A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » Coins
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 3rd 10, 05:45 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
Spartakus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and SafetyRegulations for Abortion Clinics

Spender wrote:
"The art of critical thinking" wrote:
"Steve" wrote:


Abortion under any any circumstances is murder.


You must be a religious folk or something.
Murder is a word that is only associated with those already born.
That's the accepted definition.


The accepted definition of murder is killing that which is alive, not
necessarily born.


It will be fun watching you backpedal from that definition.

I know you like your definition better because it allows you
to feel there is nothing at all wrong with partially delivering
a perfectly healthy term baby only so far as to allow you
to get to its head, crush its skull and scramble its brains.


You are being driven insane by anti-abortion propaganda. Get help
before you hurt someone.
Ads
  #22  
Old September 3rd 10, 07:12 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
Frank Provasek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 859
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and SafetyRegulations for Abortion Clinics

Here is something to ponder...

Is Heaven Populated Chiefly by the Souls of Embryos?
Harvesting stem cells without tears
Ronald Bailey | December 22, 2004

What are we to think about the fact that Nature (and for believers,
Nature's God) profligately creates and destroys human embryos? John
Opitz, a professor of pediatrics, human genetics, and obstetrics and
gynecology at the University of Utah, testified before the President's
Council on Bioethics that between 60 and 80 percent of all naturally
conceived embryos are simply flushed out in women's normal menstrual
flows unnoticed. This is not miscarriage we're talking about. The
women and their husbands or partners never even know that conception
has taken place; the embryos disappear from their wombs in their
menstrual flows. In fact, according to Opitz, embryologists estimate
that the rate of natural loss for embryos that have developed for
seven days or more is 60 percent. The total rate of natural loss of
human embryos increases to at least 80 percent if one counts from the
moment of conception. About half of the embryos lost are abnormal, but
half are not, and had they implanted they would probably have
developed into healthy babies.

So millions of viable human embryos each year produced via normal
conception fail to implant and never develop further. Does this mean
America is suffering a veritable holocaust of innocent human life
annihilated? Consider the claim made by right-to-life apologists like
Robert George, a Princeton University professor of jurisprudence and a
member of the President's Council on Bioethics, that every embryo is
"already a human being." Does that mean that if we could detect such
unimplanted embryos as they leave the womb, we would have a duty to
rescue them and try to implant them anyway?

"If the embryo loss that accompanies natural procreation were the
moral equivalent of infant death, then pregnancy would have to be
regarded as a public health crisis of epidemic proportions:
Alleviating natural embryo loss would be a more urgent moral cause
than abortion, in vitro fertilization, and stem-cell research
combined," declared Michael Sandel, a Harvard University government
professor, also a member of the President's Council on Bioethics.

As far as I know, bioconservatives like Robert George do not advocate
the rescue of naturally conceived unimplanted embryos. But why not? In
right-to-life terms, normal unimplanted embryos are the moral
equivalents of a 30-year-old mother of three children.

Of course, culturally we do not mourn the deaths of these millions of
embryos as we would the death of a child—and reasonably so, because we
do in fact know that these embryos are not people. Try this thought
experiment. A fire breaks out in a fertility clinic and you have a
choice: You can save a three-year-old child or a Petri dish containing
10 seven-day old embryos. Which do you choose to rescue?

Stepping onto dangerous theological ground, it seems that if human
embryos consisting of one hundred cells or less are the moral
equivalents of a normal adult, then religious believers must accept
that such embryos share all of the attributes of a human being,
including the possession of an immortal soul. So even if we generously
exclude all of the naturally conceived abnormal embryos—presuming, for
the sake of theological argument, that imperfections in their gene
expression have somehow blocked the installation of a soul—that would
still mean that perhaps 40 percent of all the residents of Heaven were
never born, never developed brains, and never had thoughts, emotions,
experiences, hopes, dreams, or desires.

Yet millions of intelligent people of good will maintain that seven-
day-old embryos have the exact same moral standing as do readers of
this column. Acting on this sincere belief, they are trying to block
biomedical research on human embryonic stem cells that is desired by
millions of their fellow citizens.

But there may be a way out of this politico-theological impasse. The
President's Council on Bioethics held an extraordinarily interesting
session earlier this month in which two different avenues for
obtaining human embryonic stem cells were proposed, in ways that would
skirt right-to-life moral objections.

First, Howard Zucker and Donald Landry, two medical professors at
Columbia University, proposed "a new definition of death for the human
organism, an organism in development, and that is the irreversible
arrest of cell division." They pointed out that a good percentage of
in-vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos consist of a mixture of cells, some
containing the wrong number of chromosomes (aneuploidy), some with the
normal number. Embryos with such cell mixtures often cease development
by cell division and thus cannot develop into fetuses, much less
babies. Zucker and Landry argue that such embryos can be considered
dead, and the normal embryonic cells they contain can be harvested
just as organs can be ethically harvested from brain-dead adults.
(Animal experiments have already shown that cells harvested from
defective embryos will produce normal tissues.) Thus, we get stem
cells from an entity that could not, under any circumstances, have
become a human being.

William Hurlbut, a consulting professor in the Program of Human
Biology at Stanford University and another member of the President's
Council on Bioethics, proposed another way to produce cloned human
embryonic stem cells that right-to-lifers should not find morally
objectionable. Hurlbut cited work by researcher Janet Rossant at Mount
Sinai Hospital in Toronto in which she inactivated the cdx2 gene in
mice. Once the cdx2 gene is inactivated, the mouse embryo cannot form
a trophoblast—the tissues that grow into the placenta. However,
embryonic stem cells do develop, although they cannot form an embryo.
Hurlbut proposed an attempt to find similar genes that could be
inactivated in the nuclei of adult human cells before they are
installed in enucleated human eggs to produce cloned embryonic stem
cells that are a genetic match for the person who donates the adult
nucleus. (Transplanted cells and tissues produced by such therapeutic
cloning would not be rejected by the donor's immune system.) Once the
stem cells have been derived, the inactivated genes could be
reactivated so that the stem cells could be used to produce normal
transplantable cells and tissues.

"This process does not involve the creation of an embryo that is then
altered to transform it into a non-embryonic entity," explained
Hurlbut. "Rather the proposed genetic alteration is accomplished ab
initio, the entity is brought into existence with a genetic structure
insufficient to generate a human embryo."

Will this research reduce the number of embryos populating heaven? Who
knows? But these options offer a possible way around the moral
blockades that impede promising biomedical research on human embryonic
stem cells. Should we halt current human embryonic stem-cell research
while these possible new avenues of research are being explored?
Absolutely not. That would be surrendering to the moral bullying of a
minority that wants to halt promising medical research that could cure
millions on theological grounds that many of their fellow citizens do
not share.
  #23  
Old September 3rd 10, 10:48 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
The art of critical thinking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics

"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:37:05 -0500, Bill Allen wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:18:50 -0500, Spender wrote:

The accepted definition of murder is killing that which is alive,


Then I murdered several salmon and a few veggies last night.
Come arrest me.


Another nut who thinks the abortion issue is about animals.


Then please define what 'life' is (in a human context).


  #24  
Old September 3rd 10, 11:52 PM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
Bill Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:42:22 -0500, Spender wrote:

On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 10:37:05 -0500, Bill Allen wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:18:50 -0500, Spender wrote:

The accepted definition of murder is killing that which is alive,


Then I murdered several salmon and a few veggies last night.
Come arrest me.


Another nut who thinks the abortion issue is about animals.


It is.
You are, after all, an animal.

not
necessarily born. I know you like your definition better because it allows
you to feel there is nothing at all wrong with partially delivering a
perfectly healthy term baby only so far as to allow you to get to its
head, crush its skull and scramble its brains.


Uh oh, a 'partial birth abortion' kook.


Yes, you got me.


You don't get a discount for agreeing with me4.

I just can't stand outright genocide.


You clearly don't know the definition of genocide.

I'm weird that way.


Don't sell yourself short. You're weird in numerous ways.
  #26  
Old September 4th 10, 05:14 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
RichL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics

"Spender" wrote in message
ews.com...
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 19:56:20 +1000, "The art of critical thinking"
wrote:

"Spender" wrote in message
ynews.com

The accepted definition of murder is killing that which is alive, not
necessarily born.


Ah, no. That would mean that killing a dog or a tortoise or a banana tree
is also murder.
Have you ever murdered a fly and mosquito?


The abortion issue is referring to animals? Didn't know that.


You described an "accepted definition of murder". You didn't confine that
definition to the subject of abortion, in fact if you had (and you imply
above that you did), you'd have caught yourself in a circular reasoning
pattern, since there is no "accepted definition of murder" in the context of
abortion, only anti-abortion extrapolations.

Abortion is legal, murder is not. By "accepted definition", abortion
therefore cannot be murder.

  #27  
Old September 4th 10, 05:15 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
Spartakus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and SafetyRegulations for Abortion Clinics

Spender wrote:
"The art of critical thinking" wrote:
"Spender" wrote:


The abortion issue is referring to animals? Didn't know that.


You did say it was anything that is alive.


So you completely ignore the context of the thread.


Ha ha! I predicted wrong - you aren't backpedaling away from your
definition of "murder". You are running away, as fast as you can.
Btw, here it is again:

"The accepted definition of murder is killing
that which is alive."

You didn't say anything about the species of the victim(s). Since
plants are alive, a tossed salad would be a mass grave, according to
your definition.

Have fun talking to yourself.


I guess you have a lot of experience with that.
  #28  
Old September 4th 10, 05:22 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
RichL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics

"The art of critical thinking" wrote in message
u...

By the way, I hope the people in rec.collecting.coins and
alt.guitar.amps also enjoy posts about abortion clinics because they are
getting this thread also (probably because the O.P. has a coin collection
and a guitar and goes to that group).


Posts in alt.guitar.amps that are actually about guitar amps are pretty rare
these days. However, posts about abortion clinics, Muslim community
centers, and chocolate easter bunny presidents do seem to give the aging,
intermittently amp techs who post here a nice rush and opportunity to vent
their bile.

  #29  
Old September 4th 10, 05:31 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
JimT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics


"Spartakus" wrote in message
...
Spender wrote:
"The art of critical thinking" wrote:
"Spender" wrote:


The abortion issue is referring to animals? Didn't know that.


You did say it was anything that is alive.


So you completely ignore the context of the thread.


Ha ha! I predicted wrong - you aren't backpedaling away from your
definition of "murder". You are running away, as fast as you can.
Btw, here it is again:

"The accepted definition of murder is killing
that which is alive."

You didn't say anything about the species of the victim(s). Since
plants are alive, a tossed salad would be a mass grave, according to
your definition.


"The horror... the horror..."


  #30  
Old September 4th 10, 05:50 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins,alt.abortion,alt.guitar.amps
RichL
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Rutherford Institute Urges Stringent Health and Safety Regulations for Abortion Clinics

"RichL" wrote in message
...

Posts in alt.guitar.amps that are actually about guitar amps are pretty
rare these days. However, posts about abortion clinics, Muslim community
centers, and chocolate easter bunny presidents do seem to give the aging,
intermittently amp techs who post here a nice rush and opportunity to vent
their bile.


"intermittently EMPLOYED".

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ann Rutherford- TTM [email protected] Autographs 1 January 30th 05 12:27 AM
Monetary Research Institute Michael E. Marotta Paper Money 4 September 18th 04 11:02 PM
Ann Rutherford success! Bcoton Autographs 1 March 17th 04 05:43 AM
Stop "American Health Crisis Act"/Health Food Ban Steve Bayt Football (US) 0 January 17th 04 08:10 PM
Miida 4 track abortion The Poodlebutt 8 Track Tapes 8 October 18th 03 03:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.