View Single Post
  #19  
Old August 3rd 03, 09:17 PM
A.M.Heindorff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Victor Manta wrote in message
...
"Toke Nørby" wrote in message
news


- very big snip -

One can wonder what has Toke to do with this thing, and why does he bring

it
in an unrelated thread. My only explanation is that as a (former?) FIP

juror
he tries to protect his comrades against the "bad" (in his eyes) SNA

irony.
Why haven't we heard something about those "logos" when we have discussed
here the debacle of the FIP 2002 contest, and when the page was published,
and why has he chosen for this, much later, an unrelated thread? No idea,
just some suppositions. As concerning FIP's logos (actually these were
images of their awards) on the SNA sheet, they were replaced by something
more funny a long time ago, so why speaking about the snows of yesterday

(or
continue beating the same dead horse, if this sounds more familiar)?


The images of their awards is so similar to their copyrighted logo, that
it is self-protected.


The history of FIP contest related e-mails that SNA has allegedly

published
without approval is a *pure* invention. Period.


Victor, this is *not* true, and you know it. You have quoted
my posts from this NG, without my prior consent.

BTW, it is up to the authors
of those (which?)


me for one!

e-mails to write me if they feel concerned, and not up to
Toke to try playing a kind of role of the Sir Knight of the Sorrowful
Figure, and this especially when nobody asked him for that.


I have not discussed this issue with Toke at all, but I have
written to you in private and asked you to remove "my part"
of the SNA fenny-award page. You refused flatly. You told
me that because I had published my opinion on a public NG,
you were free to use that opinion on your page without asking
first. I couldn't convince you that *I* have the copyright to what
I say, and that I do not wish to be quoted before knowing first.
You asked me whether I was afraid of somebody or something.
I am not; it is simply a matter of principle that I want to know
where I am to be quoted and in which context. I want to maintain
my right to say "no", and expected of course that you would
respect that. By refusing to remove anything quoted from me,
you have not respected my rights. In case you do not remember
this private discussion between us, I will be happy to forward
the related emails to you.

At that point I gave up discussing with you, knowing that your
main attitude is "don't argue with me, because you won't win".
The only thing I could say was DON'T DO IT IN THE FUTURE!

Ann Mette Heindorff







Ads