On 14 Aug 2006 14:12:27 -0700, "Sunoco premium 93 octane-KING OF THE
ROAD" wrote:


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA !! snip

Having another delusional break, Noodles?

just laughing at the predicament you're in....on the net, in life in
general snip

My life must be going a damn sight better than yours, as I don't have
to grovel and scrape as a rag picker, selling dead old folks' stuff on
fleaBay to make ends meet.

, and after you die- I can see you trying to explain to God why
you didn't believe in him... snip

You believe in fairy tales...I don't. That's my right.

your liberal college professors won't be able to help you then....
snip

....thus proving once again that Charlie Nudo NEVER WENT TO COLEGE AT
ALL.

in the meantime, I'll drive my extremely more luxurious cars snip

Those ****boxes?? HAHAHAHAHHA!

with
hundreds of (useless) horsepower, and spew a cloud of NOX wherever I go-snip

....which is a felony....

and
there's not a damn thing you can do about it- because we don't have
tailpipe emissoins here, and my truck and Firebird are exempt from
emissions laws anyway. snip

Not Federal law. It is UNLAWFUL for any person to modify, destroy,
alter or otherwise render useless any pollution control device on ANY
car built in the US after 1970.

and since WHEN does the DA prosecute emissions laws ? get a reality
check- we have a cursory visual inspection- if the emission device is
there, you passed- it doesn't have to work snip

Knowing your well-known disregard for the law, and your continual
misinterpretations of the law, I'm betting you're (as usual) 100%
wrong here