Australia-SG query.

Stanley Gibbons does not seem to address the differing
issues of the "peel and stick",(SG SOTW "stamps of the world") so I was
wondering
how they have numbered them in the past in the specialised catalogues?

Take for example these "Heavy Haulers"
I presume the peel and stick with "no border" are from booklets?
Do they take the peel and stick number with subtext "a"?

http://cjoint.com/data/gva1SMccJs.htm

Thanks

On 21 June, 00:59, "rodney" wrote:
Stanley Gibbons does not seem to address the differing
issues of the "peel and stick",(SG SOTW "stamps of the world") *so I was
wondering
how they have numbered them in the past in the specialised catalogues?

Take for example these "Heavy Haulers"
I presume the peel and stick with "no border" are from booklets?
Do they take the peel and stick number with subtext "a"?

http://cjoint.com/data/gva1SMccJs.htm

Thanks

They have their own numbers in SG Commonwealth, which mentions the
different design size, which as usual is across the printed portion
only, excluding the white border (if any) between print and perfs.
E.g. the 2000 gardens set numbers the large ones as 1960-64 and the
small (peel & stick, roll or booklet) ones 1965-69. The SG online cat
shows only 1960-64, but the existence of the others is betrayed by a
gap before the next stamp, 1970 = the Queen's birthday.

Chris

Thanks Chris
then the SOTW will probably be amended next ed.



They have their own numbers in SG Commonwealth, which mentions the
different design size, which as usual is across the printed portion
only, excluding the white border (if any) between print and perfs.
E.g. the 2000 gardens set numbers the large ones as 1960-64 and the
small (peel & stick, roll or booklet) ones 1965-69. The SG online cat
shows only 1960-64, but the existence of the others is betrayed by a
gap before the next stamp, 1970 = the Queen's birthday.

Chris