid. The single most offensive aspect of your online presence, above and beyond all your petty inaccuracies and stubborn stupidities, is the abrasive and patronisingly smug tone that you effect with other NG users. You (yes, *YOU*) never seem to be able to debate or discuss any issue without first launching an ad hom attack on the proposer of the other view. I personally don't give a rat's about your collecting interests or "fields of expertise". Your interests rarely coincide with mine. What galls me beyond reasonable limits is the unprovoked rudeness and caustic, childish, smug, patronising attitude that you dispense here. I've been good this last year, and not risen to your bile-soaked and venomous posts, until just recently. Note very carefully that I only *respond* to your bile - I don't initiate. You troll, and I flame. So what? When you troll, what do you expect? ...Anka can't debate substantively when she disagrees with you, so she falls back on innuendo and sarcasm. LOL! *You* criticising someone else for using sarcasm! Ha! Do you even know what the word means? ...DeMayo has done in a smaller way what Jeff does, extending Usenet flamewars with Web graffiti. Has he? Phil! I've missed your good work! Please post a link. If you have no life, you go beyond Usenet flamejunk and put up page after Web page with all these flame graphics and animations. Of course, if you *can't* then you *don't*. A few hours, two years ago, Reid. This is an obsession? This Jeff person used to call himself something like "Still Cranky" or some such through his email address. Godfather! Talk about slow on the uptake. I've explained that one to you too often to count, Reid. Are you incapable of simple comprehension? Are you going to bag me out because I now call myself "contact.me"? ...It's funny, in one sense. More than one, actually. ...I look at his pages and laugh. But it's sad, in another sense, that there are people like this, obsessed with flamejunk like this, with the online world having a disproportionate share of them, attracting people like this through its relative anonymity You don't like it when people chide you for your bad manners, do you, Reid? Here's an idea. Try being polite for a change, and I (for one) will leave you alone. -- Jeff R. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Anka" wrote in message oups.com... Reid Goldsborough wrote: Anka can't debate substantively when she disagrees with you, so she falls back on innuendo and sarcasm How's this for INNUENDO, Reid? Cram it. ~Anka I doubt he understands Italian puns, Ank. -- Jeff R. (nor much else, for that matter) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Anka wrote:
Reid Goldsborough wrote: Anka can't debate substantively when she disagrees with you, so she falls back on innuendo and sarcasm How's this for INNUENDO, Reid? Cram it. ~Anka LOL!! Reid still on his sick obsession with insulting your collecting habits? Not to worry, Anka. He's a public entertainment, sort of like the streetcorner mime, or a student driver. ;-) Alan 'you can't be insulted by a joke' |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:05:17 +1000, "Jeff R" is
alleged to have written: "Anka" wrote in message roups.com... Reid Goldsborough wrote: Anka can't debate substantively when she disagrees with you, so she falls back on innuendo and sarcasm How's this for INNUENDO, Reid? Cram it. ~Anka I doubt he understands Italian puns, Ank. I didn't get that pun until it was pointed out to me. I'd have been much happier not figuring that one out. Bruce (The first pun of the morning is always a shock) ************************************************* ANA R162074 EAC 3606 To email me, remember that RoadRunner and Coyote do not mix. ************************************************* |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:00:15 +1000, "Jeff R"
wrote: I spent a few hours a few years ago, having fun creating some graphics to satirise and parody your self-obsessive and juvenile behaviours. You're said you're retired, and that's obvious. -- Email: (delete "remove this") Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Jeff wrote: since you're a little slow on the uptake. snip I
understand this jeff, you prove your immaturity by creating a site to slander another RCC poster. Jeff since you are the one who likes to superimpose a mans face on the body of a woman you've shown your tendency to walk tall and swing a limp wrist. Jeff you're incredible you point a finger at people accusing them of being childish and in the mean time you display your troll like juvenile behavior every chance you get. Jeff you are a very bitter little man. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Reid Goldsborough" wrote in message ... On Mon, 30 May 2005 18:00:15 +1000, "Jeff R" wrote: I spent a few hours a few years ago, having fun creating some graphics to satirise and parody your self-obsessive and juvenile behaviours. You're (sic) said you're retired, and that's obvious. I never said that. You're lying again. ....and what do you have against retired folk anyway? In my experience an exceptionally underused and valuable resource (unlike your childish scribblings). -- Jeff R. (still hard at work) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Edward McGrath" wrote in message
... Jeff wrote: since you're a little slow on the uptake. snip I understand this jeff, you prove your immaturity by creating a site to slander another RCC poster. Actually, Ted, it'd be slander, not libel - except that its neither. Its satire and parody. 100% defensible. ..Jeff since you are the one who likes to superimpose a mans face on the body of a woman you've shown your tendency to walk tall and swing a limp wrist. Would you like me to explain the joke, Ted, in simple words? Starting with "clueless"? Or maybe repeat some of the utterly indefensible so-called sick "jokes" you've spewed forth in this NG? ..Jeff you're incredible Thanks Ted. ..you point a finger at people accusing them of being childish and in the mean time you display your troll like juvenile behavior every chance you get. Oh, *far* from every chance. I haven't posted these links or replied to your trolls for _ages_ ! Jeff you are a very bitter little man. Thanks Ted. Its a long time since I've been called "little". :-) -- Jeff R. ( a bitter this; a bitter that...) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Terrorism and Counterfeits | Michael E. Marotta | Coins | 85 | August 14th 04 05:38 AM |