If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
Hi Phil
kinda changed as the old eye sight gets deminished with time. Bigger easier to appreciate now but I must say I recently purchased a beautiful 1953 British farthing NGC 64 rb .. $20 paid and it is the most beautiful coin I have in my opinion so I agree not always large but smaller than a farthing is too small. I like the idea above collect a particular year .... thank you poster for that thought... Best to all Julia Phil DeMayo wrote: Retire to Italy wrote: Is it just me or whatever... but I find BIG coins more interesting and more enjoyable to view that little baby coins like 1c from USA or any country. Why would you colect coins that you need a magnify glass to view when you could have a beautiful ms70 or pf 70 silver instead from anywhere in the world ... I mean that is perfection and easy to look at. Julia It's very interesting that in a number of posts today you have made it quite clear that you think it's pretty silly to collect small, US cent sized coins.....yet, back on January 8th you responded to an FA post for an 1857 Flying Eagle cent: "Hello I like this coin but why is it not graded ? It must have a major problem or something. thank you julia " Has your opinion of these "too small" coins changed since then or are you just trolling? |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
"Retire to Italy" wrote in message ups.com... Hello all I really appreciate advice or views here, as I mentioned I think I will collect BIG coins and also I like perfection so was thinking of collection as many MS70 or PF70 as I can afford or track down. I was going to opt for NGC as they seem to do most of the world coins Panda, Lunar, Rooster ect Someone here said this was not collecting as you can get these coins antime, anywhere, from anyone but I feel if I go for graded NGC 70's that would be a worthy type collection. Any views appreciated as there does not seem to be an over supply og MS or PF 70 but yet they are available and diverse and from different countries. Thanks to all ... Julia BBQ n BLUES wrote: Julia; I can't get very excited by MS this or MS that and especially slabbed coins....When I look in my billfold I get an abrupt and harsh reality check. By all means, collect what pleases you and if slabbed MS-70 does it for you then go for it and never look back. After many years of trying to analyze my interests and failing and many years of trying to put a more concrete direction to my collecting and failing...I give up. I choose the cheap eclectic route, at least for today ;-) Dale |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
"Retire to Italy" wrote in message
oups.com... Hi Phil kinda changed as the old eye sight gets deminished with time. Bigger easier to appreciate now but I must say I recently purchased a beautiful 1953 British farthing NGC 64 rb .. $20 paid and it is the most beautiful coin I have in my opinion so I agree not always large but smaller than a farthing is too small. I like the idea above collect a particular year .... thank you poster for that thought... Best to all Julia I'll agree with you on the big coins thing. Once a coin gets past a certain size, it's neat just because it's big. I've got a couple of 1kg australian coins, but I hear that the russians made a 3kg silver coin a few years back. I might go after one of those if I can find one for a reasonable price. (If anyone out there has one, a reasonable price for me at the moment would be about $25, hint hint... I'll also pay dollar for daler for any genuine swedish plate money.) But I have to disagree with you on the smaller than a farthing being too small. I quite like my little panamanian 2 1/2 centavos coin. And once I saw a greek silver coin. It is one of the few coins that I have seen, thought about buying, not bought, and then regretted for a long time. It was essentially a sphere, about 3 mm in diameter, with a tiny owl on it. It is by far the smallest greek minor I have ever seen, and several fractional obols that I bought later are enormous in comparison. The dealer had it in an air-tight holder made for a silver dollar, and it rolled around essentially freely in the holder. I wonder how many of those it took to buy a gallon of gas in Athens at the time. IF |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
"Retire to Italy" wrote in message ups.com... Is it just me or whatever... but I find BIG coins more interesting and more enjoyable to view that little baby coins like 1c from USA or any country. Why would you colect coins that you need a magnify glass to view when you could have a beautiful ms70 or pf 70 silver instead from anywhere in the world ... I mean that is perfection and easy to look at. Julia If you had an accurately graded MS65 wheatie and the same issue accurately graded MS67 sitting next to each other you can most always tell the difference from across the room--no magnification needed. Same goes with most any coin no matter how big or small it may be. Or you might have a small coin with some awesome tones going--those you don't need to have a microscope to notice a huge difference from across the room. I would rather have a small coin with some attractive tone over a large coin that doesn't any day. Proofs are an entirely different thing though. You cannot tell much difference between a proof non-cameo that might be accurately graded PR67 compared to one that might be PR69 or 70 even--but you can really see the difference between a proof coin with a super deep cameo compared to one that doesn't have a deep cameo. Let's say you had a PR64 deep cameo sitting next to a PR69--you would definately see the difference from across the room. Point is that you can see the difference-depending on what you are looking at-without needing a scanning electron microscope. So it's 'just you' ;-) There are a few coins that are way expensive that you do need magnification to notice any difference--many re-punched mint marks or some over dates come to mind. Some doubled dies are also like "where's the beef?" It's usually a matter of 'needing' a particular variety of coin to complete a collection--like some Morgan VAMs are way expensive but you need magnification to see the differences. You just cannot beat collecting what you like--you'll never be sorry no matter how much money you dump down a bottomless numismatic hole. But whatever you do you want to avoid turning your passion into a chore--it is easy to get turned off on a series if you try to collect everything in that particular series with rules you made ahead of time. It's like those new years resolutions. Or taking a vacation--usually the very best vacations are the ones with no pre-conditions set in your mind ahead of time. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
Retire to Italy wrote:
Hello all I really appreciate advice or views here, as I mentioned I think I will collect BIG coins and also I like perfection so was thinking of collection as many MS70 or PF70 as I can afford or track down. I was going to opt for NGC as they seem to do most of the world coins Panda, Lunar, Rooster ect Someone here said this was not collecting as you can get these coins antime, anywhere, from anyone but I feel if I go for graded NGC 70's that would be a worthy type collection. Any views appreciated as there does not seem to be an over supply og MS or PF 70 but yet they are available and diverse and from different countries. Thanks to all ... Julia BBQ n BLUES wrote: If you like big and shiny try the NCLT 1 Kilo silver pieces. http://search.ebay.com/kilo-silver-b...MEFSRCHQ3aSRCH http://tinyurl.com/l3fee for short. George |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
"George D" threw out an interesting thought with:
If you like big and shiny try the NCLT 1 Kilo silver pieces. http://search.ebay.com/kilo-silver-b...MEFSRCHQ3aSRCH http://tinyurl.com/l3fee for short. Many thanks for posting that, George. I didn't know these critters even existed! :-) Amistad 'another new factoid just learned!' |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
I have a .9999 silver dollar that is about 2 1/2 inches wide and 0.625
lbs in weight. It is the biggest coin I ever saw, but I don't know if there are bigger coins out there. You can see it here (I will be adding a picture of me holding in my hand tonight to show just how big it is): http://www.proud-collector.com/5/4/collection.aspx ----------------------------------------------- http://www.proud-collector.com/ Retire to Italy wrote: Is it just me or whatever... but I find BIG coins more interesting and more enjoyable to view that little baby coins like 1c from USA or any country. Why would you colect coins that you need a magnify glass to view when you could have a beautiful ms70 or pf 70 silver instead from anywhere in the world ... I mean that is perfection and easy to look at. Julia |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
On 21 Aug 2006 09:04:58 -0700, "proud-collector.com"
wrote: I have a .9999 silver dollar that is about 2 1/2 inches wide and 0.625 lbs in weight. It is the biggest coin I ever saw, but I don't know if there are bigger coins out there. You can see it here (I will be adding a picture of me holding in my hand tonight to show just how big it is): http://www.proud-collector.com/5/4/collection.aspx Nice coin! You might want to test your website with some different browsers (i.e., something besides Microsoft Internet Explorer). I am using Netscape 7.2, and none of the pictures in the "other pictures" boxes show up. -- Bob Hairgrove |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
I've tested with IE, Firefox and Opera. I will test with others,
thanks. Bob Hairgrove wrote: On 21 Aug 2006 09:04:58 -0700, "proud-collector.com" wrote: I have a .9999 silver dollar that is about 2 1/2 inches wide and 0.625 lbs in weight. It is the biggest coin I ever saw, but I don't know if there are bigger coins out there. You can see it here (I will be adding a picture of me holding in my hand tonight to show just how big it is): http://www.proud-collector.com/5/4/collection.aspx Nice coin! You might want to test your website with some different browsers (i.e., something besides Microsoft Internet Explorer). I am using Netscape 7.2, and none of the pictures in the "other pictures" boxes show up. -- Bob Hairgrove |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
small coins or BIG coins
I just installed Netscape 7.2 and all the pictures in the "other
pictures" boxes showed up just fine for me. I don't know why they didn't for you but I will look into it some more. I wonder if it was just a slow server response, sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks, George Bob Hairgrove wrote: On 21 Aug 2006 09:04:58 -0700, "proud-collector.com" wrote: I have a .9999 silver dollar that is about 2 1/2 inches wide and 0.625 lbs in weight. It is the biggest coin I ever saw, but I don't know if there are bigger coins out there. You can see it here (I will be adding a picture of me holding in my hand tonight to show just how big it is): http://www.proud-collector.com/5/4/collection.aspx Nice coin! You might want to test your website with some different browsers (i.e., something besides Microsoft Internet Explorer). I am using Netscape 7.2, and none of the pictures in the "other pictures" boxes show up. -- Bob Hairgrove |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FYI: ASA-Accugrade files new suit in US District Court | linxlvr | Coins | 207 | January 31st 05 03:15 AM |
Toning: real, artificial, in between? -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 0 | January 11th 04 08:01 PM |
How to select a coin holder -- periodic post | Reid Goldsborough | Coins | 4 | December 15th 03 11:53 PM |