If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Major PCGS-parent shareholder demands sale of company
Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. has transmitted the following letter
to the board of directors of Collectors Universe, Inc.: March 6, 2009 Mr. A. Clinton Allen Chairman of the Board Collectors Universe, Inc. 1921 East Alton Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 Dear Mr. Allen: The Shamrock Activist Value Fund (“SAVF”) currently owns 806,005 shares or 8.8% of Collectors Universe, Inc.’s outstanding common stock and strongly recommends that the Board of Directors immediately begin the process to sell the company. We believe the company’s core business of providing value added authentication services is an attractive business and far more valuable than implied by its current stock price of $3.37 per share. Our analysis concludes that the intrinsic value of Collectors Universe is at least $7 per share. The Board has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the value of the company and should attempt to realize that value through a transaction rather than attempting to provide oversight of the current flawed strategic direction of the business. We believe the company is an attractive acquisition candidate and has a profile that would facilitate a transaction given the significant amount of cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet as well as the company’s ability to generate positive cash flow. Further, there are significant costs the company is incurring as a public entity which could be eliminated as a result of a sale. We certainly applaud and approve the company’s decision announced a few days ago to exit the business of authenticating and grading diamonds and colored gemstones. We believe this decision will help restore a certain amount of shareholder capital that was lost as a result of the Board’s decision to acquire the business in the first place. As reflected in the current $3.37 share price, we do not believe investors have confidence or expect a return to the company’s initial public offering price of $21.82 ten years ago. During this period, the stock has underperformed its peer group and the Russell 2000 by a daunting amount. In our view, the current stock price is nothing more than a reflection of the Board’s inability to provide adequate oversight of the strategic planning process required to create long- term shareholder value. The company history over the last few years is a litany of lost opportunities, frequent changes in strategy, near delisting from NASDAQ, incurrence of a series of operating losses, and the Board’s pathetic recent adoption of a poison pill we believe only serves to entrench management and this Board. The company’s earnings per share report card is simply dismal – from a reported $0.27 per share in fiscal 2004 to a loss of $1.85 per share by fiscal 2008. These earnings results have been well below consensus analyst forecasts and return on invested capital has repeatedly been below the company’s cost of capital. We believe that these long-term performance results reflect inadequate Board oversight, a fundamentally flawed strategy and a failure to hold management accountable. It should be no surprise to Directors that the company’s shareholders have lost confidence in this Board. Shareholders strongly voiced their disapproval of Directors at the 2008 annual meeting where the percentage of withheld votes per director ranged from 32% down to 12%. It is very unusual for an individual director of a public company to receive a withhold vote of 5-10%. The recent withhold vote by the company’s shareholders is clear evidence to us that shareholders have lost confidence in the Board’s ability to effectively represent the owners of Collectors Universe. So what has been this Board’s response to current and past failures? To adopt a poison pill in 2009 without shareholder approval at a time when Corporate America is judiciously moving away from this sad practice. We urge this Board to take the necessary steps now to create value for shareholders by selling the business. This initiative needs to be well underway before the 2009 annual meeting. Creating value for shareholders is your fiduciary responsibility and we believe a sale of the company is the best path to achieve that result for shareholders. Regards, Dennis A. Johnson, CFA Managing Director |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Major PCGS-parent shareholder demands sale of company
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message ... Shamrock Capital Advisors, Inc. has transmitted the following letter to the board of directors of Collectors Universe, Inc.: March 6, 2009 Mr. A. Clinton Allen Chairman of the Board Collectors Universe, Inc. 1921 East Alton Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 Dear Mr. Allen: The Shamrock Activist Value Fund (“SAVF”) currently owns 806,005 shares or 8.8% of Collectors Universe, Inc.’s outstanding common stock and strongly recommends that the Board of Directors immediately begin the process to sell the company. We believe the company’s core business of providing value added authentication services is an attractive business and far more valuable than implied by its current stock price of $3.37 per share. Our analysis concludes that the intrinsic value of Collectors Universe is at least $7 per share. The Board has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the value of the company and should attempt to realize that value through a transaction rather than attempting to provide oversight of the current flawed strategic direction of the business. We believe the company is an attractive acquisition candidate and has a profile that would facilitate a transaction given the significant amount of cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet as well as the company’s ability to generate positive cash flow. Further, there are significant costs the company is incurring as a public entity which could be eliminated as a result of a sale. We certainly applaud and approve the company’s decision announced a few days ago to exit the business of authenticating and grading diamonds and colored gemstones. We believe this decision will help restore a certain amount of shareholder capital that was lost as a result of the Board’s decision to acquire the business in the first place. As reflected in the current $3.37 share price, we do not believe investors have confidence or expect a return to the company’s initial public offering price of $21.82 ten years ago. During this period, the stock has underperformed its peer group and the Russell 2000 by a daunting amount. In our view, the current stock price is nothing more than a reflection of the Board’s inability to provide adequate oversight of the strategic planning process required to create long- term shareholder value. The company history over the last few years is a litany of lost opportunities, frequent changes in strategy, near delisting from NASDAQ, incurrence of a series of operating losses, and the Board’s pathetic recent adoption of a poison pill we believe only serves to entrench management and this Board. The company’s earnings per share report card is simply dismal – from a reported $0.27 per share in fiscal 2004 to a loss of $1.85 per share by fiscal 2008. These earnings results have been well below consensus analyst forecasts and return on invested capital has repeatedly been below the company’s cost of capital. We believe that these long-term performance results reflect inadequate Board oversight, a fundamentally flawed strategy and a failure to hold management accountable. It should be no surprise to Directors that the company’s shareholders have lost confidence in this Board. Shareholders strongly voiced their disapproval of Directors at the 2008 annual meeting where the percentage of withheld votes per director ranged from 32% down to 12%. It is very unusual for an individual director of a public company to receive a withhold vote of 5-10%. The recent withhold vote by the company’s shareholders is clear evidence to us that shareholders have lost confidence in the Board’s ability to effectively represent the owners of Collectors Universe. So what has been this Board’s response to current and past failures? To adopt a poison pill in 2009 without shareholder approval at a time when Corporate America is judiciously moving away from this sad practice. We urge this Board to take the necessary steps now to create value for shareholders by selling the business. This initiative needs to be well underway before the 2009 annual meeting. Creating value for shareholders is your fiduciary responsibility and we believe a sale of the company is the best path to achieve that result for shareholders. Regards, Dennis A. Johnson, CFA Managing Director Just wondering what this "poison pill" is this guy keeps mentioning? I have an idea,but.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Major PCGS-parent shareholder demands sale of company
Just wondering what this "poison pill" is this guy keeps mentioning?
A "poison pill" is a requirement that the board sets so that if there is a change in control of the company (somebody buys it), that the buyer has to pay big bucks to various corporate executives/board members/etc. It might also involve issuing lots of new stock, diluting the existing shares. Basically, the idea is to make it prohibitively expensive to buy the company. A great deal for current management, perhaps not so good for shareholders. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parent co. of Bank Note Reporter is for sale | stonej | Paper Money | 0 | March 24th 05 02:37 PM |
DB demands compliance chism stained dime tapes | DeserTBob | 8 Track Tapes | 3 | January 31st 05 10:28 PM |
Man demands police return seized coin collection | stonej | Coins | 9 | December 31st 04 11:02 PM |
Major internet collectible retailer having sale. | Tyler Johnston | General | 0 | May 23rd 04 05:27 PM |
Man arrested for DUI demands to know why police seized his rare $1000 dollar bill | eXistenZ32 | Coins | 22 | January 18th 04 11:36 PM |