If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Eric Babula wrote:
Alan Williams wrote in news:41FEAB35.11F53574 @atlanticbb.net: Thanks for your thoughts, Alan! So, you're kinda the cent expert. How do you "see" full luster on a dark, chocolate brown early copper cent? I'm thinking the dark brown toning will pretty much cover the luster, wouldn't it? I have some Half Cents that might be BU, or might be AU. I dunno. I have handled all too few BU Large cents to state a certainty. ;-) But to my eye, they look 'sealed' on the surfaces, no metal loss, no slight rub. Even brown, you can still see the luster lines, those metal flow lines that live on uncirculated coins. Alan 'and stop teasing me with the thought' |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I've noticed that on silver coins there is sometimes a slight color
difference on worn coins, usually visible under a 10X loupe. Human sweat and grease, I suppose. --K "Phil DeMayo" wrote in message news:1107203320.aa76345ac08e5c1854cc36d8699d16da@t eranews... On 31 Jan 2005 19:06:41 GMT, Eric Babula wrote: Is there a source that can teach me to tell the difference between Weak Strike and Wear on an MS/near-MS coin? Books? Internet sites? Look for the luster. View the suspect area from various angles. If there is unbroken luster present it is a weak strike. If there is no luster....wear. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Provasek" wrote in message nk.net... You have to be familar with the striking characteristics of the various years and mints in a series. Most series have a specialist guidebook available with a page about every date and mintmark. Here is a well known horribly struck issue http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3955447974 Ha. That's a good example, Frank. Back in about 1997, I started collecting unc walkers, the short set. I won two in the old Coin Universe auctions and one was an early 40s "S" mint, I don't remember the exact year. It was PCGS slabbed, but when I received the coin I was sure the coin in the slab had replaced the original, cuz I was looking at a Fine, not an MS. That was my first encounter with the weak strike "S" walkers. BTW, there were no luster breaks. Bill |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Well, my weak strikes (all two of them) have a sharp rim and mushy looking
devices. My DE quarter has a decent obverse, but weak reverse. But it's the rim that gives me the clue that the coin is a weak strike and not wear. Jerry "Doug Freyburger" writes: Eric Babula wrote: Doug Freyburger wrote: Eric Babula wrote: Is there a source that can teach me to tell the difference between Weak Strike and Wear on an MS/near-MS coin? Books? Internet sites? Look at some new dimes under magnification. The US Mint seems to use dime dies longer than they should, so dimes show pretty bad die-wear to the point it can be hard to read the last digit of the date without slight magnification. What I get from looking at dimes: The edge of the die wears faster than the center. Most of the time. If the coin has sharp imaging near the center and is blurred near the edge, I think that pattern comes from die wear not circulation wear. What about "mushy coins", like the Peace Dollar, Franklin Half, or Washington Quarter. Not much detail in the first place. Hard for me to tell what's what. Seems like so many of you know what you're doing. Am I the only one who has this problem? Chuckle. The whole reason I used brand new dimes as an example is brand new coins are the only ones you can be reasonably certain that any wear was on the die not while in circulation. If I see the cashier unroll a bunch of shiney-edge dimes and then I see that the dimes suck, I know I got bad die-wear. No way I can do that with older demoninations. But my point of wear patterns: center still clear edge bad. Have others seen this? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Eric Babula" wrote in message 1... Is there a source that can teach me to tell the difference between Weak Strike and Wear on an MS/near-MS coin? Books? Internet sites? Or, do any of you have tell-tale signs that you can describe to me, that I should look for in order to tell the difference? I watched the ANA video, Guide to Grading Mint State Coins, and it pretty much brushes over the topic, not explaining in much detail, or showing any pictures of coins with Wear vs coins with a Weak Strike. I have a number of O-mint Morgans that could be just weak strike (very likely with the O-mints, but...), or might not be MS at all. I really don't know. I also have a 1921 Peace Dollar that was touted as Weak- Strike MS-64, but looks like an EF-40 to me (I bought it early on in my ebaY "career", and think I might have been taken to the cleaners on this one). How do I know? TIA for any advice, or leads to lessons for me! -- Eric Babula Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA Take any coin outside in sunlight or under a bright light and hold at an angle. Any rubs will magically appear when you tilt it the right way. I've seen some really nice triple luster coins be all AU once you take them out in the sun. It doesn't take long for a new coin to get like that too. Just sitting in rolls where they rub against each other makes them AU rather quickly. Esp. ones with a higher relief like a Peace dollar. I'm sure there's a ton of MS graded coins out and about that are really not MS if you wanted to be really strict about grading. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On 31 Jan 2005 19:06:41 GMT, Eric Babula wrote:
Is there a source that can teach me to tell the difference between Weak Strike and Wear on an MS/near-MS coin? Books? Internet sites? Or, do any of you have tell-tale signs that you can describe to me, that I should look for in order to tell the difference? I watched the ANA video, Guide to Grading Mint State Coins, and it pretty much brushes over the topic, not explaining in much detail, or showing any pictures of coins with Wear vs coins with a Weak Strike. I have a number of O-mint Morgans that could be just weak strike (very likely with the O-mints, but...), or might not be MS at all. I really don't know. I also have a 1921 Peace Dollar that was touted as Weak- Strike MS-64, but looks like an EF-40 to me (I bought it early on in my ebaY "career", and think I might have been taken to the cleaners on this one). How do I know? TIA for any advice, or leads to lessons for me! Phil has already given you a good tip regarding luster breaks. On many of the O mint dollars, the centers are very weakly struck. You have to look at the feathers on the eagle's neck and right inner wing to determine if the coin is uncirculated or not. When I have some time, I'll post examples. -- K6AZ WEB PAGES http://www.k6az.com/web_pages.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ANACS 1892 "no P" Roosie: strong strike designation? | Ken Barr | Coins | 6 | May 11th 04 11:55 PM |
TECH: 345-03D Needle Wear vs. Record Wear ... | Chris | Juke Boxes | 2 | October 29th 03 09:16 AM |
Why Is The Rim Of an Off Center Strike Nickel Extra Thick? | MIckey | Coins | 2 | July 25th 03 06:33 PM |
Diff between wear and soft/weak strike? | Eric Babula | Coins | 7 | July 24th 03 02:56 AM |
Weak struck golden dollar | Andora Hall | Coins | 6 | July 23rd 03 11:14 PM |