FYI: ASA-Accugrade files new suit in US District Court

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:39:35 -0500, Alan Williams wrote:

J A M wrote:

Alan Williams wrote:

"Byron L. Reed" wrote:

Just when you think you've seen it all . . . .

Frankly, I've seen enough. A filing in a Federal court that names *me*
as a defendant as a *member of RCC* a field that includes just about
anyone with an ISP.

Not ONE comment offered as a causible action is attributed to me.

I am accused of instigating and/or participating in a boycott of the
defendant's sales???

Horsecrap of a major dimension. The only time I ever bid on an ACG
auction I was rejected by eBAY as a "Blocked Bidder". How in hell can I
be guilty of restraint of trade when the *seller* rejected by bid on his
offer *with no prior history of interaction*?

I believe an action for defamation is probably my best response to this information.

Alan
'as if '


On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:36:12 -0500, K6AZ wrote:


FYI - Beyond reporting this I can't say much else.

http://www.k6az.com/forums/acg_federal_lawsuit.pdf
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm

BLReed

To e-mail me, remove the obvious spam trap.
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things and Bust Coin Forum: http://www.byronreed.com

*member of RCC*

What is that, what are the dues, bylaws?

There is no membership in RCC of any kind. Claiming someone is a member of RCC is nonsense.

JAM

Yes, I agree, my lawyer agrees and no doubt the courts will agree. I
object to this person dragging me into his little legal dreamworld.
I've never met or spoken to the Plaintiff, but I guarantee you he's
several bricks shy of a load. He should just *sue everyone he's ever
refused to sell to* and complain that they practiced *restraint of
trade* against his business. If this crap was in a Marx Brothers movie,
I'd understand it, but it's not in a movie, it's in real life and calls
for a real life response.

I was lulled to sleep by having been dropped in his *previous
complaint*, the complaint of last spring/summer. Obviously someone is a
few fries short of a Happy Meal in attempting to make the same
allegations a second time but in a new venue.

I think there is a new venue that obviously suggests itself. I doubt
it's the one he has in mind.

Alan
'booby hatch'

Alan, I hate to disappoint you, but you are not a defendant in this lawsuit.
You are mentioned, but what these people don't seem to understand is
that RCC is not an entity with any assets.
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm

K6AZ wrote:

On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:39:35 -0500, Alan Williams wrote:

J A M wrote:

Alan Williams wrote:

"Byron L. Reed" wrote:

Just when you think you've seen it all . . . .

Frankly, I've seen enough. A filing in a Federal court that names *me*
as a defendant as a *member of RCC* a field that includes just about
anyone with an ISP.

Not ONE comment offered as a causible action is attributed to me.

I am accused of instigating and/or participating in a boycott of the
defendant's sales???

Horsecrap of a major dimension. The only time I ever bid on an ACG
auction I was rejected by eBAY as a "Blocked Bidder". How in hell can I
be guilty of restraint of trade when the *seller* rejected by bid on his
offer *with no prior history of interaction*?

I believe an action for defamation is probably my best response to this information.

Alan
'as if '


On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:36:12 -0500, K6AZ wrote:


FYI - Beyond reporting this I can't say much else.

http://www.k6az.com/forums/acg_federal_lawsuit.pdf
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm

BLReed

To e-mail me, remove the obvious spam trap.
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things and Bust Coin Forum: http://www.byronreed.com

*member of RCC*

What is that, what are the dues, bylaws?

There is no membership in RCC of any kind. Claiming someone is a member of RCC is nonsense.

JAM

Yes, I agree, my lawyer agrees and no doubt the courts will agree. I
object to this person dragging me into his little legal dreamworld.
I've never met or spoken to the Plaintiff, but I guarantee you he's
several bricks shy of a load. He should just *sue everyone he's ever
refused to sell to* and complain that they practiced *restraint of
trade* against his business. If this crap was in a Marx Brothers movie,
I'd understand it, but it's not in a movie, it's in real life and calls
for a real life response.

I was lulled to sleep by having been dropped in his *previous
complaint*, the complaint of last spring/summer. Obviously someone is a
few fries short of a Happy Meal in attempting to make the same
allegations a second time but in a new venue.

I think there is a new venue that obviously suggests itself. I doubt
it's the one he has in mind.

Alan
'booby hatch'

Alan, I hate to disappoint you, but you are not a defendant in this lawsuit.
You are mentioned, but what these people don't seem to understand is
that RCC is not an entity with any assets.
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm

Protect the Archive!!!!!! If they attempt to seize the Archive, so help
me God I'll throw the Dead Horse at 'em!!

Alan
'whack!'

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:18:48 GMT, DFloyd
is alleged to have written:
Alan Williams wrote in
:

Steve Grant wrote:

"Bruce H (BoxTurtle)" wrote in
message ...

I note that I'm not listed directly as a defendent, but I'm quoted
further on. And I'm mentioned as a one of the people RCC is "headed
up" by. I never knew I was in charge...lucky for you folks, I'd
have stood a number of people in corners at various times if I had
known. Now that I know that, there's gonna be some changes. :-)

I for one would like to welcome our new box turtle overlords!

Hold on there! How did Bruce automatically inherit this position of
power and authority? I didn't see an election, I don't recall paying
anyone a fee and if this is an inherited position...who died and named
him King? I've always assumed that Stujoe Googler was the man in
charge. ;-)

Alan
'so sue me'

Time for a revolution, A coup de tat
The bloodier the better

Dan
'Advancement through assassination'

There will be no rebellion here. As a Head Ups (?) of this newsgroup,
we control The Black Helicopter, Ira's time machine , AND the RCC dead
horse.

Think about it. if your mutaliated body were found on a Head Up's
front step, don't you think a few Ira coins could erase that act from
living memory? Remember, Ira is a Head Up too.

Bruce (It's easier when you're appointed rather than elected)


*************************************************
* *
*ANA R162074 *
*EAC3606 *
* *
*To email me, remember that RoadRunner and *
*Coyote do not mix. *
*************************************************

"Bruce H (BoxTurtle)" wrote in
:

Time for a revolution, A coup de tat
The bloodier the better

Dan
'Advancement through assassination'

There will be no rebellion here. As a Head Ups (?) of this newsgroup,
we control The Black Helicopter, Ira's time machine , AND the RCC dead
horse.

Think about it. if your mutaliated body were found on a Head Up's
front step, don't you think a few Ira coins could erase that act from
living memory? Remember, Ira is a Head Up too.

Bruce (It's easier when you're appointed rather than elected)


Ah yes, those that control the money.....

My advise is SHUT UP the public comments. Let some of the attorneys of
these big entities
work this for a while before you panic.

I am just wondering if both Steve Ivy and Steve IvEy are going to both show up.

K6AZ wrote:
FYI - Beyond reporting this I can't say much else.

http://www.k6az.com/forums/acg_federal_lawsuit.pdf
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm

I'm not going to make light or make any other comment other than I hope
the copies filed and served are a lot easier to read than what Eric
provided. I assume that's the best copy available. Readable, but
pretty tough on the right side in spots.

Jerry

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:21:15 +0200, "gogu"
wrote:

? "K6AZ" ?????? ??? ??????
.. .

FYI - Beyond reporting this I can't say much else.

http://www.k6az.com/forums/acg_federal_lawsuit.pdf


I strongly protest!
Why I am not included ?;-)

I wonder how the "member" list was developed? Just collected the easy
to grab "full" names? The reference 16(n) is the only "nick" I see.

Ron

K6AZ wrote in
:


FYI - Beyond reporting this I can't say much else.

http://www.k6az.com/forums/acg_federal_lawsuit.pdf
--
K6AZ WEB PAGES

http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm


I'm a little confused. Since he claims to have read the posts on RCC,
doesn't that make him as much of a member as is possible with a usenet
newsgroup?

In other words, didn't he just sue himself?


- Andrew W Applegarth

In article t,
"Frank Provasek" wrote:

My advise is SHUT UP the public comments. Let some of the attorneys of
these big entities
work this for a while before you panic.



I don't hear anybody panicing, Frank.