If You Have Been Made a Member Of Charlie's Group...

If you have been made a member of Nudo's Gay 8-track group and did not
request to be a member, contact Google groups and spill the beans on
this psycho loser. Because of Charlie Nudo, you (except me!) are now
recieving unsolicited email which is a violation of Googles TOS in
regards to groups. You can also un-subscribe and block the psycho from
adding you on again. Go to "groups help" to use links to report the
group owner (Charlie Nudo).

"Google Groups allows group owners to directly add users as a
convenient way of transferring members from other services. We don't
intend this to be used to build lists for unsolicited email; we don't
like spam, and using the "Add Members" feature in this way violates
both the spirit of Google Groups and our official Terms of Use. To see
our Terms of Use, click the link below. If you think a group owner is
abusing this feature, please let us know about it by clicking the
"contact us" link at the bottom of this page, then clicking "If you'd
like to report abuse, please click here." On the report page, include
the group's address and select "The group owner added me without
asking."

If you want to unsubscribe from the group and you're getting digest
emails, click the link at the bottom of each message to unsubscribe
from the group and discontinue these emails.

If you're receiving individual posts, you can unsubscribe from the
group via email. To unsubscribe, send an email to
. For example, if you wanted to
leave google-friends, you'd send an email to
.

If you've created a Google account, you can prevent other owners from
adding you to their groups. On the Google Groups homepage, sign in then
click the "Manage my subscriptions" link in the My Groups section of
the homepage. Under Invitation preferences, check the box next to "Do
not allow managers to directly add me to their groups" and click the
"Save invitation preferences" button.
If this does not answer your question, please search or browse Google
Groups Help for more assistance. If you are unable to find your answer,
please contact us.

welcome aboard !

wow, that was a lot of work on your part- you always post to yourself
on a deserted ng ?

welcome aboard bicycle...as Paul Harvey says, get ready for NEWS !

tripping28track wrote:
welcome aboard bicycle...as Paul Harvey says, get ready for NEWS !

And which invalid addy is that news going to?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

On 8 Jun 2005 07:47:18 -0700, "tripping28track"
wrote:

welcome aboard bicycle...as Paul Harvey says, get ready for NEWS ! snip

Paul Harvey...ANOTHER moron of the air. Figures Noodles would deify
him, along with Flush Limpdick!

Bicycle wrote:
If you have been made a member of Nudo's Gay 8-track group and did not
request to be a member, contact Google groups and spill the beans on
this psycho loser. Because of Charlie Nudo, you (except me!) are now
recieving unsolicited email which is a violation of Googles TOS in
regards to groups. You can also un-subscribe and block the psycho from
adding you on again. Go to "groups help" to use links to report the
group owner (Charlie Nudo).

"Google Groups allows group owners to directly add users as a
convenient way of transferring members from other services. We don't
intend this to be used to build lists for unsolicited email; we don't
like spam, and using the "Add Members" feature in this way violates
both the spirit of Google Groups and our official Terms of Use. To see
our Terms of Use, click the link below. If you think a group owner is
abusing this feature, please let us know about it by clicking the
"contact us" link at the bottom of this page, then clicking "If you'd
like to report abuse, please click here." On the report page, include
the group's address and select "The group owner added me without
asking."

If you want to unsubscribe from the group and you're getting digest
emails, click the link at the bottom of each message to unsubscribe
from the group and discontinue these emails.

If you're receiving individual posts, you can unsubscribe from the
group via email. To unsubscribe, send an email to
. For example, if you wanted to
leave google-friends, you'd send an email to
.

If you've created a Google account, you can prevent other owners from
adding you to their groups. On the Google Groups homepage, sign in then
click the "Manage my subscriptions" link in the My Groups section of
the homepage. Under Invitation preferences, check the box next to "Do
not allow managers to directly add me to their groups" and click the
"Save invitation preferences" button.
If this does not answer your question, please search or browse Google
Groups Help for more assistance. If you are unable to find your answer,
please contact us.

..

Bicycle wrote:
tripping28track wrote:
welcome aboard bicycle...as Paul Harvey says, get ready for NEWS !

And which invalid addy is that news going to?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Seawolf.CC (http://forums.seawolf.cc/index.php)
- Political Debate (http://forums.seawolf.cc/forumdisplay.php?f=3D3)
- - 'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals
(http://forums.seawolf.cc/showthread.php?t=3D4922)

Wrath 11th April 2005 12:16

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Mon April 11, 2005 9:42 AM GMT-04:00
By Randall Palme

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada's minority Liberal government is heading for
defeat at the hands of the Conservatives after more than 11 years in
power, a dramatic new poll predicted on Monday.

The EKOS poll, commissioned by the Toronto Star newspaper, was taken
after an advertising executive raised the stakes in a scandal about
misuse of government cash with testimony of large kickbacks to the
Liberal Party.

The poll, conducted after the executive's testimony was released last
Thursday, showed voter support for the Conservatives rose seven points
to 36.2 percent while the Liberals fell by nine points to just 25
percent.

It was the lowest showing for the Liberals since they took office in
November 1993. Public support for the party dipped as low as 29 percent
in the run-up to last June's election, but the party recovered to poll
36.7 percent on election day.

The newspaper said the figures suggested a late June election, and EKOS
predicted that Conservative leader Stephen Harper would win a minority
government.

"There is little immediately apparent in the political environment ...
to suggest a way back for the Liberals," the paper quoted EKOS pollster
Frank Graves as saying.

The Liberals lost their majority in Parliament in the last election, in
June 2004, in part because of public concern about the cash-for-favors
scandal. They need support from at least one other party in Parliament
to stay in power.

The latest figures point to a far deeper erosion in Liberal support
than was the case so far, especially in the populous province of
Ontario, where there are 106 seats in Parliament.

In a long-awaited breakthrough, the Conservatives were leading the
Liberals by 40 percent to 33 percent in Ontario, probably enough to
take the majority of Ontario's 106 seats.

Graves said the poll pointed to "a breathtaking shift in what had been
a stagnant and listless political landscape."

Hints of polling troubles for the Liberals came come on Saturday when
an Ipsos-Reid poll showed a much-reduced Liberal lead of 34 percent to
30 percent.

But most of that survey was taken before testimony from adman Jean
Brault was released on Thursday.

EKOS polled 1,125 Canadians between Thursday and Saturday, and its
survey is considered accurate to within 2.9 percentage points 19 times
out of 20. The survey gave 20.5 percent support to the leftist New
Democratic Party and 12.6 percent to the separatist Bloc Quebecois,
which runs only in Quebec.

The Liberals currently have 133 of the House of Commons' 308 seats; the
Conservatives 99; the Bloc 54; the NDP 19. There are two independents
and one vacancy.

Harper said last week he wanted to hear more testimony from the inquiry
investigating the spending scandal before triggering an election. The
inquiry is scheduled to finish hearing testimony on May 6.

Harper wants to lower taxes, limit government spending, boost the
military, improve relations with the United States, get tough on crime,
and end gay marriage that is now available, through court decisions, in
most of Canada.

The Liberals say they will invest billions of dollars in health care
and a proposed new national day-care network.

To add to the woes of Prime Minister Paul Martin, backbench Liberal
legislator David Kilgour is making noises that he might defect to the
Conservatives.

Canadian election campaigns must be at least 36 days long, leaving the
possibility of a vote of no-confidence sometime in May and an election
in mid- to late June.

http://www.reuters.ca/locales/c_new...storyID=3D8143460

This is all a result of the Gomery Inquiry. When the Liberals were in
power before the last election and Chretien was the leader, they had a
Sponsorship program running which was designed to promote Canadian
unity and keep Quebec in Canada.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libera...sorship_scandal
This tells about it but the short version is that during the inquiry
the big bombshell is that the Liberals got over a million dollars in
kickbacks. This is enough to bring down the government I think. It will
play itself out over the next few weeks or months. The liberals have a
minority government right now so the conservatives can topple to
government and force an election over this.

jeSilencer 11th April 2005 13:04

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

That's what happens when a party has no real material base.
Conservatives take a stance on something and keep it. Liberals are all
about trying to stand wherever popularity is, and that false core of
beliefs just doesn't cut it.

White Out 11th April 2005 13:06

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeSilencer
That's what happens when a party has no real material base.
Conservatives take a stance on something and keep it. Liberals are all
about trying to stand wherever popularity is, and that false core of
beliefs just doesn't cut it.


Obviously you weren't around or know much about 80's Canadian politics
with Brian Mulrooney and the Conservatives in power then. They may go
down as the worst government in Canadian histoyr, and most hated.

jeSilencer 11th April 2005 13:10

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

I'm basing this on historical record that goes back beyond the 80's...
not just from 1 particular government or administration

White Out 11th April 2005 13:15

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

What a load of poppycock

jeSilencer 11th April 2005 13:24

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

you're right... wait who was it that tried to defend slavery in
America? Oh yeah and what party came along to stop it? :blah:

It's also funny how Clinton only made military strikes on the bad guys
when the spotlight was on him for something he'd done wrong. And the
second a citizen stood up and said they didn't like our soldiers being
in harms way, he pulled out. Guess that wasn't for popularity..

Wrath 11th April 2005 13:32

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Canadian Liberals and Conservatives are different than American
liberals and conservatives. Even in Canada between federal and
provincial parties the Liberals are liberal in federal politics but in
BC provincial politics the Liberals would be considered the
conservative party. Confusing I know.

White Out 11th April 2005 13:37

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

O please. back when they had slaves in America the Republican party was
more left and liberal then the democrats. Pfft.

Wrath 11th April 2005 13:46

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

My problem here is if they force an election then we are pretty much
stuck with the Conservative party and Harper scares me. I know Sandbox
likes him but some of the key issues worry me. Such as the gay marriage
and marijuana reform for starters. The Conservatives will kill both of
those and I want both of those to go through.

jeSilencer 11th April 2005 14:12

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

lol that's bs dave

i might not know a lot of Canadian politics, but I do know American

Dogg 11th April 2005 14:28

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

I'm still trying to get Canadian elections...I think I grasp it now...

Is what happened in Iraq the same or modelled after Canadas? People
elect the body, and the body picks it's leader with the obvious leading
party voting it's own as a leader?

Kestrel 11th April 2005 15:04

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

gogogo red states

Wrath 11th April 2005 16:14

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Hmmm Dogg, Each party picks it's leader and that guy/gal becomes the
leader of the party. Then when an election is called each riding has
(for example) a liberal, a conservative, an NDPer, etc etc. running.
When the country goes to vote, you only vote for whoever is running in
your riding. At the end they add up all the votes and the party that
took the most ridings wins. The leader of that party becomes the Prime
Minister of Canada.

When we vote up here and we have those people in our riding to vote
for, some people don't care who is running in their riding, they just
vote for the party they like no matter who it is in their riding.
Others vote for who will represent them best no matter what party they
represent. I generally vote for the party and hold my nose and vote for
whoever it is that represents that party whether I like that person or
not OR in the case of where I am living now I basically throw away my
vote because it is a conservative riding and it matters not how I vote
so I vote for the Marijuana Party.

Dogg 11th April 2005 18:17

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

So, to relate it here..the leader of the DNC...screamer boy...I forget
his name...if the Dems won...he'd be the Prime Miister...correct?

Wrath 11th April 2005 18:51

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Dean and correct

Dogg 11th April 2005 21:53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Thats him!!! tyvm

SandBox 17th April 2005 23:56

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

'Breathtaking' Poll Sees Defeat for Liberals

Hi Anne,

Ya,i still like Harper,and i still consider him Canadian Alliance, we
all know the real reason they merged with the conservatives.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright =A92000 - 2005, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.