View Single Post
  #3  
Old June 6th 09, 09:44 PM posted to rec.collecting.stamps.discuss
Tony Clayton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 557
Default To degum or not to degum

In a recent message Ryan Davenport wrote:

Tony Clayton wrote:
I recently purchased a very scarce mint Italian
stamp that completes a difficult mint set - at long last!
(the Victor Emmanuel II set of 1863).

The stamp has clearly been regummed, and was purchased
below the Sassone 'without gum' price.

With a glass the gum is clearly visible on the front of a few of
the perforation teeth, and there is some on the front
of the stamp, but none of this is visible to the naked
eye when in the Hawid mount on my album page.

The question is, should I soak off the 'added' gum,
or leave it there?


Original gum is very rare on the oldest Canadian stamps, and the
Unitrade catalogue prices these stamps in an ungummed state, with a 100%
surplus added to the value of these stamps if they have original gum.
Regummed stamps are worth no more than stamps without gum, so I always
soak any regummed issues. There's always a fear that this mystery gum
might affect the stamps, similar to those German issues that contained
an acid in the gum.


Interesting on prices. The following gives the 2008 Sassone prices
in euros for this set (cheapest printer):

** * no gum **/* */ng
1c 25.00 10.00 2.50 2.50 4.00
2c 100.00 40.00 7.00 2.50 5.71
5c 4500.00 2250.00 350.00 2.00 6.43
10c 7500.00 3750.00 525.00 2.00 7.14
15c 6500.00 3250.00 425.00 2.00 7.65
30c 37.50 15.00 3.00 2.50 5.00
40c 14000.00 7000.00 1000.00 2.00 7.00
60c 37.50 15.00 3.00 2.50 5.00
2l 100.00 40.00 22.50 2.50 1.78
Avg: 2.28 5.52

Thus it can be seen that unmounted is valued about 2 to 2.5 times
more than mounted, and no gum is a fifth or less of mounted

--
Tony Clayton
Coins of the UK :
http://www.coins-of-the-uk.co.uk
Sent using RISCOS on an Acorn Strong Arm RiscPC
.... Beware of Geeks bearing GIFS
Ads