If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rank Barber Coinage
In two senses: where I place Barber designs in the pantheon of US
coinage, and by denomination with the Barber coinage, and rank as in foul, aromatic, disgusting and off-putting. Try as I might, I have not be able to acquire an appreciation for the Barber designs of circulating coins. Placing the very similar portraits of Liberty at her most bland on each denomination was a huge error, IMO. The reverses are even worse, especially the Eagle, reduced to the dignity of a chicken and placed in an anatomically improbable stance. This is a problem, for me. I'm nearing completion on some of the 20th Century series of the dime, nickel and quarter. The Jefferson and Roosevelt are more than 90% attained, my Washington Quarters are nearly filled, I have good starts on the Mercury dimes and an album for my slowly expanding herd of Bison. The series I have not started by date and mm are the Franklin, WL, Peace and SLQ. The next logical step in my backward progression is to begin Barber Coinage acquisition in albums. Frankly, I dread it. Some I do not despise as much as others, but the larger the coin, the less I seem to like Barber's work! The nickel is my 'favorite', I actually like the 'V', followed in descending order by the dime, quarter and Half. I think the Barber Half is dreadful, simply unattractive in all aspects. I fulfilled the Half in my type set with a $7 coin, not even caring to own an AU or MS example. I can see myself eventually working up an enthusiasm for the nickel (I like nickels!) and doing the dime from a sense of obligation, thankfully I have the SLQ between myself and the Barber 25¢ and two series, Franklin and LW before casting eyes on that Half Dollar. Is this an uncommon feeling? Do others feel as I do, that Barber ranks at or near the nadir for US design? Alan |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan & Erin Williams" wrote in message
... In two senses: where I place Barber designs in the pantheon of US coinage, and by denomination with the Barber coinage, and rank as in foul, aromatic, disgusting and off-putting. Personally, I don't dislike the Barber coins as much as it seems you do. Having said that, I have no plans to ever start a complete date/mm series of any of them either. I have an AU58 Barber quarter which I like very much. I'm looking for a comparable half and dime and that will be it for my Barber purchases. The nickel is another story. I like the nickel and plan to complete a date set at some point. -- John Visit the RCCers favorite coins web page http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jcarne...ns/rccers.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan & Erin Williams" wrote in message ... In two senses: where I place Barber designs in the pantheon of US coinage, and by denomination with the Barber coinage, and rank as in foul, aromatic, disgusting and off-putting. Try as I might, I have not be able to acquire an appreciation for the Barber designs of circulating coins. Placing the very similar portraits of Liberty at her most bland on each denomination was a huge error, IMO. The reverses are even worse, especially the Eagle, reduced to the dignity of a chicken and placed in an anatomically improbable stance. This is a problem, for me. I'm nearing completion on some of the 20th Century series of the dime, nickel and quarter. The Jefferson and Roosevelt are more than 90% attained, my Washington Quarters are nearly filled, I have good starts on the Mercury dimes and an album for my slowly expanding herd of Bison. The series I have not started by date and mm are the Franklin, WL, Peace and SLQ. The next logical step in my backward progression is to begin Barber Coinage acquisition in albums. Frankly, I dread it. Some I do not despise as much as others, but the larger the coin, the less I seem to like Barber's work! The nickel is my 'favorite', I actually like the 'V', followed in descending order by the dime, quarter and Half. I think the Barber Half is dreadful, simply unattractive in all aspects. I fulfilled the Half in my type set with a $7 coin, not even caring to own an AU or MS example. I can see myself eventually working up an enthusiasm for the nickel (I like nickels!) and doing the dime from a sense of obligation, thankfully I have the SLQ between myself and the Barber 25¢ and two series, Franklin and LW before casting eyes on that Half Dollar. Is this an uncommon feeling? Do others feel as I do, that Barber ranks at or near the nadir for US design? Alan I guess I am neither anti-Barber or pro-Barber. I do sense something different when I hold a Barberian coin as opposed to, say, a Merc dime or a WL half. With the latter, history does not touch me - I am more caught up in the beauty and symbolism. When I hold a Barberian coin, with the dates from the late 19th century and the early 20th century, I tend to get caught up in history and commerce, thinking about the importance of a half dollar in those days, who handled the coin, what was happening that year in the world. It is true, though, I do not look twice at a well worn Barber, VG or lower. But, I do find I look longer at the Barber coins when there is more detail. Bill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John Carney wrote:
"Alan & Erin Williams" wrote in message ... In two senses: where I place Barber designs in the pantheon of US coinage, and by denomination with the Barber coinage, and rank as in foul, aromatic, disgusting and off-putting. Personally, I don't dislike the Barber coins as much as it seems you do. Having said that, I have no plans to ever start a complete date/mm series of any of them either. I have an AU58 Barber quarter which I like very much. I'm looking for a comparable half and dime and that will be it for my Barber purchases. The nickel is another story. I like the nickel and plan to complete a date set at some point. It's odd, but I just realized that in my Type Set, the V Nickel is MS, the Barber Dime is EF (scratched), the Quarter is F and the Half is G (maybe)! I think that's an effect, not a cause of my feelings. I wonder if the Liberty nickels *are* the most commonly collected denomination of Barber? It's the only one I can see myself doing with any enthusiasm. Alan 'the bigger the worse' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Alan & Erin Williams wrote:
Is this an uncommon feeling? Do others feel as I do, that Barber ranks at or near the nadir for US design? I'm with you. I'm appalled at the whole series. I am only thankful that there's no "type 1, type 2" business about them -- I can cover it for my type set with one dime, one quarter, and one half, and be done with it. -- Bob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Alan & Erin Williams wrote:
Try as I might, I have not be able to acquire an appreciation for the Barber designs of circulating coins. Tut tut, my good man. A simple case of one person liking a design that another doesn't care for, and vice-versa. It's no surprise that we don't all have the exact same tastes and preferences within the realm of numismatics. FWIW, when I first became aware of Barber coinage, I fell in love with 'em! The Barber quarters were the first set that I endeavored to collect, and I now have 71 of the 74 in the series. I may never get the other three, but I enjoy looking at the ones I have. Larry 'To each his own' |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I've been working on a Barber dime set
off and on for 20 years or so. I try to get the fine to very fine grade coin. It is a real challenge for the quarter and half dollar too. Low grade Barbers are not attractive coins (some would say that about the series whatever the grade) but I rather like them anyway. The dimes have the one stopper date for everyone but the very rich. There are three very expensive coins with the quarters and the half dollars have no extremely rare coins, just a couple of scarce ones. There are many underrated coins for all three denominations that are harder to get than the mintages would suggest. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Placing the very similar portraits
of Liberty at her most bland on each denomination was a huge error, IMO. Ah, but the silver lining to this blunder of Barber blandness was that a subsequent president was inspired to inaugurate the "golden age" of US coinage! Regards, Tom |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
WinWinscenario wrote:
Placing the very similar portraits of Liberty at her most bland on each denomination was a huge error, IMO. Ah, but the silver lining to this blunder of Barber blandness was that a subsequent president was inspired to inaugurate the "golden age" of US coinage! Regards, Tom Nice alliteration, Tom. ;-) Alan 'blundering blandness' |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Krummel wrote:
= "Alan & Erin Williams" wrote in message ... In two senses: where I place Barber designs in the pantheon of US coinage, and by denomination with the Barber coinage, and rank as in foul, aromatic, disgusting and off-putting. Try as I might, I have not be able to acquire an appreciation for the= Barber designs of circulating coins. Placing the very similar portra= its of Liberty at her most bland on each denomination was a huge error, I= MO. The reverses are even worse, especially the Eagle, reduced to the dignity of a chicken and placed in an anatomically improbable stance.= This is a problem, for me. I'm nearing completion on some of the 20t= h Century series of the dime, nickel and quarter. The Jefferson and Roosevelt are more than 90% attained, my Washington Quarters are near= ly filled, I have good starts on the Mercury dimes and an album for my= slowly expanding herd of Bison. The series I have not started by dat= e and mm are the Franklin, WL, Peace and SLQ. The next logical step in= my backward progression is to begin Barber Coinage acquisition in albums= =2E Frankly, I dread it. Some I do not despise as much as others, but th= e larger the coin, the less I seem to like Barber's work! The nickel i= s my 'favorite', I actually like the 'V', followed in descending order = by the dime, quarter and Half. I think the Barber Half is dreadful, sim= ply unattractive in all aspects. I fulfilled the Half in my type set wit= h a $7 coin, not even caring to own an AU or MS example. I can see myself eventually working up an enthusiasm for the nickel (= I like nickels!) and doing the dime from a sense of obligation, thankfu= lly I have the SLQ between myself and the Barber 25=A2 and two series, Franklin and LW before casting eyes on that Half Dollar. Is this an uncommon feeling? Do others feel as I do, that Barber rank= s at or near the nadir for US design? Alan = I guess I am neither anti-Barber or pro-Barber. I do sense something different when I hold a Barberian coin as opposed to, say, a Merc dime = or a WL half. With the latter, history does not touch me - I am more caugh= t up in the beauty and symbolism. When I hold a Barberian coin, with the da= tes from the late 19th century and the early 20th century, I tend to get ca= ught up in history and commerce, thinking about the importance of a half dol= lar in those days, who handled the coin, what was happening that year in th= e world. It is true, though, I do not look twice at a well worn Barber, = VG or lower. But, I do find I look longer at the Barber coins when there is = more detail. Bill Me, too. I can get a chill from a sharp photo of a frosty MS Barber half with maybe a dash of light circumferential toning and a dazzling center, reminding me of a strong summer sun burning through storm clouds or that photo of the Arkansas half on the cover of the latest COINValues magazine. I often break into tears anyway when I notice a particularly beautiful cloud. I figure that such a coin will always be beyond my collecting budget, and it amazes me that some have actually survided over 100 years to still look this way. Low grade circ Barbers do have a certain je ne sais quoi about them, but to me they're not attractive enough to ever consider collecting them by date/mint. = Bruce |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Origins of Coinage | Michael E. Marotta | Coins | 1 | November 6th 03 05:25 PM |
The 1876 Coinage Committee | Harold Fears | Coins | 0 | September 11th 03 04:11 AM |
FA: a better date Barber half than I realized when I listed it | Bill Krummel | Coins | 0 | August 27th 03 07:48 PM |
Request for Citizen Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) Applications | Mark Olanoff | Coins | 3 | August 16th 03 06:26 PM |
Barber half dollars | Mr Bob | Coins | 1 | July 12th 03 05:02 AM |