On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:55:52 GMT, Neolibertarian
wrote:

In article ,
DeserTBoB wrote:

Here we go, bracing for yet another in a series of "Dubya Recessions,"
but this time at the end of his, the worst of just about any of the US
presidencies.

How do you define "worst?"

Just curious.snip

Oh, there are a myriad of ways to describe a "worst presidency"...the
idiocy and disinterest of the public purse of Warren Harding, the
callous disregard of Calvin Coolidge, the ineptitude of U.S. Grant,
the complete lack of ability or tilted morality of Millard Fillmore,
the self interest of William McKinley or Lyndon Johnson, the lack of
cognizance of reality of Herbert Hoover...or the calculated
destruction of the very document they were sworn to "uphold and
protect," in the cases of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. The
latter's actions which will probably prove, when viewed through the
equalizer of time, to be the far more onerous.

Take your pick á la carte, but be mindful that, of all of the above,
many got to the bottom simply by being ignorant, unintelligent or by
having limited powers of perception or a miscalibrated moral compass.
While many righttards will point to Clinton's lying about a blow job
from a fat chick, I think lying about yellow cake in Africa just to
get Halliburton staged in Iraq to start pumping their oil fields is a
far, far more grievous matter...not to mention stating, while serving
under oath, that the Constitution is just "a goddamned piece of
paper." Nice talk from such a self-proclaimed Jesus freak, don't you
think?

Lying about a blow job gets you an impeachment from the House, but
lying about going to a war to benefit oil congloms doesn't? What's
wrong with this country?