(75) NOS & used TV-radio-stereo vacuum tubes-$10

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE:IT&ih=004

PART NUMBERS IN BOXES: 31JS6C-6JE6C/6LQ6-6JE6C/6LQ6-6J36C/
6LQ6-7GF7A-6CD6GA-21LG6-19CG3-3A3-6CD6GA-6AU4GTA-5U8-12W6GT-6AG5-6FQ7/6CG7-3DA3/3CX3-6LT8-6GH8A-2AV2-6BZ6-6FQ7/6CG7-6KE8-5T8-6FQ7/6CG7-4LJ8-3AT2B-6GH8A-6AF4-6LT8-2AV2-3AT2B-8FQ7-12GN7A/
12HG7-5U8-6DE4-6GH8A

PART NUMBERS TUBES NOT IN BOXES: 6KM6-6A8GT w/metal cover-
25CD6GB-6F5-
BBN11-5W4-17-6F6-6FQ7-6K7-6SN7GTB-3BZ6-5CG8-3A3A-6HZ6-12AV5GA-6GK5-6AW8A-15710402-6GHBA-12BY7A-6FQ7/6CG7-6AQ5A-6JD6-6BA8A-1T4-6SN7GTB-6LQ8-12BY7A-6CL3-5BW8-6EH5-6JC6A-3DT6-2AF4-2FQ5-6KE8-6CK3

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:50:29 -0800 (PST), trippin-2-8-track
wrote:

http://cgi.ebay.com snip

More off-topic spam reported to Google Groups to shut down Noodles'
30th account.

That has to be some sort of record!

8-tracks are often played through tube amps- so you're mistaken

furthermo

here it is:

The purpose of alt.collecting.8-track-tapes is to provide a gathering
place for the widely scattered 8-track-tape collectors on the net. In
addition to serving as a focal point, this newsgroup will (1)
facilitate
activities such as buying/selling/trading 8-track tapes and playback
equipment; (2) help collectors find new sources of tapes and players
in
the face of an ever-dwindling supply; and (3) provide a place to
discusss 8-tracking in the 1990s, including recent 8-track releases
by
independent record labels.. Finally, the newsgroup will be a forum
for
the various philosophies engendered by the hobby (e.g., analog
vs. digital sound).

I thought folks might find this amusing. Courtesy of consumerist
http://consumerist.com/362926/do-coa...monster-cables

Can you tell the difference between music that passed through
a pricey
Monster stereo Cable, and a coat hanger? A reader forwarded us a post
from the Audioholics Home Theater Forum and its author says no. He says
his brother ran an experiment on him and four other audio aficionados
listening to a new CD from a new group blindfolded. Seven different
songs were played, each time heard with the speaker hooked up to
Monster Cables, and the other time, hooked up to coat hanger wire.
Nobody could determine which was the Monster Cable and which was the
coat hanger. The kicker? None of the subjects even knew that coat
hangers were going to be used. This is, of course, "nothing new," a
Google of "monster cables vs coat hangers" shows that some users have
been saying this for a while. Still, this is an experiment begging to
be recreated under controlled conditions (say, for instance, a
double-blind test). Science fair project! Read how it went down, inside...

On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:32:13 GMT, "William W Western"
wrote:

I thought folks might find this amusing. Courtesy of consumerist
http://consumerist.com/362926/do-coa...monster-cables

Can you tell the difference between music that passed through
a pricey
Monster stereo Cable, and a coat hanger? snip

No.

"Monster Cable" has been defrauding clueless "audiophools" for two
decades now, with their highly overpriced cables. However, they ARE
well made and do have double shielding and interruptible grounds. So
do my homemade cables with gold plated connectors. Price per cable:
around $2 apiece.