Hillary takes off the gloves, Obama keeps turning pages

Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

On Jan 7, 3:04*am, DeserTBoB wrote:
Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. *From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. *Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. *Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. *Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. *Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of *what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. *With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. *The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. *Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. *Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. *The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. *No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. *As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. *Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. *It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/...ics_poll_col_1

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009

On 7 jan, 11:29, trippin-2-8-track wrote:
On Jan 7, 3:04*am, DeserTBoB wrote:





Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. *From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. *Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. *Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. *Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. *Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of *what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. *With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. *The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. *Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. *Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. *The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. *No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. *As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. *Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. *It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/..._usa_politics_...

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009- Ocultar texto entre aspas -


The Zogby poll shows Obama has a 2-1 lead over Hillary among men (all
ages included) in NH, whereas her lead among women is considerably
narrower (something like 4 points only). With all the talk about how
difficult it would be for a black candidate (Obama) to win white
states, pundits failed to consider a much more important phenomenon,
namely that there are still many male as well as conservative female
voters in America who are not comfortable yet with the idea of a woman
as POTUS !

Racism is indeed still a major issue in the IS, but it fades in
comparison to sexism.

On Jan 7, 8:54*am, Mbruno wrote:
On 7 jan, 11:29, trippin-2-8-track wrote:





On Jan 7, 3:04*am, DeserTBoB wrote:

Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. *From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. *Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. *Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. *Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. *Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of *what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. *With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. *The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. *Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. *Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. *The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. *No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. *As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. *Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. *It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/..._usa_politics_...

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009- Ocultar texto entre aspas -

The Zogby poll shows Obama has a 2-1 lead over Hillary among men (all
ages included) in NH, whereas her lead among women is considerably
narrower (something like 4 points only). With all the talk about how
difficult it would be for a black candidate (Obama) to win white
states, pundits failed to consider a much more important phenomenon,
namely that there are still many male as well as conservative female
voters in America who are not comfortable yet with the idea of a woman
as POTUS !

Racism is indeed still a major issue in the IS, but it fades in
comparison to sexism.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



exactly- the Dems saddled themselves with "no win" candidates, that
would only have a chance in a 3-way election with a powerful 3rd party
choice.

after the Reps win in 2008, DESPITE all of Bush's negative press, the
Dems will finally wake up and realize, Clinton's 1992 and 1996 wins,
were only due to Perot stealing away conservative votes from Reps.
Had Perot not won, Bush Sr. and Dole would have beaten Clinton easily.

then finally, "perhaps", we'll get a real Dem to vote for in 2012- but
for now, it's a Republican slam-dunk

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:09:18 -0800 (PST), trippin-2-8-track
wrote:

On Jan 7, 8:54*am, Mbruno wrote:

exactly- the Dems saddled themselves with "no win" candidates snip

Kill file this paranoid delusional eBay thief and Usenet troll by
adding:




....to your kill filers.

For more about this mentally ill petty thief and Usenet troll, see:

http://nudowatch.blogspot.com

....or simply Google "Charlie Nudo" and be amazed!

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:09:18 -0800 (PST), trippin-2-8-track
wrote:

then finally, "perhaps", we'll get a real Dem to vote for in 2012- but
for now, it's a Republican slam-dunk snip

Now I want to know what Charlie will do when his weak-kneed
"prediction" falls flat on its ass in November. Like I said,
Noodles...you should be a man and put up your house as a bet that
you're right, if you're so convinced. Rather, you'll sit at home on
your thrift store computer, making wildly stupid comments like this,
which will further your reputation as a nut case and Usenet troll.

Charlie Nudo has not hit a political prediction right yet, and if you
go back, some of them are obviously the work of someone suffering from
paranoid delusions. Remember when he said that BOTH houses of
Congress would stay GOP in the mid-terms and that they'd widen their
margins?

Gee, Noodles...what's up with that?

looks like Hillary may very well lose- again- we'll see


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...76 6&ito=1490

Clinton "legacy" kaput-game over.

Weeping Hillary Clinton now underdog as Obama leads New Hampshire
primary
Last updated at 13:28pm on 8th January 2008


Hillary Clinton's eyes fill up as she explains why she decided to run
for president
White House hopeful Barack Obama today stormed ahead of his
increasingly flagging rival Hillary Clinton as voting in the New
Hampshire primary began.

The former First Lady choked back tears as she acknowledged her one-
time clear lead had been wiped away and was now an underdog in the
campaign to become the Democrat's candidate in November's presidential
election.

In the Republican race, Senator McCain has a lead over main rival Mitt
Romney.

Candidates are hoping to gain momentum before 20 states hold their
elections on February 5, known as Super Tuesday.

Two tiny hamlets, Dixville Notch and Hart's Location, traditionally
the first to vote in New Hampshire, opened their polling stations at
midnight giving small, early victories to Mr Obama and Mr McCain.

Most of the rest of the state began voting at 6am local time (11am).

Polls close at 8pm (1am Wednesday) and first results are expected
shortly afterwards.

Scroll down for more...


A pensive moment: The wife of former US president Bill Clinton has
much to think about as she faces a possible second defeat to Barack
Obama in New Hampshire


New York Senator Clinton, Rudy Giuliani and Mike Huckabee were among
the candidates who turned up at polling stations as they opened in a
last-minute bid for votes.

After a disappointing second-place showing behind Mr Huckabee in last
week's Iowa's caucuses - the opening battle of the primary season - Mr
Romney needs a strong showing in New Hampshire to keep his campaign
alive.



Hillary Clinton's eyes fill up as she explains why she decided to run
for president
"Right now it's a neck-and-neck race," he told reporters in Stratham,
New Hampshire, on Monday.
"But with the debate last night and the support I received from that
debate I anticipate winning tomorrow."

Opinion polls indicate that Mr Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor
and Baptist minister, is polling third.

Both are threatened by a resurgent Mr McCain who after seeing his
campaign nearly derail last summer, has concentrated much of his time
and money on New Hampshire.

Other Republican candidates have been looking beyond New Hampshire
primary to focus on states that go to the polls later.

Former New York mayor Mr Giuliani has been focusing on Florida's 29
January contest, hoping to gain momentum going into Super Tuesday.

Actor and former Senator Fred Thompson has been campaigning in South
Carolina, where Republicans vote on 19 January.

Humbled Mrs Clinton's voice trembled with emotion as she told a group
of undecided New Hampshire voters in a coffee shop that politics for
her was personal.

"It's not easy, and I could not do it if I just didn't passionately
believe it was the right thing to do.



She may well laugh, but there is little to smile about in terms of her
presidential campaign
"I have had so many opportunities from this country, I just don't want
us to fall backwards," she said.
She has seen her lead in the polls eclipsed by Mr Obama who told
cheering supporters in Claremont, New Hampshire, that "you're the wave
and I'm riding it".

Analysts say New Hampshire's large bloc of independents - about 45% of
registered voters - could be key to swinging the primary.

Mr Obama, in particular, showed strong appeal at Iowa's caucuses among
such voters, who are registered as neither Republican nor Democratic.

Despite a USA Today/Gallup poll indicating a 13 per cent lead for Mr
Obama, Mrs Clinton vowed to "keep going until the end of the process
on 5 February " no matter what the result of the New Hampshire vote.

While Iowa and New Hampshire - two of the earliest contests - do not
necessarily produce a winner from either campaign, they can boost
contenders' chances ahead of primaries in larger states.

Bookmakers Ladbrokes have McCain as the third best bet after Obama and
Clinton to be next president, giving him odds of 6/1, with Giuliani
fourth at 7/1 and Huckabee at 8/1.

On Jan 7, 8:29 am, trippin-2-8-track wrote:
On Jan 7, 3:04 am, DeserTBoB wrote:



Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/..._usa_politics_...

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009

As though you made any sense. Your willing to defend Rush "ManMeet"
Limbaugh, a homo, drug abuser and known coward. Your willing to
attack the dem candidates even though their morality is far, far
better than the repug candidates. How many marriages has Rudi had?
McCain?

Geez, run any repug you want and you will get beat. Some, like Rep.
Paul will get you beat like a brass gong, others, like McCain, will
result in an honorable defeat but since your last years in power were
typified by the worst administration in the nations history getting
beat is in your presidential future.

On Jan 7, 9:26*am, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:29 am, trippin-2-8-track wrote:





On Jan 7, 3:04 am, DeserTBoB wrote:

Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. *From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. *Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. *Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. *Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. *Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of *what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. *With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. *The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. *Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. *Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. *The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. *No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. *As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. *Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. *It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/..._usa_politics_...

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009

As though you made any sense. *Your willing to defend Rush "ManMeet"
Limbaugh, a homo, drug abuser and known coward. *Your willing to
attack the dem candidates even though their morality is far, far
better than the repug candidates. *How many marriages has Rudi had?
McCain?

Geez, run any repug you want and you will get beat. *Some, like Rep.
Paul will get you beat like a brass gong, others, like McCain, will
result in an honorable defeat but since your last years in power were
typified by the worst administration in the nations history getting
beat is in your presidential future.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kevin.....Democrats are more moral?

Listen up nigga...if we want any **** out of you....

we will squeeze your nappy head.

Both parties suck......

We need to take back our government.

love ya
hank
Question: how it feel to have pubic hair on your head?
Ever get mixed up?

On Jan 7, 9:26*am, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:29 am, trippin-2-8-track wrote:





On Jan 7, 3:04 am, DeserTBoB wrote:

Looks like Hillary found the gear shift lever on her campaign's
transmission in Nashua tonight, bludgeoning Obama over his votes for
"Dick Cheney's energy bill" and other untoward votes he cast in his
short Senate tenure. *From the reports, this got the crowd going
pretty good. *Meanwhile, Obama's still stuck on the "turn the page"
message with no policy specifics at all in Manchester...which has
worked well for him up until now, but may run him aground soon, if he
cannot both defend his own voting record and bash Hillary's at the
same time. *Dems are also rumoring that Clinton has a batch of new
Obama negative ads to unleash on Manchester and Nashua TV stations
Monday.

Well, she's going to need all the help she can get, according to
Gallup's latest statewide numbers. *Obama has pulled ahead to 41% of
likely primary voters (no specificity as to whether Dems or
"unaffiliateds"), with Clinton down to 28% from 33% prior to her Iowa
thrashing. *Edwards is slipping again, down to 19% now, predictable in
a state where there are virtually no "blue collar" workers left, and
70% of the state's economy consists of *what scraps the small
businesses can throw together. *With only hours left until the
balloting, the question isn't whether Clinton can or cannot campaign
hard enough to beat Obama (she can't...not enough time, not enough
"Hillaries" to go around to all the events needed to make up 14% in a
couple of days) but, rather, how many votes will McCain siphon away
from Obama (or vice versa!) among the "unaffiliateds."

That would be a bigger mover in percentage of total votes than would
anything Hillary could do now, and McCain's obviously on a roll in the
state. *The formerly "unsinkable S.S. Romney" is now taking on water,
much to the horror of party regulars like the seeming closet gay Ken
Mehlman, who ran Bush's dirty tricks campaign in 2004 at the behest of
Karl Rove.

Mehlman reminds me of another gay blade of politics, this one of the
1950s...the disgustingly vile Ray Cohn, who was Joe McCarthy's (R-WI)
hatchet man/lawyer. *Cohn was a real piece of mentally scrambled work
who died of complications of hepatitis (which one, we don't know now)
contracted most likely from his weird habit of eating left-behind food
off of other peoples' plates at any dinner function he attended.

Meanwhile, the GOPher operatives have started to really get worried
that this thing about Bush destroying their party is the real deal.
Read for yourself, from no less credible a writer than Ron Fornier of
AP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/...n_deadline_gop

Dan Rather's right...it's still VERY early in the game, and "Tsunami
Tuesday" has changed the game from a state-by-state contest to a
semi-national "pre-election" event. *Remember, Iowa has only a 75%
correct record of picking the eventual nominee for either party, and
this is the first "wide open" election since 1952. *The "rules" are
out the window, and the GOP's standard bearer now in the White House
is in the worst shape in approval of ANY sitting U.S. President since
scientific polling started in the 1940s.

Those who remember their history will recall that Iowa and New
Hampshire both thought that it would be Estes Kefauver for the
Democrats in '52, but the big states picked Adlai Stevenson. *No
matter, Kefauver would've lost probably even worse to Ike, whose
election, in retrospect, was a "prize" awarded by the American people
for his job as supreme commander of the European theater in WWII. *As
it turned out, he was nothing more than a caretaker in office...which
is probably what people wanted at the time. *Corporate clowns used
Ike's laissez-faire presidency to at least partially restore their
control over the government they lost under FDR and HST. *It's that
"corporate control" that's fueling a great deal of Obama's rise to
prominence now, believe it or not.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/..._usa_politics_...

and out comes the far-left RACISM of DeserTBob, just like the rest of
the left wing fringers....exactly like Rush Limbaugh stated- the
lefties are all for equality, until someone of color surpasses them-
then they attack them- even if they belong to their own party

If I was a Democrat strategist, I'd run Obama as president, and
Richardson as VP- at least they look more presidential and
professional than Hillary and the Bret-girl

what is more important is, how presidential all the Republican
candidates looked, compared to the Democrats- I would take any
Republican candidate at this point, over the Dems

obvious outcome- another Republican in the White House in 2009

As though you made any sense. *Your willing to defend Rush "ManMeet"
Limbaugh, a homo, drug abuser and known coward. *Your willing to
attack the dem candidates even though their morality is far, far
better than the repug candidates. *How many marriages has Rudi had?
McCain?

Geez, run any repug you want and you will get beat. *Some, like Rep.
Paul will get you beat like a brass gong, others, like McCain, will
result in an honorable defeat but since your last years in power were
typified by the worst administration in the nations history getting
beat is in your presidential future.- Hide quoted text -



beat by who, fringer....Obama ? he's the one who's "winning" in your
party, so far...

good luck with that one...