If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
Greetings,
Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj back |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
US specialists may respond, I refer to them as "offsets" where part print has adhered to the back, Can attract a serious premium on some stamps I have seen a complete transference of an entire design on Victorian Revenues. Your example just a curiosity for mine, quite common. "phantomm_1" wrote in message ... Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj back |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
On Mar 23, 12:26*pm, "rodney" pookiethai@NOSPAM iprimus.com.au
wrote: US specialists may respond, I refer to them as "offsets" where part print has adhered to the back, Can attract a serious premium on some stamps I have seen a complete transference of an entire design on Victorian Revenues. Your example just a curiosity for mine, quite common. "phantomm_1" wrote in ink.net... Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND* front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj* back I agree with that young rascal, Rodney. If it's printed on the back, the image should be normal, not reversed - as in your example. The reversed image comes about when a sheet is placed on top of another sheet on which the ink is still wet, thus transferring some portion of the image to the top sheet. True printed both sides errors are rather uncommon. Here is an example from Bhopal Front of SG 100a: http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/g...nt1200dpi..jpg and the back http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/g...ack1200dpi.jpg It was done by Perkins, Bacon, who printed the Penny Black, too, not some backwoods print shop. Tony |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
"Asia-translation" I agree with that young rascal, Rodney. Well you should have been with me today, I was want of purchase of a new pair of disposable spectacles ($3 at the red dot shop) The lass behind the counter addressed me as "Luv" If that isn't a sign of old age, I do not know what is. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
On Mar 23, 2:36*am, "phantomm_1" wrote:
Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND* front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj* back The correct printing term for this is set-off. Effectively all that it is, is ink from the sheet below that has transferred to the sheet above when the sheet was in the delivery pile. With modern day printing technology this sort of thing is non-existant. There is no way that could be classified as an error, neither is it a variety or a flaw. ian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
Op Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:10:07 +0100 schreef Sir F. A. Rien
: Ian Cox found these unused words: On Mar 23, 2:36*am, "phantomm_1" wrote: Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND* front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj* back The correct printing term for this is set-off. Effectively all that it is, is ink from the sheet below that has transferred to the sheet above when the sheet was in the delivery pile. With modern day printing technology this sort of thing is non-existant. There is no way that could be classified as an error, neither is it a variety or a flaw. ian The usual term applies is 'freak'. coming from the old-german word for girlie ... -- Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
In a recent message "phantomm_1" wrote:
Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj back There are three main types of such error. The first is as in the India stamp where the same design is on both sides. This is usually printer's waste where they have been testing the plate and save paper by using both sides. The second is where the ink has not dried and the image is partially stuck onto the reverse of the sheet above. Your example looks like one of these, and sadly has no great value, I would have thought. The third is the true offset, where the printer has run without a sheet of paper, thus inking the backing roller. The next sheet through gets a complete reverse impression on the back, as well as the correct impression on the front. Examples of this can be seen at http://www.italianstamps.co.uk/kingdom/leoni/index.html for an Italian definitive stamp, and at http://www.italianstamps.co.uk/colon...ean/index.html for an overprint used for Rhodes -- Tony Clayton Coins of the UK : http://www.coins-of-the-uk.co.uk Sent using RISCOS using VirtualAcorn-SA running on a PC .... This is 1 FM. - Quick Mr. Worf close the bloomin' hailing frequencies. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
Very nice Anton!
thanks for sharing. "CASACUDOR" wrote in message ... On Mar 23, 2:36 am, "phantomm_1" wrote: Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj back Here Romanian old stamps offset printed from 1867 thin paper king Carol I'st catalog Yvert or Michel 16 see the link https://sites.google.com/site/casacu...-20-par-offset regards, Anton |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
On Mar 23, 2:36*am, "phantomm_1" wrote:
Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJND* front http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIj* back Here Romanian old stamps offset printed from 1867 thin paper king Carol I'st catalog Yvert or Michel 16 see the link https://sites.google.com/site/casacu...-20-par-offset regards, Anton |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Print Error on Back
On Mar 25, 11:42*am, "rodney" pookiethai@NOSPAM iprimus.com.au
wrote: Very nice Anton! thanks for sharing. "CASACUDOR" wrote in message ... On Mar 23, 2:36 am, "phantomm_1" wrote: Greetings, Here is front and back of a pair of Franklins. Would this be considered a printing error on the back? http://cjoint.com/?dxbIh7NJNDfront http://cjoint.com/?dxbI7T5LIjback Here Romanian old stamps offset printed from 1867 thin paper king Carol I'st catalog Yvert or Michel 16 see the link https://sites.google.com/site/casacu...-20-par-offset regards, Anton And another one from : 1967 AUSTRALIA Scott 399 offset printed regards, Anton |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking Back #120 - (US) Columbian 1893, 4¢ Blue Error | Blair (TC) | General Discussion | 0 | November 1st 05 02:18 PM |
FA:2003 *ERROR* SILVER PROOF SET-ERROR ON COA, + Fading 3 | MS | Coins | 0 | June 11th 05 12:57 AM |
Ripken ERROR wrong back (Grace on back) 00 topps $3 | Jblinder23 | Baseball | 0 | August 12th 04 09:47 AM |
TECH: CD100 Warn 05-05 20 error is back...... | baraka | Juke Boxes | 15 | December 10th 03 07:44 PM |
Antique sterling napkin rings, silver fruit bowl, set of 12 coffee spoons, Buzza print, Edgar A. Guest print , c.1931, and more....................... | Danny Ross | General | 0 | July 16th 03 11:34 PM |