If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#241
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:28:18 GMT, Dik T. Winter wrote:
In article Jorg Lueke writes: If this is the case why then are PCGS considered the best? MAybe because people like slipping grading as they can resubmist and their coins are suddenly worth considerably more. Madness. I don't know why PCGS is cosnidered the best or what the best would mean. I know their coins tend to bring a premium for some series in MS grades. So the basic behind the slabbing and grading is just monetary value. Sorry, I am a collector (and I think Colin is also a collector). When I see a coin and the price looks like what I wish to afford for it, I buy. I am not interested in the value (in some circles) of a coin, I am only interested in whether it fits in my collection and whether I want to have it. I do not collect coins to sell them later at a premium, I just collect. I have quite a few duplicates, but they will *not* go to a buyer, they will only go for an exchange. Actually I have no idea what the most expensive coin in my collection is, let alone what it would give me in monetary value. I am just that, a collector. I think for a lot of people the slab represents some protection against fakes and grossly misgraded coins. I don't know that people are overly concerned about value in the terms of resale, I think they just want to get the "best deal" possible and also to help guarantee the long term value. That dosen't mean that these collectors are out for a profit but rather that they see slabs as a way to maximize what they can get in terms of value. |
Ads |
#242
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:44:59 GMT, Colin Kynoch
wrote: On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:35:52 -0600, Jorg Lueke wrote: Since they don't publish their standards and I heartily disagree with their grading almost all the time this opinion is worth nothing to me and many others. Yet weren't you advicating slabbing as a benefit to someone without much experience, and for keeping dealers honest? No, not me. I don't advocate for buying coins in slabs or against the practice. I take note of it, but to each his own. But even those who directly advocate buying slabs usually limit this endorsement to PCGS, NGC, ANACS and ICG, These are larger companies that have a better chance of staying in business and certainly offer some guarantees and customer service. Much else that passes for a garding company is little more than a guy selling fancy holders with arbitrary numbers on them. I do hope you see some differences between the two. |
#243
|
|||
|
|||
"Colin Kynoch" wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:02:22 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: So alabbing oins't really THE answer that people here have calimed it to be. If anything it makes it easier for the unsuspecting to be conned. Again, what people say Anyone who did would be as wrong as the anti-slabbing extremist view. Several people here have said they can buy with confidence because of slabs. First, I've never seen one who said their confidence was 100% blind confidence. And you didn't answer the question: Who said slabbing is THE answer? I hold the anti-slabbing view and I am quite proud of it. What sort of idiot wants their coins to be entombed. Maybe someone who plans to sell the coin to another person who respects the slabber's opinion. Maybe someone who values the slabber's guarantee, whatever it may be. What kind of idiot would ignore a coin just because it's in a slab? What kind of idiot couldn't figure out how to remove it? So you admit that buying a salb does not gurantee a legitimate coin and that it may be counterfeit. Reputable slabbers do provide certain guarantees, but they are limited, and subject to interpretation. For a $30 or less opinion, I wouldn't expect infallible, unconditional, unlimited, permanent assurances. So really there is little to no point to forking out the dollars for an opinion that may or may not be correct. Personally I'd prefer a decent dealer's opinion and his gurantee. If you're so concerned about imperfection among reputable slabbers, shouldn't you avoid "decent" dealers, and stick only to the perfect ones? Would you, then, never, ever buy a coin from a collector who is leaving the hobby, or a collector's heir? Or would you only do that through a dealer who offers an opinion and a guarantee? Or even better having a good knowledge of what I am purchasing. Again, why would "good knowledge" be good enough for you, when any shortcomings in slabbers opinions, even when guaranteed, be unacceptable? If you are so expert that you have never needed or wanted to ask anyone else's opinion on a coin, bully for you. I haven't said that. I said I have asked lots of people, read lots of literature and when confident I go and buy the coins I want. You ask other people's opinions on coins, but somehow you conclude that no other person should ever ask a slabber's opinion. With a slabber you are getting one opinion and relying on that. Why would an opinion written on a slab require you to stop thinking? When you research what you are purchasing you are making an informed decision. Subject, of course, to your own imperfections and the imperfections of the sources from which you conducted your research. Is perfection required there, too? Generally from a dealer, but not always. And why does the dealer offer his opinion to you? Perhaps because you pay him in the form of purchases or referrals? Altruism? Not likely. Could it be your charm? :-) Could it be that the dealers I purchase from have good return policies and will stand behind them 100% Which, of course, you're paying for. It could also be that I don't always agree with the dealer and I purchase a coin because I want that particular coin for any number of reasons. Could not, then, a person viewing a slab also disagree with and override the slabber's opinion? In either case, a sale only occurs when the amount you're willing to pay exceeds the seller's value of the coin. Slabbing mistakes and abuse happen, just as mistakes and abuse happen in the raw coin market. But good things happen in both markets, as well. An extremist view for or against slabs is wrong. --Chris -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#244
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:42:26 -0600, Jorg Lueke
wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:44:59 GMT, Colin Kynoch wrote: On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:35:52 -0600, Jorg Lueke wrote: Since they don't publish their standards and I heartily disagree with their grading almost all the time this opinion is worth nothing to me and many others. Yet weren't you advicating slabbing as a benefit to someone without much experience, and for keeping dealers honest? No, not me. I don't advocate for buying coins in slabs or against the practice. I take note of it, but to each his own. But even those who directly advocate buying slabs usually limit this endorsement to PCGS, NGC, ANACS and ICG, These are larger companies that have a better chance of staying in business and certainly offer some guarantees and customer service. Much else that passes for a garding company is little more than a guy selling fancy holders with arbitrary numbers on them. I do hope you see some differences between the two. Oh I do. You have a choice of a 'high grade' tomb or a 'low grade' tomb. Neither are that palatable. Colin Kynoch |
#245
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:38:37 -0600, Jorg Lueke
wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:28:18 GMT, Dik T. Winter wrote: In article Jorg Lueke writes: If this is the case why then are PCGS considered the best? MAybe because people like slipping grading as they can resubmist and their coins are suddenly worth considerably more. Madness. I don't know why PCGS is cosnidered the best or what the best would mean. I know their coins tend to bring a premium for some series in MS grades. So the basic behind the slabbing and grading is just monetary value. Sorry, I am a collector (and I think Colin is also a collector). When I see a coin and the price looks like what I wish to afford for it, I buy. I am not interested in the value (in some circles) of a coin, I am only interested in whether it fits in my collection and whether I want to have it. I do not collect coins to sell them later at a premium, I just collect. I have quite a few duplicates, but they will *not* go to a buyer, they will only go for an exchange. Actually I have no idea what the most expensive coin in my collection is, let alone what it would give me in monetary value. I am just that, a collector. I think for a lot of people the slab represents some protection against fakes and grossly misgraded coins. Or you could equally say that it provides protection to those who grossly misgrade and slab fakes. I don't know that people are overly concerned about value in the terms of resale, I think they just want to get the "best deal" possible and also to help guarantee the long term value. That dosen't mean that these collectors are out for a profit but rather that they see slabs as a way to maximize what they can get in terms of value. ie how much more they can seel them for a t a later date. Colin Kynoch Who has read of so many buying in one slab to get regraded by another company for a profit. |
#246
|
|||
|
|||
"Colin Kynoch" wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:41 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrotewrote: "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: Ironically, the legal backdrop provides greater disincentive to counterfeit slabs than to counterfeit coins. If my hunch is right, a civil (intellectual property rights) case would be easier to prove than the criminal (fraud) case, and more lucrative. snip Regardless of the technical incentives to counterfeit slabs, the US tort system provides an added disincentive. And what of counterfeit coins? The same motive for counterfeiting slabs. My hunch is that counterfeit coins don't violate intellectual property rights; countfeit slabs would. So. Would that stop counterfeiting of slabs being lucrative? No it would not. I am not and was not making an extremist argument that slab counterfeiting can't or doesn't happen. Theoretically, someone could post an ad claiming to be the Littleton Coin Company, and sell counterfeit raw coins from a fake address, too. In both cases, the intellectual property holder has an added incentive to take legal action, and the law reinforces that incentive with intellectual property statutes on top of any criminal or other civil statutes. If the only evidence you have that slab counterfeiting is happening an ancient rcc post about a "rash" that occured in the '80s, I'll choose to place counterfeit slabs low on my list of concerns. --Chris -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#247
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:21:16 -0600, "Chris S"
chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:02:22 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: So alabbing oins't really THE answer that people here have calimed it to be. If anything it makes it easier for the unsuspecting to be conned. Again, what people say Anyone who did would be as wrong as the anti-slabbing extremist view. Several people here have said they can buy with confidence because of slabs. First, I've never seen one who said their confidence was 100% blind confidence. And you didn't answer the question: Who said slabbing is THE answer? Anyone who considers slabbing to be the be all and end all. Those who wouldn't buy X coin unless it was in a PCGS tomb. I hold the anti-slabbing view and I am quite proud of it. What sort of idiot wants their coins to be entombed. Maybe someone who plans to sell the coin to another person who respects the slabber's opinion. So someone who wants to sell to another idiot? Maybe someone who values the slabber's guarantee, whatever it may be. What kind of idiot would ignore a coin just because it's in a slab? I'd buy a slabbed coin if it met my criteria. I wouldn't buy a slabbed coin if it was a frequently counterfeited type, as I would be relying on someone elses opinion., and I understand that the slabbing companies will only honour the gurantee is the coin is still entombed. Nice catch 22 What kind of idiot couldn't figure out how to remove it? There is always the danger of damaging a coin as you unentomb it. So you admit that buying a salb does not gurantee a legitimate coin and that it may be counterfeit. Reputable slabbers do provide certain guarantees, but they are limited, and subject to interpretation. For a $30 or less opinion, I wouldn't expect infallible, unconditional, unlimited, permanent assurances. So really there is little to no point to forking out the dollars for an opinion that may or may not be correct. Personally I'd prefer a decent dealer's opinion and his gurantee. If you're so concerned about imperfection among reputable slabbers, shouldn't you avoid "decent" dealers, and stick only to the perfect ones? I consider a good dealer and good knowledge to be vital when purchasing a coin. Would you, then, never, ever buy a coin from a collector who is leaving the hobby, or a collector's heir? If I could see the coin and do any tests I would have no problem (eg weighing the coin measuring the coin) If not then I'd pass Or would you only do that through a dealer who offers an opinion and a guarantee? I have purchased coins from a wide variety of sources. I have purchased some lower grade coins from the net based on the photos. I hae yet to be disappointed. I have also bought some high grade coins from the net, but then only from dealers whom I trust and whom have a reasonable returns policy. Or even better having a good knowledge of what I am purchasing. Again, why would "good knowledge" be good enough for you, when any shortcomings in slabbers opinions, even when guaranteed, be unacceptable? Becuase if I rely on my opinion (and really that is the only one that matters for coins I purchase) then I can blame no-one but myself if I don't get what I wanted. I don't need to pass blame to someone else. If you are so expert that you have never needed or wanted to ask anyone else's opinion on a coin, bully for you. I haven't said that. I said I have asked lots of people, read lots of literature and when confident I go and buy the coins I want. You ask other people's opinions on coins, but somehow you conclude that no other person should ever ask a slabber's opinion. With a slabber you are getting one opinion and relying on that. Why would an opinion written on a slab require you to stop thinking? A slabbed coin is less attractive to me because I have to get it out of the slab, to be happy. And have a read of the American posters on this ng. Many of them stop thinking when they read the initials PCGS. When you research what you are purchasing you are making an informed decision. Subject, of course, to your own imperfections and the imperfections of the sources from which you conducted your research. Is perfection required there, too? I am not the one advocating the slabbers as the pancea for the evils of coin dealers. Generally from a dealer, but not always. And why does the dealer offer his opinion to you? Perhaps because you pay him in the form of purchases or referrals? Altruism? Not likely. Could it be your charm? :-) Could it be that the dealers I purchase from have good return policies and will stand behind them 100% Which, of course, you're paying for. Not really. I can buy two coins from two separate dealers taht are essentially the same, for the same price. One dealer offers a guarantee, the other doesn't. It could also be that I don't always agree with the dealer and I purchase a coin because I want that particular coin for any number of reasons. Could not, then, a person viewing a slab also disagree with and override the slabber's opinion? They could, but it seems the majority of Americans don't, they take the Slab as GOSPEL. In either case, a sale only occurs when the amount you're willing to pay exceeds the seller's value of the coin. Or equals what the seller is willing to sell for. If a dealer isn't willing to sell for what I am willing to pay no deal is done. Slabbing mistakes and abuse happen, just as mistakes and abuse happen in the raw coin market. So why slab? Slabbing is not beneficial to the newbie in particular. If anything slabbing gives unscrupulous dealers more opportunity to deceive, than before. But good things happen in both markets, as well. An extremist view for or against slabs is wrong. I have yet to see a good arguement for slabbing other than it helps people to sell coins with miniscule differences for massive premiums. Colin Kynoch |
#248
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:32:47 -0600, "Chris S"
chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:09:41 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrotewrote: "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: Ironically, the legal backdrop provides greater disincentive to counterfeit slabs than to counterfeit coins. If my hunch is right, a civil (intellectual property rights) case would be easier to prove than the criminal (fraud) case, and more lucrative. snip Regardless of the technical incentives to counterfeit slabs, the US tort system provides an added disincentive. And what of counterfeit coins? The same motive for counterfeiting slabs. My hunch is that counterfeit coins don't violate intellectual property rights; countfeit slabs would. So. Would that stop counterfeiting of slabs being lucrative? No it would not. I am not and was not making an extremist argument that slab counterfeiting can't or doesn't happen. Theoretically, someone could post an ad claiming to be the Littleton Coin Company, and sell counterfeit raw coins from a fake address, too. In both cases, the intellectual property holder has an added incentive to take legal action, and the law reinforces that incentive with intellectual property statutes on top of any criminal or other civil statutes. If the only evidence you have that slab counterfeiting is happening an ancient rcc post about a "rash" that occured in the '80s, I'll choose to place counterfeit slabs low on my list of concerns. I have suggested that counterfeit slabs are likely to be so good as to be undetectable. A smart counterfeiter will make sure that the counterfeit slab is for a coin worth a reasonable amount that has a reasonable population. It would take a very unfortunate (for the counterfeiter) situation for them to be ound out. As this would be very lucrative, it makes perfect sense that it has and is being done. Colin Kynoch |
#249
|
|||
|
|||
I'll cede the battle of attrition on this one--I'm out of time, except to
say that each of the practices you rely on has risks that are just as assailable as those inherent in considering a slabber's opinion or valuing his guarantee, if the assailant takes an extremist position. --Chris "Colin Kynoch" wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:21:16 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:02:22 -0600, "Chris S" chris(at)imt.xohost.com wrote: "Colin Kynoch" wrote: So alabbing oins't really THE answer that people here have calimed it to be. If anything it makes it easier for the unsuspecting to be conned. Again, what people say Anyone who did would be as wrong as the anti-slabbing extremist view. Several people here have said they can buy with confidence because of slabs. First, I've never seen one who said their confidence was 100% blind confidence. And you didn't answer the question: Who said slabbing is THE answer? Anyone who considers slabbing to be the be all and end all. Those who wouldn't buy X coin unless it was in a PCGS tomb. I hold the anti-slabbing view and I am quite proud of it. What sort of idiot wants their coins to be entombed. Maybe someone who plans to sell the coin to another person who respects the slabber's opinion. So someone who wants to sell to another idiot? Maybe someone who values the slabber's guarantee, whatever it may be. What kind of idiot would ignore a coin just because it's in a slab? I'd buy a slabbed coin if it met my criteria. I wouldn't buy a slabbed coin if it was a frequently counterfeited type, as I would be relying on someone elses opinion., and I understand that the slabbing companies will only honour the gurantee is the coin is still entombed. Nice catch 22 What kind of idiot couldn't figure out how to remove it? There is always the danger of damaging a coin as you unentomb it. So you admit that buying a salb does not gurantee a legitimate coin and that it may be counterfeit. Reputable slabbers do provide certain guarantees, but they are limited, and subject to interpretation. For a $30 or less opinion, I wouldn't expect infallible, unconditional, unlimited, permanent assurances. So really there is little to no point to forking out the dollars for an opinion that may or may not be correct. Personally I'd prefer a decent dealer's opinion and his gurantee. If you're so concerned about imperfection among reputable slabbers, shouldn't you avoid "decent" dealers, and stick only to the perfect ones? I consider a good dealer and good knowledge to be vital when purchasing a coin. Would you, then, never, ever buy a coin from a collector who is leaving the hobby, or a collector's heir? If I could see the coin and do any tests I would have no problem (eg weighing the coin measuring the coin) If not then I'd pass Or would you only do that through a dealer who offers an opinion and a guarantee? I have purchased coins from a wide variety of sources. I have purchased some lower grade coins from the net based on the photos. I hae yet to be disappointed. I have also bought some high grade coins from the net, but then only from dealers whom I trust and whom have a reasonable returns policy. Or even better having a good knowledge of what I am purchasing. Again, why would "good knowledge" be good enough for you, when any shortcomings in slabbers opinions, even when guaranteed, be unacceptable? Becuase if I rely on my opinion (and really that is the only one that matters for coins I purchase) then I can blame no-one but myself if I don't get what I wanted. I don't need to pass blame to someone else. If you are so expert that you have never needed or wanted to ask anyone else's opinion on a coin, bully for you. I haven't said that. I said I have asked lots of people, read lots of literature and when confident I go and buy the coins I want. You ask other people's opinions on coins, but somehow you conclude that no other person should ever ask a slabber's opinion. With a slabber you are getting one opinion and relying on that. Why would an opinion written on a slab require you to stop thinking? A slabbed coin is less attractive to me because I have to get it out of the slab, to be happy. And have a read of the American posters on this ng. Many of them stop thinking when they read the initials PCGS. When you research what you are purchasing you are making an informed decision. Subject, of course, to your own imperfections and the imperfections of the sources from which you conducted your research. Is perfection required there, too? I am not the one advocating the slabbers as the pancea for the evils of coin dealers. Generally from a dealer, but not always. And why does the dealer offer his opinion to you? Perhaps because you pay him in the form of purchases or referrals? Altruism? Not likely. Could it be your charm? :-) Could it be that the dealers I purchase from have good return policies and will stand behind them 100% Which, of course, you're paying for. Not really. I can buy two coins from two separate dealers taht are essentially the same, for the same price. One dealer offers a guarantee, the other doesn't. It could also be that I don't always agree with the dealer and I purchase a coin because I want that particular coin for any number of reasons. Could not, then, a person viewing a slab also disagree with and override the slabber's opinion? They could, but it seems the majority of Americans don't, they take the Slab as GOSPEL. In either case, a sale only occurs when the amount you're willing to pay exceeds the seller's value of the coin. Or equals what the seller is willing to sell for. If a dealer isn't willing to sell for what I am willing to pay no deal is done. Slabbing mistakes and abuse happen, just as mistakes and abuse happen in the raw coin market. So why slab? Slabbing is not beneficial to the newbie in particular. If anything slabbing gives unscrupulous dealers more opportunity to deceive, than before. But good things happen in both markets, as well. An extremist view for or against slabs is wrong. I have yet to see a good arguement for slabbing other than it helps people to sell coins with miniscule differences for massive premiums. Colin Kynoch -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#250
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:30:53 GMT, Colin Kynoch
wrote: On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:38:37 -0600, Jorg Lueke wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:28:18 GMT, Dik T. Winter wrote: In article Jorg Lueke writes: If this is the case why then are PCGS considered the best? MAybe because people like slipping grading as they can resubmist and their coins are suddenly worth considerably more. Madness. I don't know why PCGS is cosnidered the best or what the best would mean. I know their coins tend to bring a premium for some series in MS grades. So the basic behind the slabbing and grading is just monetary value. Sorry, I am a collector (and I think Colin is also a collector). When I see a coin and the price looks like what I wish to afford for it, I buy. I am not interested in the value (in some circles) of a coin, I am only interested in whether it fits in my collection and whether I want to have it. I do not collect coins to sell them later at a premium, I just collect. I have quite a few duplicates, but they will *not* go to a buyer, they will only go for an exchange. Actually I have no idea what the most expensive coin in my collection is, let alone what it would give me in monetary value. I am just that, a collector. I think for a lot of people the slab represents some protection against fakes and grossly misgraded coins. Or you could equally say that it provides protection to those who grossly misgrade and slab fakes. I don't know that people are overly concerned about value in the terms of resale, I think they just want to get the "best deal" possible and also to help guarantee the long term value. That dosen't mean that these collectors are out for a profit but rather that they see slabs as a way to maximize what they can get in terms of value. ie how much more they can seel them for a t a later date. Colin Kynoch Who has read of so many buying in one slab to get regraded by another company for a profit. Certainly people do this as well. Does it make sense that a coin I bough for $1000 a week ago is now magically worth $10,000 in a new piece of plastic? Some people must think so. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wurlitzer 1700 plays slow.. | Randy Brown | Juke Boxes | 3 | January 28th 05 03:00 AM |
Slow Thursday, 2/19/04 | Joe | Autographs | 0 | February 19th 04 05:42 PM |
Slow Day, but! | Joe Rosa | Autographs | 1 | November 14th 03 06:31 PM |
Wurlitzer 1250 slow | Ken G. | Juke Boxes | 0 | August 4th 03 06:49 AM |
Is eBay slow? | Doggo | Coins | 0 | July 31st 03 05:28 PM |