The Truth About Charlie Nudo. Busted and Bitch Slapped AGAIN!

66FOURDOOR wrote:
who's lying ?

My car has about twice as much HP as yours, weighs more, is safer in a
crash due to more frame and steel in it...

If that was true it would have earned a higher crash rating. It didn't
You lose.

66FOURDOOR wrote:
well sure, if your car is so much "better"

it should beat a "****box" Pontiac any day, right ?

so we'll race for money

$1000

or did you suddenly lose faith in your Jap car purchase ?

I mean, what good is a car, if it's a DOG.

I never said it would win a race. Keep beating a dead horse.

I claimed it was safer. It is.

I claimed it was more reliable. It is.

I claimed it got better mileage. It does.

I win, you lose.

BTW, you'll be getting contacted real soon. You'll see what I mean.

well a bicycle is safer, more reliable, and gets better mileage too...

but you would not want to drive one every day in the winter, now would
you.

so that's not saying much, now is it...

do your worst, "Rick"

you're a LOSER !

http://memimage.cardomain.net/member...088_2_full.jpg

On 15 Dec 2005 17:30:07 -0800, wrote:


66FOURDOOR wrote:
we'll race.

You can look at my car up close.

then you can see the tail lights.

ante- $1000 snip

This is hilarious! Some fat unemployed middle aged greaseball from NE
Penna, talking about "street racing" in a ****box GM intermediate.
What it REALLY means is that Noodles thinks of his car as some sort of
"prick extension"...to add to his woeful inadequacy in that
department!!!

'94 Potty-tank Grand Prick...whatta ****box! ROFLMAO!

It IS to laugh!

On 15 Dec 2005 17:40:06 -0800, wrote:


66FOURDOOR wrote:
well sure, if your car is so much "better"

it should beat a "****box" Pontiac any day, right ?

so we'll race for money

$1000 snip

Set the race, and clue in the Butler Twp Police and the Penna State
Troopers. The police can get him for exhibition of speed, and then
the troopers can move in, inspect his smog gear, and arrest him for
tampering/disconnecting. Solves our problem rather neatly, I'd say!

On 15 Dec 2005 17:37:53 -0800, wrote:


66FOURDOOR wrote:
who's lying ?

My car has about twice as much HP as yours, weighs more, is safer in a
crash due to more frame and steel in it...

If that was true it would have earned a higher crash rating. It didn't
You lose. snip

'80s-'90s GM intermediates were ****BOXES, a remnant of Roger Smith
"cheapen 'em more and slap different badges on the same body"
engineering maxims...and were some of the worst for bodily harm in
accidents, according to the Insurance Institute of America's own
statistics. Looks like the NHTSA and CU weren't off the mark at all!