If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On to New Hampster
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:09:48 -0800, DeserTBoB
wrote: I doubt Huckabee will survive long in the Primaries. He'll be way behind in any of the New Hamsphire vote and I suspect Super-Tuesday will kill him, if he isn't already dead in the water by then. -Tom Sr. snip Which means that unless Giuiliani can win, we'll get Romney. I'm sure that works fine for Dems because the RR isn't likely to give him enough support to keep even Hillary out of office. Agreed. The stories I got out of Iowa tonight a 1.) Record youth turnout at the Dem caucuses, and record turnout by all Democrats. That played well for Obama, not-so-hot for Edwards He took 2nd in a virtual tie with third place Clinton. That Clinton didn't finish first is notable, that Edwards did as well as she did is a miracle. But can he keep it up? He's got to do better than third place in at least the next three primaries to even have a chance. and badly for Clinton, who needed the middle-aged and older female vote that just didn't coalesce for her, and who went for...get this...Obama! And Edwards. Of the three, Hillary got the smallest share of that vote and ironically, it was a vote she was specially courting in Iowa. I'll bet the Clinton camp is worried ****less and getting ready for a major change in voter targeting. The real worry for Hillary isn't Obama, proper...rather it's that Edwards beat her, even if only by a nose. Lesson: Hillary's whole campaign needs to be retooled..."experience" doesn't work anymore, neither does her being a "change" agent. She's not a "change" agent, she's a return to the past. Not that the nineties is all that bad a past to return to . . . Of course, this is only IOWA...49 states left, not to mention "Tsunami Tuesday." "Super" Tuesday. I'll bet Georgia will go for Obama and Huckabee. Also, don't EVER forget..."Comeback Kid" Clinton LOVES to run as an underdog and so, naturally, does she. Bill has been a genius in working the "underdog" spot in every election he's ever been in, and yes...he's very active in Hillary's campaign strategy. Makes sense. 2.) 60% of ALL Republican caucusers were self-styled "evangelicals." If you follow the underlying Huckabee logic, he should have run the table, but he didn't. Telling is that 14% of "evangelicals" went for Romney! Enjoy it now, Huckleberry...America's not ready for yet another "talk to God" guy in the White House...not to mention one who resembles Gomer Pyle a bit too much for comfort. But he's the Republican most likely to turn out the Evangelical vote, just as Giuliani is the Repulican most likely to bleed votes off Clinton. 3.) BIG news of the GOP: Guiliani only pulled 3%! 3%!!!! Even Ron Paul beat him! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! In hindsight it makes sense. The RR won't vote for Giuliani, the midwest isn't likely to vote for a New Yorker and western independence and liberty voters are ones Ron Paul appeals to. So much for his "name recognition" and being "America's mayor." Yoo hoo, Rootie Tootie...it's not working anymore. Guiliani thinks that firing up late (in Florida, where he thinks all the snowbird retirees from NYC will all flock to him) And if they do? he can just assume the top slot from there into "Tsunami Tuesday," but that strategy could be his immediate undoing. He's done far to badly in Iowa. I'm not sure he can even be considered a serious contender. Giuliani's biggest influence on this election may end up being who he throws his support to by convention time. The Dems nominate first and their nominee will have a lot of influence on the Rep choice (unless one of them starts running away with the race). Mega-advantage: McCain, who may take New Hampshire and has already announced he'll be going, not to South Carolina, where the churchers will drool over Huckabee, but Michigan, where he can bury Romney on his home turf. Should McCain clean Romney's clock in MI, he can then kick Giuliani out of the #1 spot in the national polls...which Giuliani's been doing to himself just in the last couple of weeks anyway...and thus out of the box on "Tsunami Tuesday." If, if, if. McCain can still bleed a few left of center votes from the Dems but will the Fundies vote for him? 4.) Overall: BOTH parties are sick and tired of the status quo. Major error there, man. The PARTIES are perfectly happy with the status quo. It's the center that's sick and tired of it. Bush has destroyed the GOP machine that used to anoint their nominees prior to ANY primaries. "Experience" also isn't playing well to GOP voters anymore, just as it backfired on Hillary in Iowa. I mean, look at all the "experience" that Dumbsfeld and Cheney have, and they, along with their addled-brained boss, have almost tanked the whole country! Bush was no more experienced than Huckabee or Edwards when he was elected. His lack of knowledge about international issues was a major criticism of him by Dems in 2000. Same works against Hillary, whose refusal to abandon her Iraq position came back to bite her in the fanny. I understand it perfectly. She won't apologize because the mistake wasn't hers. It was the adminisration's for providing faulty information to the Congress in order to bypass reality and do what it wanted. Both Huckabee and Obama, for their respective parties, represent a complete "throw the bums out" attitude. I don't see that with Hucakbee. The only "throw the bums out" candidates I percieve are Obama, Edwards and Paul. This, however, will ultimately benefit McCain on the GOP side, but who gets the bow on the Dem side depends solely on how much overhauling of Clinton gets done by "Tsunami Tuesday." Edwards showed tonight that he can indeed cash in on the "change" platform, but he'd better be prepared to take on Obama head to head, NOT Hillary. I hate to make predictions 'cause I'm so often wrong, but I suspect a pair of very interesting conventions. Both parties seem to be splitting between candidates. Romney is pretty. He's just not fast on his feet and isn't well prepared to deal with his detractors. Huckabee is undeniably a Bush Republican. Devout, liberal and spendthrift, he's pure status quo and a likely GOP choice. McCain is going to have to work hard and that will take a toll on his health unless he has excellent staffing. Early picks in NH: Obama for the Dems, McCain for the GOP, but anything can happen in a week! Romney may unleash robotic Mormons into every nook and cranny of the state this weekend, so who knows? More likely Huckabee will try to flood the state with volunteers. One thing's for sure...for McCain to win in NH, he's got to stop hemorrhaging votes of the "indies" to Obama; else, Romney gets the win. Can't add anything to that. McCain offended his center by sucking up to the RR. He has to make up for that and fast. He also needs to give compelling arguments on issues other than Iraq. The voters are looking at other positions as well. He can do that now only by painting Obama as a "babe in the woods" compared to his own long Senate career as an "outsider," and he definitely has those credentials. Yes, McCain has a streak of that western state independence and that's something he may be able to capitalize on. Nobody seems yet to be going after him, but they'll start if he does well in NH. Swill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How can I even begin to thank you? | Chrysta | Coins | 34 | January 27th 05 03:40 AM |
FA: Circus bl of 4 FDC | Stan | Marketplace | 0 | June 21st 04 03:15 AM |
Where to begin.... | RJ Polock | Coins | 12 | November 9th 03 04:22 AM |
FS: Circus Topicals | Bill Kemp | Marketplace | 0 | October 2nd 03 05:53 PM |
let the questions begin | Bruce Hickmott | Coins | 10 | August 14th 03 01:38 PM |