Thread: Pro-PCGS posts
View Single Post
  #8  
Old January 2nd 11, 04:17 AM posted to rec.collecting.coins
Reid Goldsborough[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 357
Default Pro-PCGS posts

On 1/1/2011 8:44 PM, Frank Provasek wrote:
According to this ad in coin publications, there seems to be a lawsuit
brewing AGAINST PCGS on behalf of coin buyers who feel they were
harmed by failure of PCGS to buy back supposedly problem coins.

http://www.earlyus.com/coinforum/junk1101.jpg


What do you think? Are these three just-arrived anonymous posters who
are posting pro-PCGS spin, or maybe one poster with three email
addresses, a part of a PR firm retained by PCGS? Or are they PCGS employees?

If a PR firm, PCGS should fire the firm. PCGS isn't being represented
professionally. If they're part of PCGS and they're doing this on their
own, they should be reprimanded. If this is an official in-house PCGS
effort, shame. I don't see it as the work of three coin collectors who
just happen to like PCGS, which is the pretense.

In any case, it's not working, and it can't possibly work the way it's
being carried out.

--

Consumer: http://rg.ancients.info/guide
Connoisseur: http://rg.ancients.info/glom
Counterfeit: http://rg.ancients.info/bogos
Ads