If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting
Well, with three sales now under by belt, as it were, I have topped $10,000.
The last - 22 books for $3000. It seems I have discovered a market, one that needs little tending. The total advertising for the three sales was six e-mails outbound. I think I'll keep this going for time. My investment? About $1000 for the stock. Hugs, Willow |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
Willow Arune wrote: Well, with three sales now under by belt, as it were, I have topped $10,000. The last - 22 books for $3000. It seems I have discovered a market, one that needs little tending. The total advertising for the three sales was six e-mails outbound. I think I'll keep this going for time. My investment? About $1000 for the stock. You need to know a few things about the man named Bill Orobko who posts here as "willow Arune". Firstly and lastly he's a Usenet kook and consummate liar. Before you believe that this welfare Queen (and I do mean "Queen") who admits that he lives off a Canadian psych disibility for "PTSD" ahem has made any money at all in any business venture whatsoever you should check out the following page of info about him: http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/bailey-willow-arune.html Here is both a photoshopped picture of him that he distributed to several people as well as the real photo of what he looks like in drag: http://www.geocities.com/therealbillorobko/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
Jon Meyers wrote:
Yeah, I already saw all that. So what? She's never been anything but a polite participant here, and not much odder than anyone else (I don't except myself). Well I can't and won't argue with your opinion of this man. He is less then ... polite... on other newsgroups and regularly makes a point of threatening woman in other groups. Within the last week he publicly posted the employer information of a woman who disagreed with him via Usenet. He has done this via Usenet three times as far as I am aware. Each time, it was a woman. Of course poeple are always free to disregard such behavior so long as it doesn't affect them personally - many could care less if some man, say , beats his wife so long as it's done privately. So I respect your right to hold and form your own opinion about this person. Others however... have formed a different impression of him: From: http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/willow-arune.html "Willow Arune is a former lawyer who lives on disability in Canada. Arune is also a nudist who claims to be an "escaped person under Thai law" and who is best known as a USENET troll on transgender newsgroups. Arune is also a frequent defender of Ray Blanchard at Canada's notorious Clarke Institute, and Arune is a prominent supporter of a disease model of gender variance called "autogynephilia," made up by Blanchard in 1989. [2] .... Many believe it is a spurious diagnosis akin to "nymphomania" and other discredited illnesses made up to pathologize socially unacceptable behavior. ..... Arune is well-known both on and off the internet as a prodigious kook. Arune has probably been kicked off more email lists and out of more transgender groups than any other transgenderist in North America. Arune enjoys trolling and baiting people online "to get a quotable quote," [4] which then gets used as evidence that Arune is being attacked." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
wrote in message ups.com... Jon Meyers wrote: Yeah, I already saw all that. So what? She's never been anything but a polite participant here, and not much odder than anyone else (I don't except myself). Well I can't and won't argue with your opinion of this man. He is less then ... polite... on other newsgroups and regularly makes a point of threatening woman in other groups. You're saying that we females are too stupid to use a killfile, so we have no recourse but to reply and wage war? Grow up, "Diana Melrose". You're stalking. As a target myself, I find you repellant. Kris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
Kris Baker wrote:
You're saying that we females are too stupid to use a killfile, so we have no recourse but to reply and wage war? 1. You'll have to point out where I said that because for the life of me I can't seem to find that particular thing that I said.... although I'm sure you can point to me saying that ...right? 2. If I understand the gist of what you are saying above - you are not using a killfile yourself and going on to berate me ("I find you repellant") in order to tell me that I should be using a kill file and not berate people who's actions I find repellant. Did I understand you correectly? I just want to be sure so we can have useful communication here, OK? Melrose". You're stalking. As a target myself, I find you repellant. I find men like Bill Orobko, who harass women online to be repellant but that's just me and there's no accounting for taste is there? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
On 27 Mar 2006 18:43:47 -0800, wrote:
Francis A. Miniter wrote: To repeat (and expand on) what others have said. Willow is a courteous, regular and respected participant in this newsgroup and we regulars do not like to see anyone insult our friends. I respect yoiur opinion of Will and, of course have no desire at all to dissuade you from keeping company and being friends with whomever you choose. From: http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/willow-arune.html "Of special interest to Arune are matters in Thailand, where Arune claims to have spent time in jail on a forgery charge.... Arune was able to manipulate the Canadian health system to indulge an erotic interest in vaginoplasty. Arune is apparently drawing Canadian welfare, while being able-bodied enough to spend 12 to 16 hours a day devouring and regurgitating anything related to transgenderism. Arune seems to have a compulsion toward hoarding, especially with online materials, books about transgenderism, and animals. This hoarding impulse seems connected to the amount of energy Arune spends on this topic, and Arune's identification with a disease that characterizes Arune's behavior as a sexual compulsion." Why do you keep posting these inane excerpts from your website? Do you feel that this will, in some way, sway ANYONE'S opinion of Willow? I realise that some people are just too dense to understand when they are digging their own graves, but you are just too much! Let me spell it out to you in plain English (I'll try to use small words so you can follow along.) Everyone here S-U-P-P-O-R-T-S Willow's right to post in this group as long as he (or she) contributes to the topic at hand and is respectful of the opinions of others. Willow does both. Nobody cares if he is a man who wears a dress, or is Canadian, or suffers from a mental illness (we all do, it's called bibliophenia!) Babble on all you want, you will get NO support from ANYONE here. Plain enough for you? Michael |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
mdobson wrote:
Why do you keep posting these inane excerpts from your website? Sorry about the confusion - the exerpts are not from my website. They are from someone's site that I am in no way associated with. Orobko, being a somewhat notorious kook is documented several places on the web. The site that I posted was just one place. Here is another place, for example's sake. This one from a female University professor whom Arune/Orobko attempted to libel (a newspaper retraction was eventually printed: She says: http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conw....12-12-03.html "... the words of his "autogynephilia-theory" spokesperson W. Arune, to libel both McClosky and Conway - including grossly caricaturing Conway as someone who had lived for 50 years as a man and who was powerful as a man throughout her career: Arune says she understands why McCloskey, Kieltyka, and other gender crossers have attacked The Man Who Would Be Queen so vociferously. "These trannies are older when they transition," she says. "They're not the young, beautiful ones who were living as women from an early age. They had maybe 50 years of being males and being forceful and aggressive and shouting to get what they want as men. They're only a few years, relatively, into their lives as women when they have these strong feelings that Bailey is wrong, but they don't yet know how to control feelings the way a woman would, so they go about arguing against him in a very male way. I know that's the worst insult I can aim at a fellow tranny, but look, these people like McCloskey and Conway are used to being powerful in their respective occupations, and they demand to be listened to." Of course that is a blatant falsehood, since Lynn Conway transitioned way back in 1968 and worked her way up from the very bottom of the ladder in stealth in her career as a computer scientist:" Do you feel that this will, in some way, sway ANYONE'S opinion of Willow? I think that responsible people will make responsible decisions when they are presented with facts. Of course I am fully aware of the "diversity" of personalities that occupy Usenet. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion - that is what I believe. I fully respect your right to have your opinion Michael/ Babble on all you want, you will get NO support from ANYONE here. Oh Michael, you misunderstand. I'm not asking for your support. Just clearing up a few questions that you asked. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A Littel Boasting (and a lot of lyin')
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|