If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret Atwood's nwe invention
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret Atwood's nwe invention
Morpheus wrote:
Any comments? http://tinyurl.com/qjpse I get my books signed as mementos of meeting the author in person, and for that intangible whatever that comes from owning a book that you know was once in the hands of its author. The prospect of a webcam interface & a robot-signed book doesn't thrill me much. I also think it would be a good idea if such signatures were always followed by a "robot-arm-signed" disclaimer, included as part of the device's normal routine. Having said that, of course, who the hell do I think I'm kidding? If the opportunity arose, I'd still get some books by my favorite authors signed like this--for the experience, for the interesting addition to the collection, and for the conversation value. And you know that sooner rather than later SF writers & fans, in particular, are going to be all over this. --Jon Meyers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret Atwood's nwe invention
Like Jon, I value the signing of books as a "personal connection to the
writer, silly and wishy-washy as that sounds. Indeed, the whole idea of collecting first editions as opposed to good new versions is also rather silly on any logical basis. The same can be said for stamps, coins (what is "intrinsic value" if you cannot eat it??), Barbie dolls and all the rest of things that people collect - including one fellow who collected used oil rags. Which is really better - a real Reubens or a digitally enhanced and recreated image done to make the original look as it did upon being painted? How many paintings have bee retouched; how may first signed editions are forgeries. Sure, I have provenance for many of mine, but certainly not all. Heck, I even have all of J.T. LeRoy, ARC, first HC and SC signed. By whom? Some are even left-handed, according to JT (in "in" joke between us). But then, any car in mechanically sound condition will get you form Vancouver to Montreal. Ford, VW, Rolls. Even a few years old. Save for a few, they will take the same time. Heck, we humans have been doing these silly things for years, and for reason that I cannot understand, we still do. So to me personally, does it matter? Really, I suppose the answer is rather like right now - only if I know. Crazy as it sounds, I would not wish to have such a signed copy, but damn - if I bought one without knowing (especially at a garage sale), I would be damn pleased... At a Value Village some time ago, I found a signed copy of a Peter Ustinov book, one of the short story collections. The inscription challenged me, so I looked up the former owner and yes, she had some interaction with him and gave a certain lecture. to me, that made the book far more interesting than a "flat signed" copy. It was real, it had a story. But flat signed is all the rage, it seems. And that can be too often an pen machine - do we really believe that X signed all those copies of his/her latest book that are sold in every branch of a chain store, even remaindered? We buy the myth, the fantasy. As long as we believe it, it has value to us. Convince more to believe, it has more value to many. That's collecting... Willow "Jon Meyers" wrote in message ... Morpheus wrote: Any comments? http://tinyurl.com/qjpse I get my books signed as mementos of meeting the author in person, and for that intangible whatever that comes from owning a book that you know was once in the hands of its author. The prospect of a webcam interface & a robot-signed book doesn't thrill me much. I also think it would be a good idea if such signatures were always followed by a "robot-arm-signed" disclaimer, included as part of the device's normal routine. Having said that, of course, who the hell do I think I'm kidding? If the opportunity arose, I'd still get some books by my favorite authors signed like this--for the experience, for the interesting addition to the collection, and for the conversation value. And you know that sooner rather than later SF writers & fans, in particular, are going to be all over this. --Jon Meyers |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret Atwood's nwe invention
"Willow Arune" wrote in
news:ZAuNf.84836$B94.82459@pd7tw3no: Like Jon, I value the signing of books as a "personal connection to the writer, silly and wishy-washy as that sounds. Indeed, the whole idea of collecting first editions as opposed to good new versions is also rather silly on any logical basis. The same can be said for stamps, coins (what is "intrinsic value" if you cannot eat it??), Barbie dolls and all the rest of things that people collect - including one fellow who collected used oil rags. Which is really better - a real Reubens or a digitally enhanced and recreated image done to make the original look as it did upon being painted? How many paintings have bee retouched; how may first signed editions are forgeries. Sure, I have provenance for many of mine, but certainly not all. Heck, I even have all of J.T. LeRoy, ARC, first HC and SC signed. By whom? Some are even left-handed, according to JT (in "in" joke between us). But then, any car in mechanically sound condition will get you form Vancouver to Montreal. Ford, VW, Rolls. Even a few years old. Save for a few, they will take the same time. Heck, we humans have been doing these silly things for years, and for reason that I cannot understand, we still do. So to me personally, does it matter? Really, I suppose the answer is rather like right now - only if I know. Crazy as it sounds, I would not wish to have such a signed copy, but damn - if I bought one without knowing (especially at a garage sale), I would be damn pleased... At a Value Village some time ago, I found a signed copy of a Peter Ustinov book, one of the short story collections. The inscription challenged me, so I looked up the former owner and yes, she had some interaction with him and gave a certain lecture. to me, that made the book far more interesting than a "flat signed" copy. It was real, it had a story. But flat signed is all the rage, it seems. And that can be too often an pen machine - do we really believe that X signed all those copies of his/her latest book that are sold in every branch of a chain store, even remaindered? We buy the myth, the fantasy. As long as we believe it, it has value to us. Convince more to believe, it has more value to many. That's collecting... Willow "Jon Meyers" wrote in message ... Morpheus wrote: Any comments? http://tinyurl.com/qjpse I get my books signed as mementos of meeting the author in person, and for that intangible whatever that comes from owning a book that you know was once in the hands of its author. The prospect of a webcam interface & a robot-signed book doesn't thrill me much. I also think it would be a good idea if such signatures were always followed by a "robot-arm-signed" disclaimer, included as part of the device's normal routine. Having said that, of course, who the hell do I think I'm kidding? If the opportunity arose, I'd still get some books by my favorite authors signed like this--for the experience, for the interesting addition to the collection, and for the conversation value. And you know that sooner rather than later SF writers & fans, in particular, are going to be all over this. --Jon Meyers I am of several minds about this. This would be an unique inscription.The signature would produce the same degree of writer's cramp.as a real signature. Thus, it would hover between real and fake. At the moment, I am inclined to go with "virtual" inscription. The result of a "Virtual Book Tour". As stated, the DVD would be necessary to establish provenance. With or with out the disclaimer, it would be important to establish the number of such inscriptions. It then would possible the books could become collectable in some sort of bizarre way. Without the numbers, you could go into your neighhborhood Barnes & Noble and look at racks (similar to key chains in Las Vegas) and choose inscriptions for - Michael, Jennifer, Christopher, Jessica, Matthew, Ashley et.c.(Chosen from the top three male and female names in the U.S. in 1984 per Social Security.) John Dunning managed to establish this with his anti-signature "Fickle Finger" imprints. "Let's see, the thumb is inexpensive - The "fickle finger' is rare but expensive - I'll go with the ring finger." Without the disclaimer, It would be reasonable to ask Ms. Atwood to add "signed in person" or depending on your view of her work "signed in the flesh" when meeting her face to face. Arduous - yes, but she asked for it. This is a area that cries for reductio ad absurdum. I hope my small contribution will be graciously accepted |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Margaret Atwood's nwe invention
"Morpheus" wrote in message
.. . Any comments? News reports from Guelph, Ont., say the gadget failed to work as designed. It appears the inventors kept on improving it, at the cost of reliabity. Miss Atwood handled the failure with polite aplomb, as we might have expected. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|