A collecting forum. CollectingBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CollectingBanter forum » Collecting newsgroups » 8 Track Tapes
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Democrats in Congress choking off USA oil supply-when 67% ofAmericans want to drill !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old July 7th 08, 01:18 AM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
www.bobbarr2008.com www.bobbarr2008.com is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by CollectingBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default Republicans Go to Bat to Help Oil Companies Make More Money

In article , says...
In .net
www.bobbarr2008.com wrote:

They suck because Exxon funds junk science to discredit climate
change, because the solution inevitably means buying less of what they
sell.


Well, you certainly don't want any other opinions offered but yours, do
you?


I want opinions that make sense, sure. All you seem to have
is snarky comments.
Ads
  #42  
Old July 7th 08, 01:20 AM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
www.bobbarr2008.com www.bobbarr2008.com is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by CollectingBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default Republicans Go to Bat to Help Oil Companies Make More Money

In article , says...
In .net
www.bobbarr2008.com wrote:

Wouldn't it be smarter to do things that will actually save average
Americans money today? I don't understand what your problem is with
that.


You were the one who said "instead", remember?

Nobody but you seems to be interested in restricting choices.

If it was up to me, you'd be free to do whatever you think is best, so
long as you leave me alone to do what I need to do.

Simple, isn't it?


We already talked about "instead." You seem to want to have
a big debate with your strawman. If you think I want to
"restrict choices" by saying we should do something smart
'instead' of something dumb then you are a real piece of work.
  #43  
Old July 7th 08, 02:18 PM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrat,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
Zeke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Republicans Go to Bat to Help Oil Companies Make More Money

We have the oil, gas, & coal for all of our energy needs for a 100 years.
We just need to use it.

We have had two ice ages & in between we had gloable warming. No one burned
fossil fuels back then. So we need to get off AlGores scam & save the USA.

Z
"www.bobbarr2008.com" wrote in message
. net...
In article ,
says...

"Eat the rich" wrote in message
...
I wish you would do some research before posting. Only takes a second
with the internet. The United States has in oil reserves at current
consumption rates a little more than three years of oil, if you were
to exclude oil from other countries.

Remember when the genius Ronald Reagan ripped the solar panels off of
the White House. Remember all of the Republicans and some Democrats
who voted to keep subsidizing oil companies with tax breaks and who
voted against funding the research and development of alternative
energy sources? And all of you yahoos who can't do math or do a
little research before barfing up your drill-more nonsense posts,
you're partly to blame, too.


Try including oil shale, nuclear and coal technology into the equation.
New
technology sounds fine but first something has to be developed, tested,
improved upon and proven to be of a practical nature. Then the next huge
step is a distribution, supply and maintenance system to support it.
Hydrogen cars would be great except there are almost no places to refuel
such cars. Of course, we could encourage thousands of refill stations be
established but, hey, that would mean a few entrepreneurs would become
quite
wealthy and, well, we can't have some ******* actually make a lot of
money.
But then again, we could tax the hell out of him and his companies.

Many new products are found to have unwanted consequences so we have to
be
careful. The creation of asbestos was great until we found out about
health hazards of exposure. And the unexpected realization that
discontinued use of the standard light bulb in favor of the new ugly bulb
involves a hazardous waste problem. No more throwing your expired bulb
in
the trash can.

Yes, by all means look to new technology to reduce consumption of oil but
right now we use oil. We can't run our cars today on the promise of
maybe
something better ten years from now.



The first thing we should do is promote conservation, instead of
trying to drum up business for Exxon. Why are conservatives
against conservation? If right-wingers were not oil company errand
boys, they'd talking about mass transit, telecommuting, and higher
CAFE standards, not drilling ANWR for oil.



  #44  
Old July 8th 08, 11:53 AM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrat,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
trippin-2-8-track
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 365
Default Global Warming trends occur every 1500 years naturally

On Jul 7, 9:18*am, "Zeke" wrote:
We have the oil, gas, & coal for all of our energy needs for a 100 years.
We just need to use it.

We have had two ice ages & in between we had gloable warming. *No one burned
fossil fuels back then. *So we need to get off AlGores scam & save the USA.

Z"www.bobbarr2008.com" wrote in message

. net...



In article ,
says...


"Eat the rich" wrote in message
....
I wish you would do some research before posting. *Only takes a second
with the internet. *The United States has in oil reserves at current
consumption rates a little more than three years of oil, if you were
to exclude oil from other countries.


Remember when the genius Ronald Reagan ripped the solar panels off of
the White House. *Remember all of the Republicans and some Democrats
who voted to keep subsidizing oil companies with tax breaks and who
voted against funding the research and development of alternative
energy sources? *And all of you yahoos who can't do math or do a
little research before barfing up your drill-more nonsense posts,
you're partly to blame, too.


Try including oil shale, nuclear and coal technology into the equation..
New
technology sounds fine but first something has to be developed, tested,
improved upon and proven to be of a practical nature. *Then the next huge
step is a distribution, supply and maintenance system to support it.
Hydrogen cars would be great except there are almost no places to refuel
such cars. *Of course, we could encourage thousands of refill stations be
established but, hey, that would mean a few entrepreneurs would become
quite
wealthy and, well, we can't have some ******* actually make a lot of
money.
But then again, we could tax the hell out of him and his companies.


Many new products are found to have unwanted consequences so we have to
be
careful. * The creation of asbestos was great until we found out about
health hazards of exposure. *And the unexpected realization that
discontinued use of the standard light bulb in favor of the new ugly bulb
involves a hazardous waste problem. *No more throwing your expired bulb
in
the trash can.


Yes, by all means look to new technology to reduce consumption of oil but
right now we use oil. * We can't run our cars today on the promise of
maybe
something better ten years from now.


The first thing we should do is promote conservation, instead of
trying to drum up business for Exxon. Why are conservatives
against conservation? If right-wingers were not oil company errand
boys, they'd talking about mass transit, telecommuting, and higher
CAFE standards, not drilling ANWR for oil.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -




the Global Warming Scare and Green Fad are just that, fads- and will
go the way of the "No Nukes" fad of the 1970's, along with the CB
radio, pet rock, and mood ring

we can't have greenie tree huggers planning our national energy
policy, otherwise our entire way of life and country will become
emasculated and we'll go back to living in caves, and have a national
population of about 500,000 people

  #45  
Old July 8th 08, 12:04 PM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrat,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
trippin-2-8-track
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 365
Default new scientific findings completely debunks the Global Warming hoax

On Jul 7, 9:18*am, "Zeke" wrote:
We have the oil, gas, & coal for all of our energy needs for a 100 years.
We just need to use it.

We have had two ice ages & in between we had gloable warming. *No one burned
fossil fuels back then. *So we need to get off AlGores scam & save the USA.

Z"www.bobbarr2008.com" wrote in message

. net...



In article ,
says...


"Eat the rich" wrote in message
....
I wish you would do some research before posting. *Only takes a second
with the internet. *The United States has in oil reserves at current
consumption rates a little more than three years of oil, if you were
to exclude oil from other countries.


Remember when the genius Ronald Reagan ripped the solar panels off of
the White House. *Remember all of the Republicans and some Democrats
who voted to keep subsidizing oil companies with tax breaks and who
voted against funding the research and development of alternative
energy sources? *And all of you yahoos who can't do math or do a
little research before barfing up your drill-more nonsense posts,
you're partly to blame, too.


Try including oil shale, nuclear and coal technology into the equation..
New
technology sounds fine but first something has to be developed, tested,
improved upon and proven to be of a practical nature. *Then the next huge
step is a distribution, supply and maintenance system to support it.
Hydrogen cars would be great except there are almost no places to refuel
such cars. *Of course, we could encourage thousands of refill stations be
established but, hey, that would mean a few entrepreneurs would become
quite
wealthy and, well, we can't have some ******* actually make a lot of
money.
But then again, we could tax the hell out of him and his companies.


Many new products are found to have unwanted consequences so we have to
be
careful. * The creation of asbestos was great until we found out about
health hazards of exposure. *And the unexpected realization that
discontinued use of the standard light bulb in favor of the new ugly bulb
involves a hazardous waste problem. *No more throwing your expired bulb
in
the trash can.


Yes, by all means look to new technology to reduce consumption of oil but
right now we use oil. * We can't run our cars today on the promise of
maybe
something better ten years from now.


The first thing we should do is promote conservation, instead of
trying to drum up business for Exxon. Why are conservatives
against conservation? If right-wingers were not oil company errand
boys, they'd talking about mass transit, telecommuting, and higher
CAFE standards, not drilling ANWR for oil.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -



no one with half a brain believes the Global Warming farce- it's been
debunked by European scientists in the past year, the findings are in
print, taken from polar and Greenland ice cores, ocean sediment cores,
and the fossil history of the earth

get the book- see it here

http://www.pontiaczone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22044

  #46  
Old July 9th 08, 04:37 PM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrat,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
z
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default new scientific findings completely debunks the Global Warminghoax

On Jul 8, 7:04*am, trippin-2-8-track wrote:

no one with half a brain believes the Global Warming farce- it's been
debunked by European scientists in the past year, the findings are in
print, taken from polar and Greenland ice cores, ocean sediment cores,
and the fossil history of the earth

get the book- see it here

http://www.pontiaczone.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=22044- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


what do the folks over on the chrysler forum say?
  #47  
Old July 10th 08, 07:00 PM posted to alt.politics,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.collecting.8-track-tapes
William W Western[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default PoliSci Primer

Political Science for Dummies DEMOCRAT
You have two cows.
Your neighbor has none.
You feel guilty for being successful.
You push for higher taxes so the government can provide cows for
everyone.

REPUBLICAN
You have two cows.
Your neighbor has none.
So?

SOCIALIST
You have two cows.
The government takes one and gives it to your neighbor.
You form a cooperative to tell him how to manage his cow.

COMMUNIST
You have two cows.
The government seizes both and provides you with milk.
You wait in line for hours to get it.
It is expensive and sour.

CAPITALISM, AMERICAN STYLE
You have two cows.
You sell one, buy a bull, and build a herd of cows.

BUREAUCRACY, AMERICAN STYLE
You have two cows.
Under the new farm program the government pays you to shoot one, milk
the other, and then pours the milk down the drain.

AMERICAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You sell one, lease it back to yourself and do an IPO on the 2nd one.
You force the two cows to produce the milk of four cows. You are
surprised when one cow drops dead. You spin an announcement to the analysts
stating you have downsized and are reducing expenses.
Your stock goes up.

FRENCH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You go on strike because you want three cows.
You go to lunch and drink wine.
Life is good.

JAPANESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow
and produce twenty times the milk.
They learn to travel on unbelievably crowded trains.
Most are at the top of their class at cow school.

GERMAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You engineer them so they are all blond, drink lots of beer, give
excellent quality milk, and run a hundred miles an hour.
Unfortunately they also demand 13 weeks of vacation per year.

ITALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows but you don't know where they are.
You break for lunch.
Life is good.

RUSSIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You have some vodka.
You count them and learn you have five cows.
You have some more vodka.
You count them again and learn you have 42 cows.
The Mafia shows up and takes over however many cows you really have.

TALIBAN CORPORATION
You have all the cows in Afghanistan , which are two.
You don't milk them because you cannot touch any creature's private
parts.
You get a $40 million grant from the US government to find
alternatives to milk production but use the money to buy weapons.

IRAQI CORPORATION
You have two cows.
They go into hiding.
They send radio tapes of their mooing.

POLISH CORPORATION
You have two bulls.
Employees are regularly maimed and killed attempting to milk them.

BELGIAN CORPORATION
You have one cow.
The cow is schizophrenic.
Sometimes the cow thinks he's French, other times he's Flemish.
The Flemish cow won't share with the French cow.
The French cow wants control of the Flemish cow's milk.
The cow asks permission to be cut in half.
The cow dies happy.

FLORIDA CORPORATION
You have a black cow and a brown cow.
Everyone votes for the best looking one.
Some of the people who actually like the brown one best accidentally
vote for the black one.
Some people vote for both.
Some people vote for neither.
Some people can't figure out how to vote at all.
Finally, a bunch of guys from out-of-state tell you which one you
think is the best-looking cow.

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
You have millions of cows.
They make real California cheese.
Only five speak English.
Most are illegal.
Arnold likes the ones with the big udders.






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: 1-Day, Machinists Jacobs Drill Chuck, inch Arbor, No. 6 fishnet General 0 April 19th 06 12:24 AM
Boy dies choking on cent John Stone Coins 0 August 12th 04 12:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 CollectingBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.