If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
I've just finished reading "The Expert's Guide to Collecting &
Investing in Rare Coins" by Q. David Bowers. Do any of you know of a source for Universal Rarity Scale numbers for most U.S. coins? Bowers gives URS numbers for a few coins throughout the book, but not for many. If URS numbers aren't available anywhere, what about numbers using the Sheldon Rarity Scale or any other indication of the rarity of a given coin? Thanks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
MikeO wrote: I've just finished reading "The Expert's Guide to Collecting & Investing in Rare Coins" by Q. David Bowers. Do any of you know of a source for Universal Rarity Scale numbers for most U.S. coins? Bowers gives URS numbers for a few coins throughout the book, but not for many. If URS numbers aren't available anywhere, what about numbers using the Sheldon Rarity Scale or any other indication of the rarity of a given coin? Thanks. The vast majority of collector coins are considered to be in the most common category, including the keys, for most of the popularly collected US coin series. Rare die varieties, uncirculated and proof early gold coins, pattern coins, early proofs (prior to 1858) immediately come to mind as likely registering on the lower portion of the URS scale, but I don't know of a difinitive source for most of those numbers. The Cherrypickers Guide provides URS numbers for several rare die varieties. In the Breen Encyclopedia, he stated that he tried to refer to a coin's rarity as often as possible based on the Sheldon Scale, although that scale falls apart when it comes to later date modern coins based on scarcity versus demand. I presume that was the Genesis of the URS. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
On 31 Jan 2006 15:48:01 -0800, "reality"
wrote: MikeO wrote: I've just finished reading "The Expert's Guide to Collecting & Investing in Rare Coins" by Q. David Bowers. Do any of you know of a source for Universal Rarity Scale numbers for most U.S. coins? Bowers gives URS numbers for a few coins throughout the book, but not for many. If URS numbers aren't available anywhere, what about numbers using the Sheldon Rarity Scale or any other indication of the rarity of a given coin? Thanks. The vast majority of collector coins are considered to be in the most common category, including the keys, for most of the popularly collected US coin series. Rare die varieties, uncirculated and proof early gold coins, pattern coins, early proofs (prior to 1858) immediately come to mind as likely registering on the lower portion of the URS scale, but I don't know of a difinitive source for most of those numbers. The Cherrypickers Guide provides URS numbers for several rare die varieties. In the Breen Encyclopedia, he stated that he tried to refer to a coin's rarity as often as possible based on the Sheldon Scale, although that scale falls apart when it comes to later date modern coins based on scarcity versus demand. I presume that was the Genesis of the URS. I understand that the two rarity scales, Sheldon's and Bowers', are exactly opposite ways to look at rarity. Bowers uses 1 to indicate the most extreme rarity. Sheldon means just the opposite - 1 representing the most common. I think that both were created out of whole cloth. Neither makes a whole lot of sense, given the numbers associated with the scarcity of the coins. It is very important, however, to make sure which scale, the Sheldon scale or the "URS" of Bowers, is being used. I think that Dr. Sheldon became enamored with his approach to the grading scale and transferred his approach to the Rarity Scale. Why are there such great differences in the intervals of R8, 7, 6, 5, and 4? Much like the question of the intervals represented by F, VF, and EF. I am sure there is a rationale. Perhaps a math whiz could explain the relationships of the following: R8- 1, 2, or 3 examples known R7 -4-12 known R6- 13-30 known R5- 31-75 known R4- 76- 200 known And this: Basal State Poor 1 Fair 2 AG 3 G4-6 VG7-11 F12-19 VF20-39 XF40-49 AU50-59 The basis for the grades was Sheldon's approach to valuing Large Cents. Was there a similar connection to the numbers and the Rarity Scale he developed? I would love to know. Aram. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:23:39 -0800, Aram H. Haroutunian
wrote: On 31 Jan 2006 15:48:01 -0800, "reality" wrote: EF. I am sure there is a rationale. Perhaps a math whiz could explain the relationships of the following: R8- 1, 2, or 3 examples known R7 -4-12 known R6- 13-30 known R5- 31-75 known R4- 76- 200 known Well, other than the step from R8 to R7, the highest number in each group is _about_ 2 1/2 times as common as the next rarest. The R4-R5 step is a little bigger (2.67 times), but since that's the last one for which he lists numbers, I'm not sure if it's an anomoly, or the start of a nice curve. To fit the "2 1/2 times" scenario, the highest number of examples to qualify for R4 should have been 188. He might have just decided to round it off. Or he could have used the ever popular "this sounds about right" model. take care, Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
Apples and oranges.
A Universal Rarity Scale works only within one area of interest. I collect a number of different types of tokens that each have their own rarity scale, which makes sense to me. For example I collect magic tokens, which are usually issued in very small numbers. A R-1 is more than 1,000 and a R-2 is 501-1,000. In Civil War Tokens a R-1 is more than 5,000, a R-2 is 2,001-5,000 and a R-3 is 501-2,000. Therefore, a R-1 magic token can be many times rarer than a R-3 Civil War Token. It is fun to compare when a token "crosses over" into different realms of interest. The Clarksburg Ohio Civil War Token issued by French is listed by Fuld as OH170A-1a, R-5 (75-200 known) and as a magic token, MT-138, R-7 (11-25 known). Even if the estimates of known examples were the same, they would still have different "R" numbers. Jamaica issued only 48,000 farthings in 1910, a year after the San Francisco mint made 484,000 1909-S VDB cents. Bought my farthing for $75. Ten times rarer, and at less than 1/10th the cost of the cent. Rarity doesn't equate to price, unless related to other comparable coins. Scarcity vs demand says it all. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
On 31 Jan 2006 20:52:29 -0800, "Jud" wrote:
Apples and oranges. A Universal Rarity Scale works only within one area of interest. I collect a number of different types of tokens that each have their own rarity scale, which makes sense to me. For example I collect magic tokens, which are usually issued in very small numbers. A R-1 is more than 1,000 and a R-2 is 501-1,000. In Civil War Tokens a R-1 is more than 5,000, a R-2 is 2,001-5,000 and a R-3 is 501-2,000. Therefore, a R-1 magic token can be many times rarer than a R-3 Civil War Token. It is fun to compare when a token "crosses over" into different realms of interest. The Clarksburg Ohio Civil War Token issued by French is listed by Fuld as OH170A-1a, R-5 (75-200 known) and as a magic token, MT-138, R-7 (11-25 known). Even if the estimates of known examples were the same, they would still have different "R" numbers. Jamaica issued only 48,000 farthings in 1910, a year after the San Francisco mint made 484,000 1909-S VDB cents. Bought my farthing for $75. Ten times rarer, and at less than 1/10th the cost of the cent. Rarity doesn't equate to price, unless related to other comparable coins. Scarcity vs demand says it all. Very interesting stuff, Jud. I can see a relationship between the apples and oranges in the sense that Dr Sheldon created both systematic approaches out of his head, and both are fruit. :-) The complete Sheldon Scale of Rarity is: 1 - Common (In Bust Quarters it is 1,250 or more known, or believed to exist) 2- "Not as common"- From 501 to 1,250 KBTE 3- Scarce- 201-500 4- Very scarce- 76-200 5- Rare- 31-75 6- Very rare- 13- 30 7- Extremely rare- 4-12 8- Unique, or nearly so- 1, 2, or 3 known (Taken from the late Jules Reiver's Variety Identification Manual for US Quarter Dollars, 1796- 1838.) I think it is very clever to create a separate Rarity Scale for specific issues, however, it seems that that approach would create confusion for newer collectors who might bid at auction, for example, and misinterpret the rarity ratings given because now each series might represent an apple or an orange with the newbie thinking of a pomegranate (sp?). :-) I also agree that rarity in and of itself means very little. In the original Cherrypickers' Guide, Fivaz and Stanton listed both rarity and demand, rarity represented by a URS number and demand represented by stars, IIRC. Of course, those of us who are into Bust material had to interpret the rarity ratings from URS to Sheldon to understand what was intended, but the addition of "interest level" made the material more meaningful, to me, at least. I would love to hear more discussion about the issue of rarity, popularity, value not as a function of condition so much as a function of rarity, perception, demand, fun, and any other facets of collecting involved. Aram. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:21:35 -0800, Aram H. Haroutunian
wrote: On 31 Jan 2006 20:52:29 -0800, "Jud" wrote: Apples and oranges. A Universal Rarity Scale works only within one area of interest. I collect a number of different types of tokens that each have their own rarity scale, which makes sense to me. For example I collect magic tokens, which are usually issued in very small numbers. A R-1 is more than 1,000 and a R-2 is 501-1,000. In Civil War Tokens a R-1 is more than 5,000, a R-2 is 2,001-5,000 and a R-3 is 501-2,000. Therefore, a R-1 magic token can be many times rarer than a R-3 Civil War Token. It is fun to compare when a token "crosses over" into different realms of interest. The Clarksburg Ohio Civil War Token issued by French is listed by Fuld as OH170A-1a, R-5 (75-200 known) and as a magic token, MT-138, R-7 (11-25 known). Even if the estimates of known examples were the same, they would still have different "R" numbers. Jamaica issued only 48,000 farthings in 1910, a year after the San Francisco mint made 484,000 1909-S VDB cents. Bought my farthing for $75. Ten times rarer, and at less than 1/10th the cost of the cent. Rarity doesn't equate to price, unless related to other comparable coins. Scarcity vs demand says it all. Very interesting stuff, Jud. I can see a relationship between the apples and oranges in the sense that Dr Sheldon created both systematic approaches out of his head, and both are fruit. :-) The complete Sheldon Scale of Rarity is: 1 - Common (In Bust Quarters it is 1,250 or more known, or believed to exist) 2- "Not as common"- From 501 to 1,250 KBTE 3- Scarce- 201-500 4- Very scarce- 76-200 5- Rare- 31-75 6- Very rare- 13- 30 7- Extremely rare- 4-12 8- Unique, or nearly so- 1, 2, or 3 known (Taken from the late Jules Reiver's Variety Identification Manual for US Quarter Dollars, 1796- 1838.) So, at least with Bust Quarters, the greatest number of examples for each "rarity" does go up by 2 1/2 times, except for the jump from R8 to R7, and from R5 to R4. take care, Scott "Stand back kids, it's math!" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Universal Rarity Scale
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:35:26 GMT, MikeO wrote:
I've just finished reading "The Expert's Guide to Collecting & Investing in Rare Coins" by Q. David Bowers. Do any of you know of a source for Universal Rarity Scale numbers for most U.S. coins? Bowers gives URS numbers for a few coins throughout the book, but not for many. If URS numbers aren't available anywhere, what about numbers using the Sheldon Rarity Scale or any other indication of the rarity of a given coin? Thanks. Very interesting & helpful comments. In Bowers book he describes where the numbers come from. He says " stated simply, it is a geometric progression of numbers, rounded off for convenience in use, with each category containing about twice as many members as the preceding category." His first attempt used precise numbers in the higher ranges, such as URS-16 being 16,385 to 32,768, then someone suggested that the URS would be simpler if he rounded off the numbers in higher categories. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Definitive Chord & Scale Bible - Literally EVERY chord and scale! | Kind of Blue254 | Coins | 0 | February 8th 05 05:47 PM |
GLIMPSES OF A MYSTERY | GLIMPSES OF A MYSTERY | Books | 0 | August 29th 04 06:07 AM |
FS: 1991 Universal Studios "LUCY A TRIBUTE" Pin | J.R. Sinclair | Cards:- non-sport | 2 | April 11th 04 09:10 PM |
FS: 1991 Universal Studios "LUCY A TRIBUTE" Pin | J.R. Sinclair | General | 0 | November 25th 03 05:52 AM |
FA: Vintage Chicago Dairy Scale, c. 20-30's | buckeyeweb | General | 0 | July 27th 03 11:50 PM |