what is this?

i coudnt have said it better my self bob

--
"DeserTBoB" wrote in message
...
On 8 Jun 2006 03:46:24 -0700, "The Poisoned Brain"
wrote:

Andy, you were the one fighting with D-Bob not too long ago. snip

Not really, Noodles...he is, just like the rest of us, tired of your
crap.

Furthermore, I didn't even post on this thread until now- Scott had a
knee jerk reaction to...nothing. snip

I post usually only under this name and addy. Noodles posts under
several, ocassionally "sock puppeting" to make it seem as if someone
agrees with him...a sure sign of mental illness. Noodles has had
seven Google accounts shut down, and in retribution he had one of mine
shut down...big deal, no one with half a brain uses "goo goo groopz"
for anything, anyway. I had hoped that maybe he threw in the towel
yesterday (or got carted off to a mental ward) but no such luck.

Andy,

perhaps you can have DeserTBob explain the various usernames he used,
under this search of his BANNED email addy,

http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...om&qt_s=Search

Google banned him for TOS violations- just like Ebay banned his
"voxpopper" name for TOS violations. Do a search on Ebay for
"voxpopper" see what comes up.

So now you can see how he LIES repeatedly, trying to prove a false
point. That statement he made that he "usually" posts under one name-
that's more than a stretch- it's a total LIE ! Perhaps if he wasn't so
obsessed being the "tattle tale strangler" of Google, trying to have
others' accounts shut down, then new ones would not have to pop up so
often.

Like someone on the radio site said, he's the snake that eats itself.
Here's an interesting header from one of his posts- now who uses the
other names ? He uses more than anyone:

Path:
g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000cwa .googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "NudoSpamCop"
Newsgroups: austin.general,rec.backcountry
Subject: FS: lot of old barber shop tools-trimmers, etc.
Date: 13 May 2006 06:36:07 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 34
Message-ID: .com
References: . com
.com

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.81.26.60
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1147527372 22853 127.0.0.1 (13 May 2006
13:36:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:36:12 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows
98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.81.26.60;
posting-account=6B4UjwsAAACJ2kg6YBkVQIW1fpQM2owE


And by the way, if you do a search on his yahoo account, you'll find
this message- SHUT DOWN for TOS violations.

http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...Q76SLnMRgR9a0A

On 10 Jun 2006 06:20:24 -0700, "The Paris Gun"
wrote:

Andy,

perhaps you can have DeserTBob explain the various usernames he used,
under this search of his BANNED email addy, snip

So what? I don't CARE about "goo goo groopz." While 'tards like you,
Charlie, depend on it for Usenet access because you're too stupid to
know otherwise, I can access Usenet anytime I want through real NNTP
servers...much to your chagrin.

Google banned him for TOS violations- just like Ebay banned his
"voxpopper" name for TOS violations. Do a search on Ebay for
"voxpopper" see what comes up. snip

Who CARES? We all know that you phonied up some complaints against my
"goo goo" account to get it banned...so what? It's just a tool used
to mess with you...nothing else. As far as fraudBay goes, same
thing...you phonied up some ToS violations, although you've committed
hundred of same, and, fraudBay being fraudBay, they go with their
sellers, to hell with buyers...until lately, that is. By the
way...you neglect to mention that you've had SEVER "goo goo" account
terminated for ToS violatinos and TWO EBAY accounts.

So now you can see how he LIES repeatedly, trying to prove a false
point. That statement he made that he "usually" posts under one name-
that's more than a stretch- it's a total LIE ! snip

Go check, asshat. I post under this name and address 99% of the time.
THe only time I don't are to drive you nuts.

Perhaps if he wasn't so
obsessed being the "tattle tale strangler" of Google, trying to have
others' accounts shut down, then new ones would not have to pop up so
often. snip

Not just me...others have had a bigger hand in that than I have. SEVER
accounts shut down for abuse...that says a lot right there.
And by the way, if you do a search on his yahoo account, you'll find
this message- SHUT DOWN for TOS violations.

http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...Q76SLnMRgR9a0A snip

Again..who CARES about "goo goo groopz?" It's "Usenet for
'Tards"...like you.

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:10:26 GMT, "William W Western"
wrote:

Ah Muntz. I remember in Minneapolis in about 1960 or '61 spotting an
interesting looking vehicle languishing in a backyard. I was nuts about cars
and thought I was aware of most carmakers, so naturally I had to get a
closer look. An inspection of it's badgework revealed its name - Muntz Jet.
It sat there uncovered for a year or two and then disappeared. It was some
years later before I pieced together some of the Muntz story. snip

One of the Muntz Jets now resides in the Laughlin Auto Museum.
Estimated worth: $250,000. Should have moved on that one, WWW.

To my knowledge no one has put together a movie about Muntz, which
seems odd. snip

They did so regarding Preston Tucker, who had the gall to try to go up
against corrupt GM management and finally threw in the towel after
producing a few 1948 models. Later legal action showed that Al Sloan
and his toadies at GM pulled many dirty tricks to get the Tucker
plant, the former Dodge Bros. Cicero, IL plant, for their own, much
the same way they wrested the Willow Run, MI former aircraft plant
from Henry J. Kaiser in the '50s. GM had several scams in place with
bought-and-paid-for politicians to try to scoop up all the WWII
aircraft and armament plants for their own expansion.

Two unsuccessful spoilers of that plan were Preston Tucker and Henry
J. Kaiser. One successful one was Chrysler Corporation. Sloan wanted
Chrysler crushed after WWII, seeing them as unneeded competition.
Fortunately, it didn't work out that way, and Chrysler held on to its
tank and aircraft parts plants built and expanded by the government.
Chrysler because serious competition after scooping up the brand new
Packard engine plant in 1956, which is where all the modern Chrysler
engines until "outsourcing" to the japs happened. The valve lifters
in a Chrysler LA engine (273/318/340/360?) A stock Packard part, as
are a few others.

GM: a long tale of corruption and criminal behavior, aided and
abetted by government. Similar stories exist at Lockheed-Martin and
Boeing, by the way.

One of the Muntz Jets now resides in the Laughlin Auto Museum.
Estimated worth: $250,000. Should have moved on that one, WWW.
I was but a wee bairn at the time and had only my
paper route earnings. The way the thing languished there though, it was
clearly undervalued at the time.

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:46:10 GMT, "William W Western"
wrote:

One of the Muntz Jets now resides in the Laughlin Auto Museum.
Estimated worth: $250,000. Should have moved on that one, WWW.
I was but a wee bairn at the time and had only my
paper route earnings. The way the thing languished there though, it was
clearly undervalued at the time. snip

Well, they weren't without their problems, for certain. Another one
that wasn't appreciated until too late: The Kaiser Darrin, which with
the Olds 303 and HydraMatic, was a rocket ship in its own right.

Most production Muntezes had flattie Lincolns and GM's HydraMatic,
which Ford was buying from GM and rebadging "LincolnMatic." The last
Jets had the 317" version of Ford's new 239" OHV engine, and the new
Dual Range HydraMatic. They were incredibly fast cars, hitting 80 MPH
in only 8 seconds. Options even included Ford's dual quad setup only
seen on the '55 T-Bird with the 312 by special order.

Due to the nature of the car and its custom bodywork, Madman Muntz was
said to have lost a grand per car. Production was low, only
one-seventh that of tiny Kaiser-Fraser at the time.